1,329 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Design critique with 7 rated passes: Information Architecture, Interaction State Coverage, User Journey and Emotional Arc, AI Slop Risk (10-item blacklist), Design System Alignment, Responsive and Accessibility, Unresolved Decisions. Each rated 0-10 with gap-fill loop. Parallel cross-model design voices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Eng manager-mode plan review. Scope challenge, architecture review, code quality review, detailed test coverage diagram, performance review. Produces test plan artifact for downstream QA. Optional cross-model outside voice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fully automated ship workflow: pre-flight, merge base, run tests, coverage audit, pre-landing review, design review, adversarial review, version bump, CHANGELOG generation, TODOS.md update, bisectable commits, push and PR creation, auto-sync docs via document-release.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates test files, creates mocking strategies, analyzes code coverage, designs test architectures, and produces test plans across functional, performance, and security testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-pass code review orchestration with parallel reviewers for quality, security, performance, and test coverage
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-agent source security audit with a coverage ledger, independently verified findings, and machine-checked records. Use when asked to audit a codebase, find vulnerabilities, or run a source-level pen test.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic PR review with blast-radius analysis, security scanning, and breaking-change and test-coverage deltas. Use when reviewing PRs that touch shared libraries, APIs, database schemas, auth, or security-sensitive code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Testing for React/Next.js with Jest, React Testing Library, and Playwright. Use when generating tests, writing unit tests, analyzing coverage, scaffolding E2E tests, configuring Jest, or improving test quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cloud posture security across AWS, Azure, and GCP — IAM least privilege, public exposure, encryption, logging coverage, landing-zone guardrails. Use when auditing a cloud account, before a production launch, or after a scan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate API test suites from route definitions across frameworks: auth, input validation, contract, k6 load testing, mocking, and OpenAPI-driven generation. Use when adding new APIs, auditing test coverage, or building regression suites.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes pipeline coverage, tracks forecast accuracy with MAPE, and calculates GTM efficiency metrics for SaaS revenue optimization
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes RFP responses for coverage gaps, builds competitive feature matrices, and plans proof-of-concept engagements for pre-sales engineering
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement Terraform Provider resources and data sources using the Plugin Framework: CRUD operations, schema design, plan modifiers and validators, not-found handling, waiters for eventually consistent APIs, import support, resource design principles, and required acceptance test coverage. Use when adding or changing a resource or data source, deciding whether an API concept should be a resource, wiring a resource to the provider's configured client, handling drift or resource-not-found, or reviewing a resource implementation before submission.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive Test Driven Development guide for engineering subagents with multi-framework support, coverage analysis, and intelligent test generation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user needs to design evaluation datasets, create test cases, stratify samples, generate adversarial examples, extract eval dimensions from traces/specs, or build a labeled evaluation set. Also use when the user mentions test data design, eval coverage, difficulty stratification, synthetic data generation for eval, or "how to create good evaluation data." Outputs datasets in OpenJudge-compatible format.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verifies UK case-law citations, pinpoint references and quotations against the official public register — The National Archives' Find Case Law — and statutory references against legislation.gov.uk, before a document that cites them is relied on, served or filed. Every check returns a graded verdict: VERIFIED, MISMATCH (the citation resolves to a different case — the classic AI miscitation), NOT ON REGISTER, OUTSIDE COVERAGE (the register cannot answer — absence proves nothing), or UNCHECKABLE (a law-report citation). The grading exists because there are two ways to get this wrong: citing a case that does not exist, and accusing a real case of not existing. Use when asked to check citations, verify a case exists, confirm a quotation is verbatim, check a pinpoint paragraph, audit a draft's authorities, screen a document for hallucinated cases, or check a statutory provision is in force. Not a substitute for reading the judgment: existence is not authority.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Panel structure design, firm selection criteria, right-sourcing analysis, and coverage gap assessment for in-house legal teams. Build panel frameworks from scratch or formalise existing informal arrangements. Define weighted selection criteria for firm evaluation. Run right-sourcing analysis (ABC tiering) to identify work sent to expensive providers that doesn't require that level of resource. Assess existing panels for practice area, geographic, and capability gaps. Trigger on: 'design our panel', 'how many firms do we need', 'panel structure', 'firm selection criteria', 'which firms should we use', 'right-sourcing', 'are we sending work to the right firms', 'panel gaps', 'too many firms', 'consolidate our panel', 'we need a firm for', 'preferred provider', 'panel tiers', 'do we need BigLaw for this', 'convergence', 'D&I panel targets', 'how do we choose firms'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate a spreadsheet of test entries — newly designated names from OFAC, OFSI, and EU sanctions lists plus deliberate variations of those names — to validate that a sanctions screening system catches fresh designations and is tuned to the right fuzziness threshold. Use this whenever the user asks for sanctions list update test data, screening regression test data, screening QA, fuzzy match calibration, or wants to verify their screening lists are current. Trigger even if the user doesn't say 'screening' explicitly — phrases like 'test my sanctions list', 'check our SDN coverage', 'is my list up to date', or 'build me a regression set from the latest designations' should also invoke this skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
NIS2 Compliance Navigator — scope classification, Art. 21 gap analysis (0-4 maturity scoring), and compliance roadmap under EU Directive 2022/2555 with deep German BSIG-neu coverage and profiles for Italy, France, Netherlands, Austria, Spain. Use when: (1) User mentions "NIS2", "NIS-2", "BSIG", "BSIG-neu", "NIS2UmsuCG", "Cyberbeveiligingswet", "Loi Résilience", "NISG", "decreto legislativo 138", (2) User asks if their organization falls under NIS2 or needs a cybersecurity compliance assessment, (3) User mentions essential/important entities, Annex I/II, BSI registration, § 30 BSIG, incident reporting, management body liability, supply chain security, (4) User wants a NIS2 gap analysis, readiness assessment, or compliance roadmap, (5) User asks about NIS2 fines, enforcement, or Nachweispflicht, (6) User asks about NIS2 in any EU Member State.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes how multiple regulations interact for a specific product, service, or business model. Identifies where obligations overlap, reinforce, complement, duplicate, or conflict; builds a priority matrix; produces an integrated compliance timeline; and estimates the total compliance burden. Use when (1) scoping a new product or service against the full regulatory landscape before launch, (2) conducting M&A due diligence on a target's multi-regulation exposure, (3) building a strategic compliance roadmap where single-regulation analyses miss the interactions, (4) advising on complex situations where regulations touch the same conduct from different angles, or (5) estimating budget and resourcing for multi-regulation compliance. Primary coverage of EU digital regulation (GDPR, Data Act, AI Act, CRA, NIS2, DORA, DMA, DSA, ePrivacy) and national implementations; the framework extends to any jurisdiction where overlapping regulatory regimes apply to the same activity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review, draft, or redline a Data Processing Agreement (DPA / Auftragsverarbeitungsvertrag / AVV) under Art. 28 GDPR, or prepare a Joint Controller Arrangement under Art. 26 GDPR. Supports bilingual output (DE/EN), both controller- and processor-side perspectives, and two review depths — quick (Art. 28(3)(a)–(h) coverage) and negotiation-grade (clause-by-clause risk scoring).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Gary Vaynerchuk's jab-jab-jab-right-hook framework applied to a personal portfolio rotation on X and LinkedIn. Jabs = build-in-public + educational (value). Hooks = promo (the ask). Each property in the user's configured portfolio (see `~/.config/makerskills/jab-hook/properties.yaml`) gets a hook at least once every ~3 weeks; jabs fill the rest. Drafts go into the user's Typefully workspace via MCP. Modes — plan (7-day plan), pick-next (single post), audit (coverage report), draft (specific post). Triggers on "/jab-hook," "what should I post," "plan my socials," "next promo," "next jab," "next hook," "social rotation," "promote [property]," "BIP post," "audit my socials," "what haven't I posted about."
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compares two or more band-tagged frameworks and produces a framework-neutral topic matrix showing coverage and gaps across all inputs, plus an optional reference-centric PLC crosswalk document when a reference framework is supplied.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pre-earnings analysis for A-share stocks. Builds scenario frameworks (actual vs consensus, beat/miss cases), identifies key metrics to watch, and prepares positioning notes before Chinese companies report quarterly results. Use instead of the original earnings-preview skill for A-share coverage. Triggers on "A股财报前瞻", "季报前瞻", "业绩前瞻", "earnings preview", "what to watch for [company] earnings", or "pre-earnings setup".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。