「feedback」の検索結果

Use when a leader must review or approve TEXT-based team output before it ships — content briefs checked for angle, pillar, and CTA, ad copy and creative checked for substantiated claims, on-brand tone, a hook inside the first 125 characters, and platform policy, ending in an Approve, Revise, or Redo verdict with point-by-point feedback. Trigger on 'review this brief', 'approve the ad copy', 'check ads before launch', 'review team output', 'is this good enough to publish', 'my team keeps sending me drafts'. Not for — reviewing a visual design, see `47-design-review-global`; evaluating a person over a period, see `65-team-performance-review-global`; writing the copy yourself, see `05-ad-copy-global`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes meeting transcripts and recordings to uncover behavioral patterns, communication insights, and actionable feedback. Identifies when you avoid conflict, use filler words, dominate conversations, or miss opportunities to listen. Perfect for professionals seeking to improve their communication and leadership skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assists in writing high-quality content by conducting research, adding citations, improving hooks, iterating on outlines, and providing real-time feedback on each section. Transforms your writing process from solo effort to collaborative partnership.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent Media OS, the single skill for every media need in a HyperFrames project. Resolve BGM, SFX, image, icon, brand logo, voice, color grade, or LUT into a frozen local file or paste-ready block + ledger record (one verb, `resolve`); generate via TTS / music / image models when the catalog misses; produce voiceover, transcription, captions, and background removal through one shared audio engine; operate on media (cut / reframe / transform); and reuse assets across projects. Also use for vague feedback that real footage looks dark, flat, boring, should feel retro/camcorder/print/ASCII, needs privacy, or needs a media reveal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the HyperFrames CLI development loop: init, add, catalog, capture, lint, check, snapshot, compare, grade-compare, preview, play, present, beats, keyframes, single or batch render, publish, cloud, cloudrun, feedback, lambda, doctor, browser, info, upgrade, skills, compositions, docs, benchmark, telemetry, transcribe, auth, tts, and remove-background. Also use when diagnosing build or render failures. validate, inspect, and layout are deprecated aliases; use check. Covers local, HeyGen-hosted cloud, AWS Lambda, and Google Cloud Run rendering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to see what the agent assumes about a phase's approach, order, scope, risks and dependencies before planning starts, instead of running a full discuss session. Read-only; ends with a prompt for feedback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-run self-evaluation system that scores agent output on correctness, clarity, actionability, and conciseness. Use after /team runs, skill executions, or when explicitly asked to evaluate output quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply test-driven development with small, behavior-focused feedback loops. Use when the user asks to build or fix something test-first, mentions red-green-refactor, or wants integration tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ultra-compressed code review comments. Cuts noise from PR feedback while preserving the actionable signal. Each comment is one line: location, problem, fix. Use when user says "review this PR", "code review", "review the diff", "/review", or invokes /caveman-review. Auto-triggers when reviewing pull requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Measures whether an automation suite builds release confidence via feedback-loop length, suite reliability, release cadence, and production escape rate, and emits a release_confidence verdict. Use when judging suite value, ROI, or pre-release trust; not for writing or healing tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-write audit for skill violations: checks planned code against loaded skill anti-patterns before any file write. Use when writing Flutter/Dart/TS code or editing SKILL.md files with active project skills. Load as composite; on auto-fixed violation, also load +common/common-learning-log.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct high-quality, persona-driven code reviews. Use when reviewing PRs, critiquing code quality, or analyzing changes for team feedback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic academic paper review workflow covering self-review before submission and rebuttal writing after receiving reviewer feedback. Triggers on "review paper", "self-review", "write rebuttal", "respond to reviewers", "analyze review comments", "paper review".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iterative skill tuning via execute-evaluate-improve feedback loop. Uses maestro delegate Claude to execute skill, Agy to evaluate quality, and Agent to apply improvements. Iterates until quality threshold or max iterations. Triggers on "skill iter tune", "iterative skill tuning", "tune skill".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Address feedback left on a GitHub pull request: fetch unresolved; Use for a PR URL/number or reviewer comments.…

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Address feedback left on a GitHub pull request: fetch unresolved review threads, make agreed Elixir/Phoenix code fixes, reply, and resolve. Use for a PR URL/number or reviewer comments. NOT for pre-PR review, findings triage, or CI monitoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Address feedback left on a GitHub pull request: fetch unresolved review threads, make agreed Elixir/Phoenix code fixes, reply, and resolve. Use for a PR URL/number or reviewer comments. NOT for pre-PR review, findings triage, or CI monitoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Helps a teacher prepare to teach an existing K-12 lesson (math / ELA / science / social studies) — a prep partner that thinks through the lesson's key student task with the teacher and leaves a short teacher-only prep note. Triggers on asks to internalize, prepare for, get ready to teach, or understand a lesson, including implicit ones ("help me get ready for tomorrow's lesson"), and right after another skill built a lesson, which it can follow. Not for building or adapting a lesson, grading, rubrics, assessment feedback, or generating quizzes or student-facing material, and not for single-fact lookups a sentence would answer ("what standard is this?", "how long is this lesson?").

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adapts an existing K-12 lesson (math, ELA, science, or social studies) for students at different proficiency levels (below / at / above grade level). Load this skill BEFORE asking the teacher any clarifying question about the lesson, tiers, or student levels. Triggers on explicit asks to differentiate, tier, or scaffold a lesson, and on implicit signals like "my students are at different levels". Produces 1 teacher-facing differentiation plan + 3 student-ready tier documents as editable Word documents in a single output turn, rendered from one material-source JSON via bundled scripts (shared content is written once so tiers cannot drift). Uses the Learning Commons Knowledge Graph when connected; works without it. This skill adapts a lesson the teacher brings or names. Not for creating a new lesson from scratch — a new-lesson request that asks for differentiated or leveled materials is k12-lesson-plan-creation's job, one package. Not for grading, rubrics, assessment feedback, or quizzes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates a lesson plan, student-facing materials, and observation template. Load this skill BEFORE asking the teacher any clarifying question about grade, subject, topic, standard, or timing. Use when a K-12 teacher needs a math, ELA, science, or social studies lesson built from scratch — even if grade, subject, or topic isn't yet stated. Do NOT load for grading, a rubric, assessment feedback, a quiz, or a standards lookup — answer those directly. Triggers on explicit requests (lesson plan, mini-lesson, unit plan, daily plan) and implicit teacher intent: "I'm teaching long division to 5th graders," "need to teach photosynthesis tomorrow." Core signal: teacher needs new instructional content created. A new lesson that asks for differentiated, tiered, or leveled materials is still ONE planning request — this skill produces those materials inside the lesson package; do not also invoke k12-lesson-differentiation. Not for differentiating an existing lesson (use k12-lesson-differentiation) or passage rewrites.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Address PR review feedback by systematically working through every unresolved PR review thread on the current branch's PR - analyze each comment, make the requested code changes (with tests where useful), commit, and optionally reply and resolve.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rigorously review code or pull requests for correctness, security, accessibility, maintainability, tests, and edge cases. Use when users request a critical code review, want a guided walkthrough of findings, need implementer-facing feedback, or want to prepare, create, or submit a GitHub pull request review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare R packages for CRAN submission by checking for common ad-hoc requirements not caught by devtools::check(). Use when: (1) Preparing a package for first CRAN release, (2) Preparing a package update for CRAN resubmission, (3) Reviewing a package to ensure CRAN compliance, (4) Responding to CRAN reviewer feedback. Covers documentation requirements, DESCRIPTION field standards, URL validation, examples, and administrative requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mines a pull request's review threads for lessons that generalize beyond that PR, reconstructs each against the actual code before deciding, checks whether it is already codified, and routes the genuinely-new, durable ones into Infrahub's internal documentation — `dev/knowledge/`, `dev/guides/`, `dev/guidelines/`, the `AGENTS.md` files, and `.agents/rules/` — proposing edits first and applying only with the user's approval. TRIGGER when: the user wants to turn PR review feedback into durable conventions, guidelines, or rules; capture recurring reviewer comments as internal documentation; or check whether review lessons are reflected in the knowledge/guides/guidelines/AGENTS.md/rules layer. DO NOT TRIGGER when: sweeping a feature's changes for documentation coverage across all layers → use `audit-docs`; extracting knowledge from completed spec directories → `speckit-opsmill-extract`; only replying to or resolving review threads → normal git/gh flow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。