2,200 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when removing AI-writing tells from deliverable prose — posts, articles, drafts. Triggers on 'make this sound less like AI', 'humanize this draft', 'this reads like ChatGPT wrote it'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Acelere a inferência de LLMs usando especulative decoding, múltiplas cabeças Medusa e técnicas de lookahead decoding. Use ao otimizar velocidade de inferência (aceleração de 1,5-3,6×), reduzir latência em aplicações em tempo real ou fazer deploy de modelos com recursos computacionais limitados. Cobre modelos draft, atenção em árvore, iteração de Jacobi, geração paralela de tokens e estratégias de deploy em produção.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Gmail CLI for searching emails, reading threads, sending messages, managing drafts, and handling labels/attachments. Triggers: Gmail, send email, search email, read email, email thread, email draft, email labels, gmcli.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Documentation] Use to author, audit, amend, or test-spec a business Feature Spec. The single spec skill — modes draft|init|update|audit|amend create/maintain the tech-free 8-section Feature Spec; draft authors a provisional spec from an idea/requirement (no code yet, Evidence: TBD); tests generates Section 8 TC-{FEATURE}-{NNN} test specifications; sync reconciles §8 TCs ↔ executing test code. Per-mode procedure lives in references/{author,tests,sync}.md.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to create, add, convert, publish, or deploy a blog post from a draft, notes, Markdown, outline, or topic. Turns a draft into a complete, SEO/GEO-optimized post wired into the site (template, blog index, sitemap, routing) with QA and deploy. Framework-agnostic — discover the project's own conventions first.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Project-level WeChat article drafting workflow for turning source materials, repo intakes, product notes, screenshots, or existing markdown into a publishable Chinese公众号 draft. Use for writing, rewriting, evidence-gating, title options, platform adaptation, and image planning before optional publishing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Project-level workflow for turning GitHub repositories, URLs, local product materials, or markdown drafts into WeChat Official Account articles and draft-box submissions. Use when the user asks to write, adapt, illustrate, verify, or publish a WeChat/公众号 article, especially from a GitHub repo or existing technical/product material.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants text to sound more human, says writing sounds "too AI" or "too ChatGPT," asks to humanize or rewrite a draft to feel natural, or shares content wanting it to feel authentic and less robotic. Also applies to LinkedIn posts, blog drafts, or emails where the user wants a more genuine voice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft or refine IDD-ready GitHub issues, roadmap issues, and sub-issues before the normal IDD execution loop begins. Use when a request is too large or ambiguous for one reviewable change, when work needs decomposition or dependency encoding, or when the user asks for issue drafting, roadmap planning, or parallelizable task breakdown.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
跟用户对话讨论选题——**默认一次一个**，用户主动给主题或经历，AI 围绕用户的输入深挖、提炼角度、写一份 draft。不是 AI 拿三个开放问题追用户，也不是一次给 5 个候选。触发词："找选题"/"我想做一条 X"/"最近有个想法"/"seed"/"启动种子"。可选 batch 模式：`/cheat-seed --batch 5` 走旧的 brainstorm 5 候选 + 写 5 draft 流程。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SOP for structured documentation lifecycle. Trigger when: - Designing, writing, reviewing, or auditing large-scale documentation structures. - Navigating phases: Audit, Plan, Draft, Review, Verify. - Prompt contains: /doc, doc workflow, audit, draft, review, verify, documentation debt.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
業務委託契約書の下書きを確認後にPDF発行・確定したいとき、ユーザーの明示指示でdraftをcompletedへ遷移したいときに使う。
run-extract-blueprint が生成した章別ブループリントの忠実性を独立 context で評価したいとき、事実/推測区別と粒度と被覆を検証し draft_hash に束縛した PASS/FAIL verdict をローカル品質ゲート (C01 の周回内の受入判定・差し戻し) へ渡したいときに使う。
Draft edits to existing specs (or a new spec if no existing one fits) from the card description
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft or refine the test-cases checklist for this card
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft or refine the project's PRD from the description and conversation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate strategic-consultant-grade meeting minutes from transcripts or notes in Japanese OR English (matching the source language), then run a self-review loop (max 3 iterations) that checks for internal contradictions, action-item omissions, speaker-name errors, and date/day-of-week mistakes before reporting completion. Use this skill whenever the user asks to draft meeting minutes, summarize a transcript, or document a meeting discussion — including Japanese-language transcripts (議事録 / 会議メモ / 文字起こし) and English-language transcripts.
Analyze inbox emails to identify action-required items, prioritize by urgency/importance, classify by topic, and draft contextual replies. Use when triaging unread emails, prioritizing inbox, generating response drafts, or tracking email response status.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compose professional internal emails for coordination tasks like vendor quote requests, task delegation, and follow-up communications. Generates bilingual (JA/EN) email drafts with proper business tone. Use when user needs to draft internal emails for vendor RFQ forwarding, quote compilation requests, status updates, or task delegation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hand a research run over as a file — read `rs_open action=capabilities` for the formats this build writes, choose between `md`, `docx`, a self-contained `html`, the `ris`/`bib`/`enw` library exports and `tex`, pick `draft=watermark` while working or `draft=clean` to hand it over, and read `build/build.json` for what was built from which bytes. Use when a document is finished enough to leave the run, when a citation style or an export has to be chosen, or when a build refuses.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Role-based multi-model strategy. The model catalog lives in a local configuration file instead of the skill text -- roles (thinker/decision-maker, long-running worker, draft generator, reviewer/acceptance, escalation), reasoning effort as an independent axis, mandatory review for draft models, provider switching for independent reviews, budgets, delegation flow, and cost/quality of small workers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compares one policy against one requirement set (standard, regulation, contract schedule or customer requirement) clause by clause and returns a draft gap review: each requirement element, the policy clause that appears to address it, an apparent match state, and every gap as a question with the clause reference on both sides. Never concludes that the policy complies; the owner decides. Use when the user asks to "gap our policy against the standard", "map this policy to the regulation clause by clause", "check the security policy against the customer's contract schedule", "compare our policy with the new edition" or "where does our policy fall short of the requirements". Do not use for mapping a requirement to the operating controls that implement it, use controls-gap-pack instead; for what a regulatory change means for the organisation, use regulatory-change-impact-note. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns sustainability or ESG reports the user provides into a DRAFT question pack for reviewers: every quantitative disclosure as stated with unit, period, boundary and page, year-over-year changes computed only from the stated figures with the arithmetic shown, targets with stated and computed progress, restatements and inconsistencies, gaps and specific questions to the report owner. No assurance, accuracy or conformance verdict. Use when the user asks to "prepare review questions on our sustainability report", "what changed year on year in this ESG report", "check the figures in this report before it goes to the board", "find the gaps in this ESG disclosure" or "build a question pack for the report owner". Do not use for reviewing marketing text against environmental-claim rules, use green-claims-review instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns a schedule extract (milestone list or planning tool export) and the period's status notes into a DRAFT plain-language slip explanation: which milestones and activities slipped and by how many working days, arithmetic shown, why per the notes as verbatim fragments with source and date, what each slip pushes next per the extract, and the decision each slip needs framed as a question with the options the notes propose and the owner the governance documents name, every missing fact marked UNKNOWN. Use when the user asks to "explain the schedule slip", "what slipped this month and why", "write the schedule commentary for the steering pack", "put the delay in plain language for the sponsor" or "what decisions do these slips need". Do not use for the weekly status report, use project-status-tracker instead; for cost variances, use budget-variance-explainer; for one sprint's carry-over, use sprint-review-summary. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。