「plan」の検索結果

Use when the user asks "что сегодня", "задачи на сегодня", "план на день", or wants the current department's living weekly plan refreshed from task facts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when managing Paperclip AI agent companies - creating tasks, managing agents, approving hires, running heartbeats, or any Paperclip control-plane operations via CLI or REST API. Triggers on "paperclip", "задача агенту", "одобри найм", "heartbeat", "запусти агента".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user is closing an ISO week, reviewing planned outcomes against evidence, interviewing work Areas, resolving unfinished commitments, or asking for "ретро", "weekly retro", "week review", or lessons from the week.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Break a plan, spec, or PRD into independently-grabbable task files using tracer-bullet vertical slices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when planning new bundle-plugins, splitting complex skills, combining skills into bundles, or exploring a vague idea about packaging skills

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answer quick architectural questions, debug mini-issues, explore the codebase, and help improve skills and workflows. Use this skill when the user asks "how does X work", "where is Y", "why does Z happen", wants to understand code flow, trace a bug through the system, or asks about the relationship between components. Also use when the user wants to improve an existing skill or refine development workflows. This is the lightweight, exploratory counterpart to the planner -- use it for questions and small fixes, not multi-file changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to run or continue an autonomous build: turn a goal into an approved plan, dispatch implementation and review agents, and finish with one pull request. The Lead is a provider-neutral orchestrator that makes decisions but never writes code, edits files, runs commands, or reviews its own work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze a software repository at the latest remote main commit and turn its implemented architecture into a citation-backed interactive isometric system map with a legend, selectable infrastructure buildings, dependency and payload flows, and plain-language learner explanations. For eligible public GitHub repositories, also contribute the verified map to tamdogood/CodeTerrain with a pull request. Use when a user provides a repository URL or asks to visualize, explore, learn, explain, or map a repo's architecture, infrastructure, runtime control flow, data flow, services, queues, stores, external systems, or deployment topology in an interactive UI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transform saved links, papers, articles, posts, videos, and reference collections into approachable AI teaching artifacts for later study. Use when a user wants to queue learning material, create a readable explanation from a source, teach a paper or post step by step, or run an interactive tutor that validates understanding over multiple sessions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dependency upgrades: outdated/vulnerable deps planned into semver waves (patch/minor batched, majors gated and changelog-read), applied incrementally with lockfiles regenerated and tests green after each. Runs on green main. Triggers on "absolute upgrade", "upgrade our dependencies", "bump deps", "update packages", "move off the deprecated X", "clear the Dependabot backlog".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diátaxis-driven documentation for AI coding agents: write, improve, or audit tutorials, how-tos, reference, explanation, and developer docs (README, CONTRIBUTING, ADRs). Detects the docs stack; gates on the outline before writing prose; verifies every claim against the code before it ships. Triggers on "absolute docs", "write docs", "write a tutorial", "write a README", "document this", "improve this doc", "audit our docs".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Develop and execute a content strategy that maps content to audience needs, funnel stages, and business goals through editorial planning and performance analysis. Use when the user requests content strategy or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build evidence-oriented readiness checklists for frameworks such as SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI DSS, and GDPR, with gaps and remediation priorities. Use when the user needs an internal readiness assessment or control-mapping plan; do not use it to certify compliance or replace an auditor or counsel.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate SQL queries from natural-language requirements using SELECT, JOIN, GROUP BY, window functions, CTEs, and subqueries. Use when the user needs a new query from a business question or schema; use query-optimization when an existing query or execution plan is slow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, execute, document, and retest authorized security assessments of AI agents and multi-agent workflows using safe adversarial cases, synthetic identities, canaries, and evidence-based findings. Use when defining red-team rules of engagement, assessing prompt injection or excessive agency, testing tool and identity boundaries, evaluating memory or cross-agent attacks, scoring a campaign, or verifying remediation in an approved environment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Mechatronics Engineer. Use when a task calls for Mechatronics Engineer judgment. Reasons from reflected inertia, control bandwidth, sensor physics, and thermal duty cycle through Bode loop-shaping with phase/gain margins, FOC current-velocity-position loops, plant identification, HIL, and IEC 61800-5-2 STO architecture while treating backlash and structural-mode resonance, transport-delay phase loss, encoder aliasing, and EMC ground loops as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Industrial Microbiologist. Use when a task calls for Industrial Microbiologist judgment. Reasons from SmF/SSF physiology, fed-batch μ/OTR–OUR/RQ, DoE media optimization, PAT (Raman soft sensors), ICH Q8/Q7 characterization, bioleaching, SVI/F/M filament ID, and phage (10⁴–10⁶ PFU/mL) plant hygiene; treats antifoam kLa penalty, F₀ CIP/SIP cold spots, DSP mass balance, and golden-batch vs biofilm red herrings as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Horticulturist. Use when a task calls for Horticulturist judgment. Reasons from plant-environment-cultural coupling, source-sink carbon partitioning, and chilling/photoperiod thresholds through rootstock-scion matching, DLI/VPD and substrate EC/pH targets, Dynamic/Utah chill models, and CA/MA postharvest setpoints while treating blossom-end rot, bitter pit, tipburn, storage scald, and MRL/PHI breaches as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Ethologist. Use when a task calls for Ethologist judgment. Reasons from Tinbergen's four questions and versioned species vs experimental ethograms; scores with BORIS (Cohen's κ per behavior), Altmann focal/scan budgets, and ARRIVE 2.0/study-plan lab reporting while treating observer expectation, field–lab arena mismatch, habituation, and pseudoreplication as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Food Microbiologist. Use when a task calls for Food Microbiologist judgment. Reasons from food as a hurdle-governed matrix of water activity, pH, and redox through BAM/ISO reference methods, c/n/m/M sampling plans, PMA-v-qPCR, and ComBase kinetics while treating VBNC and injured cells, post-process contamination, matrix inhibition, and unconfirmed PCR hits as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Control Systems Engineer. Use when a task calls for Control Systems Engineer judgment. Reasons from plant dynamics, stability margins, and disturbance-rejection specs through Bode/Nyquist and Routh-Hurwitz analysis, LQR/H-infinity and pole placement, Kalman/EKF observers, RGA pairing, and HIL validation while treating integrator windup, actuator saturation and backlash limit cycles, sensor delay masking phase margin, and estimator divergence as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Dentist-Scientist. Use when a task calls for Dentist-Scientist judgment. Reasons from oral biofilm-host ecology, tissue healing capacity, and patient-level clinical endpoints (DMFS, PD/CAL, implant survival) through PICO/PROSPERO protocols, CAMBRA and 2017 AAP/EFP staging, ISO 4049/14801 bench tests with thermocycling, and GRADE-rated reviews while treating in-vitro-to-chairside leaps, plaque-index surrogates without caries reduction, and examiner calibration drift as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Condensed Matter Physicist. Use when a task calls for Condensed Matter Physicist judgment. Reasons from Bloch bands, quasiparticles, and symmetry through ARPES/STM/neutron/transport workflows, VASP/QE/Wannier90/DMFT, and Materials Project/ICSD/MPDS while treating matrix-element artifacts, Mott vs. DFT gaps, pseudogap vs. SC gap, and Planckian bad-metal transport as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Deep Learning Scientist. Use when a task calls for Deep Learning Scientist judgment. Reasons from CNN/Transformer inductive bias, Li et al. loss landscapes, grokking/mode connectivity, and Kaplan/Chinchilla scaling (~20 tokens/param); designs ResNet/ViT/DiT/MoE/FlashAttention stacks with FLOPs-matched ablations; trains AdamW+cosine/WSD via Megatron-FSDP/DeepSpeed; evaluates FID/MMLU-Pro/MMLU-CF with lm-eval decontamination and Pineau/NeurIPS reproducibility checklists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。