「oss」の検索結果

Perform critical Rust code reviews covering correctness, edition 2024 compliance, error handling, API design, async pitfalls, and dependency hygiene. ALWAYS use this skill when the user wants to review, audit, or critically evaluate Rust code — whether that's a PR diff, a specific crate or module, a cross-cutting concern like error handling, or the whole codebase. This includes requests to "review my changes", "check this code", "audit for best practices", "look for issues", "what's wrong with this", or "flag anything that could bite us". Use it even when the user doesn't say "review" explicitly but is asking you to find problems, inconsistencies, or anti-patterns in existing Rust code. Do NOT use for requests to write, fix, refactor, test, explain, or implement code — only for evaluating existing code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a user asks to scan, investigate, or characterize a URL. Submits to URLScan (unlisted by default), cross-references with VirusTotal and OTX, extracts the parent domain and resolved IP for follow-up investigation. Returns verdict, redirect chain, contacted infrastructure, and screenshot. Invoked by /cti-orchestrator when the target is a URL.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when assessing the maturity of a CTI programme, the user asks "how mature is our CTI?" / "what should we improve next?", or wants a benchmark against the five-level model across six dimensions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Indicator pivoting methodology — how to use one known indicator to discover related infrastructure across the IOC graph. Decision tree by indicator type with concrete `/lookup-*` commands per pivot, a worked multi-hop example, pivot-quality scoring, and routing into the rigor pipeline. Use when the user asks "what else is connected to this IP / domain / hash / cert / actor?", needs to expand a single seed IOC into a campaign cluster, or wants the canonical reference for graph-walking IOCs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to check whether an organisation/domain has been claimed by a ransomware group, profile a specific ransomware group (TTPs, leak-site infra, IOCs, YARA), or aggregate ransomware victim claims by country/sector/timeframe. Backed by ransomware.live's leak-site scrapes — 27k+ victims across 330+ groups. Commonly invoked by /domain-investigation, /ransomware-ecosystem, /threat-actor-profiling, and detection-engineering workflows. Reads $RANSOMWARE_LIVE.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when phrasing a forward-looking statement, the user asks "how likely is X?" / "what's the likelihood?", or the tradecraft pipeline applies a probability yardstick to a finished product. Standardised likelihood language across all products.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when documenting a named campaign across time and victims, the user asks to start or update a campaign record, or another skill identified a multi-incident cluster that warrants formal tracking. Provides the template (timeline, attribution, victimology, attack chain, Diamond Model mapping, IOC clusters) and the lifecycle from active to historical.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks about the CTI Hyperloop framework, the intelligence lifecycle as a high-tempo loop, or how to map intelligence work across strategic / operational / tactical levels with bidirectional feedback. Liberty91's operational doctrine.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cybersecurity partner skill for acting as a practical security collaborator across architecture review, threat modeling, secure design, risk prioritization, defensive planning, vulnerability remediation, incident readiness, security roadmaps, and technical decision support. Use when the user wants an ongoing security advisor, reviewer, or second set of eyes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assembly programming and low-level debugging skill for reading, writing, explaining, optimizing, and reviewing assembly across x86, x86-64, ARM, AArch64, RISC-V, calling conventions, ABI boundaries, inline assembly, disassembly, stack frames, registers, and binary-level behavior. Use for .s/.asm files, compiler output, reverse-engineering snippets, low-level performance, and crash analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Meta-skill que orquestra todos os agentes do ecossistema. Scan automatico de skills, match por capacidades, coordenacao de workflows multi-skill e registry management.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert Flutter specialist mastering Flutter 3+ with modern architecture patterns. Specializes in cross-platform development, custom animations, native integrations, and performance optimization with focus on creating beautiful, native-performance applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perpetual autonomous work loop for Claude Code — no end condition, no memory regression, no context overfill. Maintains a persistent ledger across all sessions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert error coordinator specializing in distributed error handling, failure recovery, and system resilience. Masters error correlation, cascade prevention, and automated recovery strategies across multi-agent systems with focus on minimizing impact and learning from failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Open protocol for AI agent interoperability enabling standardized communication between agents, applications, and humans across different frameworks

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check agent configuration coverage across hierarchy levels and phases. Use to ensure complete agent system coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides guidance for automatically evolving and optimizing AI agents across any domain using LLM-driven evolution algorithms. Use when building self-improving agents, optimizing agent prompts and skills against benchmarks, or implementing automated agent evaluation loops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep review — random exploration + cross-agent review, alternating. Finds integration bugs that self-review misses. Run every 30–60 min during active implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep code review after beads have landed — random exploration + cross-agent review, alternating. Use every 30–60 min during active implementation, or after any epic lands.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the Crabbox wrapper for OpenClaw remote validation across Linux, macOS, Windows, and WSL2, including delegated Blacksmith Testbox proof. Report the actual provider and id.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synchronize curated Agent Skills across approved repositories with policy checks and verification. Use when publishing or updating managed skills, validating a repository mirror, or selecting a safe sync scope. Triggers on "sync public skills", "publish skills", "public 公開", "skill sync", "repository mirror".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, create, update, and verify personal calendar events across Outlook, Google Calendar, and TimeTree. Use when the user asks to add, change, move, organize, synchronize, or check a schedule, travel, hotel, appointment, or calendar event.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, run, and review fair performance, token, and cost comparisons across GitHub Copilot CLI, Codex CLI, and direct model APIs. Use for AI CLI benchmark, Copilot vs Codex, prompt-cache diagnosis, cache read/write analysis, fresh-process latency measurement, token-cost comparison, or when a benchmark must separate provider caching from local CLI caches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reduce repeated permission prompts across Microsoft Scout, Copilot CLI, and host tool confirmations with user-approved settings and explicit before/after verification. Use when users ask for permission max, fewer approval prompts, shell allow-list expansion, autoApprove, or diagnosis of repeated Read/Write/PowerShell confirmations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。