「compliance」の検索結果

Audit websites for Google AdSense application readiness and ad-serving compliance. Use when checking whether a site is likely to satisfy AdSense eligibility, site ownership, content quality, navigation, crawler access, ads.txt, privacy disclosure, Google Publisher Policies, AdSense Program policies, or when the user asks if a site can apply for AdSense, pass AdSense review, show ads, or fix AdSense rejection/site-not-ready issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "perform vulnerability scanning", "scan networks for open ports", "assess web application security", "scan wireless networks", "detect malware", "check cloud security", or "evaluate system compliance". It provides comprehensive guidance on security scanning tools and methodologies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive system flow tracing across CODE, API, AUTH, DATA, NETWORK layers with SQLite persistence and Mermaid export. Use for security audits, compliance documentation, flow tracing, feature ideation, brainstorming, debugging, architecture reviews, or incident post-mortems. Triggers on audit, trace flow, document flow, security review, debug flow, brainstorm, architecture review, post-mortem, incident review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Redistricting analysis in R using the redistverse ecosystem. Use whenever the user is working with redist, redistmetrics, ggredist, geomander, adj, alarmdata, PL94171, censable, easycensus, tinytiger, baf, rict, or redistio. Covers the complete pipeline: Census and spatial data loading, adjacency graph construction, SMC/MCMC simulation, constraints (population balance, county splits, VRA compliance), convergence diagnostics, plan metrics (compactness, partisan fairness, splits), visualization, summary tables, and interactive plan drawing. Invoke whenever the user mentions redistricting, gerrymandering, district plans, simulation ensembles, or any redistverse package by name.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write competitive research proposals for NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA, and Taiwan NSTC. Agency-specific formatting, review criteria, budget preparation, broader impacts, significance statements, innovation narratives, and compliance with submission requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write competitive research proposals for NSF, NIH, DOE, and DARPA. Agency-specific formatting, review criteria, budget preparation, broader impacts, significance statements, innovation narratives, and compliance with submission requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementing, integrating, upgrading, debugging, or answering anything involving third-party APIs, libraries, frameworks, CLIs, cloud services, model/provider SDKs, fast-moving product behavior, user requests for latest/current/official behavior, unfamiliar repo docs/specs, errors that may indicate API drift, or high-stakes auth, security, billing, data, migration, deployment, compliance, or privacy behavior. Forces Codex to web-search for current official docs and read primary docs before assuming from memory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OWASP compliance, vulnerability scanning, and adversarial red team testing — use for security reviews

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Swift Concurrency review and remediation for Swift 6.2+. Use when asked to review Swift Concurrency usage, improve concurrency compliance, or fix Swift concurrency compiler errors in a feature or file. Concrete actions include adding Sendable conformance, applying @MainActor annotations, resolving actor isolation warnings, fixing data race diagnostics, and migrating completion handlers to async/await.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate changesets in openai-agents-js using LLM judgment against git diffs (including uncommitted local changes). Use when packages/ or .changeset/ are modified, or when verifying PR changeset compliance and bump level.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when preparing manuscripts, conference papers, or academic posters that need venue-specific templates, LaTeX style files, author guidelines, page limits, anonymity rules, camera-ready formatting, or submission compliance checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate concise (3-4 page), focused medical treatment plans in LaTeX/PDF format for all clinical specialties. Supports general medical treatment, rehabilitation therapy, mental health care, chronic disease management, perioperative care, and pain management. Includes SMART goal frameworks, evidence-based interventions with minimal text citations, regulatory compliance (HIPAA), and professional formatting. Prioritizes brevity and clinical actionability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write competitive research proposals for NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA, and Taiwan NSTC. Agency-specific formatting, review criteria, budget preparation, broader impacts, significance statements, innovation narratives, and compliance with submission requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review documentation changes for compliance with the Metabase writing style guide. Use when reviewing pull requests, files, or diffs containing documentation markdown files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write comprehensive clinical reports including case reports (CARE guidelines), diagnostic reports (radiology/pathology/lab), clinical trial reports (ICH-E3, SAE, CSR), and patient documentation (SOAP, H&P, discharge summaries). Full support with templates, regulatory compliance (HIPAA, FDA, ICH-GCP), and validation tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate professional clinical decision support (CDS) documents for pharmaceutical and clinical research settings, including patient cohort analyses (biomarker-stratified with outcomes) and treatment recommendation reports (evidence-based guidelines with decision algorithms). Supports GRADE evidence grading, statistical analysis (hazard ratios, survival curves, waterfall plots), biomarker integration, and regulatory compliance. Outputs publication-ready LaTeX/PDF format optimized for drug development, clinical research, and evidence synthesis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

发布前质量关卡：合规风险检测（敏感词、绝对化用语、平台规则） + 产物质量审核（完整性、可读性、平台适配度）。一次检查，两道把关。 当用户说"检查合规"、"质量检查"、"能不能发"、"有没有敏感词"、 "审核一下"、"发布前检查"、"质量够不够"时使用。 合并了原 skill-check-compliance 和 skill-review-deliverable 的能力。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Data-backed email marketing skill for AI agents. Use when building or running email automation, driving an ESP from an agent (MCP/connectors), diagnosing deliverability, writing or de-slopping email copy, directing AI email design, choosing a platform, or pulling benchmarks. Covers flows, segmentation, compliance, cold email, WhatsApp, SMS and RCS, and 19 industry playbooks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when building, deploying, evaluating, debugging, or measuring latency for the DeepStream SOP Inference Microservice — a GPU-accelerated FastAPI service that detects whether operators perform assembly-line steps in order via event boundary detection (GEBD) plus VLM classification. Trigger even if the user does not name it: verify operator step sequence, detect missing or out-of-order SOP steps, score factory/work-cell video for procedure compliance, run VLM-based SOP checking on industrial cameras, or call /v1/chat/completions with a file, RTSP, or Basler camera. Also trigger for its internals: SOPVideoProcessor, DeepStream GEBD model (e.g. DDM) via Triton CAPI, nvds_custom_postprocess, Cosmos Reason 1/2 vLLM, SSE streaming, Kafka NvProto/JSON output, Basler/Pylon camera + emulation, Docker compose, chunk-level latency. Do NOT trigger for generic DeepStream pipelines, object detection/tracking, NIM imports, or video summarization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Combined verification — recite (description quality via cold-read prediction) + validate (schema compliance) + review (health checks). Use as a quality gate after creating notes or as periodic maintenance. Triggers on "/verify", "/verify [note]", "verify note quality", "check note health".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run condition-based vault health diagnostics. 8 categories — schema compliance, orphan detection, link health, description quality, three-space boundaries, processing throughput, stale notes, MOC coherence. 3 modes — quick (schema+orphans+links), full (all 8), three-space (boundary violations only). Returns actionable FAIL/WARN/PASS report with specific fixes ranked by impact. Triggers on "/health", "check vault health", "maintenance report", "what needs fixing".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create text-driven visuals in Markdown: charts, diagrams, cards, architecture and page layouts. Charts and analytical views (bar, line, pie, heatmap, correlation, regression); reliability and operations (latency, incident, throughput, cycle time, OKR, standup, on-call); product and finance (funnel, retention, revenue, budget); process and workflow (approval, BPMN); software design and behaviour (class, state machine, sequence, C4); dependencies and impact (dependency graph, ER, causality); system architecture as HTML (layer stack, wings, zones, topology, service catalogue, request paths); infrastructure (cloud, Kubernetes, ETL, network, security, IAM, compliance); governance and people (ArchiMate, org chart, hiring); knowledge and planning (mind map, roadmap, Gantt, migration); documents (comparison, SWOT, memo, policy, catalogue, case study). Use when a document needs a diagram, chart or card. Figures render live. Not for slide decks or math notation. Not recommended: mermaid / canvas / drawio / dot.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。