「code quality」の検索結果

Convert SVG files to high-quality PNG images with precise control over dimensions, background color, and CSS rendering (including mix-blend-mode, filters, gradients). Use this skill when the user wants to: (1) convert SVG to PNG, (2) generate app icons or splash screens from SVG source, (3) batch-generate multiple PNG sizes from a single SVG, (4) render SVG with advanced CSS features like mix-blend-mode or filters to PNG. Triggers: "SVG to PNG", "SVG変換", "PNG変換", "アイコン生成", "スプラッシュ生成", "app icon from SVG", "favicon generation", "splash screen generation".

App Store / Google Play 用のプロモーションスクリーンショットを Pencil (.pen) で生成する Agent Team スキル。creative-director が戦略を立て、screenshot-designer が Pencil で デザインを構築し、copy-writer がコピーを提供し、spec-validator が技術仕様を数値検証し、 quality-reviewer が最終品質を確認する。5エージェント体制で高品質なスクリーンショットを生成。 Use when: App Store スクリーンショットを作りたい、プロモーション画像を作成したい、 スクショのデザインをしたい。 Triggers: "スクリーンショット作成", "App Store 画像", "プロモーションスクショ", "screenshot creator", "スクショ作って", "App Store 素材"

Analyze pre-trained generative diffusion models (Stable Diffusion, DALL-E, Flux) by computing quality metrics (FID, IS, CLIP score, precision/recall), inspecting noise schedules, extracting and visualizing attention maps, and probing latent spaces. Use when evaluating a pre-trained generative diffusion model's output quality, comparing noise schedule variants, analyzing cross-attention patterns for text-conditioned generation, interpolating between latent codes, or detecting out-of-distribution inputs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shared conventions for every SDLC development-phase architect agent: hard rules, code quality bar, workflow steps (superpowers invocation, spec reading, codebase exploration, verification), and the report/compact-summary contract. Architects load this skill first, then apply their stack-specific instructions on top.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a PR for correctness, security, code quality, and testing issues. TRIGGER when user asks to review a PR, check PR quality, or give feedback on a PR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify completed implementation against the plan. Checks that all tasks were implemented, nothing was forgotten, code compiles, tests pass, and quality standards are met. Use after "$aif-implement" completes, or when user says "verify", "check work", "did we miss anything".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a strict multi-iteration Reflex Loop with phases (PLAN, PRODUCE||PREPARE, EVALUATE, CRITIQUE, REFINE) to improve an artifact until quality gates pass or iteration limits are reached. Use when user asks for iterative refinement, quality-gated generation, or "generate -> critique -> refine" loops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-angle code and plan review with security, scope, and UI profiles. Use when reviewing code, plans, PRs, or running pre-merge quality gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refactoring pipeline: analyzes a target file or directory for code quality issues, plans safe incremental improvements, optionally writes tests first as a safety net, implements the changes, and reviews the result. Orchestrates refactor-planner → (test-writer) → parallel-task-orchestrator → code-reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code for quality, simplicity, and common mistakes before declaring work complete.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews pull requests for overall quality before merging. Combines code quality and security checks at PR level. Use when performing pre-merge review in Operations Phase.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review Playwright tests for quality. Use when user says "review tests", "check test quality", "audit tests", "improve tests", "test code review", or "playwright best practices check".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code for quality, security, and performance with comprehensive feedback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct structured root cause analysis using Ishikawa (Fishbone), 5 Whys, and Pareto methods. Suitable for production incidents, quality defects, customer complaints, and recurring operational problems. Use when problems recur or when initial fixes do not resolve the issue. Do not use for one-time, obvious fixes or strategic decision-making.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate and tier suppliers using a weighted scorecard per SCOR DS Supplier Management practices. Score Quality, Delivery, Cost, Responsiveness, and Sustainability. Classify suppliers as Strategic, Preferred, Approved, or Conditional. Use during vendor reviews or procurement decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for creating distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces. Covers visual design systems, typography, color, motion, spatial composition, and web interface standards. Use when designing UI, establishing design systems, or reviewing visual quality of frontend code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-agent management workflow — task delegation, progress monitoring, quality verification with regression testing, feedback delivery, and cross-review orchestration. Use this skill when coordinating multiple agents on a shared task, monitoring delegated work, ensuring quality across agent outputs, or implementing a multi-phase plan (3+ phases or 10+ file changes).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build evaluation frameworks for LLM systems — harness design, graders, datasets, regression tracking, and human-in-the-loop eval. Use when you need systematic measurement of model or agent quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Distill large models into smaller ones — teacher-student training, data generation, loss design, and quality validation. Use when you need big-model behavior at small-model cost.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design annotation pipelines that produce reliable training labels — guidelines, agreement measurement, and quality control.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Split documents for retrieval effectively — fixed, semantic, structural, and hierarchical chunking with overlap tuning. Use when RAG retrieval quality depends on how documents are divided.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate UI with AI tools effectively: prompt structure, design-system grounding, iteration technique, and evaluating output quality. Use when using AI to create interfaces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates EditMode and PlayMode tests using NUnit, mapped from GDD Gherkin scenarios. Use when writing tests, validating features, ensuring code quality, or verifying behavior after changes. Triggers on requests like "write tests for this", "test the health system", "add unit tests", "verify this works", "add PlayMode tests", "test this feature", "write integration tests", "make sure this doesn't break", "add test coverage", "TDD this feature", or any task involving test creation, test-driven development, or quality assurance. Maps Given/When/Then scenarios directly to test methods using NUnit assertions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs an architectural and quality code review on a specified file or set of files. Checks for coding standard compliance, architectural pattern adherence, SOLID principles, testability, and performance concerns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。