「experiment」の検索結果

Scaffold and run a reproducible Monte Carlo simulation study in R — a declared assumption regime, a parameterized DGP, an estimator grid, a seeded replication loop, and a summary of bias, RMSE, empirical SE, coverage, size/power with Monte Carlo standard errors. Use when the user says "run a Monte Carlo simulation", "simulation study", "check the bias/coverage of an estimator", "compare estimators in simulation", "size and power simulation", "Monte Carlo experiment", or wants to demonstrate an estimator's finite-sample properties. Produces a numbered R script in `scripts/R/` and saves per-replication raw results + a summary table to `output/`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compute statistical power, required sample size, and minimum detectable effect (MDE) for a study design, then write a registry-ready power section. Handles two-arm RCTs (with clustering / ICC and unequal allocation), multiple-arm corrections, and a simulation-based power option for non-standard designs (DiD/event-study, IV, panel). Use when user says "power analysis", "power calculation", "MDE", "minimum detectable effect", "how big a sample do I need", "is my study powered", "power for an RCT", or when /preregister needs a power section for an experiment. Produces a power/MDE table, power curves, and a methods paragraph to paste into a preregistration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft a structured preregistration document (OSF, AsPredicted, or AEA RCT Registry style) from a research spec or free-form study description. Output is a Markdown file with hypotheses, design, sampling plan, analysis plan, exclusions, and inference criteria — annotated with MUST / SHOULD / MAY clarity flags. Use when user says "preregister", "draft a preregistration", "OSF preregistration", "AsPredicted", "AEA RCT registry", "PAP", "preanalysis plan", or before launching an experiment / data collection / analysis on data the analyst has not yet seen. NOT a registry submission tool — produces a document the user uploads to OSF / AsPredicted / AEA themselves.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI DevKit · Use when the user asks to brainstorm, ideate, generate ideas, expand options, challenge ideas, pressure-test ideas, compare concepts, narrow choices, name something, plan content angles, explore strategy, evaluate product ideas, technical approaches, experiments, or decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When a real test is too rare, large, or irreversible, run a controlled counterfactual: isolate one variable, fix conditions, trace the mechanistic chain, and bound what the result implies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the scientific method to debugging by helping users form specific, testable hypotheses, design targeted experiments, and systematically confirm or reject theories to find root causes. Use when a user says their code isn't working, they're getting an error, something broke, they want to troubleshoot a bug, or they're trying to figure out what's causing an issue. Concrete actions include isolating failing components, forming and testing hypotheses, analyzing error messages, tracing execution paths, and interpreting test results to narrow down root causes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Modify living Roblox Studio projects safely: inspect Explorer and execution locations, preserve existing structure, reuse modules/remotes, create meaningful Instances, apply Attributes and CollectionService tags, test server/client and multiple devices, inspect Output, and remove experiments/debug objects. Use when an agent edits a place or rbxl/rbxlx/Rojo project, operates in Studio, adds Scripts/LocalScripts/ModuleScripts, or must verify a Roblox change in context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Initialize evo for the current repository by exploring the codebase, proposing unexplored optimization dimensions, constructing the benchmark inside a baseline worktree, and running the first experiment. Use when the user invokes /evo:discover, mentions setting up evo, wants to instrument a codebase for autonomous optimization, or asks to start a new evo run on a project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive structured autoresearch iteration after evo:discover and the baseline commit. Use when the user invokes /evo:optimize or asks to try ideas, try variants, run experiments, use available GPUs, improve the current best/frontier, continue an evo search, or compare candidate changes in an evo workspace. The orchestrator plans and spawns optimization subagents; candidate edits/runs belong to those subagents. Width is set via subagents=N (1 for serial workloads, larger for parallel); the loop's structural value applies at any width.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigates network, streaming and protocol failures with falsification-first layered experiments, the general fallback for unknown root causes. Use for ECONNRESET / RST_STREAM / SSE stalls, CDN/CGNAT timeouts or certificate errors, throughput collapse where everything returns 200 but transfers crawl, or LAN identity/topology mysteries. Not for known Tailscale/TUN/DNS/proxy-path conflicts (use tunnel-doctor).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pressure-test a business or side-hustle idea before you sink money and months into it — find the real demand, the risky assumptions, and the cheapest way to test them. Use when asked to validate my business idea, is this a good business idea, test my side hustle, or should I start this. Produces a read on the core assumptions the idea depends on, who the customer really is and whether the pain is real, the cheapest experiments to test demand before building, a rough viability check (market, competition, economics), and a go/refine/rethink call — honest, not a cheerleader.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyse a finished A/B test and write the readout — the result, whether it's statistically and practically significant, what it means, and the ship/no-ship call. Use when asked to analyse experiment results, write an A/B test readout, interpret test data, or decide whether to ship a variant. Produces a clear verdict with the lift and confidence, segment cuts, the risks (peeking, novelty, sample), and a recommendation. Distinct from planning a test — this reads results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce an experiment blueprint from a research hypothesis

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates publication-quality figures for ML papers from research context. Given a paper section or description, extracts system components and relationships to generate architecture diagrams via Gemini. Given experiment results or data, auto-selects chart type and generates data-driven figures via matplotlib/seaborn. Use when creating any figure for a conference paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Battle-tested PyTorch training recipes for all domains — LLMs, vision, diffusion, medical imaging, protein/drug discovery, spatial omics, genomics. Covers training loops, optimizer selection (AdamW, Muon), LR scheduling, mixed precision, debugging, and systematic experimentation. Use when training or fine-tuning neural networks, debugging loss spikes or OOM, choosing architectures, or optimizing GPU throughput.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run fast, progressive experiments to map tunable parameters and their effects. Use when optimizing code, prompts, configurations, or other artifacts against a goal or benchmark, or when a long research run needs a planned hypothesis queue, focused trials, and durable findings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous development with experimental self-correction. Iterates through quality gates until antifragile or blocked.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Recall project-scoped Waggle history about a topic, component, decision, bug, experiment, or implementation attempt.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Debugging-method traps: run the discriminating experiment first, read build logs bottom-up, treat an empty actual as unwritten, audit shared handles before removing a feature, read commit history critically. Use when a fix is not converging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when defending the research design of an American Educational Research Journal (AERJ) manuscript — quantitative (multilevel, IRT, quasi-experimental, RCT), qualitative (case study, ethnography, interview), or mixed methods. AERJ judges each tradition on its own terms against the AERA reporting standards. Strengthens the design; it does not write code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when planning or reporting the analysis for an American Educational Research Journal (AERJ) manuscript — multilevel/HLM and growth models, IRT/measurement, quasi-experimental estimation, or qualitative coding and thematic analysis. Analysis must meet the AERA reporting standards (warrant + transparency). Strengthens analysis reporting; it does not run models for you.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when planning an AISTATS project timeline from venue fit through abstract submission, full-paper upload, supplementary material, review release, author-reviewer discussion, decision, camera-ready, PMLR publication, registration, presentation, and artifact release, with backward-planning offsets for theory-plus-experiments papers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when preparing AISTATS supplementary material, appendices, proof details, code/data archives, simulation scripts, additional tables, and anonymized artifacts under deadline, size, anonymity, and reviewer-discretion constraints, including how to split a theory-plus-experiments paper between body and supplement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when revising an AISTATS paper for concise AI-statistics framing, theorem-and-experiment clarity, 8-page two-column compression, double-blind wording, reproducibility clarity, statistically careful claims, and assumption-labeling discipline that survives statistician reviewers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。