1,552 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and writing with quantitative scoring and actionable feedback.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Choose supported scope and compatibility boundaries for SDK behavior changes; revisit when feedback changes the design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use LinkedIn data for profile, company, job, post, feed, inbox, recruiting, and outreach work through the bundled LinkedIn MCP server. Use only for an explicit LinkedIn request.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
群众路线：从持有真实情况的多方（用户、使用者、代码库、日志、运行结果）收集分散意见，系统化为方案，再带回去对齐与检验，循环改进。当多方意见分歧、需要汇总零散反馈、方案要拿回给真实使用者确认、或你发觉自己在闭门造车时触发；信息源单一且完整、处于执行阶段时不触发。 English: Mass line. Collect scattered input from everyone who holds ground truth (users, operators, codebase, logs, runtime results), synthesize it into a coherent plan, take it back for alignment and validation, and iterate. Trigger when inputs conflict, feedback must be consolidated, a plan needs sign-off from real users, or you sense you are designing in isolation; skip when there is a single complete source and the work is pure execution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when Codex needs to understand or respond to automatic comment-checker feedback emitted after an edit-like PostToolUse hook.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Capture a full DevTools-protocol trace of any browser automation — CDP firehose, screenshots, and DOM dumps — then bisect the stream into per-page searchable buckets. Use when the user wants to debug a failed run, audit network/console/DOM activity, attach a trace to an in-progress session, or feed structured per-page summaries back into an agent loop so its next iteration learns from the last one.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Competitor research and intelligence skill. Takes a user's company (with optional seed competitor URLs), auto-discovers additional competitors via Browserbase Search API, deeply researches each using a 4-lane pattern (marketing surface, external signal, public benchmarks, strategic diff vs the user's company), and compiles the results into an HTML report with four views: overview, per-competitor deep dive, side-by-side feature/pricing matrix, and a chronological mentions feed (news, reviews, social, comparison pages, and public benchmarks). Use when the user wants to: (1) analyze competitors, (2) build a competitive matrix, (3) extract competitor pricing / features, (4) find comparison pages and online mentions of competitors, (5) surface public benchmarks. Triggers: "competitor analysis", "analyze competitors", "competitive intel", "competitor research", "competitor pricing", "feature comparison", "price comparison", "find comparisons", "who's comparing us", "competitor mentions", "competitor benchmarks".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Completion-evidence route used before claiming work is complete, fixed, passing, committed, or PR-ready. Requires fresh verification output before success claims. Do not use for root-cause debugging, TDD implementation, test-report packaging, or review-feedback triage.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Root-cause route for actual bugs, failing tests, build errors, crashes, stack traces, and unexpected behavior. Do not use for test-first/TDD feature work, test-report packaging, review-feedback handling, or final completion evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review-feedback handling route for CodeRabbit, GitHub, PR, or human reviewer comments. Use before implementing suggestions to verify each finding. Do not use for a fresh code review, security audit, TDD, or final completion evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and writing with quantitative scoring and actionable feedback.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assists in writing high-quality content by conducting research, adding citations, improving hooks, iterating on outlines, and providing real-time feedback on each section. Transforms your writing process from solo effort to collaborative partnership.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Default code-quality route for broad code review, PR review, maintainability, correctness, and regression-risk checks. Do not use as the primary route for dedicated OWASP/security audits, review-feedback handling, completion verification, AI-code cleanup, or TDD/test-first work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refresh a LinkedIn profile for a job search from the user's own resume — pick and check the profile photo, crop it locally to LinkedIn, Slack and GitHub sizes, and write a headline and About section grounded in the resume, then check that LinkedIn, GitHub and the resume tell the same story. Use when the user asks to "update my LinkedIn", "write my LinkedIn headline/About", "is this a good LinkedIn photo", "resize my headshot for LinkedIn", or shares a resume or profile photo for job-search feedback. Uses the free ProfessionalHeadshot.io MCP for official photo specs and photo scores when connected; works without it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review and improve a dating profile on Tinder, Hinge or Bumble — rank the user's photos and pick the lead photo, check them against the app's official photo and AI-photo rules, then tighten the bio and suggest openers. Use when the user asks "which photo should be my first", "rate my dating photos", "can I use AI photos on Hinge/Bumble/Tinder", "fix my dating profile", or shares profile photos or a bio for feedback. Uses the free DatePhotos.AI MCP for official rules and photo scores when connected; falls back to a built-in checklist when it is not.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
MiCA compliance evidence and stablecoin risk scoring. Use when the user asks about stablecoin compliance, MiCA status, peg stability, or needs verifiable evidence for audit workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Convene an AI executive board of directors (CEO, CFO, COO, CLO, CISO sub-agent personas) to vet a business idea, product concept, new service offering, M&A target, or operational initiative — and deliver an integrated board memo with a Go/No-Go recommendation. Use this skill whenever the user wants an idea vetted, stress-tested, or reviewed from multiple executive perspectives; asks to "present this to the board," "run this by the boardroom," "vet this idea," "poke holes in this plan," or "prep me for a board meeting"; or shares a business plan, pitch, proposal, or initiative document and asks for structured executive feedback. Also trigger when the user asks for a Go/No-Go decision, risk review across finance/legal/security/operations, or preparation for presenting an initiative to real leadership.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Modern, clean UI/UX guidance + review skill. Use when you need actionable UX/UI recommendations, design principles, or a design review checklist for new features or existing systems (web/app). Focus on CRAP (Contrast/Repetition/Alignment/Proximity) plus task-first UX, information architecture, feedback & system status, consistency, affordances, error prevention/recovery, and cognitive load. Enforce a modern minimal style (clean, spacious, typography-led), reduce unnecessary copy, forbid emoji as icons, and recommend intuitive refined icons from a consistent icon set.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes meeting transcripts and recordings to uncover behavioral patterns, communication insights, and actionable feedback. Identifies when you avoid conflict, use filler words, dominate conversations, or miss opportunities to listen. Perfect for professionals seeking to improve their communication and leadership skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assists in writing high-quality content by conducting research, adding citations, improving hooks, iterating on outlines, and providing real-time feedback on each section. Transforms your writing process from solo effort to collaborative partnership.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
RSS/Newsletter 聚合：订阅一批博主/媒体/Newsletter 的 RSS/Atom 源，拉取最新条目， 按关键词与时间窗过滤、去重、按时间排序，产出选题/资讯摘要。当用户说"RSS""订阅源" "聚合资讯""追更博主""Newsletter""看看最近有什么新文章""汇总这些源的更新""feed"时使用。 纯标准库解析，无第三方依赖。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
DOCA Rivermax (doca_rmax) receive streams for timing-precise media over IP (SMPTE ST 2110 video / audio, market data, scientific feeds) on a BlueField DPU or ConnectX host, once the Rivermax SDK and its license are installed; getting the SDK or license is doca-setup / doca-public-knowledge-map territory. Trigger on "ST 2110 receive isn't getting frames", "sub-microsecond jitter on my media receiver", "NOT_SUPPORTED from doca_rmax_init", "no recv events after stream start", or "license check failing on a media receiver", even without naming Rivermax. Covers doca_rmax_in_stream sessions, the SDK + license precondition check, doca_rmax_get_*_supported capability queries, pairing with doca-eth queues and doca-flow steering, and DOCA_ERROR_* from Rivermax calls. Refuse and route elsewhere for programming the underlying queue (doca-eth), steering rules (doca-flow), PTP / clock sync (doca-firefly), or best-effort packet I/O.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
钉钉消息发送技能。支持企业内部机器人（批量单聊/群聊）和 Webhook 自定义机器人两种接入方式，支持多机器人管理，支持文本、Markdown、链接、ActionCard、FeedCard等多种消息类型。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。