「log」の検索結果

ISTQB/JSTQB のテスト実行（test execution）活動を支援するスキル。test-implement が具体化したテストを実行し、結果を記録し、失敗を欠陥候補として整理して test-execution-log.md にまとめる。自動テストならランナーを実行し結果を解釈、手動テストなら利用者の実施結果を聞き取って記録する。失敗は欠陥候補として整理し、外部 issue 化は提案に留める。「テストを実行して結果を記録して」「テスト実行ログを作って」「失敗を欠陥として整理して」「手動テストの結果を記録して」と依頼されたときに使う。ワークフローの test-targeted（修正範囲にテストランナーを絞り込んで実行するだけ）とは別物で、こちらは ISTQB プロセスとしての実行・記録・欠陥候補整理を成果物 test-execution-log.md に残す。単発のテスト作成依頼（単にユニットテストを書きたいだけ）は対象外。/test-execute <テスト対象名> で明示的に呼び出されたときのみ使用する。

When the user wants to apply psychological principles, mental models, or behavioral science to marketing. Also use when the user mentions 'psychology,' 'mental models,' 'cognitive bias,' 'persuasion,' 'behavioral science,' 'why people buy,' 'decision-making,' 'consumer behavior,' 'anchoring,' 'social proof,' 'scarcity,' 'loss aversion,' 'framing,' or 'nudge.' Use this whenever someone wants to understand or leverage how people think and make decisions in a marketing context. For applying psychology to specific pages, see cro; for pricing tactics, see pricing; for copy framing, see copywriting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with Better Stack — better Stack (formerly Logtail) for log search, uptime monitoring, incident management, on-call scheduling, and status page management. Covers log querying, monitor configuration, heartbeat checks, escalation policies, and team management. Use when searching logs, managing uptime monitors, handling incidents, or configuring on-call schedules via Better Stack API.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with Aws Service Catalog — aWS Service Catalog portfolio and product management. Covers portfolio administration, product versioning, provisioned product inspection, launch constraints, tag options, and sharing across accounts. Use when managing self-service IT catalogs, provisioning products, reviewing portfolios, or auditing product usage across an organization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when doing ANY task involving Supabase. Triggers: Supabase products (Database, Auth, Edge Functions, Realtime, Storage, Vectors, Cron, Queues); client libraries and SSR integrations (supabase-js, @supabase/ssr) in Next.js, React, SvelteKit, Astro, Remix; auth issues (login, logout, sessions, JWT, cookies, getSession, getUser, getClaims, RLS); Supabase CLI or MCP server; schema changes, migrations, declarative schemas, security audits, Postgres extensions (pg_graphql, pg_cron, pg_vector); debugging and troubleshooting errors or unexpected behavior on Supabase projects (HTTP errors, Postgres errors, RLS surprises, permission denied, schema cache issues, timeouts, Edge Function crashes, Realtime drops, Storage failures) and reading or querying logs (Logs Explorer, ClickHouse).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnoses .NET Framework CLR activation issues using CLR activation logs (CLRLoad logs) produced by mscoree.dll. Use when: the shim picks the wrong runtime, fails to load any runtime, shows unexpected .NET 3.5 Feature-on-Demand (FOD) dialogs, unexpectedly does NOT show FOD dialogs, loads both v2 and v4 into the same process causing failures, or any time someone is wondering "what is happening with .NET Framework activation?"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose MSBuild build performance bottlenecks using binary log analysis. Only activate in MSBuild/.NET build context. USE FOR: identifying why builds are slow by analyzing binlog performance summaries, detecting ResolveAssemblyReference (RAR) taking >5s, Roslyn analyzers consuming >30% of Csc time, single targets dominating >50% of build time, node utilization below 80%, excessive Copy tasks, NuGet restore running every build. Covers timeline analysis, Target/Task Performance Summary interpretation, and 7 common bottleneck categories. Use after build-perf-baseline has established measurements. DO NOT USE FOR: establishing initial baselines (use build-perf-baseline first), fixing incremental build issues (use incremental-build), parallelism tuning (use build-parallelism), non-MSBuild build systems. INVOKES: binlog MCP server tools (overview, errors, search, items, properties); falls back to dotnet msbuild binlog replay + grep/cat when the MCP is unavailable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive a whole tdmcp feature BACKLOG to completion as resumable, wave-by-wave releases — the campaign layer ABOVE tdmcp-pipeline/tdmcp-feature-lead. Use whenever the user wants to implement an ENTIRE backlog or discovery file (e.g. _workspace/discovery*/FEATURE_BACKLOG*.md), 'all the features', many features across multiple releases, or a long autonomous build campaign, AND for every follow-up: continue/resume the campaign, run the next wave, re-run a failed wave, fold in QA results, or check campaign status. Backed by a ledger.json so re-running is idempotent (skips shipped work, resumes interrupted work) and resilient (retry-once then quarantine-and-continue). For a SINGLE feature or one small batch, use tdmcp-pipeline instead; this skill is for the whole ledger.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert changelogs, release notes, and version updates into Ozor.ai video prompts. Use this skill whenever the user has a CHANGELOG.md, release notes, GitHub release, version bump summary, or any list of product changes and wants to turn them into a video. Trigger on phrases like 'video from my changelog', 'release notes video', 'make a video from this update', 'announce this release', 'version update video', 'what's new video', 'product update video', 'feature release video', or any request to transform a list of product changes into video format using Ozor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for training outputs, metrics logging, logtree reports, tracing/profiling, and debugging training runs. Use when the user asks about training logs, metrics, debugging, tracing, profiling, timing, Gantt charts, or understanding training output files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implementing AWS CloudTrail log analysis for security monitoring, threat Tespit, and forensic investigation using Athena, CloudWatch Logs Insights, and SIEM integration to identify unauthorized access, privilege escalation, and suspicious API activity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

git logからCHANGELOGとリリースノートを自動生成する。リリース作業時に使用。

The default code-driven browser path for interactive browsing work: drives any browser from code with token-efficient a11y snapshots (57% smaller via compactSnapshot), ref-based clicks, coordinate control (CUA), viewport pinning, CAPTCHA solving (reCAPTCHA, Turnstile, hCaptcha, slider, OCR), Chrome MV3 APIs (tabs/bookmarks/history/downloads/topSites), network snoop (read API JSON instead of DOM), flight-recorder trace (jsonl + HAR + screenshots), OOPIF-aware snapshots, dialog policy, human handoff for login/OTP, device emulation, request routes, stealth via CloakBrowser as the default owned engine with zero exposed CDP ports, and an attached engine that drives the user's own signed-in browser through BrowserSkill (connectBrowserSkill, bskSnapshot, one-click onboarding via bskOnboard). MUST USE for interactive browser work: scraping, blocked/WAF/JS-rendered pages, logins, the user's logged-in sites and open tabs, extension popups, form filling, screenshots, web QA, CAPTCHAs. The ulw-research browsing lane runs on ultimate-browsing, not this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

リリースワークフロー全体のガイド。CHANGELOG 形式、セマンティックバージョニング、Git フローのベストプラクティス。「release」「リリース」「version」「バージョン」「CHANGELOG」「tag」「GitHub Release」などのキーワードで自動適用。

Analyze WAF (ModSecurity/AWS WAF/Cloudflare) logs to detect SQL injection attack campaigns. Parses ModSecurity audit logs and JSON WAF event logs to identify SQLi patterns (UNION SELECT, OR 1=1, SLEEP(), BENCHMARK()), tracks attack sources, correlates multi-stage injection attempts, and generates incident reports with OWASP classification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects defense evasion techniques used by adversaries in endpoint logs including log tampering, timestomping, process injection, and security tool disabling. Use when investigating suspicious endpoint behavior, building detection rules for evasion tactics, or conducting threat hunting for stealthy adversary activity. Activates for requests involving evasion detection, defense evasion analysis, log tampering detection, or MITRE ATT&CK TA0005.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Queries Azure Monitor activity logs and sign-in logs via azure-monitor-query to detect suspicious administrative operations, impossible travel, privilege escalation, and resource modifications. Builds KQL queries for threat hunting in Azure environments. Use when investigating suspicious Azure tenant activity or building cloud SIEM detections.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add PostHog log capture to track application logs. Use after implementing features or reviewing PRs to ensure meaningful log events are captured with structured properties. Also handles initial OTLP exporter setup if not yet configured.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explore and diagnose a PostHog endpoint's execution logs — error messages, failed runs, cache misses, slow runs, or unexpected row counts during endpoint invocations. Use when the user says "my endpoint is failing", "show me the logs for endpoint X", "what error did endpoint Y produce", "why did endpoint Z return no rows", "is this endpoint hitting cache", or "check the last N runs". Focused on a single named endpoint's runtime log entries, not project-wide auditing or query performance profiling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Technical research methodology with YAGNI/KISS/DRY principles. Phases: scope definition, information gathering, analysis, synthesis, recommendation. Capabilities: technology evaluation, architecture analysis, best practices research, trade-off assessment, solution design. Actions: research, analyze, evaluate, compare, recommend technical solutions. Keywords: research, technology evaluation, best practices, architecture analysis, trade-offs, scalability, security, maintainability, YAGNI, KISS, DRY, technical analysis, solution design, competitive analysis, feasibility study. Use when: researching technologies, evaluating architectures, analyzing best practices, comparing solutions, assessing technical trade-offs, planning scalable/secure systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The perception-by-culture lens for psycho-logic — establish HOW a specific region, country, or subculture reads a signal before you send it, because perception is culturally coded and the same move can mean the opposite elsewhere. Use when adapting a product, price, message, or campaign to a new market; when the user asks 'will this work in [country/region]', 'why does this land in X but flop in Y', 'how do people here perceive Z', 'how do we localise/differentiate by region', or is about to copy a US/global playbook into another market. Covers the cultural dimensions that move Sutherland's levers — uncertainty avoidance, individualism/collectivism, status/power distance, high- vs low-context communication, mental-accounting norms, trust locus, and taboo/sacredness — and how each rewires reframing, costly-signaling, and experience-design. Inspired by Rory Sutherland's *Alchemy*. Routed to from psycho-logic; pair with market-recon for live local data. 日本語・中文の相談（「この地域で通用する？」「适合本地市场吗？」）にも使う。

Assigns GO terms, Pfam/InterPro domains, KEGG orthologs, EC numbers, and product names to predicted proteins using eggNOG-mapper (orthology), InterProScan (domain signatures), and KofamScan (KEGG), routing specialized functions to dbCAN/antiSMASH/AMRFinderPlus/SignalP. Covers the orthology-vs-domain-vs-homology paradigms, the annotation-error percolation cascade, domain-presence-is-not-function, GO IEA circularity in enrichment, evidence tiering, and bit-score/coverage thresholds. Use when adding functional annotation to predicted genes, choosing between eggNOG-mapper and InterProScan, or judging how much to trust a functional label.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes species-environment relationships with constrained ordination (CCA, RDA, db-RDA), variance partitioning, indicator species (indicspecies IndVal.g group-equalized), PERMANOVA paired MANDATORILY with PERMDISP (Anderson & Walsh 2013; dispersion confounds centroid tests), Joint Species Distribution Models (HMSC, sjSDM, gjam) with explicit rejection of "residual covariance equals biotic interaction", phylogenetic community ecology (SES_MPD/MNTD), trait-environment via RLQ + fourth-corner with corrected modeltype=6 (Dray 2014), bipartite network metrics (NODF, modularity) with curveball null (Strona 2014), and Mantel-test replacements (dbRDA, GDM) for spatial data. Use when testing how environmental gradients structure communities, identifying habitat indicator taxa, partitioning variance among predictors, deciding whether PERMANOVA significance is location vs dispersion, picking among HMSC/sjSDM/gjam, or replacing Mantel tests for landscape data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs and analyzes combinatorial CRISPR screens covering paired-Cas9 (Big Papi, Najm 2018), enhanced AsCas12a multiplex (enCas12a, DeWeirdt 2021), in4mer 4-guide-array Cas12a (Esmaeili Anvar N et al 2024 Nat Commun 15:3577) and the Inzolia paralog-pair library, paralog-buffering detection (Dede 2020 Genome Biol; Thompson 2021 Cell Reports 36:109597), genetic-interaction (GI) scoring as observed_double_LFC minus expected_additive_double_LFC, synthetic-lethal and synthetic-rescue interaction interpretation, the half-of-essentiality buffered by paralogs phenomenon, multiplex screen statistical analysis with MAGeCK MLE interaction terms, and the relationship to single-cell combinatorial Perturb-seq. Use when designing a paralog or pathway-pair screen, choosing between paired-Cas9 (Big Papi) and Cas12a multiplex (Inzolia), interpreting genetic interaction scores, identifying synthetic-lethal targets for drug development, or scaling beyond single-gene CRISPR screens.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。