「goal」の検索結果

Go-to-market engineering for the Yupcha portfolio (OmniVoice-Studio, the Clay-alternative in this repo, ResuBird). A closed set of executable verbs — research, audit, draft, measure, prepare, publish, escalate — each with a typed contract, required sources, and a risk tier. Use when: (1) researching ICP/competitors/channels/prior art, (2) auditing our own properties for what's actually broken (dead pricing pages, 404ing clone URLs, unfilled demos, licence detection, watermark coverage), (3) drafting docs/comparison pages/release notes/launch copy, (4) measuring real numbers against GOAL.md, (5) preparing a Show HN or a listing up to the send button, (6) any question about whether a GTM action is allowed. Triggers: 'gtm', 'go to market', 'launch', 'show hn', 'growth', 'marketing', 'positioning', 'icp', 'competitors', 'outreach', 'cold email', 'audit our', 'is it ok to', 'can we post', 'promote'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GIST planning workflow. Structure goals into ideas, steps, and tasks using Gilad's evidence-guided framework.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reverse-engineer the hook from a viral Threads post or thread URL. Identifies which of the 10 canonical 2026 Threads formulas it uses (warm contrarian, data-point, build-in-public, quote-post, mini-list, relatable, listicle, story, curiosity-gap, how-I teardown), explains why it worked, and returns a blank template mapped to your topic with its primary goal (replies, reposts, likes, quotes). Use to learn from a post you admire. Not for writing your own (use threads-post-writer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft a single Threads post or a multi-post thread using a 2026 Threads hook formula (warm contrarian, data-point, build-in-public, quote-post, mini-list, relatable, listicle, story, curiosity-gap, how-I teardown), picked by goal (replies, reposts, likes, quotes). Respects the 500-char limit and one-hashtag cap, runs the humanizer pass, and publishes via Publora, which auto-splits long content into a thread. Not for auditing a draft (use threads-humanizer) or hook teardown (use threads-hook-extractor).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deprecated alias. Use cxc-loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct an adaptive interactive interview on any topic and produce a structured markdown report, summary, or implementation plan. Use when the user says "interview me", "interview me about", "run an interview on", "help me think through", or wants guided discovery on any subject. Also triggers on "talk me through", "explore X with me", "help me plan Y", or "walk me through my thinking on Z" when the user wants a guided conversation rather than a direct answer. Applies broadly — career decisions, project ideas, product direction, personal goals, research questions, team problems — not just technical topics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when keeping imp's docs and config examples coherent after a change - updating docs/internals/ARCHITECTURE.md / README / docs/GOAL.md / docs/MODELS.md / docs/roadmap.md / imp.conf.example / CHANGELOG / MISSION_JOURNAL, or "is this doc stale", "document this change", "the example config is out of date", "the README says X but the code does Y", "add a roadmap ledger row". Do NOT use for layer/frontmatter/lint questions (docs-layers), structural code audits (codebase-audit), measuring perf or refreshing the perf baseline (benchmark-cuda), or the agent's private memory (MEMORY.md).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Independent LLM judge evaluates task completion separately from the executing agent, catching false success claims by reviewing task goal, actions taken, final state, and evidence. Produces PASS/FAIL with confidence score and reasoning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gather and persist project design context such as audience, brand personality, UX goals, and implementation defaults for future better-web-ui work. Use when starting a project, defining UI direction, or establishing reusable design guidance before other better-web-ui skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run Kimi's autonomous goal mode for an explicitly requested hands-off multi-turn objective. This is write-capable and budget-bounded; use only when the user explicitly asks Kimi to pursue an objective autonomously.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates a structured Project Brief — a comprehensive markdown document that extracts goals, architecture, knowledge file inventory, Custom Instructions summary, Memory contents, current state, ecosystem position, and key decisions from a Claude Project. Briefs serve as uploadable context documents: add one to any other Project for immediate deep awareness of the source Project's purpose, architecture, and progress. Use when user says "create a brief," "brief this project," "extract project context," "generate a project summary for another project," "I need to share this project's context," "prepare this project for cross-project reference," or "document this project." Also use when the user is preparing to work across Projects and needs portable context. Do NOT use for session handoffs, project audits, or Memory optimization (use rootnode-session-handoff, rootnode-project-audit, or rootnode-memory-optimization respectively, if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Develop a high-performance liquid chromatography method: define separation goals, select column chemistry and mobile phase, optimize gradient and flow conditions, choose the appropriate detector, and evaluate initial method performance for target analytes in solution or complex matrices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Establish Service Level Objectives (SLO), Service Level Indicators (SLI), and Service Level Agreements (SLA) with error budget tracking, burn rate alerts, and automated reporting using Prometheus and tools like Sloth or Pyrra. Use when defining reliability targets for customer-facing services, balancing feature velocity against system reliability through error budgets, migrating from arbitrary uptime goals to data-driven metrics, or implementing Site Reliability Engineering practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Coach the user through a rigorous, repository-grounded interview to create or improve program.md. Use when a target repository lacks program.md, its goals, metrics, data, or guardrails are unclear, or the user asks to be grilled about an autoresearch setup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find the route to guaranteed failure, negate it. Use when a goal keeps not being reached head-on.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or update a project roadmap with major milestones. Generates the configured roadmap artifact (default .ai-factory/ROADMAP.md) — a strategic checklist of high-level goals. Use when user says "roadmap", "project plan", "milestones", or "what to build next".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for ANY bug bounty, penetration test, or web/API/mobile security assessment: recon, testing endpoints, analyzing Burp traffic or any bug-bounty platform's MCP (HackerOne, Intigriti, Bugcrowd, YesWeHack, Immunefi), reviewing APKs, bypassing a WAF, enforcing scope, hunting a specific vuln class, validating findings, writing reports, or when you are stuck on a target and about to give up. Activates automatically for all bug-bounty and pentest sessions. Runs an autonomous, never-surrender predator methodology: refuses to conclude "secure", exhausts each vuln class to depth, proves a real attacker-path with impact and no false positives, tracks coverage so nothing is re-tested or skipped, diagnoses failed tooling from full logs, and hunts at maximum effort with intelligent token use until the goal is found. Activates and follows instructions in ANY language the operator writes in (the skill itself is English). Bundles a per-class web-exploitation KB, a writeup library, and PayloadsAllTheThings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or update a project roadmap with major milestones. Generates the configured roadmap artifact (default .ai-factory/ROADMAP.md) — a strategic checklist of high-level goals. Use when user says "roadmap", "project plan", "milestones", or "what to build next".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Before any material decision — code chunk, plan, strategy, design, scope cut, push to GitHub — convene a war-room. The session driver takes the CEO seat: frame the tradeoff, summon specialist seats from whatever agent roster the user has built, dispatch a cross-family voice via `ato dispatch` so priors actually disagree, decide. A failure-mode filter (wrong assumptions / overcomplexity / orthogonal edits / imperative-over-declarative — Karpathy's four are one good default, swap in your own) runs on every dispatch. Place in the v2.16 stack: war-rooms DECIDE before code starts; `ato-mission` EXECUTES the work between decisions (multi-step, goal-driven, persisted across days); `ato-review` VERIFIES the resulting commits. Use a war-room for the design verdict, hand the verdict to a Mission, review the merged result. Fires before: sending a code draft to the user as final, opening a PR, pushing to a remote-tracking branch, committing >50 LOC of behavior change, or delivering a plan or strategic recommendation as the final answer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or audit a complete, concise, UI-ready website page content framework from verified business facts before visual design. Use to define page goals, customer decision flow, section order, realistic draft copy, content and evidence needs, CTAs, or page-family rules; do not use for visual design, HTML, SEO implementation, or platform code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end social content campaign pipeline. Takes a marketing goal and produces scheduled, on-brand social posts with visuals across postiz-supported platforms, while keeping Typefully for X/thread specialist flows and fallback coverage. Chains: CMO strategy, content writing with voice calibration, AI slop audit, selective Paper MCP visual design, and routed scheduling via postiz or Typefully. Each phase has a human gate. Use this skill whenever someone wants to plan and execute a batch of social posts — not just one-off tweets. Triggers include: "social campaign", "schedule posts", "pre-launch content", "content calendar", "social content pipeline", "build up content", "I need social media content for my launch", "help me build social presence", "plan a week of posts", "batch social content", "social media strategy", or any request involving multiple scheduled posts with optional visuals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

On-brand visual marketing content using Paper MCP and parallel agent teams. Reads the project's brand/ directory to build a design system, then spawns designer agents in parallel — each creating a unique artboard with a different on-brand layout interpretation. Intelligently adapts agent count and approach based on user goals via AskUserQuestion interrogation. Produces Instagram carousels, TikTok slideshows, social posts, story slides, and visual assets. When used with content spec YAMLs from /slideshow-script, each agent gets a unique script AND unique design direction. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants visual marketing content designed in Paper — carousels, slideshows, social posts, story slides, or any visual asset. Even if they just say "design something" or "make slides" or "create visual content", this is the skill. Also triggers on "paper marketing", "instagram design", "TikTok design", "slideshow design", "create carousel", or "social graphics".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs cancel flow UX, dunning email sequences, win-back campaigns, and retention triggers. Covers the full churn prevention lifecycle from early warning signals to 90-day win-back. Use when someone mentions 'churn', 'retention', 'cancel flow', 'dunning', 'win-back', 'users leaving', 'reducing churn', 'keep users', 'customers canceling', 'payment failed', 'failed payments', 'losing subscribers', 'customer retention', or wants to prevent customers from leaving. Even if they just say 'people keep canceling' or 'how do I keep users' — this is the skill. Handles both voluntary churn (unhappy users) and involuntary churn (failed payments). Use this whenever subscription retention is the goal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Lightweight refactor: audit → plan → approve → implement in a single Opus context, no sub-agent fan-out. Behavior preservation is the goal — verifies tests still pass, optionally commits, and offers a separate /code-review pass at the end. Use by default; reach for /claude-setup:refactor only when the cleanup needs parallel fan-out or exceeds one context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。