「plan」の検索結果

Plan, implement, or review behave bdd work in an existing codebase with compatibility, security, and verification controls. Use when the user explicitly requests behave bdd work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, implement, or review ci/cd and automation work in an existing codebase with compatibility, security, and verification controls. Use when the user explicitly requests ci/cd and automation work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or review audit support deliverables with traceable assumptions, decision criteria, ownership, and risk controls. Use when the user asks for audit support planning or analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, implement, or review finishing a development branch work in an existing codebase with compatibility, security, and verification controls. Use when the user explicitly requests finishing a development branch work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, implement, or review gemini api work in an existing codebase with compatibility, security, and verification controls. Use when the user explicitly requests gemini api work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, implement, or review git commit work in an existing codebase with compatibility, security, and verification controls. Use when the user explicitly requests git commit work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, implement, or review git workflow and versioning work in an existing codebase with compatibility, security, and verification controls. Use when the user explicitly requests git workflow and versioning work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, implement, or review azure role selector work in an existing codebase with compatibility, security, and verification controls. Use when the user explicitly requests azure role selector work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, implement, or review dispatching parallel agents work in an existing codebase with compatibility, security, and verification controls. Use when the user explicitly requests dispatching parallel agents work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, implement, or review claude automation recommender work in an existing codebase with compatibility, security, and verification controls. Use when the user explicitly requests claude automation recommender work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cheat-on-skill 的首次 onboarding。盘点用户能力（现有技能/可迁移底子/学历经验/每周可学时间/能坚持几个月/学习能力自评/地区/目标薪资/转型紧迫度），判定起点档位，创建 .skill-state.json 状态文件，是 skill-scan / skill-plan 的前置。触发词："能力盘点"/"我想转AI相关工作"/"找AI时代高薪工作"/"skill init"/"职业转型初始化"。**当用户想找/规划 AI 时代工作但 .skill-state.json 不存在时，先路由到此。**

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate release readiness with evidence-based go/no-go decisions. Covers go/no-go checklists, smoke test suite design, staged rollout validation, rollback criteria and procedures, and post-deployment verification. Ensures release confidence comes from data, not feelings. Use when: "release ready," "go/no-go," "smoke test," "release checklist," "rollback plan," "staged rollout," "canary deploy." Not for: safe-release techniques (flags, canary, dark launch) applied during the rollout itself — use testing-in-production; scheduled probes that run continuously after release — use synthetic-monitoring; designing new tests from prod telemetry — use observability-driven-testing. Related: testing-in-production, qa-metrics, ci-cd-integration, ai-system-testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and execute structured exploratory testing sessions. Covers Session-Based Test Management (SBTM), charter writing, heuristic-based exploration (HICCUPS, FEW HICCUPS), bug discovery patterns, note-taking templates, and conversion of findings to automated tests. Use when: "exploratory testing," "SBTM," "manual testing," "bug hunting," "test charter," "heuristic testing." Not for: an AI browser agent autonomously exploring the app from a natural-language goal — use agentic-browser-testing. Not for: testing your product's own AI/LLM features — use ai-system-testing. Related: test-planning, ai-bug-triage, risk-based-testing, agentic-browser-testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runtime per-test healing with evidence: multi-attribute selector healing, environment-aware diagnosis, flake classification, quarantine management, and confidence-scored auto-repair. Goes beyond simple locator fallbacks to cover action-level healing, data healing, and observable repair workflows. Use when: "flaky test," "test stability," "self-healing locator," "broken locator recovery," "unreliable test," "quarantine flaky test." Not for: bulk regenerating selectors after a planned UI refactor — use selector-drift-recovery (this skill heals ONE test at runtime; that one rewrites many tests offline). Not for: classifying/clustering CI failures into bug reports — use ai-bug-triage. Related: playwright-automation, selector-drift-recovery, ci-cd-integration, qa-metrics, ai-bug-triage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Onboard a new QA engineer to an existing codebase, or audit an existing test architecture. Produces a 30-day ramp plan: codebase orientation, framework walkthrough, test architecture audit, mentorship pairing, and first-test guidance. Use when: "QA onboarding," "new tester," "ramp up," "test architecture audit," "first 30 days," "QA mentorship," "joining QA team." Not for: setting up QA on a brand-new project from scratch — use `qa-start`. Related: qa-start, qa-project-context, shift-left-testing, ai-qa-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate system resilience through controlled fault injection. Covers hypothesis-driven chaos experiments, failure injection types (network, service, infrastructure, dependency), LitmusChaos/Chaos Mesh/AWS FIS/Gremlin/toxiproxy tooling, automated abort gating, game day planning, and progressive chaos adoption. Use when: "chaos engineering," "fault injection," "resilience test," "game day," "failure recovery," "system reliability," "blast radius." Not for: safe rollout flags/canary/dark launch during a release — use testing-in-production; designing new tests from production telemetry — use observability-driven-testing. Related: testing-in-production, observability-driven-testing, performance-testing, release-readiness, test-environments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Move quality earlier in the development lifecycle. Covers dev/QA pairing patterns, Three Amigos sessions, TDD facilitation (Red-Green-Refactor), PR review checklists for testability, and Definition of Done with quality gates. Includes shift-left maturity model for team assessment. Use when: "shift left," "TDD," "dev-QA pairing," "definition of done," "testability," "quality culture," "QA in sprint planning." Not for: writing the unit tests themselves — use unit-testing; automated PR test-quality review at scale — use ai-qa-review; multi-quarter QA direction or roadmap — use test-strategy. Related: unit-testing, ai-qa-review, test-strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PM skill for Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and Windsurf. Diagnoses SaaS metrics, critiques PRDs, plans roadmaps, runs discovery, coaches PM career transitions, pressure-tests AI product decisions, and designs PLG growth strategies. Seven knowledge domains, 12 templates, 40+ frameworks, and an opinionated interaction style that labels assumptions and names tradeoffs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute approved, bounded work in an isolated implementation conversation and return a structured evidence receipt. Use with inherited history or an explicitly identified source; no particular planning, testing, or review skill is required.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate approved, bounded work through a same-directory Codex App fork: create and name the execution task, ask it to run spec-executor, route decisions through Codex Task Messenger, validate the returned receipt, and archive a completed child. The source may come from any planning workflow. Requires Codex App task tools and codex-task-messenger.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design, which also creates docs (ADR's and glossary) as we go.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Break a plan, spec, or the current conversation into a set of tracer-bullet tickets, each declaring its blocking edges, published to the configured tracker (edges as text in one file per ticket locally, or native blocking links on a real tracker).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。