「product」の検索結果

Builds production-ready REST API endpoints with validation, error handling, authentication, and documentation. Follows best practices for security and scalability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract product data, prices, reviews, and seller information from any e-commerce platform using Apify's E-commerce Scraping Tool.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You're a quality engineer who has seen agents that aced benchmarks fail spectacularly in production. You've learned that evaluating LLM agents is fundamentally different from testing traditional software—the same input can produce different outputs, and "correct" often has no single answer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build production-ready LLM applications, advanced RAG systems, and intelligent agents. Implements vector search, multimodal AI, agent orchestration, and enterprise AI integrations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build production Apache Airflow DAGs with best practices for operators, sensors, testing, and deployment. Use when creating data pipelines, orchestrating workflows, or scheduling batch jobs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assigns GO terms, Pfam/InterPro domains, KEGG orthologs, EC numbers, and product names to predicted proteins using eggNOG-mapper (orthology), InterProScan (domain signatures), and KofamScan (KEGG), routing specialized functions to dbCAN/antiSMASH/AMRFinderPlus/SignalP. Covers the orthology-vs-domain-vs-homology paradigms, the annotation-error percolation cascade, domain-presence-is-not-function, GO IEA circularity in enrichment, evidence tiering, and bit-score/coverage thresholds. Use when adding functional annotation to predicted genes, choosing between eggNOG-mapper and InterProScan, or judging how much to trust a functional label.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs cytosine (CBE, C-to-T) and adenine (ABE, A-to-G) base-editor guides by positioning the target base at the activity-peak of the editing window (protospacer positions ~5-7, PAM-distal numbering), minimizing bystander edits for product purity, reading dinucleotide context (APOBEC1 TC favored / GC disfavored), and selecting the editor variant (BE4max, ABEmax, ABE8e, YE1/SECURE, TadCBE, CGBE, SpG/SpRY-BE). Covers knockout by premature stop (CRISPR-STOP/iSTOP) and splice-site disruption, the three off-target classes (Cas-dependent, Cas-independent DNA, RNA), outcome prediction (BE-Hive/DeepBE), and the base-vs-prime-vs-HDR decision. Use when installing a transition mutation without a double-strand break, knocking out a gene without indels, or choosing CBE vs ABE. Generic guide scoring, prime editing, and HDR donors are separate skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Estimates time-scaled phylogenies, molecular clock rates, effective reproduction number R_e (or R_t), and population dynamics from dated pathogen genomes using TreeTime (maximum-likelihood) and BEAST2 (Bayesian; strict / uncorrelated lognormal / ORC clocks; constant / exponential / Bayesian Skyline / Skygrid / BICEPS / Birth-Death-Skyline / sampled-ancestor BDSKY priors; structured coalescent via MASCOT). Covers root-to-tip clock signal QC via TempEst, date-randomisation tests (Ramsden 2009; Duchêne 2015), recombination masking via Gubbins and ClonalFrameML before clock inference for recombining bacteria, BDSKY origin-vs-rootHeight pitfalls, sampling-bias correction (Volz & Frost 2014; preferential-sampling extensions), MASCOT structured coalescent for migration, BICEPS-vs-BSP skyline choice, multi-chain BEAST2 convergence diagnostics, and reconciliation between phylodynamic R_e and case-based R_t. Use when dating outbreak origins, estimating substitution rates, inferring R_e through time, building time-calibrated Nextstrain Augur trees, choosing between strict and relaxed clocks, fitting Birth-Death-Skyline (Stadler 2013) models, diagnosing temporal-signal failure, masking recombination before clock inference for *Streptococcus pneumoniae* / *Neisseria gonorrhoeae* / *Klebsiella* / *E. coli* phylodynamics, running MASCOT for structured-population analyses, or using UShER for pandemic-scale placement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs JACKS (Joint Analysis of CRISPR/Cas9 Knockout Screens; Allen et al 2019 Genome Research) which models per-sgRNA log-fold-change as the product of a treatment-dependent gene-essentiality term and a treatment-independent guide-efficacy term. Covers the Bayesian decomposition math, the hierarchical efficacy prior shared across screens performed with the same library, when JACKS outperforms MAGeCK (multi-screen joint analysis, libraries with broad efficacy variance) and when it does not (single screen, novel libraries with no prior efficacy), library-reuse efficacy transfer, downstream essentiality interpretation, and the 2.5x sample-size reduction enabled by efficacy-aware testing. Use when running multiple screens with the same library, when guide-level noise is suspected to dominate per-gene signal, when reusing published essentiality reference screens for efficacy priors, or when comparing screens performed across cell lines that share library but differ biologically.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes base-editing screens for variant function. Covers library design (Sanson 2020 GRACE, Hanna 2021 BRCA1/2 SNV scanning, Cuella-Martin 2021), CBE vs ABE chemistry choice (BE3/BE4 vs ABE7.10/ABE8.20/ABE8e), editing-window math (positions 4-8 from PAM-distal end, wider for ABE8e), bystander-edit quantification and the variant-call ambiguity it creates, sgRNA-efficiency filtering before hit calling, indel byproduct interpretation, the substitution-vs-indel diagnostic, variant annotation against ClinVar / COSMIC, and the Broad be-validation-pipeline. Use when designing a BE variant screen, choosing CBE vs ABE for a specific edit, interpreting bystander-confounded hits, distinguishing functional signal from indel artifact, integrating CRISPResso2 output with screen scoring, or deciding BE vs PE for SNV installation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs and analyzes pooled prime-editor (PE) screens for installing precise genetic variants without bystander confounding. Covers pegRNA design with PRIDICT and PRIDICT2 (Mathis 2023/2024) for predicting per-pegRNA editing efficiency, pegRNA architecture (spacer + scaffold + PBS + RTT), PE2 / PE3 / PE3b / PEmax / PEAR variants, MOSAIC in situ saturation mutagenesis (Hsu JY et al 2024 bioRxiv), the PRIME pooled-screen methodology (Erwood/Doman 2023 Nat Biotechnol 41:885; ~3,699 ClinVar variant screens), chromatin context as a primary determinant of PE efficiency, scaffold-incorporation and indel byproduct quantification with CRISPResso2, and the cross-modal validation strategy of PE + base-editor screens for variant function. Use when designing a pegRNA library for variant installation, choosing between BE and PE for a specific edit, predicting pegRNA efficiency before library synthesis, analyzing PE screen output, distinguishing intended-edit from scaffold-incorporation, or scaling PE screens to thousands of variants.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quantifies CRISPR editing outcomes with CRISPResso2 (Clement 2019 Nat Biotechnol) across Cas9-nuclease (indels, HDR), CBE and ABE base editors (target conversion + bystander), and prime editor (pegRNA-templated) modes. Covers single-amplicon (CRISPResso), multi-sample batch (CRISPRessoBatch), pooled-amplicon (CRISPRessoPooled), WGS off-target (CRISPRessoWGS), and sample-comparison (CRISPRessoCompare) workflows; quantification-window math that controls what is called edited; substitution-vs-indel diagnostic to distinguish BE from Cas9 contamination; MMEJ deletion pattern interpretation; allele-frequency tables; and failure modes from amplicon misalignment or contamination. Use when quantifying editing from amplicon sequencing, choosing CRISPResso mode by design, distinguishing intended edits from bystanders and indel byproducts, debugging low-alignment runs, or generating publication-grade editing reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enumerates virtual chemical libraries via reaction SMARTS transformations using RDKit and Reaction templates, with explicit handling of atom mapping, template extraction (RDKit reaction mining), product validation, RECAP/BRICS fragmentation, R-group decomposition, matched molecular pair analysis (MMPA), and Free-Wilson analysis. Use when generating combinatorial libraries from building blocks, enumerating analog series, deriving structure-activity rules, or extracting transformations from reaction data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs ML-based protein-ligand pose prediction and scoring using DiffDock-L (diffusion-based), Boltz-1 / Boltz-2 (foundation model with affinity), Chai-1, AlphaFold3 ligand, EquiBind, TANKBind, NeuralPLexer, and hybrid workflows (DiffDock pose + GNINA rescore + PoseBusters QC). Explicit handling of when ML beats classical docking, when classical beats ML, the PB-invalid pose problem, and rescoring as the standard production hybrid. Use when modern docking is needed: foundation-model ligand-pose prediction, AI rescoring of classical poses, or scaffold-hopping in cross-docking scenarios.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to respond to an FMCSA audit document request efficiently. Covers organization, file labeling, secure transmission.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Troubleshoot Coval OpenTelemetry trace ingestion, missing trace UI, sparse traces, bad simulation or conversation correlation, auth/org errors, oversized payloads, duplicate spans, and production debugging with Trace Search.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate a read-only Coval evaluation, simulation, monitoring, product-how-to, or troubleshooting subtask to Sofia through the official Coval MCP consult_sofia tool. Use when the user needs Coval-specific FDE judgment, analysis of organization data, metric or test-set recommendations, or a diagnosis grounded in Coval runs and conversations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Select and configure a Coval metric for a concrete product criterion, choosing transcript, audio, trace or deterministic evidence and testing the result. Use for metric creation or scoring design, not for final human calibration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a compact Coval test set from product requirements, observed conversation failures or a coverage gap. Design realistic scenarios with separate expected behaviors, provenance and controlled voice/persona variation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Recommend, create, preview, and attach Coval trace-based metrics from OpenTelemetry spans. Use when a user has Coval traces and wants custom trace metrics, trace-aware LLM judge metrics with include_traces, latency, token usage, provider failures, tool behavior, vertical-specific workflow signals, or production monitoring based on trace attributes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states. Handles UX review, visual hierarchy, information architecture, cognitive load, accessibility, performance, responsive behavior, theming, anti-patterns, typography, fonts, spacing, layout, alignment, color, motion, micro-interactions, UX copy, error states, edge cases, i18n, and reusable design systems or tokens. Also use for bland designs that need to become bolder or more delightful, loud designs that should become quieter, live browser iteration on UI elements, or ambitious visual effects that should feel technically extraordinary. Not for backend-only or non-UI tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trial protocol for teaching AI Matrx an expert's knowledge until the platform breaks, fixing it. Use when asked to run an expertise trial, distil a person/creator/recent video into a Masterwork, or test the capture product. NOT for a known-missing feature (use build-sub-feature).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the full on-track check on a conversation, project, or keyword the owner names: find the sessions, extract exactly what he typed, dispatch independent judges who go to the live product as him and report what was missed, plan the remedy, and return one page — what he will see, what is missing, the plan. Use when told to check whether work is on track, to audit a project that has drifted, on 'run the on-track check on X', or when a long campaign is about to freeze, hand off, or claim done.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Recipe for building one focused UI section out for every consumer. Use when asked to 'make this section canonical', 'productize this widget', give it 'the full treatment', or set it up 'like the SEO metadata system', or when building a new analyzer, preview, or calculator section.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。