「repo」の検索結果

How to determine which backlog backend a project is configured to use, and what to do with the answer. Use when about to call a backend-specific tool, choosing between a GitHub-only and a Beads-native operation, or reporting which store a result came from.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research community usage patterns, real-world gotchas, and client compatibility for a specific known library, tool, or protocol feature. Use when a technical-researcher orchestrator needs community-sourced evidence about a named library or feature — bug reports, workarounds, compatibility gaps, and patterns from issue trackers and discussions. Distinct from the broad ecosystem-researcher agent — this skill targets a KNOWN entity and mines what real users have actually experienced, not what exists in a domain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quantitative cost measurement for technical research — token injection costs, payload sizes, context window consumption, and file-level counts from actual repo files. Use when a technical-researcher orchestrator needs the cost dimension of adding or changing something: how many tokens will it inject, how big are the artifacts, what is the context window impact? This is NOT blast-radius analysis (which files break) — it covers size, tokens, and performance cost only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates a GitHub milestone on the current repository and returns its number for downstream use. Use when starting a new sprint, release, or theme grouping of backlog items. No args triggers guided intake (title, due date, description); 'quick {title}' skips to description only. Checks for duplicates before creating. Returns milestone number for /group-items-to-milestone.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate and iterate on the SDLC Layer Separation Architecture implementation across the check categories defined in its Evaluation Checklist — cross-references, doc completeness, knowledge-explorer layer filters, research entry metadata, integration points, and plan consistency. Produces a structured findings report and optionally applies safe fixes. Use when validating a first-pass implementation, before claiming layer work complete, auditing layer docs or schema, or running --dry-run to preview findings without changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when extracting specific data points from large agent output transcripts, kaizen analysis reports, or JSONL session files — tool timings, query counts, error summaries, or any structured facts — without loading raw data into orchestrator context. Activates when the orchestrator needs targeted facts from large files and context pollution must be avoided.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Modern Git workflows, best practices, and commands. Use when the user asks about Git branch management (git switch vs checkout), file restoration (git restore), fixup commits, autosquash rebasing, git worktrees, rerere, force-with-lease, repository cleanup (git clean, stale branches, bloat analysis), history navigation (revision syntax, range notation, pickaxe search), recommended global git config, or GitButler and the but CLI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces a structured, end-to-end linear walkthrough of an unfamiliar codebase by orchestrating parallel subagents across four phases — discovery, tracing, validation, and synthesis. Use when onboarding to a new repository, understanding execution paths from entry points, generating navigable codebase documentation, or needing fact-checked coverage of architecture, deployment, testing, and operations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Look up prior Claude Code sessions when context is lost or forgotten. Use when asked what was done before, what happened in the last session, or any request to recall past conversation history, prior decisions, experiments, or outcomes. Indexes and searches raw JSONL transcripts from ~/.claude/projects/ via DuckDB. Returns verbatim user messages, summarizes AI actions and sub-agent outcomes, detects tool errors and user frustration signals, and reports tool usage statistics. Summaries cached at ~/.claude/kaizen/session-summaries/.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decompose substantive work into phases, dispatch each phase to a sub-agent, and adjudicate what comes back. Use whenever a request asks for implementation, investigation, a fix, a review, or any change to files — including small ones — and whenever you are about to read source or run a diagnostic yourself instead of handing it off. Also use when a report from a sub-agent needs judging, when a phase needs re-dispatching, or when a user names one instance of a pattern. Does not apply when your own prompt begins "Your ROLE_TYPE is sub-agent." — then follow references/sub-agent-contract.md instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transforms validated /linear-walkthrough artifacts into one presentation-ready deck outline per major codebase component. Use when the user asks to create a presentation, prepare a walkthrough deck, build an onboarding deck, produce an architecture review deck, or summarize a codebase for a technical audience. Requires walkthrough directory output -- reads unified walkthrough, per-section files, validation reports, coverage maps, entry points, and open questions -- then orchestrates four parallel agent phases to produce slide outlines with speaker notes, evidence references, and suggested visuals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Close a completed GitHub milestone and generate a completion summary. Use when a sprint or release is finished and needs to be officially closed. Audits open and closed issues, offers to carry forward open items to a new or existing milestone, closes the milestone, updates Project V2 Status to Done for closed issues, and produces a completion report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when converting an agentic repository into a ChatGPT/Codex Plugin or when building, repairing, validating, packaging, submitting, publishing, or auditing an existing Plugin.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a repository has a valuable agentic workflow, prompt chain, playbook, command, or runbook that should become a portable ChatGPT/Codex Skill without losing its real decision logic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a ChatGPT/Codex Plugin workflow needs deterministic computation, file processing, repository checks, package inspection, or other work that should be actually executed with host-native Python instead of answered from unverified reasoning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reads or converts documents in a research workflow, including PDF, Word, PowerPoint, Excel, OpenDocument, RTF, EPUB, and CSV. Chooses direct reading or conversion, selects a converter from document structure, and decides whether the Markdown is tracked or temporary. Use when a document must be read, quoted, summarized, searched, extracted, or added to a source library. Scanned documents go to vlm-ocr and bulk intake to research-repo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Advises on setting up LLM-based text classification as a validated measurement design. Covers codebook construction, learning-regime and model choice, prompt construction, validation against human coding with kappa and F1, hybrid human-LLM review, downstream measurement error, and reporting, plus a short resumable batch pattern with a rule-based baseline for repeated free text against a closed codebook. Use when the user wants to classify, code, or label text at scale. Category discovery goes to topic-modeling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Advises on setting up and validating topic models for survey and experimental text. Covers the discovery-versus-measurement question, choosing STM, LDA, or BERTopic, preprocessing consequences, prevalence and content formulas, topic-count selection across coherence, exclusivity and FREX, held-out likelihood, and residuals, validation of topics against human judgment, robustness, and DA-RT-compliant reporting. Use when the user has open-ended responses or another corpus and asks what topics are present, how many topics to use, about STM, searchK, coherence, or FREX, or wants topic prevalence compared across treatment arms or countries. Fixed-codebook coding goes to text-classification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits fielded survey-response data for registered elements, data quality, bot and AI-automation screening, and sample integrity, and produces an appendix-ready quality report. Use at soft launch before full field, after fielding before outcomes are analyzed, or when asked what a study did about bots and AI respondents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts a referee report for a journal editor. Produces a recommendation, claim-and-design summary, three to six decision-driving concerns, additional concerns, and a revision plan through five parallel adversarial finders, Breaker, Butcher, Shredder, Void, Situator, a Blue Team error filter, Chief Reviewer synthesis, Tone Guard legal pass, and optional confidential editor note. Use when the user has been asked to referee a manuscript. Self-audits go to paper-review-lite or presubmit, and author responses go to referee-response.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Organizes an author’s response to peer review. Extracts every referee and editor point, tags severity and type, orders the revision by dependency, flags defensible pushbacks as questions, and builds a numbered comment → response → location letter whose substantive answers the author writes. Use when the user has referee reports, a revise-and-resubmit decision, or an editor’s letter and wants to plan the revision, draft the response letter, or check that every point was addressed. The reviewer-side twin is journal-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans a research project as a decision map that persists across sessions, resolving one ticket per session until the design is defensible and pre-registerable. The map lives as Markdown in the repository, literature sweeps run as parallel research tickets, and the resolved map compiles into a pre-analysis plan. Use at project start, when a design has more open decisions than one conversation can hold, or when planning restarts each session. Not for executing analyses or writing the paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs conjoint and factorial-vignette experiments, covering attribute architecture and randomization restrictions, effective-N power, treatment realism, the choice among AMCE, marginal-mean, and AMIE estimands, forced-choice versus rating designs, and PAP tiers. Use when the user is planning a conjoint, drafting or critiquing an attribute table, asking how many respondents or tasks are needed, whether to report AMCEs or marginal means, or how to test interactions. Reviewing an existing design goes to conjoint-diagnostics, cleaning the export to conjoint-cleaning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft a referee report on someone else's manuscript for a journal editor, using five adversarial finders, a Blue Team error filter, a Chief Reviewer synthesis, and a Tone Guard legal pass. Use when the user has been asked to referee a manuscript; self-audits go to paper-review-lite or presubmit, author responses to referee-response.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。