「evaluate」の検索結果

This skill should be used when the user asks to "design system architecture", "evaluate microservices vs monolith", "create architecture diagrams", "analyze dependencies", "choose a database", "plan for scalability", "make technical decisions", or "review system design". Use for architecture decision records (ADRs), tech stack evaluation, system design reviews, dependency analysis, and generating architecture diagrams in Mermaid, PlantUML, or ASCII format.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits any landing or service page across 48 checks in 10 categories for LLM/AI discoverability, GEO readiness, content clarity, schema markup, internal linking, freshness signals, and technical crawlability. Produces an overall score out of 100, a per-category score out of 100, pass/warn/fail/ manual counts, and a prioritised fix list — all rendered as a standalone HTML report saved to disk. Use when a user provides a URL and asks to audit it, score it, check its GEO readiness, test its AI discoverability, run a landing page audit, or evaluate it for LLM citation potential. Also trigger on phrases like "audit this page", "score this URL", "check GEO for", "is this page AI-ready", "run a GEO audit", "LLM page check", "how would AI read this page", or "landing page score".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to plan, evaluate, or build a free tool for marketing purposes — lead generation, SEO value, or brand awareness. Also use when the user mentions "engineering as marketing," "free tool," "marketing tool," "calculator," "generator," "interactive tool," "lead gen tool," "build a tool for leads," "free resource," "ROI calculator," "grader tool," "audit tool," "should I build a free tool," or "tools for lead gen." Use this whenever someone wants to build something useful and give it away to attract leads or earn links. For downloadable content lead magnets (ebooks, checklists, templates), see lead-magnets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design click/first-click tests to evaluate navigation and information findability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits any developer documentation site across 33 checks in 7 categories and produces a scored report (out of 100) with Pass / Warn / Fail status per check. Use this skill whenever a user provides a docs URL and asks to audit it, review it, score it, check its quality, or evaluate it for AI discoverability, SEO, structure, content, or completeness. Also trigger when the user says "run a docs audit", "audit these docs", "check this documentation", "how good are the docs for X", or pastes a docs URL with any evaluative intent. Always use this skill — do not attempt a freeform docs review without following this structured workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI citation readiness audit ONLY (does not touch Google rankings, use blog-rewrite for combined Google+AI work). Use whenever the user wants their content to rank in ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, or Google AI Overviews. AI citation optimization audit scoring blog posts for ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overview citability. Evaluates passage-level citability, Q&A formatting, entity clarity, structured data, and AI crawler accessibility. Generates citation capsules and a 0-100 AI Citation Readiness score. Use when user says "geo", "ai citation", "ai optimization", "citation audit", "aeo", "perplexity optimization", "chatgpt citation".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds end-to-end predictive modeling pipelines on tabular datasets—data exploration, preprocessing, baseline modeling, and mandatory optimization—producing valid saved predictions in the required output format. Use for any supervised machine learning or data modeling task, including classification and regression on tabular data, Kaggle-style competitions or submission-file challenges, training a model to predict a target from features, or requests to fit/tune/evaluate models with scikit-learn, XGBoost, Random Forest, Logistic Regression, and similar non-deep-learning methods. Runs fully automated end-to-end without asking the user for intermediate decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when 王建硕 wants to evaluate whether a change to VoiceDrop's 挖矿 system prompt is actually better than the live version — runs the local eval harness (golden fixtures × champion-vs-candidate, same input), dispatches blind pairwise judge subagents, aggregates a win-rate verdict, and on approval promotes the candidate into agent/src/prompts/mine.js. Triggers — "评估 prompt"、"挖矿 prompt 改好了吗"、"eval prompt"、"比一比两版 prompt"、"/wjs-evaling-voicedrop-prompts".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate app/startup ideas with market, feasibility, commercial, and open-source competitor analysis. Use when asked to evaluate, validate, or score a product idea. Don't use for PRDs, go-to-market plans, or investor decks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reach for this skill whenever you are discussing reinforcement learning, agentic AI systems, AI alignment, continual learning, or the philosophical limits of large language models. This skill channels the thinking of Richard S. Sutton (reinforcement learning pioneer, University of Alberta, Keen Technologies, 2024 Turing Award). Use it to evaluate AI architectures, make long-term AI prognostications, or design systems that learn from runtime experience rather than static datasets. Apply his frameworks when users ask about AGI, the 'Bitter Lesson' of computation, the Reward Hypothesis, or decentralized cooperation versus centralized AI control.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the reasoning of Mary Wollstonecraft (18th-century English philosopher and author of A Vindication of the Rights of Woman) to evaluate situations involving power dynamics, education, independence, gender roles, and systemic inequality. Use this skill whenever Claude encounters career trade-offs involving financial dependence, analyzing structural oppression, questioning societal norms, or balancing reason against emotion. It helps dismantle arbitrary hierarchies, prioritize rational capability over superficial elegance, and frame personal struggles as political realities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the developmental psychopathology and longitudinal research frameworks of Terrie E. Moffitt (psychologist, Duke University). Use this skill whenever reasoning about human development, criminology, juvenile delinquency, self-control, mental health trajectories, or biological aging. Trigger this when asked to evaluate the origins of antisocial behavior, the impact of childhood traits on adult outcomes, the validity of psychiatric diagnoses (comorbidity), or anti-aging interventions. Apply her models to shift focus from cross-sectional snapshots to longitudinal life-course trajectories, emphasizing the 'p' factor, the self-control gradient, and the dual taxonomy of antisocial behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the rigorous deontological ethics, transcendental idealism, and political philosophy of Immanuel Kant (18th-century German philosopher, Critique of Pure Reason). Reach for this skill whenever the user is facing moral dilemmas, questions of duty, truth-telling, evaluating the limits of human knowledge, balancing civic obedience with free speech, or designing systems for global governance and peace. Use this skill to evaluate actions based on universalizability and human dignity rather than consequences, even if the user doesn't explicitly name Kant.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the engineering and research philosophies of Jeff Dean, Chief Scientist at Google DeepMind and Google Research. Reach for this skill whenever you are designing large-scale distributed systems, optimizing latency and energy efficiency, or making architectural decisions about machine learning infrastructure. It should trigger automatically for topics involving hardware-ML co-design, model distillation, sparse activation, massively multi-task models, or scaling systems by 5x to 10x. Use this skill to evaluate system bottlenecks, transition from specialized to unified models, and optimize experimental velocity. Apply his mental models to avoid premature 100x scaling and to treat AI models as reasoning engines rather than memorization databases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies Judea Pearl's causal reasoning frameworks to distinguish correlation from causation, evaluate AI capabilities, and make counterfactual decisions. Reach for this skill whenever Claude encounters questions about causal inference, structural causal models, the limitations of deep learning, AGI, experimental design, covariate selection, or personalized decision-making. Trigger this skill for topics involving Bayesian networks, the do-calculus, the Ladder of Causation, or when a user tries to answer 'what if' or 'why' questions using purely observational data. Pearl's principles are essential for moving beyond probability calculus into true causal understanding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the mental models and frameworks of Andrej Karpathy (deep learning, former Director of AI at Tesla, founding member of OpenAI, Eureka Labs). Use this skill whenever you are helping the user build neural networks from scratch, debug deep learning pipelines, evaluate AI agent workflows, design LLM apps, or navigate the transition to Software 3.0 (vibe coding). It is highly relevant for pedagogy (untangling complex knowledge), assessing AI capabilities vs. limitations (jagged intelligence, tokenization limits), and architectural decisions (end-to-end optimization vs. complex pipelines). Reach for this whenever discussing LLM training, autonomous systems, or AI-assisted coding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the philosophical frameworks of Confucius (ancient Chinese philosopher, 551-479 BCE) to modern problems. Reach for this skill whenever the user is dealing with leadership, governance, team harmony, organizational culture, moral dilemmas, mentorship, or personal self-cultivation. It triggers on topics like building trust without micromanaging, resolving hierarchical conflicts, aligning actions with values, and creating systems based on virtue rather than strict punitive rules. Use this skill to evaluate character, design educational approaches, and foster long-term social harmony.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the philosophical frameworks of Martha Nussbaum (American philosopher, capabilities approach, University of Chicago) to evaluate justice, human welfare, and ethical dilemmas. Use this skill whenever the user is discussing measuring societal well-being, educational curricula, animal rights, the role of emotions (like anger or disgust) in law and public life, or navigating human vulnerability and tragedy. Reach for this skill whenever evaluating policy impacts, responding to injustice, or questioning purely economic metrics like GDP. It shifts the focus to what people are actually able to do and be.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate agent and skill behavior or routing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate proposed repository harness changes with pinned Darwin tools and explicit evidence limits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research products across the web with Firecrawl and produce a shopping recommendation or cart-ready summary. Use when the user wants to compare products, find the best option, evaluate reviews, respect budget/preferences, or shop with a saved browser session.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review UI designs and implementations for accessibility, consistency, usability, and visual quality. Use when asked to review a design, audit accessibility, check UI consistency, compare implementation against mockups, or evaluate a user interface.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find new skills on GitHub or check a specific skill before installing. Use when the user wants to search for skills, evaluate a skill URL, check overlap and security risk before installing, or compare a local skill against alternatives. Trigger with '/janitor-discover'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Brainstorms and debates approaches, then drives toward an actionable decision. Use whenever someone needs a thinking partner for a decision they're facing: 'discuss', 'debate', 'brainstorm', 'weigh options', 'tradeoffs', 'should I do X or Y', 'help me decide', 'I'm torn between', 'sanity check my thinking', or 'what do you think about'. The user must be asking for help reasoning through a choice — not asking to build, fix, evaluate, plan, or modify something (even if the topic involves this skill itself). Picks the right decision lens, surfaces tradeoffs and blind spots, pushes back when reasoning is genuinely weak, and never implements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。