「final」の検索結果

Implements multiplicity control for confirmatory clinical trials using graphical procedures (Bretz-Maurer-Hommel), gatekeeping (parallel, serial, mixed), Hochberg/Hommel/Holm with PRDS, and the closed-testing principle (Marcus-Peritz-Gabriel; Goeman 2021 admissibility). Covers FDA Multiple Endpoints Final Guidance (October 2022), graphical procedures via R gMCP, primary + key-secondary + subgroup hierarchies, and FWER vs FDR distinction. Use when designing the multiplicity strategy for confirmatory trials with multiple primary or key secondary endpoints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft or revise English prose for any brief — documentation body, intake problem statements, spec context, RCA summaries, marketing copy, README sections, PR descriptions. Mandatorily invokes `Skill(humanizer)` as the final pass on every draft. Conditionally invokes `copywriting` for persuasive register, `documentation` for reference docs, `technical-tutorials` for tutorials. Used when any phase needs human-readable prose written or rewritten. Composition only — research and register-picking happen in the caller's context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run or resume a deliverable active-outreach workflow across lead discovery, screening, customer intel, and outreach email. Use when an operator or system pipeline needs durable run state, visible intermediate artifacts, evidence gates, report-bound human approval, and a final editable email draft that is never auto-sent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

小说完稿校验与导出，适用于用户说"小说写完了帮我检查下"、"导出适合起点/番茄的格式"、"查有没有错别字"、"检测敏感词"、"整理成发布版本"、"帮我导出小说发布格式"、"检查小说错别字"、"敏感词检测"、"小说完稿检查"、"适配起点格式导出"、"番茄小说格式导出"、"小说排版整理"、"多平台格式导出"等需求，负责全技术性文字校验（错别字、标点、语法错误）与合规检查，导出适配各平台的发布格式，**批量处理时使用子Agent并行校验，每个Agent最多负责3个章节**

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate production-ready manga pages, chapter pages, covers, and panel sequences with strict recurring-character consistency. Use this when the user asks for a manga page, manga scene, chapter page, comic page, storyboard page, or character-consistent page generation. Before generating any page, inspect `img-memory`, create missing character sprites/reference sheets, make those images visible to image generation, then generate the final manga page.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate guided Chinese software copyright application materials from a real project. Use this skill when the user asks for 软件著作权, 软著申请资料, 软著代码材料, 操作手册, 申请表信息, or wants Word/TXT materials for software copyright registration. The workflow analyzes the imported project, extracts real source code, creates Markdown drafts for user confirmation, then uses bundled DOCX tooling to produce final Word documents and TXT.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mark a rolling-wave slice done on explicit user authority, regardless of its current lifecycle status or missing implementation, finalization, review, verification, or child-project state. Use when the user says a slice is done, complete, finished, accepted, or should be marked done; capture available material learnings, update project state, and output roadmap progress without requiring earlier workflow steps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shared support references for the rolling-wave engineering skill set. Use only when a rolling-wave workflow skill explicitly points here, or when maintaining the shape-project, prepare-next-slice, implement-slice, finalize-slice, and complete-slice skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement a ready rolling-wave slice without locking it down with broad tests yet. Use when the user explicitly wants to code the current docs/rolling-wave/{project}/slices/NNN-slug.md slice, mark it in progress while working, implement small or cohesive work in the main context by default, use one to three gpt-5.6-terra workers only for genuine parallel chunks or large discovery/mechanical work where delegation pays for its handoff cost, pause or hand off chunks marked human-fit when appropriate, record implementation notes and final-test backlog, preserve the original slice contract, and mark completed implementation ready for review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pin the current cmux workspace to the done lane with `cmux workspace status set done` once a session goal is reached and verified. Use at the end of a work session running inside a cmux terminal, right before the final response; skip when work is blocked, handed off, awaiting user input, or when nothing was changed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs a final quality pass fixing alignment, spacing, consistency, and micro-detail issues before shipping. Use when the user mentions polish, finishing touches, pre-launch review, something looks off, or wants to go from good to great.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the speckit implementation phase chunk-by-chunk in clean-context subagents, then review, then produce a final report. Picks up from an existing tasks.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a final code review on a pull request

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Package completed data analysis and ML work so an independent recipient can reproduce the claimed results, verify artifact lineage, and operate the handoff within its stated scope. Use when finalizing a project, study, model package, or review bundle; not for deploying to a live system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enforce traceability from natural-language intent to machine predicates, final observables, evidence, and owner-readable acceptance. Use when conducting any audit, review, QA pass, parity or compliance check, security assessment, code or architecture review, visual or behavioral comparison, data validation, system verification, completion gate, or claim that an implementation satisfies a human request.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

LLM and cloud cost awareness — model tiering, token budgets, right-sizing, and when a cheaper model suffices. Trigger before finalising any architecture that calls LLMs, before scaling a workload, or when a cost estimate is needed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Govern discovery, eligibility, and submission of a plugin or skill to official directories, registries, marketplaces, and curated GitHub lists. Use when preparing or sending plugin listings, marketplace forms, directory PRs, or repository recommendations; require current policy evidence and a final human confirmation before every external submission.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sync reusable frontend decisions into persistent project documentation after UI work. Use when frontend changes introduce or modify component APIs, variants, design-system tokens, styling conventions, layout behavior, accessibility rules, interaction patterns, responsive behavior, or agent operating instructions; when the user asks to reflect decisions in components.md, design system docs, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, or similar project memory files; or before finalizing frontend work where future consistency depends on decisions made during implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GitHub Pull Request creation specialist. Analyzes user requirements to create PRs with structured titles and bodies matching the user's query language. Handles git change analysis, PR draft creation, user confirmation, and final PR creation via gh CLI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing a DPA as controller or processor against GDPR Art. 28 — GREEN/YELLOW/RED gap frame, never a final call. Triggers on "review this DPA", "check this DPA".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this Canvas-owned clean-room skill for PDF work where layout, extraction, generation, forms, page operations, or visual verification matter. Trigger for reading PDFs beyond plain text, creating PDFs, merging, splitting, rotating, watermarking, extracting tables or images, filling forms, OCR handoff, and final PDF QA.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Load this skill when building any web feature, reviewing architecture decisions, or evaluating JavaScript dependencies. Under no circumstances build features that break completely when JavaScript is unavailable or fails. Absolutely always start with semantic HTML, layer CSS enhancements, and add JavaScript as the final, optional layer. Prioritize resilience and universal access over cutting-edge features.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

At the end of a long working session, produce a counterfactual trace note — a backward walk through the session that identifies the small number of load-bearing moments (observations, failures, accidents, decisions) without which the final outcome would not exist. Use this whenever the user asks to "close the session", "run the butterfly", "trace back", "what actually mattered here", asks for a session retrospective, or asks how the session arrived at its result. Also use it when a session ends with a significant outcome (a fix, a design decision, a shipped artifact) and the user wants a note capturing why it happened, not just what happened. Do NOT use for simple summaries of short sessions — this skill is for causal tracing, and it only earns its cost when the session was long enough to contain real forks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

INTERNAL/HELPER skill — do NOT invoke directly from a user query. This is the shared formatter/poster used by answer-issue-questions and breakdown-issues. It formats a scope GitHub Issue body (label cc-triage-scope, used before code analysis), runs the pre-posting checklist, and executes `gh issue create`. Invoke this skill ONLY from one of the parent skills via the Skill tool, after the parent has finalized the task breakdown. If a user asks to 'create a scope issue' or similar, route them to the appropriate parent skill (/breakdown-issues for fresh breakdowns, /answer-issue-questions for derived sub-tasks) rather than invoking this one directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。