797 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Write a comprehensive product or engineering specification before implementation. Use when the user asks for `/spec`, PRDs, feature specs, API specs, refactor specs, acceptance criteria, user stories, edge cases, or open decision tracking before code is written.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepare logical commits, publish through Pharos’s protected-main pull-request gate, monitor deployment, and hand off operational acceptance. Use only when commit, push, publish, release, or deployment watching is requested.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Post-review intake closing skill. After an intake is resolved (whether accepted via review/meta PR merge or rejected/deferred at triage/evidence review), run this skill to post standardized, personalized closing comments on the PR (if any) and each intake issue. Comments include: evidence pipeline findings with /trust-appraise TM output, per-row artifact scores, decisions rationale, path-to-promotion/acceptance guidance, and a mandatory badge status note including the universal Powered by Gaia badge. Use after curation completes, before or immediately after merge for accepted intakes, or immediately upon rejection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes how a ransomware sample encrypts files: identifying the crypto scheme (symmetric/asymmetric/hybrid), key handling, file targeting and extension/marker changes, shadow-copy deletion, and ransom-note artifacts. Activates for requests to analyze ransomware encryption, assess decryptability, or study ransomware behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The acceptance bar for anything Pulp can install (a `pulp tool` registry entry, `pulp add` package, or any downloadable). Validate the FULL lifecycle — install AND uninstall, from OUTSIDE a Pulp checkout, with the installed-user's binary — before its README or docs ship. TRIGGER when adding/editing tools/packages/tool-registry.json, a new binary_download/python_pip/npm_package tool, a `pulp add` importer, or writing docs that tell users to install something.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The measurement surface for ALL Pulp DSP and audio-pipeline work — read it BEFORE writing or gating DSP, not only when something already sounds wrong. Covers the C++ harness (signal generators, metrics, assertions, RenderScenario, contracts), the offline Audio Doctor (magnitude/frequency response, THD/THD+N, phase/group delay), and their Python sibling the Audio Quality Lab (tools/audio/quality-lab — null residual + alignment, LTAS log-spectral distance, spectral flux/centroid, HNR, Theil-Sen drift slope, Kaiser-sinc resampling, license-guarded corpus, regression-net ratchet). TRIGGER on AUTHORING work — "build/design an oscillator/filter/synth/effect", "add a DSP module", "what should the acceptance gate be", "how do I measure aliasing / anti-aliasing / alias floor", "null against a reference", "is this DSP correct", "choose a tolerance", "golden/regression corpus for audio", "measure drift or jitter", "A/B two renders" — AND on DEBUGGING work — "is there sound / no audio / I hear nothing", "does this filter/compressor/synth/delay produce the right signal", "prove the DSP / prove the contract", "measure the frequency response", "what's the THD / is it distorting", "what's the group delay / phase response / measured latency", "magnitude response curve", "render a test tone and assert", "audio regression", "64-frame works but 128 is silent", "sample-rate change pitch-shifted it", "describe what's in this buffer", "audio doctor", "compare before/after a DSP refactor". Reach for this BEFORE hand-rolling any FFT, null test, alias measurement, pitch tracker, or golden-render script — most of it already exists in one of the two lanes. Test/tool layer over HeadlessHost — deterministic, no audio device, no speakers. Off the realtime thread entirely.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Judge whether a change made things better with demonstrable proxy measures tied to the mechanism it targets, not wall-clock time. Load before choosing acceptance measures for any before/after or A/B claim — CI and fleet speed-ups, build speed, DSP/audio quality, render fidelity. Each proxy names its data source, detection floor and sample size, and every zero is paired with a control on the same instrument.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate that a story file is implementation-ready. Checks for embedded GDD requirements, ADR references, engine notes, clear acceptance criteria, and no open design questions. Produces READY / NEEDS WORK / BLOCKED verdict with specific gaps. Use when user says 'is this story ready', 'can I start on this story', 'is story X ready to implement'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Opt-in DI architecture using Reflex for Unity 6+. Covers container setup, scoping, injection, command pattern, update management, and class taxonomy. Use when ProjectConfig.yaml -> architecture_pattern is "di-first", or when the user asks about dependency injection, inversion of control, service architecture, or testable game code. Triggers on "set up DI", "add dependency injection", "create a service", "wire up dependencies", "make this testable", "decouple these systems", "add a command pattern", "cross-feature communication", or architecture discussions involving testability, decoupling, and service layers. Only activates when ProjectConfig.yaml -> architecture_pattern is "di-first". For simpler projects, use uw-scriptable-object-arch instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-of-story completion review. Reads the story file, verifies each acceptance criterion against the implementation, checks for GDD/ADR deviations, prompts code review, updates story status to Complete, and surfaces the next ready story from the sprint.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read a story file and implement it. Loads the full context (story, GDD requirement, ADR guidelines, control manifest), routes to the right programmer agent for the system and engine, implements the code and test, and confirms each acceptance criterion. The core implementation skill — run after /story-readiness, before /code-review and /story-done.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Break a single epic into implementable story files. Reads the epic, its GDD, governing ADRs, and control manifest. Each story embeds its GDD requirement TR-ID, ADR guidance, acceptance criteria, story type, and test evidence path. Run after /create-epics for each epic.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Unity 6 C# scripting guide. Use when writing MonoBehaviour scripts, handling lifecycle events (Awake, Start, Update, FixedUpdate), using coroutines or async/await (Awaitable), working with ScriptableObjects, events, delegates, or core APIs like Vector3, Quaternion, Time, Debug. Based on Unity 6.3 LTS documentation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Unity data-driven design architecture. ScriptableObject config hierarchies, JSON data pipelines, designer handoff workflows, data versioning and migration, Inspector attributes for self-documenting configs. DECISION format: WHEN/DECISION/SCAFFOLD/GOTCHA. Based on Unity 6.3 LTS.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Unity game architecture decision patterns. Service Locator vs Singleton vs DI, Event Bus vs ScriptableObject channels, MonoBehaviour vs plain C#, component composition, manager bootstrap sequences. DECISION format: WHEN/DECISION/SCAFFOLD/GOTCHA. Based on Unity 6.3 LTS.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Unity 6 core concepts and architecture guide. Use when working with GameObjects, Components, Transforms, Scenes, Prefabs, ScriptableObjects, or Unity project structure. Covers the entity-component architecture, object hierarchy, tags, layers, and project conventions. Based on Unity 6.3 LTS documentation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing, implementing, or reviewing responsive frontend layouts, mobile-first breakpoints, container queries, fluid grids, data-dense tables, touch targets, safe areas, orientation changes, viewport overflow, or cross-device UI behavior; Chinese triggers include responsive layouts, mobile-side adaptation, breakpoints, container queries, horizontal and vertical screens, touch targets.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when behavior-preserving frontend refactoring focuses on function structure, naming, parameters, shared context, or phase boundaries, and the selected technique needs family-specific mechanics, risks, and JavaScript/TypeScript/React/Vue adaptation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when behavior-preserving frontend refactoring focuses on conditional complexity, repeated branches, guards, special cases, or internal invariants, and the selected technique needs family-specific mechanics, risks, and JavaScript/TypeScript/React/Vue adaptation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when behavior-preserving frontend refactoring focuses on legacy OO hierarchies, subtype responsibilities, superclass extraction/collapse, or delegation, and the selected technique needs family-specific mechanics, risks, and JavaScript/TypeScript/React/Vue adaptation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when behavior-preserving frontend refactoring focuses on behavior/data ownership, statement placement, loops, or dead-code knowledge, and the selected technique needs family-specific mechanics, risks, and JavaScript/TypeScript/React/Vue adaptation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when behavior-preserving frontend refactoring focuses on record, collection, value, responsibility, delegation, or algorithm boundaries, and the selected technique needs family-specific mechanics, risks, and JavaScript/TypeScript/React/Vue adaptation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when behavior-preserving frontend refactoring focuses on variable meaning, field naming, derived state, or reference/value identity, and the selected technique needs family-specific mechanics, risks, and JavaScript/TypeScript/React/Vue adaptation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when behavior-preserving frontend refactoring focuses on function API shape, flags, dependencies, mutability, construction, or command/function trade-offs, and the selected technique needs family-specific mechanics, risks, and JavaScript/TypeScript/React/Vue adaptation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。