「did」の検索結果

Show autopilot status: health, auto-corrections, guardrails, escalations. "what did the autopilot change"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to figure out which marketing actually drives conversions and revenue, choose or interpret an attribution model, or reconcile conflicting numbers across tools. Also use when the user mentions "attribution," "attribution model," "first-touch vs last-touch," "multi-touch," "which channel drives revenue," "what's my real CAC," "my dashboards disagree," "Google/Meta says X but GA says Y," "media mix model," "MMM," "incrementality," "geo lift," "holdout test," "how did you hear about us," "self-reported attribution," "dark social," or wants to instrument attribution themselves — "stitch my bookings to their source," "SavvyCal/Calendly attribution," "close the identify gap," "track conversions on a third-party domain," "first-party / self-hosted attribution." For event tracking setup and UTMs, see analytics. For ad-platform pixels/CAPI, see ads. For pipeline and CRM revenue reporting, see revops. For the AI-search attribution blind spot, see ai-seo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verification-first methodology for the UNMIK Regulation 64 Panels of the Kosovo district courts (2000–2008). Citations are verified against UNMIK/EULEX archives and legal-tools.org. Keeps the Reg. 64 Panels distinct from the Kosovo Specialist Chambers, and clarifies that Reg. 2000/64 permitted (did not impose) internationally-majority panels. Research aid, not legal advice. Part of the open-source "Skills for International Justice" library — methodology: github.com/jeannesulzer/international-criminal-tribunals-skills

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Screen a client, counterparty, payer or corporate against the sanctions lists published by the designating authorities themselves — the UK Sanctions List (FCDO), OFSI, the UN Security Council, the EU consolidated list and OFAC's SDN and non-SDN lists. Use when onboarding, before taking a payment, before completing a transaction, or whenever a name must be checked against sanctions. Produces candidates and provenance, never a clearance: the record names every list searched with its publication date and count, states what was NOT searched, and ends at a blank decision block. Fails closed — a cache that is missing, damaged, truncated or stale is reported NOT SEARCHED and the process exits non-zero, so nothing can read an incomplete run as clean. Matches across transliteration, diacritics, homoglyphs and initials, because nobody spells a name the way the publisher does. Standard library only; screening opens no network connection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adjudicates whether a hit generated by sanctions, PEP, or adverse-media screening is a true positive, false positive, or requires human escalation. Use whenever a user presents a screening alert, a name match against a watchlist (OFAC SDN, EU consolidated list, UK OFSI, UN list, PEP list, adverse media hit, etc.), or asks to clear a screening hit / reduce false positives / determine whether a flagged name is actually the listed party. Use even when the user describes the task casually — "is this person actually on the sanctions list", "did we get a real match", "clear this alert", "I have a hit on X" — these are all screening-adjudication tasks. Produces a deterministic determination with full audit trail (structured JSON + human-readable narrative). Designed for use by compliance analysts and screening systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Helps a lawyer build and use a personalized Legal Guidance Vault — a local folder of structured, privilege-marked entries capturing legal guidance they've given, searchable later by topic, person, or product. Use this skill when the user says "set up my vault," "archive this meeting/email/thread/doc," "log the guidance I gave on [topic]," "save my notes from [meeting]," "what did I say about [topic]," "find the time I advised [person] on [topic]," or "search my vault for [topic]." Runs a setup interview to learn the user's tool stack (meeting notes, calendar, email, docs, messaging, vault location), then generates a customized vault prompt they can reuse in any future Claude session to start archiving and retrieving guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture, structure, and recycle lessons from active and closed legal matters. Three modes: in-flight capture (triggered by scope changes, risk events, status updates — highest value), mid-matter review (phase gates or quarterly), and matter close retrospective (full structured findings). Lessons are formatted for immediate reuse, not filed and forgotten. Use when a risk materialises, a scope change lands, a phase completes, or a matter closes and you want to convert what happened into something useful for the next matter. Trigger on: 'capture a lesson', 'what did we learn', 'matter close', 'retrospective', 'lessons learned', 'what went wrong', 'what worked', 'phase gate review', 'debrief', 'extract the learning', 'close the matter', 'what should we do differently', 'pattern from this matter', 'improve the next one'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces detailed law-school case briefs of United States judicial opinions in a fixed nine-section structure: memory jogger, facts, procedural history, judicial votes, holding, opinion-by-opinion analysis, five future-application hypotheticals, critique, and verified key quotations. Also builds vote tables, cross-case consistency tables, perspective-based critiques, and LaTeX in article, Beamer and casebook-chapter formats. Use whenever someone asks to brief a case, analyse or explain an opinion, summarise a decision for students, generate hypotheticals from a holding, critique a judgment, tabulate how justices voted, or convert case analysis to LaTeX. Triggers on "brief this case", "case brief", "explain the holding", "what did the court hold", "hypotheticals based on", "critique this opinion", "vote table", "Beamer presentation", "chapter brief", and on any reference to a judicial opinion or Supreme Court decision in a teaching context. Requires web search to verify quotations, votes and holdings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a risk-matched whitebox or the approved production game for its target runtime. Turn GAME_DESIGN, and ART_DIRECTION when production begins, into a minimal BUILD_BRIEF and a runnable candidate that can be iterated with replayable evidence. Use for prototype the riskiest design question, implement the approved game design, or turn this design into a running game. 游戏构建执行。先按最大风险做白盒，或在正式生产时把批准后的 GAME_DESIGN 与 ART_DIRECTION 压缩成最小 BUILD_BRIEF，在目标运行环境中实现可运行候选并用可回放证据迭代。用于验证高风险设计问题、构建游戏原型或实现批准方案。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a one-line description of a repetitive task into a reusable, self-guarding slash command. loop-forge diagnoses the task into one of 5 loop shapes (Batch / Pipeline / Refine / Watch / Explore), interviews for the blanks, and auto-injects two safety devices the user didn't know they needed — an independent verifier (maker ≠ checker) and a hardstop (a budget/count/cooldown ceiling) — then previews the result and stamps it as a `/command` they can run forever. Use when the user says "/loop", "/loop-forge", "/make-it-loop", "automate this", "make this repeatable", "turn this into a command", "do this for all 100 items", "do X every time Y happens", "generate several and pick the best", or otherwise wants to capture a recurring task as a reusable slash command instead of re-typing the prompt by hand. Works in any language: it interviews the user and writes the stamped command in the user's own language. Non-goal — it does not schedule unattended runs (launchd/cron) or publish externally on its own; it stamps the reusable command and stops there.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the adversarial verification loop — implement, then hand the change to a fresh checker that did not write it, fix what it finds, and re-dispatch until APPROVE. Use before claiming any behavioural change is done, and on requests like "review loop", "adversarial review", "independent review", "get this verified", "is this actually done", "maker checker", "second pair of eyes on this change". Not for prose, docs or typo edits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Keep the ComfyUI sidebar panel node-pack (comfyui-agent-panel) in step with the orchestrator after comfyui-mcp updates. Use this whenever the orchestrator was just updated (install_comfyui (action:"self_update"), npm i -g comfyui-mcp, a new version in the ENVIRONMENT line), when a panel/bridge command fails in a way that smells like version drift ("panel is too old", a graph_/ui_ command the panel doesn't implement, a feature that works in the docs but not in the sidebar), or when the user asks to update/pin/unpin the panel. It checks the installed panel version against what THIS orchestrator build needs, RESPECTS an explicit version pin (warn-only, never move a pinned user), offers a clear way to unset the pin, runs the sync through the verified install_comfyui(action:'panel') path, and reports the version RE-READ from disk. Never claim a sync that did not happen.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SEO drift monitoring: capture baselines of SEO-critical elements, detect changes, and track regressions over time. Git for SEO — baseline, diff, and track changes to your on-page SEO. Use when user says "SEO drift", "baseline", "track changes", "did anything break", "SEO regression", "compare SEO", "before and after", "monitor SEO changes", or "deployment check".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive the real Course Video Manager web app in a browser and capture proof of what it did. Use to verify a change before opening a PR, to reproduce a reported UI bug, to see what a page actually renders, or to capture a screenshot of app behaviour. Runs on a per-run, writable clone of a local copy of Matt's data by default — click anything that mutates; production is never written to.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SwiftUI's actual mental model — view identity, lifetime, and dependencies (the Demystify canon), state ownership decision rules, Observation's per-property tracking, body-performance discipline, and the main-actor concurrency contract. Use when state resets mysteriously, views re-render too often, animations glitch between branches, choosing @State vs @Bindable vs plain property, or debugging "why did body run."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn an app idea into validated, App-Store-ready name candidates. Use when the user says "name my app", "what should I call it", "app name ideas", "help me name this app", "is this name available", or needs to pick a brandable, ownable name before reserving it in App Store Connect.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A first step in the data analysis of Mass Spectrometry (MS) based proteomics data is to identify peptides and proteins. With this respect the huge number of experimental mass spectra typically have to be assigned to theoretical peptides derived from a sequence database. Search engines are used for this purpose. These tools compare each of the observed spectra to all candidate theoretical spectra derived from the sequence data base and calculate a score for each comparison. The observed spectrum

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improve the agent itself, or audit its recent performance - better skills, prompts, workflows, and config, plus a quality/reliability/memory-hygiene review of what it did and what failed

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build prospect lists where the prospect is already one hop from the client, and write the line that says so. Seven members, each with its own source. Current-customer alumni is the priority member - everyone who ever worked at one of the client's customers or case-study companies and has since moved on. Triggers on "warm intro", "who do we know at that account", "they used to work at our customer", "alumni of our case study company", "shared investor angle", "who is in the same city as our rep", "did they visit our site". Outputs warm_intro_line plus a per-member evidence column.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fetches the most recent usable LinkedIn post from a company page OR a person's profile and stores the post content itself, with an optional AI personalization line on top. Triggers on "what did they post about", "recent LinkedIn post", "social signal", "reference their content", "they posted about X", "what is this person posting", "engage with their content". Outputs social_post_text (the raw post) plus social_post_url and social_post_days_ago; social_post_line only when the operator asks for one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find the exact commit that introduced a bug. Use when something worked before and broke, and you don't know which change did it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

根据候选人简历与岗位要求生成可审计的后台评估、简明的候选人介绍、按岗位重要性排列的简历疑点、12–18 道可直接照读的面试题，以及支持重点标记和本机保存的离线 HTML。用于招聘方准备结构化面试、核验岗位能力和记录回答。不要用于求职者模拟面试、私人背景调查、心理或人格诊断、从敏感属性推断表现，或自动录用、淘汰、排序候选人。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to run a full ad-campaign pipeline on top of Higgsfield Marketing Studio — 'create a campaign', 'build a content plan', 'run the content pipeline', 'generate 100 UGC videos', 'plan and schedule a launch', 'make a batch of ads from my product', or 'how much did this save vs traditional production'. Covers the 5-stage orchestration (Research → Plan → Generate → Publish → Report), the UGC-first 5-format campaign mix (UGC Entertainment, Street Interview, Unboxing, Product Review, ASMR), the even-split allocation math, button-driven onboarding, the per-batch generation gate, and the publish + cost-report tail (satellite). Defers all Marketing Studio API ground-truth (presets, params, hooks, avatars) to higgsfield-marketing-studio.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rank and summarize the user's own WeChat Moments (朋友圈) feed so real life events and genuine information rise above promotion and small talk, weighted by how much the user actually talks to each author. Use when the user says 'summarize my Moments', 'read my 朋友圈', 'what did I miss on Moments', 'rank my Moments', or 'check my WeChat Moments'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。