「stat」の検索結果

World-class motion graphics expertise combining the animation principles of Disney, the kinetic typography of MK12, and the visual storytelling of studios like Buck and Ordinary Folk. Motion graphics transforms static ideas into dynamic visual experiences. Great motion graphics doesn't just move—it communicates. Every animation should have purpose: to guide attention, reinforce message, create emotion, or clarify concept. The best motion designers understand that restraint is power, that timing is everything, and that the animation should be invisible—viewers should feel the story, not notice the effects. Use when "motion graphics, animation, animate, motion design, kinetic, logo animation, title sequence, lower thirds, animated, after effects, lottie, transitions, motion, motion, graphics, animation, after-effects, lottie, kinetic, typography, design" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

World-class Kubernetes operations - deployments, debugging, Helm charts, and the battle scars from managing clusters that serve millions of requestsUse when "kubernetes, k8s, kubectl, helm, pod, deployment, service, ingress, configmap, secret, statefulset, daemonset, hpa, pvc, crashloopbackoff, imagepullbackoff, oomkilled, liveness probe, readiness probe, kubernetes, k8s, containers, docker, helm, deployment, devops, cloud-native" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expertise in real-time multiplayer networking, lag compensation, and authoritative server architectureUse when "multiplayer game, netcode, client-server game, P2P networking, lag compensation, rollback networking, game server, matchmaking, lobby system, player synchronization, state replication, dedicated server, authoritative server, tick rate, network prediction, interpolation, extrapolation, GGPO, lockstep, real-time multiplayer, networking, multiplayer, gamedev, realtime, client-server, p2p, netcode, synchronization, lag-compensation, matchmaking" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and implement discrete event simulations (DES) for systems where state changes occur at discrete time points: queues, manufacturing, logistics, networks. Use when "discrete event, DES simulation, queuing system, queue model, manufacturing simulation, process simulation, SimPy, event-driven simulation, " mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Patterns for feedback control systems including PID tuning, state-space control, Model Predictive Control (MPC), trajectory tracking, and stability analysis. Covers both classical and modern control approaches for robotics and automation. Use when ", " mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

World-class brand positioning expertise combining David Ogilvy's direct response wisdom, Emily Heyward's obsessive brand strategy (Red Antler), and Al Ries/Jack Trout's positioning classics. This skill answers: "What space do we own in the customer's mind, and why does it matter?" Brand isn't what you say about yourself - it's what others say when you're not in the room. Positioning isn't about creativity - it's about claiming territory in an overcrowded mind. Use when "brand positioning, positioning statement, brand strategy, category design, competitive positioning, how should we position, brand differentiation, value proposition, what makes us different, brand platform, brand values, brand personality, brand promise, brand manifesto, tagline, unique selling proposition, usp, category creation, own a word, mind share, brand, positioning, strategy, differentiation, category, competitive, values, identity" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The intersection of AI generation and performance marketing. This skill covers creating ad creatives at scale using AI tools—from static images to video ads to dynamic creative optimization—while maintaining the conversion focus that performance marketing demands. Traditional creative testing is slow: create 5 variants, wait weeks for data, iterate. AI-powered ad creative is fast: generate 50 variants in an hour, test simultaneously, learn in days, iterate continuously. The constraint is no longer production capacity—it's testing velocity and creative strategy. This skill bridges AI generation capability with advertising effectiveness, ensuring that AI-created ads don't just look good—they convert. Use when "AI ads, ad creative, performance creative, ad generation, creative testing, ad variants, DCO, dynamic creative, Meta ads, Google ads, ad fatigue, conversion creative, advertising, performance-marketing, creative-testing, ai-ads, conversion, paid-media, scale" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

v2.4.0 · Dungeon Master assistant for running persistent D&D 5e campaigns. Handles campaign creation/loading, character management, combat tracking, NPC generation, dice rolling, and session state — all persisted across sessions. Invoke with /dm:dnd followed by a subcommand, or just speak naturally once a campaign is loaded.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial senior-engineer review for agent-generated plans, designs, and architectures. Treats the current output as junior work, constructs a senior reviewer whose domain expertise comes from live codebase research plus web research of current best practices, diagnoses altitude failures (too vague or too granular), then rewrites the plan into a scoped, state-of-the-art version. Use when the user says "junior to senior", "senior review", "review this like a staff engineer", when a plan feels hand-wavy or lost in details, or before committing to any agent-written plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Finds and finishes the last 20% of a built solution — the experiential layer agents skip: what the output actually reads like, which pages or screens should exist, first-run and empty states, opinionated defaults, the golden path. Use when planning any build so the magic gets specced as concretely as the plumbing, before calling any build "done", when a solution works but feels like a demo, or when the user says "last 20%", "finish this", "make it actually good", "is this actually done", or "why does this feel flat".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

De-slop pass for any text. Scans for the statistical fingerprints of AI writing (negative parallelism / "not X but Y", em-dash density, rule-of-three, false ranges, puffery vocabulary, uniform cadence, hedged both-sidesing), rewrites by meaning, then re-scans until the text is clean and sits in the right register for its genre: academic article, tweet, reddit post, email, blog, docs, marketing. Use when the user says "deslopify", "deslop", "de-slop this", "remove the AI tells", "humanize this", "make this not sound like AI", or invokes /deslopify. Also use before publishing any agent-drafted prose.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify meeting notes are fully processed. Args: <path>, [dates], all, pending [dates] [--step=X]. Shows which wrap steps are complete or missing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit whether a paper's baseline comparisons are COMPLETE, FAIR, and SIGNIFICANT: a required recent SOTA baseline is missing while 'best/SOTA' is claimed (HP-MISSING-BASELINE); a baseline is undertuned / given less compute-tuning-data, run at a mismatched config, or the equal-budget ablation-as-baseline is absent (HP-WEAK-BASELINE); 'outperforms' is asserted over overlapping error bars or with no variance/seeds (HP-SIG-OVERLAP); and a cross-row 'improves over baseline by X%' is arithmetically wrong (HP-DELTA-ERROR, cross-row form only). A versioned per-domain baseline profile + a live leaderboard/recency search are assembled by the EXECUTOR as structured facts; a fresh cross-model reviewer (gpt-5.6-sol xhigh, read-only, fresh thread per dimension) PROPOSES findings, each span-anchored to a ledger claim_id; tools/adjudicate_findings.py DECIDES the verdict. Works at L0 (stated comparisons) and deepens at L2 (configs/result files). A completeness question it cannot settle internally becomes needs_external_check, never a guessed missing baseline. Emits baseline-comparison-audit.findings.json; computes NO verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "baseline audit", "missing baselines", "is the comparison fair", "weak baseline", "baseline 误报", "SOTA earned?".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build the deterministic evidence ledger (artifact_manifest.json + claims.json) that every other Anti-Autoresearch auditor reads. One pass inventories artifacts, derives the observability level (L0 PDF-only / L1 +LaTeX / L2 +repo+results) by fixed rule, and extracts span-anchored, hashed, checkable claims (numbers, comparisons, scope, method, baselines, citations, captions, table cells) into claims.json. An OPTIONAL additive cross-model pass ADDS span-anchored semantic claims — method, theorem statements with their assumptions, definitions, proof/derivation steps and equations, scope, baselines, conclusions, the motivation span, and reproducibility-artifact references (the proof, derivation, and structure anchors the family B/D/G auditors need) — it never invents a number, emits a finding, or computes a verdict. Run FIRST, before any audit skill. Triggers: "build the ledger", "extract claims", "prep for integrity audit", "evidence ledger", "建证据账本".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Family-G proof & derivation integrity forensics: does a THIRD PARTY's written proof/derivation actually establish its theorem, or does it skip an obligation, assume its own conclusion, take an invalid step, drift a symbol's meaning, or smuggle an unstated assumption? Decides from the WRITTEN proof/derivation — verdict-bearing at L1 (the LaTeX source; PDF-extracted math is unreliable, so an L0 PDF-only run surfaces info only) — never asserts 'fabricated', only that the step shown does not hold. A fresh cross-model reviewer reads the theorem/proof + an extraction-only obligation scaffold and proposes per-obligation findings, each span-anchored to the evidence ledger (claims.json); reviewer≠adjudicator. Emits proof-derivation-forensics.findings.json; NEVER computes the verdict. dimension=proof, can be critical. Triggers: "proof forensics", "check this proof", "derivation integrity", "audit the math", "证明审计", "推导有没有漏洞".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transparent, itemized impressions of AI-generated WRITING STYLE — the repo's ONLY non-integrity track. Two passes: a deterministic defensive-hedge density screen (tools/check_ai_style.py, AIS-DEFENSIVE-HEDGE) plus a fresh cross-model GROSS-cases-only semantic pass over the 13 AIS-* style tells (broken narrative arc, LLM phrase tics, jargon-stuffing, invented codenames, clause/formula walls, gratuitous pseudocode, bullet overuse, bold-module spam, restatement loops, focus drift, single-style figures, appendix dumping). Every finding is named, LOCATED, span-anchored to the evidence ledger (claims.json), carries not_integrity_finding:true + false_positive_risk:high + an fp_case, and gets ZERO verdict weight: the adjudicator forces it to info, excludes it from overall_verdict, and renders it in a SEPARATE report section. NOT an AI-text classifier — no scores, no "this is AI-written", no authorship probability; a paper can be CLEAN_GIVEN_EVIDENCE and still list many. Emits ai-style-impressions.findings.json; computes NO verdict; if a tell is actually substantive it routes to the integrity auditor. Triggers: "AI style", "vibe check", "writing fingerprint", "AI 文风", "vibe paper".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scans staged changes for secrets, debug statements, TODOs without references, and other common commit mistakes. Use before creating any commit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Keeps private and unapproved material out of a public build. Scans the built output (HTML, serialized component payloads, client JS and CSS chunks, static data routes, public files) against a private tier that always applies and a draft tier that applies in production. Gates work-in-progress so it shows in preview and is absent from production, and keeps sign-off in a ledger only the human writes. Use when a site or app publishes content that agents drafted or that came from private sources.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Queries all configured services for health status — uptime, restarts, errors, resources. Use when checking the health of running services.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses production readiness or audits a codebase against its specs. Supports quick static mode, deep 17-dimension audit, or single-dimension focus. Use before a production launch, after a major refactor, when inheriting a codebase, or when someone asks how done the project is.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

供应链与生产运营 (供应链与生产运营 (Supply Chain & Production Operations) — 面向制造业与消费品实体供应链的『计划-制造-交付』运营判断,不是采购谈价技巧,也不是跨境电商发货物流。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 这行的核心世界观分歧: **流动 > 局部效率(用有效产出/流动时间看系统,而不是用设备利用率/人均产出看工位;非瓶颈上的效率是幻觉) ⇄ 精益拉动 vs 推式预测(TPS/JIT 按下游消耗拉动、小批量平准化 vs MRP 按预测展开净需求推动;DDMRP 解耦缓冲是第三条路) ⇄ 精益/丰田 TPS 派 vs 约束理论 TOC 派(消除七大浪费、全局改善 vs 五步聚焦瓶颈、鼓-缓冲-绳 DBR 排产;两派互相指责对方浪费时间/只治标) ⇄ 变异是敌人(Deming/六西格玛/Factory Physics 的 VUT 排队论: 利用率越靠近满载排队时间越爆炸,交期长不是产能不够而是变异+高负荷) ⇄ 库存是负债 vs 库存是缓冲(会计把库存记成资产、精益视其为掩盖问题的水位、TOC 与韧性派视其为吸收变异的必要缓冲;真问题是缓冲放在哪一层而不是有没有) ⇄ 精益 JIT vs 韧性冗余(2020-2023 断链后 just-in-case、多源、近岸/友岸的回摆;精益派反驳崩的是『假精益』——单一来源+砍库存不砍变异) ⇄ 服务水平 vs 库存成本(安全库存/报童模型/ABC-XYZ 的经典取舍,牛鞭效应放大上游波动) ⇄ 成本导向压价 vs 供应商共生开发(Kraljic 分级、丰田供应商协会式长期共生 vs 年降指标与竞价) ⇄ 一个数 vs 各部门各算各的(S&OP/IBP 的本质是跨职能对齐到一套数字与一份产销计划))**; (b) 工具栈(此行的工具是『系统+方法』的混合) — ERP/MRP(SAP S/4HANA PP·MM、Oracle、用友·金蝶、Odoo、NetSuite)、APS 高级计划排程(Kinaxis RapidResponse、o9、Blue Yonder、SAP IBP、OMP、Siemens Opcenter APS)、MES/车间执行(Siemens Opcenter、Rockwell FactoryTalk、黑湖智造)、WMS/TMS、需求预测(统计模型 + Nixtla StatsForecast/Prophet、FVA 预测增值分析)、运筹优化与仿真(OR-Tools、Gurobi、Pyomo、AnyLogic、FlexSim、SimPy)、供应链风险与多级可视(Resilinc、Everstream、Interos)、分析层(SQL/Python pandas/Power BI)、以及纸笔工具(价值流图 VSM、A3、看板、标准作业票)—— 选型决策树的关键分岔是 MTS/MTO/ATO/ETO 履行模式与需求变异度,而非厂商功能清单; (c) 心智模型层 — 利特尔法则(在制品 = 产出率 × 流动时间)、瓶颈与非瓶颈、缓冲三态(库存/时间/产能缓冲)、解耦点(客户订单渗透点 CODP)、牛鞭效应、takt time 节拍与产线平衡、OEE 与六大损失、muda·mura·muri 三种浪费、自働化 jidoka 与安灯、防错 poka-yoke、SMED 快速换模换出小批量、平准化 heijunka、PDCA 与丰田改善型 Toyota Kata、DMAIC 与 Cpk 过程能力、报童模型与安全库存公式、ABC-XYZ 分级; (d) 工作流/SOP — 跑一轮月度 S&OP(需求评审→供应评审→预 S&OP→执行 S&OP)、做需求预测与预测误差复盘(MAPE/WMAPE/bias/FVA)、设定库存分级与安全库存、MRP 跑批与例外消息处理(缺料齐套与 MRP 神经质)、瓶颈识别与 DBR 排产、价值流图现状图→未来图→改善计划、新品导入 NPI 与多级 BOM/ECN 工程变更、供应商选择与开发(RFQ→审厂→APQP/PPAP→量产→年度绩效)、断料应急与交期承诺(ATP/CTP)、循环盘点与库存准确率; (e) 知识正典(en/ja 一手极厚,中译齐全) — 《目标 The Goal》Goldratt(TOC 小说体奠基)、《丰田生产方式》大野耐一、《改变世界的机器》Womack·Jones·Roos(MIT IMVP 研究)、《精益思想 Lean Thinking》Womack & Jones、《丰田模式 The Toyota Way》Liker、《工厂物理学 Factory Physics》Hopp & Spearman(排队论视角的运营科学)、《学习观察 Learning to See》Rother & Shook(VSM)、《丰田套路 Toyota Kata》Rother、Spear & Bowen 的 HBR 1999《Decoding the DNA of the Toyota Production System》、Lee/Padmanabhan/Whang 1997《The Bullwhip Effect in Supply Chains》、Ptak & Smith 的 DDMRP、Orlicky 的 MRP、Chopra & Meindl 的供应链管理教材、Deming《转危为安 Out of the Crisis》、Sheffi《The Resilient Enterprise》、ASCM/APICS 的 SCOR 参考模型与 CPIM/CSCP 知识体系; (f) 行业大佬/figures — 大野耐一(TPS 立法者)、新乡重夫(SMED/防错)、Eliyahu Goldratt(TOC 创立者)、W. Edwards Deming(变异与系统观)、James Womack & Daniel Jones(把 TPS 译成西方可学的『精益』)、Jeffrey Liker(丰田模式学术化)、Mike Rother(VSM 与改善型)、Wallace Hopp & Mark Spearman(工厂物理学)、Hau Lee(斯坦福,牛鞭效应与 Triple-A 供应链)、Yossi Sheffi(MIT,韧性)、Carol Ptak & Chad Smith(DDMRP)、David Simchi-Levi(MIT,风险敞口指数)、Steven Spear(TPS 的 DNA)、以及中文圈的供应链实务作者(刘宝红等); (g) 争议/批判(必须保留不洗白) — JIT 是不是 2021 全球断链的元凶(精益派反驳:崩的是单一来源+砍库存不砍变异的『假精益』);西方学精益的高失败率(只搬工具不搬思维,精益在很多工厂沦为裁员的代号);六西格玛黑带官僚化与扼杀创新之争;TOC 派与精益派互相攻击(Goldratt 讽刺精益是等浪费自己浮现);预测无用论(需求驱动派说预测必然错、要靠缓冲吸收)vs 统计预测派;控制塔/数字孪生/AI 预测的过度承诺与高项目失败率;中国制造的年降与内卷式压价 vs 供应商共生;近岸·友岸外包是真实产能转移还是政治叙事; (h) 流派/思想谱系 — **精益/TPS 派(丰田血统:大野-新乡→Womack/Jones/Liker/Rother,信全局消除浪费与人的改善能力)** vs **约束理论 TOC 派(Goldratt:系统产出只由瓶颈决定,聚焦五步、DBR、缓冲管理)** vs **统计质量/六西格玛派(Deming-Juran-Shewhart→GE/Motorola,信减少变异与过程能力)** vs **运营科学/工厂物理学派(Hopp & Spearman:用排队论与数学定律解释,认为精益与 TOC 都是特例)** vs **需求驱动/DDMRP 派(Ptak & Smith:预测不可靠,靠战略解耦缓冲)** vs **韧性/风险派(Sheffi、Simchi-Levi:效率之外必须为断链设计)**。不含: 跨境电商卖家的发货与头程物流(已由 cross-border-ecommerce 覆盖)、纯采购的商务谈判技巧、企业级 ERP 的代码实施与二次开发、通用项目管理。) Master OS — automated mastery of 供应链与生产运营 (Supply Chain & Production Operations) — 面向制造业与消费品实体供应链的『计划-制造-交付』运营判断,不是采购谈价技巧,也不是跨境电商发货物流。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 这行的核心世界观分歧: **流动 > 局部效率(用有效产出/流动时间看系统,而不是用设备利用率/人均产出看工位;非瓶颈上的效率是幻觉) ⇄ 精益拉动 vs 推式预测(TPS/JIT 按下游消耗拉动、小批量平准化 vs MRP 按预测展开净需求推动;DDMRP 解耦缓冲是第三条路) ⇄ 精益/丰田 TPS 派 vs 约束理论 TOC 派(消除七大浪费、全局改善 vs 五步聚焦瓶颈、鼓-缓冲-绳 DBR 排产;两派互相指责对方浪费时间/只治标) ⇄ 变异是敌人(Deming/六西格玛/Factory Physics 的 VUT 排队论: 利用率越靠近满载排队时间越爆炸,交期长不是产能不够而是变异+高负荷) ⇄ 库存是负债 vs 库存是缓冲(会计把库存记成资产、精益视其为掩盖问题的水位、TOC 与韧性派视其为吸收变异的必要缓冲;真问题是缓冲放在哪一层而不是有没有) ⇄ 精益 JIT vs 韧性冗余(2020-2023 断链后

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

企业财务与 CFO 视角 (企业财务与 CFO 视角 (Corporate Finance & the CFO Lens) — 面向创业公司与中小企业主/创始人/业务负责人的『看懂钱、管住钱、用好钱』的财务判断,不是考注会/中级职称的准则背诵,也不是投行卖方并购执行或 VC 投资人的看项目视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 这行的核心世界观分歧: **利润是观点,现金是事实(权责发生制下的利润由收入确认时点、折旧摊销年限、存货计价、资本化与费用化的选择拼出来,是一组可辩论的判断;银行户头的钱是唯一不能辩论的事实——所以 CFO 看三张表的顺序是现金流量表→资产负债表→利润表,与外行相反) ⇄ 增长本身要烧钱(账面盈利的公司照样会因营运资金被增长吸干而倒闭:先付供应商、后收客户钱,规模越大缺口越大,这是『增长性破产』;所以现金转换周期比毛利率更早预警) ⇄ 记账合规派 vs 管理决策派(一套账是给税局与审计看的准则语言,另一套视图是给经营者看的贡献边际与单位经济;同一笔成本在两种语言里归属不同,把合规科目直接拿来做定价决策是中小企业最常见的错) ⇄ 全成本分摊 vs 贡献边际(把固定成本按产量分摊进单件成本,会在淡季得出『卖一件亏一件所以停产』的错误结论;边际思维只问增量收入是否覆盖增量成本,但长期只看边际会让公司永远收不回固定成本) ⇄ 预算是承诺 vs 预算是地图(传统年度预算把数字变成考核契约,导致部门年底突击花钱与藏预算;滚动预测与超越预算派主张预算只是当前最好的猜测,该月月刷新) ⇄ 融资是里程碑 vs 融资是负债(融资新闻稿把估值当成绩,但优先股、优先清算权、对赌与回购条款让创始人在低价退出时可能一分不拿;自筹派认为最便宜的钱是客户的预付款) ⇄ 估值方法之争(DCF 的数学严谨但对增长率与折现率假设极敏感,业内讥为『垃圾进垃圾出』;可比公司倍数简单但把市场情绪打包进来;早期公司两者都不成立,实际靠谈判与稀释目标倒推) ⇄ EBITDA 是不是有用(PE 与并购圈把它当经营现金流代理,巴菲特与芒格公开斥其忽略了折旧背后真实的资本开支;调整后 EBITDA 的『加回』项在业内被视为高危信号) ⇄ 财务是记分员 vs 财务是业务伙伴(传统财务事后出报表,财务 BP/FP&A 主张财务应在决策前进场做定价、投产、招人的经济性测算) ⇄ 中国中小企业的两套账现实 vs 合规红线(金税四期与社保入税之后,业内公认的做法是尽早并账,但这条张力必须如实呈现而不是装作不存在,也绝不给出规避税收的操作建议)); (b) 工具栈(记账层与决策层是两套东西) — 记账与 ERP(用友、金蝶、Odoo、QuickBooks、Xero、NetSuite、SAP Business One)、中国财税合规(电子税务局、金税四期发票与进销项比对、百望/航天信息电子发票、慧算账等代账 SaaS、个税与社保申报)、FP&A 与预算(Excel 与 Google Sheets 仍是绝对主力,之上是 Cube、Causal、Jirav、Mosaic、Runway、Abacum、Pigment、Anaplan、Planful)、现金流预测(Float、Fathom、13 周滚动现金流模板)、股权与 cap table(Carta、Pulley、AngelList、Excel 稀释模型,中国的股权代持与持股平台)、订阅计费与收入确认(Stripe Billing、Chargebee、Maxio)、费控报销(Ramp、Brex、Expensify、汇联易、分贝通)、BI 与看板(Power BI、Tableau、Metabase、帆软)、以及最被低估的纸笔工具(一页纸的驱动因素模型、贡献边际表、13 周现金日历)—— 选型的真正分岔是『公司在哪个阶段、由谁来维护这个模型』,不是厂商功能清单; (c) 心智模型层 — 三张表的勾稽关系(利润表的净利经现金流量表调整后落到资产负债表的未分配利润)、权责发生制与收付实现制的差、现金转换周期 CCC 与 DSO/DIO/DPO、营运资金与增长的耦合、贡献边际与盈亏平衡点、经营杠杆与固定成本结构、单位经济与 LTV/CAC 及回本周期、烧钱率与现金跑道 runway、自由现金流与业主收益 owner earnings、资本成本与机会成本、净现值与内部收益率、投入资本回报率 ROIC 与增长的价值条件(只有 ROIC 高于资本成本时增长才创造价值)、股权稀释与优先清算权的退出瀑布、递延收入是负债不是收入; (d) 工作流/SOP — 月度关账与管理报表包(关账日历、计提、对账、出具一页纸经营分析)、13 周滚动现金流预测的搭建与每周刷新、年度预算与滚动预测(自上而下目标与自下而上驱动因素模型的对撞)、定价与成本核算(标准成本、作业成本法、贡献边际定价与报价审批)、应收账款与账期管理(信用政策、账龄表、催收节奏、保理与供应链金融)、融资轮次建模(投前投后估值、期权池扩容对创始人的额外稀释、SAFE 与可转债转股、优先清算权下的退出分配)、投资决策与产能/招人测算(增量现金流、回收期、敏感性分析)、税务合规日历与汇算清缴、董事会与投资人财务包、尽调与数据室准备、以及财务模型的三表联动搭建; (e) 知识正典(en 一手极厚,中文一手集中在高校教授与准则原文) — 《Financial Intelligence》Berman & Knight(给非财务经理的入门标准)、《Financial Statements》Thomas Ittelson、Brealey·Myers·Allen《Principles of Corporate Finance》(公司金融教科书)、Damodaran 的估值三部曲与《Narrative and Numbers》及其 NYU 公开课与免费数据集、《Simple Numbers, Straight Talk, Big Profits!》Greg Crabtree(中小企业实操)、《Venture Deals》Feld & Mendelson(条款与稀释)、《Financial Shenanigans》Howard Schilit(识别财务粉饰)、《The Outsiders》Thorndike(资本配置)、《Accounting for Value》Penman、伯克希尔股东信中的业主收益与商誉摊销讨论、《The Essays of Warren Buffett》、《Profit First》Michalowicz(流行但有争议)、IFRS 15/16 与 ASC 606 收入与租赁准则原文、中国企业会计准则 CAS 与小企业会计准则、肖星《一本书读懂财报》与清华的财务分析公开课、张新民的财务报表分析体系; (f) 行业大佬/figures — Aswath Damodaran(NYU,估值教父,博客与公开课与数据集全免费开放,一手素材极厚)、Michael Mauboussin(ROIC 与资本配置的实证写作)、Howard Schilit(财务舞弊识别)、Karen Berman 与 Joe Knight(财务素养普及)、Greg Crabtree(中小企业现金与利润实操)、Brad Feld 与 Jason Mendelson(创业融资条款)、David Skok 与 Jason Lemkin 与 David Sacks(SaaS 单位经济与烧钱效率指标)、Warren Buffett 与 Charlie Munger(对 EBITDA 与股权激励费用化的著名批评)、CJ Gustafson 等现役 CFO 的时事通讯作者、以及中文圈的肖星与张新民等高校学者; (g) 争议/批判(必须保留不洗白) — 调整后 EBITDA 与非公认会计准则指标的滥用(把股权激励与一次性费用年年加回)、DCF 对假设的极端敏感与被用来事后合理化结论、独角兽估值与优先清算权造成的『纸面身价』幻觉、对赌与回购条款把股权融资变成隐性债务、Profit First 现金分桶法被专业会计批评为回避真实成本结构、作业成本法的实施失败率高、预算游戏与年底突击花钱、财务 BP 沦为报表美化、中国中小企业两套账的历史现实与金税四期后的合规收敛(如实呈现风险,不提供规避操作)、以及『融资额等于成功』的媒体叙事对创始人的误导; (h) 流派/思想谱系 — **准则与合规派(IASB/FASB/财政部,信可比性与审计留痕,语言是准则条文)** vs **管理会计/决策派(IMA 与贡献边际、作业成本法、有效产出会计,信决策相关性高于合规一致性)** vs **公司金融/估值派(Brealey-Myers-Allen 与 Damodaran,信现金流折现与资本成本)** vs **价值投资/资本配置派(巴菲特-芒格-Thorndike-Mauboussin,信业主收益与 ROIC,公开鄙视 EBITDA)** vs **创业与 SaaS 指标派(Skok-Lemkin-Sacks-Bessemer,信单位经济、回本周期与烧钱倍数)** vs **中小企业现金实操派(Crabtree、Profit First 一脉,信老板看得懂的少数几个数)**。不含: 投行卖方并购执行与尽调建模(已由 investment-banking-mna 覆盖)、VC 投资人的看项目与投后视角(已由 vc-investor 覆盖)、个人理财与二级市场投资(已由 personal-investing 覆盖)、注册会计师考证与准则条文背诵、以及任何税收规避操作建议。) Master O

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CEO (Chief Executive Officer) — 一家公司「最高操作员」的工艺, 与泛泛「领导力 / 管理学」不同: (a) 设定战略与凝结愿景 (Drucker 的「企业的经营理论」+ Porter 论定位 + Hamilton Helmer 的「七力」+ Andy Grove 的「战略转折点」+ Roger Martin 《Playing to Win》); (b) 资本配置是 CEO 单一最高杠杆的工作 (Buffett/Munger Berkshire 致股东信 + William Thorndike 《The Outsiders 商界局外人》论 8 位非常规 CEO + Michael Mauboussin 论 hurdle rate + Bezos 年度致股东信「invariants vs bets」+ Mark Leonard Constellation Software); (c) 组建与领导高管班子 (Patrick Lencioni 《团队的五大障碍》+ Ben Horowitz 《艰难的事》+ Reed Hastings 《No Rules Rules》人才密度 + Andy Grove HOP《高产出管理》+ Lou Gerstner IBM 转型 + Marshall Goldsmith); (d) 董事会与投资人关系 (Larcker & Tayan 《公司治理重要》+ Bill George 《True North》+ 正式 CEO-董事长 / CEO-独立董事 protocol + 维权投资人 playbook + 资本市场沟通); (e) 企业文化与价值观作为操作系统 (Netflix 文化手册 + Amazon Leadership Principles + Bridgewater 《Principles》Ray Dalio + Schein 论组织文化 + 任正非 灰度 + 张瑞敏 人单合一 + 稻盛和夫 阿米巴); (f) 高不确定下的高风险决策 (Bezos Type 1/Type 2 决策 + premortem Klein + Kahneman 论 executive bias + RAPID/DACI + base rates + 情景规划 + 反思 premortem); (g) 对内对外沟通 (创始人 / CEO 致股东信作为机构构建工具: Bezos / Buffett / Reed Hastings 备忘录 / 任正非 内部讲话 + Town Hall + 危机沟通 Tylenol/Boeing/Wells Fargo + 应对维权投资人); (h) 跨阶段规模化 (创业 0→1 / 扩张 1→100 / 成熟期掌舵 / 危机转型): Steve Blank + Brian Chesky founder-mode + Marc Andreessen + Pierre Lassonde + Lou Gerstner 转型; (i) 创始人 CEO vs 职业经理人 CEO 的差异 (Paul Graham 「Founder Mode」2024 + Brian Chesky + Reed Hastings (创始人→职业过渡) + BCG/McKinsey 的「manager mode」+ 两者各自代价 + 什么时候切换)。诚实处理: 幸存者偏差 (单个 CEO 的打法 ≠ 普适规律, 学术研究显示 CEO 个人方差约 ⅓, 约 70% 来自行业 / 时代 / 运气 / 资本结构), 创始人崇拜, 区分可复制工艺与不可移植个人魅力, 治理与利益相关者责任 (员工 / 股东 / 社会), 反对 CEO 神话与 Welch 退休金扭曲 / Theranos / WeWork / FTX / Uber-Kalanick 时代 / Musk 80h+ / 996 工时崇拜。覆盖 founder-CEO (Bezos/Hastings/黄仁勋/Chesky/Brin/任正非) 与职业 CEO (Nadella/Gerstner/Pichai/Mulally/Lafley)。不含: 泛泛管理理论 (商业书已覆盖, 本 skill 专谈 C-suite 这个具体岗位), 不含: 「领导力」作为个人成长自助 (Robbins/Tracy/Maxwell 励志体裁), 不含: 「如何创业」早期战术 — 一旦有员工 / 董事会 / 资本, CEO 的工艺才开始。 (CEO (Chief Executive Officer) — the craft of being the top operator of a company, distinct from generic 'leadership/management': (a) setting the strategy and crystallizing the vision (Drucker's 'theory of the business' + Porter on positioning + Hamilton Helmer's 7 powers + Andy Grove's strategic inflection points + Roger Martin Playing to Win); (b) capital allocation as the CEO's single highest-leverage job (Buffett/Munger Berkshire letters + William Thorndike 'The Outsiders' on 8 unconventional CEOs + Michael Mauboussin on hurdle rates + Bezos's annual shareholder letter approach to invariants vs bets + Mark Leonard Constellation Software); (c) building and leading the executive team (Patrick Lencioni 'Five Dysfunctions' + Ben Horowitz 'Hard Things About Hard Things' + Reed Hastings 'No Rules Rules' on talent density + Andy Grove HOP + Lou Gerstner IBM turnaround + Marshall Goldsmith); (d) board and investor relations (Larcker & Tayan 'Corporate Governance Matters' + Bill George 'True North' + the formal CEO-Chair / CEO-Lead Director protocols + activist investor playbooks + capital markets communication); (e) culture and values as operating system (Netflix culture deck + Amazon Leadership Principles + Bridgewater 'Principles' Ray Dalio + Schein on org culture + 任正非 Ren Zhengfei 灰度 + 张瑞敏 Zhang Ruimin 人单合一 + 稻盛和夫 阿米巴); (f) high-stakes decision-making under uncertainty (Bezos Type 1 vs Type 2 + premortem Klein + Kahneman 'Thinking Fast and Slow' for executive bias + RAPID/DACI + base rates + scenario planning + premortem); (g) internal and external communication (founder/CEO letters as institution-builders: Bezos shareholder letters / Buffett letters / Reed Hastings memos / 任正非 内部讲话 + Town Halls + crisis communication Tylenol/Boeing/Wells Fargo + activist responses); (h) cross-stage scaling (founder-CEO of 0→1 / scaling 1→100 / mature-stage stewardship / turnaround): Steve Blank + Brian Chesky founder-mode + Marc Andreessen + Pierre Lassonde mining vs steady-state + Lou Gerstner turnaround; (i) the founder-CEO vs professional-manager-CEO distinction (Paul Graham 'Founder Mod

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Android Jetpack Compose Expert workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Expert guidance for building modern Android UIs with Jetpack Compose, covering state management, navigation, performance, and Material Design 3 and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。