「evidence」の検索結果

Preserve the coding agent's explicit AAS skill selection as a validated stack and optional evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review AAS stack manifests, preview plans and selection evidence in Workbench without applying changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Track Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) implementation progress by comparing Confluence specs against codebase evidence. Use when asked to assess, report on, or compare AIP status.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tailors one resume to one specific job posting. Builds a must-have/nice-to-have requirement table, an evidence map, gap questions instead of invention, a tailored copy (headline, summary, bullet order, skills), honest ATS guidance, and an optional cover letter for that posting. Use when the user says "tailor my resume to this job", "customize my CV for this posting", "match my resume to this job description", "what keywords am I missing", "make my resume ATS-friendly for this role", "will this get past the ATS", "the job asks for X and I don't have it", or pastes a job ad with a resume. Works from pasted text; uses Reactive Resume MCP tools when connected. Not for bullets with no target job (resume-bullet-writer), what belongs on a resume or a general audit (resume-content-guide), tracking or follow-ups (job-application-manager), or interview prep and practice (interview-prep, mock-interview).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically explore and test a web application to find bugs, UX issues, and other problems. Use when asked to "dogfood", "QA", "exploratory test", "find issues", "bug hunt", "test this app/site/platform", or review the quality of a web application. Produces a structured report with full reproduction evidence -- step-by-step screenshots, repro videos, and detailed repro steps for every issue -- so findings can be handed directly to the responsible teams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Default entrypoint and master ctf-sandbox-orchestrator workflow for CTF, exploit, reverse engineering, DFIR, pwnable, crypto, stego, mobile, AI-agent, cloud, container, Active Directory, Windows-host, and identity challenges. Use first when the user presents challenge infrastructure, binaries, prompts, hosts, or identities that should be treated as sandbox-internal by default and Codex needs to choose, route, and load the right downstream analysis path with concise evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for Active Directory, Kerberos, LDAP, OAuth, enterprise messaging, Windows host forensics, credential material, and lateral-movement challenges. Use when the user asks to trace tickets or tokens, inspect mailbox rules, analyze Windows host evidence, understand an AD trust path, or explain a lateral-movement chain across sandbox-linked nodes. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for enterprise mail abuse, OAuth consent, inbox or forwarding rules, transport rules, shared mailbox access, phishing chains, and token-to-mailbox side effects. Use when the user asks to trace mailbox rules, OAuth consent grants, forwarding or delegate abuse, shared mailbox access, message-trace evidence, or explain how mail artifacts turn into persistence, exfiltration, or privilege. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for authorized digital forensics including memory dumps, disk timelines, PCAP investigation, artifact triage, and IR evidence preservation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a reverse-skill case package for scope readiness, Evidence to Finding to Path traceability, work item coverage, timeline references, and optional artifact hash integrity before report handoff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for authorized OSINT and cyber threat intelligence that enriches IOCs, campaigns, impersonation, scams, or threat actors from public sources. Includes bounded X/Twitter search through Xquik, source preservation, corroboration, and evidence handoff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use Understanding by Design (UbD) to plan one OpenMAIC classroom or a course series around transferable conceptual understanding. Use when the user wants backward design, enduring understandings, essential questions, GRASPS performance evidence, WHERETO learning experiences, or a concept-centered lesson rather than a list of facts. Do not use for visual style cloning, teacher-style imitation, or direct PPT import.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a coherent assessment-and-practice lesson using zone-of-proximal-development principles: independent diagnosis, targeted review, supported practice, fresh independent checks, and an evidence-based next step. Use for 习题课（最近发展区）, 最近发展区, 测验习题课, diagnostic review lessons, or guided-to-independent practice. Can also run one practice cycle in chat; do not turn a request for a single exercise or theory explanation into a full lesson.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evidence-based creation of a reusable personal course-making Skill from the user's own classroom and chat history. Use when the user asks to summarize, analyze, or learn from their past course-making records/history and create a personal, exclusive, or reusable Skill, such as “总结我的做课记录，给我做个专属 Skill” or “从我过去的课程和对话里提炼一个个人技能”.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a project keeps its state in Superself (a `<!-- superself:begin` block in AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md, or `self setup` resolves the directory to a registered project): read `self context` at session start, attach work to a work unit, report with evidence, and record confirmed decisions so the next session picks up where this one left off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure Cedar policy enforcement and Ed25519 signed receipts for Claude Code tool calls. Use when setting up projects that need cryptographic audit trails, policy-gated tool execution, or compliance-ready evidence of agent actions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Debug complex issues using competing hypotheses with parallel investigation, evidence collection, and root cause arbitration. Use this skill when debugging bugs with multiple potential causes, performing root cause analysis, or organizing parallel investigation workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A persistent, compounding knowledge base combining Karpathy's LLM Wiki pattern with a structured knowledge graph. Ingest documents once — the LLM writes wiki pages, extracts entities/relations into the graph, and stores raw content for evidence retrieval. Knowledge accumulates and cross-references; it is never re-derived from scratch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review the implementation source code of MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers, clients, and tool handlers against a security baseline — authentication, sessions, rate limiting, input-schema validation, official-SDK usage, RCE vectors, and the OWASP MCP Top 10 — producing a report with file/line evidence. Use this skill when: - Reviewing an MCP server implementation for security before release - Checking a server against the baseline controls (MCP-01 to MCP-05) and the OWASP MCP Top 10 - Auditing tools for RCE vectors (command/code injection, unsafe deserialization, path traversal, SSTI, dependency hijacking, SSRF) - Verifying auth, session, rate-limiting, and input-validation controls on a network-exposed server - Reviewing MCP client code that handles untrusted server responses and session IDs - Requests like "review this MCP server for security" or "is my MCP server implementation secure?"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify an MCP server before release by exercising a real protocol session, comparing runtime capabilities with source and documentation, testing failure paths, and recording reproducible evidence. Use when shipping or reviewing an MCP server, tool, resource, prompt, catalog, or install path.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rigorous challenge profile for Anitta: assumption checks, evidence calibration, and defensible reasoning patterns for Ember collaboration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a vague, intermittent, or environment-specific bug report into a minimal evidence-backed reproduction before proposing a fix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enforce output quality, evidence verification, and quality gates across security audits. Use this skill when you perform SAST, SCA, threat modeling, or security code reviews. Use this skill to verify code locations and taint traces for all findings. Use this skill to prevent the suppression of valid security findings. Use this skill to evaluate reports against quality thresholds (score ≥ 8/10) before delivery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reorient in the current Claude Code session with an evidence-backed map of its goal, pivots, outcomes, current step, and open decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。