Use for authorized wireless security assessment including Wi-Fi capture, WPA handshake analysis, rogue AP detection research, and lab-only deauth testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
1,379 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use for authorized wireless security assessment including Wi-Fi capture, WPA handshake analysis, rogue AP detection research, and lab-only deauth testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for authorized database security assessment covering PostgreSQL/MySQL/MSSQL/Mongo/Redis exposure, authz, UDF/command paths, and misconfiguration review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for authorized assessment of federated identity systems including SAML, OIDC, OAuth2 flows, SSO misconfiguration, and token confusion issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for authorized OT/ICS security assessment covering Purdue model zoning, PLC/SCADA exposure, industrial protocol discovery, and safe passive-first evaluation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for software supply-chain security assessment covering SBOM, SCA, CI/CD pipelines, container images, build integrity, dependency provenance, and vulnerability reachability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for authorized cloud, container, and Kubernetes security assessment including metadata SSRF, IAM misconfig, container escape paths, and cluster RBAC review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks for a visual or UI quality review of frontend code that already shipped, or passes a phase number. Produces {phase_num}-UI-REVIEW.md with a graded 1-4 assessment across six pillars.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for authorized security assessment of REST, GraphQL, WebSocket, or SOAP APIs, including discovery, authentication, authorization, rate-limit, and CI/CD testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Your education and edtech brain trust. 25 named personas across 7 cells covering learning science, curriculum design, AI tutoring, higher-ed strategy, edtech platforms, assessment, and workforce development.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
NIST SP 800-61r3-aligned incident triage that preserves evidence, separates analysis from authorization, and records status. Use for incident intake, severity assessment, containment readiness, or evidence preservation; not generic debugging or unscoped response.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
PTES-aligned penetration testing methodology for backend, frontend, and mobile. Provides attack taxonomy, exploit techniques per vulnerability class, and platform-specific test matrices. Use when executing pentest workflow, planning security assessments, mapping attack surfaces, or building threat models.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts bounded cybersecurity engagement plans with objectives, scope, exclusions, roles, authorization, runtime controls, evidence, stop criteria, and restart gates. Use when preparing an exercise or assessment plan before execution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adapts an existing K-12 lesson (math, ELA, science, or social studies) for students at different proficiency levels (below / at / above grade level). Load this skill BEFORE asking the teacher any clarifying question about the lesson, tiers, or student levels. Triggers on explicit asks to differentiate, tier, or scaffold a lesson, and on implicit signals like "my students are at different levels". Produces 1 teacher-facing differentiation plan + 3 student-ready tier documents as editable, printable documents in a single output turn (shared content is written once, so tiers cannot drift). Uses the Learning Commons Knowledge Graph when connected; works without it. This skill adapts a lesson the teacher brings or names. Not for creating a new lesson from scratch — a new-lesson request that asks for differentiated or leveled materials is k12-lesson-plan-creation's job, one package. Not for grading, rubrics, assessment feedback, or quizzes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Helps a teacher prepare to teach an existing K-12 lesson (math / ELA / science / social studies) — a prep partner that thinks through the lesson's key student task with the teacher and leaves a short teacher-only prep note. Triggers on asks to internalize, prepare for, get ready to teach, or understand a lesson, including implicit ones ("help me get ready for tomorrow's lesson"), and right after another skill built a lesson, which it can follow. Not for building or adapting a lesson, grading, rubrics, assessment feedback, or generating quizzes or student-facing material, and not for single-fact lookups a sentence would answer ("what standard is this?", "how long is this lesson?").
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates a lesson plan, student-facing materials, and observation template. Load this skill BEFORE asking the teacher any clarifying question about grade, subject, topic, standard, or timing. Use when a K-12 teacher needs a math, ELA, science, or social studies lesson built from scratch — even if grade, subject, or topic isn't yet stated. Do NOT load for grading, a rubric, assessment feedback, a quiz, or a standards lookup — answer those directly. Triggers on explicit requests (lesson plan, mini-lesson, unit plan, daily plan) and implicit teacher intent: "I'm teaching long division to 5th graders," "need to teach photosynthesis tomorrow." Core signal: teacher needs new instructional content created. A new lesson that asks for differentiated, tiered, or leveled materials is still ONE planning request — this skill produces those materials inside the lesson package; do not also invoke k12-lesson-differentiation. Not for differentiating an existing lesson (use k12-lesson-differentiation) or passage rewrites.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Code comment accuracy verification, documentation completeness assessment, comment rot detection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Product Requirements Document writing - PRD templates, MoSCoW prioritization, user personas, competitive analysis, feature specs, acceptance criteria, risk assessment
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits existing tests in any language using formal, research-backed test smell names and the testsmells.org 19-smell academic taxonomy. Use when the caller asks for an academic or citable test-smell review, named smell categories, or a formal severity-ranked smell assessment. Covers Assertion Roulette, Conditional Test Logic, Mystery Guest, Eager Test, Sleepy Test, Unknown Test, Sensitive Equality, and the rest of the catalog across .NET, Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, Java, Go, Ruby, Rust, Swift, Kotlin, PowerShell, and C++. DO NOT USE FOR a quick pragmatic test review (use test-anti-patterns), writing or running tests, framework migration, coverage, or assertion-diversity metrics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive data quality assessment against business rules, schema constraints, and freshness expectations. Activate when validating data pipeline outputs before production use, auditing a dataset against defined business rules, or producing a quality scorecard for a data asset.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
LLM and AI application security testing — prompt injection, jailbreak resistance, OWASP LLM Top 10 (2025), RAG and agent/tool-use security, model supply chain, and AI red teaming for authorized assessments
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SSL/TLS auditing, cipher suite analysis, hash algorithm identification, encryption implementation review, and cryptographic weakness detection in code
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Android and iOS application security testing — static and dynamic analysis, APK/IPA inspection, OWASP MASVS/MASTG verification, secure-storage and transport review, and mobile malware triage for authorized assessments
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Passive and active reconnaissance, subdomain enumeration, DNS analysis, technology fingerprinting, and OSINT data correlation for authorized security assessments
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AWS/Azure/GCP security auditing, container and Kubernetes hardening, Infrastructure as Code scanning, and cloud compliance assessment
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。