「artifacts」の検索結果

Use when adding or modifying generator scripts that write files; keeps generated artifacts out of docs/ and aligns script defaults with ownership paths plus CI gate updates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run outcome-focused Firecrawl workflows that produce deliverables such as research reports, literature reviews over published papers, SEO audits, QA reports, lead lists, knowledge bases, website design systems, and other structured web-data artifacts. Use when the user wants Firecrawl to complete a business, marketing, product, or creative workflow rather than merely scrape a page or integrate API calls into code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute the implementation planning workflow using the plan template to generate design artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate an actionable, dependency-ordered tasks.md for the feature based on available design artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guidance for Cosign, the Sigstore tool for signing, verifying, and attaching metadata to container images and other OCI artifacts. Helps developers implement supply chain security by signing images in CI/CD, verifying signatures before deployment, and attaching SBOMs and vulnerability scan results as attestations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ClearML is an open-source MLOps platform that records machine-learning experiments, versions datasets, chains tasks into pipelines and runs them on remote machines through agents and queues. Use when a user asks to "track experiments with ClearML", "log metrics, artifacts and models", "version a dataset", "run training on a remote GPU with clearml-agent", "build a ClearML pipeline", "run hyperparameter optimization", or "self-host ClearML Server". Covers the clearml 2.x Python SDK, clearml-agent 3.x and ClearML Server 2.x.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build the deterministic evidence ledger (artifact_manifest.json + claims.json) that every other Anti-Autoresearch auditor reads. One pass inventories artifacts, derives the observability level (L0 PDF-only / L1 +LaTeX / L2 +repo+results) by fixed rule, and extracts span-anchored, hashed, checkable claims (numbers, comparisons, scope, method, baselines, citations, captions, table cells) into claims.json. An OPTIONAL additive cross-model pass ADDS span-anchored semantic claims — method, theorem statements with their assumptions, definitions, proof/derivation steps and equations, scope, baselines, conclusions, the motivation span, and reproducibility-artifact references (the proof, derivation, and structure anchors the family B/D/G auditors need) — it never invents a number, emits a finding, or computes a verdict. Run FIRST, before any audit skill. Triggers: "build the ledger", "extract claims", "prep for integrity audit", "evidence ledger", "建证据账本".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit experiment integrity against the evidence ledger. At L2 (repo + result files present) a fresh cross-model reviewer reads the eval code line-by-line for fake/derived ground truth, score self-normalization, phantom results (a paper number with no backing file/key), dead/uncalled metric code, verified-scope inflation, method-described ≠ method-evaluated drift, synthesized-looking results, placeholder/fake data still wired into a released result, code-output ≠ reported-number mismatch, and missing reproducibility artifacts (an empirical/agent/LLM paper shipping neither code nor the prompts/configs its results need) — every finding span-anchored to a ledger claim_id. At L0/L1 (PDF / source only) the same patterns are surfaced as info-level 'could-not-verify' signals where the ledger gives an anchor (observability_level_required:2) — NEVER a fraud verdict from a PDF. The reviewer PROPOSES findings; tools/adjudicate_findings.py computes the verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "experiment forensics", "audit the results", "check the eval code", "实验诚实度".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create interactive data visualizations using Vega-Lite declarative JSON grammar. Supports 20+ chart types (bar, line, scatter, histogram, boxplot, grouped/stacked variations, etc.) via templates and programmatic builders. Use when users upload data for charting, request specific chart types, or mention visualizations. Produces portable JSON specs with inline data islands that work in Claude artifacts and can be adapted for production.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Composes single-file HTML artifacts (PR review writeups, status reports, incident postmortems, slide decks, design systems, prototypes, flowcharts, module maps, feature explainers, kanban boards, prompt tuners) from a small JSON spec instead of hand-written HTML/CSS/JS. Use when the user asks to "compare options side-by-side", requests an HTML version of a report or review or deck, asks for a flowchart, status update, postmortem, design system reference, interactive prototype, custom editor — or explicitly says "HTML artifact", "single HTML file", "self-contained HTML". Skip for ad-hoc HTML snippets (forms, emails, embedded widgets) where there's no template fit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The spec-to-plan bridge. /feature supplies an approved spec; initial full-lane HTML sprint review may supply a ready draft only through draft_for_pair. Creates the same-format plan with exact paths, tests, dependencies and complete criterion coverage. The initial paired review has no execution authority until one real user reply approves both artifacts. Ordinary sequential planning retains approved-source binding and plan approval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage git worktrees across any repository with the `gwm` Rust binary (CLI + ratatui TUI). Use when the user asks to create / list / remove / bootstrap / switch / link worktrees, run a command across worktrees (`gwm exec`) or reclaim build artifacts (`gwm clean`), materialise a PR into a worktree (`gwm review`), drive a multi-repo workspace (`--workspace`), run the JSON daemon / statusline (`gwm daemon`, `gwm statusline`), list or pin AI-agent sessions per worktree (`gwm agents`, Claude Code / Codex / opencode / Mistral Vibe detection), seed config from a preset (`gwm init --preset`), diagnose with `gwm doctor`, drive tmux/zellij, or wire `gcd` via `gwm shell-init`. Also covers multi-forge (#419): GitHub via `gh` **or** GitLab via `glab`, the `forge` / `[forge_hosts]` keys, and `gwm trust add`. Triggers on `gwm`, `gwq`, `git worktree`, `.gwm.toml`, `forge`, `forge_hosts`, `glab`, `gwm trust add`, GitLab MR, `gwm create`, `gwm list`, `gwm exec`, `gwm clean`, `gwm review`, `gwm daemon`, `gwm statusline`, `gwm agents`, `gwm note`, `gwm bootstrap`, `gwm doctor`, `gwm switch`, `gwm tmux`, `gwm zellij`, `gwm link`, `gwm status`, `gwm shell-init`, `gcd`, `feat/#`, `fix/#`, GitHub issue/PR linking on a worktree.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when running or explaining the ClawScan CLI, including one-off agent-skill scans, benchmark runs, scanner fixtures, judge harness commands, env var validation, and interpreting clawscan-run-v1 and clawscan-benchmark-v1 artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help the user understand the current topic visually with concise diagrams, code-shape sketches, and focused HTML artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create stakeholder alignment artifacts including responsibility matrices, decision frameworks, and communication plans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Translate existing blog posts into one or more target languages with SEO-optimized localization. Produces native-quality translations that preserve markdown structure, frontmatter, schema JSON-LD, image and chart embeds, and citation capsules. Localizes keywords, meta tags, numbers, dates, currencies, and quote styles per locale. Flags machine-translation artifacts for review. Run BEFORE blog-localize: this handles language conversion; localize handles cultural adaptation after translation completes. Use when user says "translate blog", "blog translate", "uebersetzen", "traduire", "traducir", "translate post", "blog auf Deutsch", "blog en espanol".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repurpose existing content into a native X (Twitter) post or thread. Take a LinkedIn post, blog, YouTube script, or newsletter and rewrite it for X: re-hook for the no-fold first line, refit to 280 chars or a thread, strip off-platform artifacts, run the humanizer, publish via Publora on approval. Not for writing from scratch (use x-post-writer or x-thread-builder), not for auditing a draft (use x-humanizer --mode audit).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repository quality gates for Rust and generated artifacts. Use when validating changes locally or before committing Rust, schema, or documentation updates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run outcome-focused Firecrawl workflows that produce deliverables such as research reports, literature reviews over published papers, SEO audits, QA reports, lead lists, knowledge bases, website design systems, and other structured web-data artifacts. Use when the user wants Firecrawl to complete a business, marketing, product, or creative workflow rather than merely scrape a page or integrate API calls into code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code for quality, correctness, and fit. Use when the user wants judgment on code that already exists — their own changes, a teammate's patch, a PR, branch, commit, diff, staged changes, or one or more files to look over. Activate on requests like review, look over, sanity check, critique, code review, or 'is this good?' The key signal is that the user wants evaluation of existing code and its tradeoffs, not implementation, debugging, or explanation. This skill works independently, but when plans, specs, task artifacts, or prior discussion exist, use them to understand why the code exists before judging it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to save knowledge as a file so others don't have to rediscover it — "turn this into a doc", "write this up", "document how X works", "we figured this out and want to capture it", "nobody should have to figure this out again". Covers any request to create or update durable written artifacts: onboarding guides, runbooks, ADRs, API docs, architecture notes, postmortems, changelogs, setup guides. The trigger: user wants knowledge captured in a file for future reference, not just a conversation. Do NOT use when still making decisions (→ give-plan), just asking for explanation without a file (→ ask), or writing code (→ cook).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase A of a WinForms-to-Avalonia migration: inventory the legacy application, split responsibilities, capture command and state contracts, build a coverage matrix, and define acceptance evidence without implementing Avalonia UI. Use only in an explicit WinForms-to- Avalonia migration when behavior is undocumented or the orchestrator routes here. Generated artifacts must use the current repository's real paths, terminology, and capabilities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify implementation matches change artifacts. Use when the user wants to validate that implementation is complete, correct, and coherent before archiving.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fast-forward through OpenSpec artifact creation. Use when the user wants to quickly create all artifacts needed for implementation without stepping through each one individually.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。