Run comprehensive health checks on the Claude Code Agent Monitor system. Validates dashboard API, database, WebSocket, hooks, and disk usage. Use to verify the monitoring setup is working correctly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
1,433 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Run comprehensive health checks on the Claude Code Agent Monitor system. Validates dashboard API, database, WebSocket, hooks, and disk usage. Use to verify the monitoring setup is working correctly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quick dashboard health and status overview — checks the Agent Monitor API (port 4820), reports session/agent/event counts from /api/stats, confirms WebSocket connectivity, reads the redacted hook status returned by /api/settings/info, and shows data freshness (last event timestamp). Use to verify the monitoring system is operational.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Inspect and install CCAM monitoring hooks for Claude Code and Codex. Use when onboarding a provider, repairing missing hooks, checking which provider is active, or validating that installation preserved unrelated user hooks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs a guided, end-to-end security review of a Power Pages site and consolidates every finding into one HTML report covering source code and dependencies, the live site, browser headers, firewall, authentication, and role-based permissions. Use when the user wants a full security review, a release-readiness check before publishing, a code-and-config check during development, live site monitoring, or asks open-ended questions like "review my site security", "is my site safe to ship", "do a security check", "monitor my site" — even if they do not name the individual checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Production-ready scripts for Android app testing, building, and automation. Provides semantic UI navigation, build automation, log monitoring, and emulator lifecycle management. Optimized for AI agents with minimal token output.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan and execute a launch runbook covering pre-launch verification, go-live procedures, DNS cutover, post-launch monitoring, and rollback procedures. Use this skill whenever the user is preparing to launch a website or product, planning a DNS cutover, building a go-live checklist, or executing a launch day. Triggers on launch runbook, go-live, launch day, DNS cutover, deploy to production, site launch, product launch, cutover plan, launch checklist, deployment procedure. Also triggers when a launch is approaching and the team needs structured coordination, even if 'runbook' is not explicitly stated.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The operational playbook for launching a feature well. Positioning, internal alignment, customer comms, sales enablement, support readiness, rollout strategy, monitoring with pre-defined rollback triggers, post-launch measurement against spec hypotheses, and the discipline that distinguishes shipping from releasing from actually launching. Triggers on launch plan, feature launch, launch checklist, ship vs release, rollout strategy, gradual rollout, sales enablement, support readiness, launch announcement, post-launch measurement, launch failure, declared victory too early. Also triggers when planning a launch (any size, any segment), auditing an existing launch process, fixing the we shipped it but the metric did not move problem, or building a launch checklist for the team.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Make sure email actually reaches inboxes. Use this skill when setting up email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), diagnosing emails landing in spam, planning a domain reputation strategy, monitoring sender reputation, or hardening against email spoofing. Triggers on email deliverability, SPF, DKIM, DMARC, spam folder, sender reputation, mailbox provider, soft bounces, bounce rate, BIMI, MTA-STS, deliverability audit. Also triggers when a marketing or transactional email isn't reaching users.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert CIS Controls v8 (CIS Top 18) advisor — implementation group scoping (IG1/IG2/IG3), control gap assessments, safeguard-level guidance, asset inventory, software inventory, data protection, secure configuration, account management, access control, continuous vulnerability management, audit log management, email and web browser protections, malware defenses, network infrastructure management, network monitoring and defense, application software security, incident response, penetration testing, and CIS Controls mapping to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, SOC 2, and CMMC. Use for any question about CIS Controls, CIS Benchmarks, Implementation Groups, or prioritized cyber hygiene for any organization size.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert third-party risk management (TPRM) advisor — a vendor risk analyst for the full lifecycle: risk-based vendor tiering, tailored due-diligence questionnaires (SIG-style or mapped to ISO 27001, SOC 2, DORA, NIS2, HIPAA), SOC 2 Type II report review (exceptions, carve-outs, CUECs, bridge letters), DPA and sub-processor review under GDPR Art. 28, contract security addenda (DORA Art. 30 provisions), ongoing monitoring programmes, and vendor offboarding. Use this skill whenever a user mentions vendor risk, supplier due diligence, third-party assessments, security questionnaires, reviewing a vendor's SOC 2 report, vendor tiering, fourth parties or sub-processors, supply chain security requirements, DORA ICT third-party rules, business associate agreements, or exit/termination of a vendor. Also trigger for 'a customer sent us a questionnaire' and 'how do I assess this vendor' style requests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Defines service level objectives, creates error budget policies, designs incident response procedures, develops capacity models, and produces monitoring configurations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "analyze logs for threats", "detect suspicious activity", "scan for brute force attempts", "identify injection attacks", or "audit access patterns for anomalies".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate operational runbooks from codebase analysis covering deployment, incident response, scaling, and monitoring, with copy-paste commands and rollback steps. Use when bootstrapping ops docs, preparing for on-call, or post-incident.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
DevOps for CI/CD, containers, Kubernetes, and Terraform. Use when building pipelines, containerizing apps, managing clusters, provisioning cloud infra, deploying with blue- green/canary, or handling infrastructure incidents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ML engineering skill for productionizing models, building MLOps pipelines, and integrating LLMs. Covers model deployment, feature stores, drift monitoring, RAG systems, and cost optimization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit data quality across pipelines, warehouses, and stores. Use when designing a DQ program, defining DQ dimensions, building rule-based checks, detecting schema drift, monitoring freshness SLAs, or responding to a DQ incident.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The canonical way to run agent-relay - self-bootstrap the local broker and autonomously spawn, monitor, and coordinate a team of worker agents without human intervention. Covers infrastructure startup, agent spawning, lifecycle monitoring, message-based reading via the relay MCP, and team coordination.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Risk-based vendor assessment framework for IT service providers, technology vendors, and third-party partners under DORA, NIS2, GDPR. Provides three-phase process (Initial Screening / Detailed Assessment / Final Evaluation), six-dimension risk scoring (Financial/Operational/Compliance/Security/Reputational/Strategic) with weighted matrices, full DORA Art. 28-30 contractual checklist, NIS2 Art. 21(2) security measures enumeration, GDPR Art. 28 documentation checks, red flags per dimension, trigger-based review criteria, and document templates. Use when: (1) Evaluating new vendors or technology providers, (2) Conducting critical ICT third-party due diligence under DORA, (3) Performing supply chain security assessment under NIS2, (4) Creating vendor onboarding documentation, (5) Establishing ongoing vendor monitoring, (6) Assessing concentration risk, or (7) Generating executive vendor risk reports.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GDPR Legitimate Interest Assessment (LIA) — Guided assessment for Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR using the EDPB three-step test. Based on EDPB Guidelines 1/2024, EDPB Opinion 28/2024 (AI models), the OSS Case Digest on Legitimate Interest (McIntyre 2026), CNIL AI guidance (June 2025), ICO guidance, and key CJEU case law. Use when: (1) user needs to assess whether legitimate interest is appropriate, (2) user asks about Art. 6(1)(f), "Interessenabwägung", "berechtigtes Interesse", "balancing test", or "LIA", (3) user wants to document a legitimate interest assessment, (4) user mentions the three-step test, (5) user evaluates necessity or proportionality under Art. 6(1)(f), (6) user discusses direct marketing, fraud prevention, IT security, employee monitoring, AI training, web scraping, or credit checks in context of legal basis, (7) user handles a right to object (Art. 21), (8) user asks about children's data, profiling, or cross-border data sharing under legitimate interest, (9) user compares legitimate interest against other legal bases. Do NOT use for: consent assessments (Art. 6(1)(a)), contract performance (Art. 6(1)(b)), DPIA workflows, or pure ePrivacy/cookie compliance questions — though the skill does address the ePrivacy/GDPR overlap where relevant.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end external local counsel lifecycle management for multi-jurisdiction legal matters. LC selection criteria and capability assessment, engagement setup and instruction design, performance monitoring and check-in cadence, scope enforcement, and relationship escalation. Use when selecting local counsel for a jurisdiction, designing LC instructions, managing the LC check-in rhythm, enforcing scope boundaries when LC signals overreach, or escalating a performance or relationship issue beyond the matter team. Trigger on: 'which LC should we use', 'LC instruction', 'brief the local counsel', 'LC hasn't responded', 'LC is going off scope', 'LC scope dispute', 'confirm scope with LC', 'LC check-in', 'LC is slow', 'monitor the LC network', 'LC engagement letter', 'LC selection', 'what should we tell the local counsel', 'LC onboarding', 'LC performance issue', 'LC relationship problem'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess and operationalize implementation readiness for high-risk AI systems under the EU AI Act Annex III, including provider and deployer obligations, conformity assessment, post-market monitoring, and EU database registration. Use when users say things like “we classified this as high-risk, what now?”, “build an EU AI Act readiness plan”, “assess our Annex III compliance gaps”, “what do providers/deployers of high-risk AI need to implement?”, “prepare for conformity assessment”, or “create a high-risk AI implementation roadmap.”
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GDPR Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) guidance under Article 35 GDPR, EDPB Guidelines WP 248 rev.01, EDPB Opinion 28/2024 (AI), and national SA blacklists/whitelists. Triggers: "DPIA", "DSFA", "Datenschutz-Folgenabschätzung", "impact assessment", "Art. 35", "do I need a DPIA", descriptions of new high-risk processing (profiling, AI, biometrics, large-scale monitoring, special category data), Art. 36 prior consultation questions, national blacklist/whitelist queries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert CIS Controls v8 (CIS Top 18) advisor — implementation group scoping (IG1/IG2/IG3), control gap assessments, safeguard-level guidance, asset inventory, software inventory, data protection, secure configuration, account management, access control, continuous vulnerability management, audit log management, email and web browser protections, malware defenses, network infrastructure management, network monitoring and defense, application software security, incident response, penetration testing, and CIS Controls mapping to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, SOC 2, and CMMC. Use for any question about CIS Controls, CIS Benchmarks, Implementation Groups, or prioritized cyber hygiene for any organization size.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate scaffolds supporting student self-regulation across planning, monitoring, and evaluation phases. Use when students struggle to manage their own learning during extended or independent tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。