「stat」の検索結果

Track and update action item status from natural language updates like 'Seanのメールには返信しておいた' or 'Lu対応予定'. Integrates with daily-comms-ops workflow. Use when managing action items across communication channels.

Playwright workflows for authenticated browser state reuse through storageState and setup projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive Stata reference for writing correct .do files. Covers syntax, options, gotchas, and idiomatic patterns. Use this skill whenever the user asks you to write, debug, or explain Stata code. Generates ready-to-run .do files for the user to execute manually.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces a DRAFT product requirements document from the discovery notes, interview summaries, support themes, analytics notes and stakeholder messages the user provides: problem statement, target users, goals with measures as stated, numbered requirements each with a testable acceptance criterion, non-goals, constraints, dependencies and open questions, with every statement tagged evidenced, assumed or UNKNOWN so each assumption is visible for the product owner to confirm. Use when the user asks to "write a PRD", "draft the product requirements", "turn these discovery notes into requirements", "document what this feature needs to do" or "build the requirements doc for this epic". Do not use for supplier-facing requirements in a tender, use rfp-requirements-pack instead; for a technical design decision, use architecture-decision-record; for the change ticket that ships the work, use change-request-pack. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns a schedule extract (milestone list or planning tool export) and the period's status notes into a DRAFT plain-language slip explanation: which milestones and activities slipped and by how many working days, arithmetic shown, why per the notes as verbatim fragments with source and date, what each slip pushes next per the extract, and the decision each slip needs framed as a question with the options the notes propose and the owner the governance documents name, every missing fact marked UNKNOWN. Use when the user asks to "explain the schedule slip", "what slipped this month and why", "write the schedule commentary for the steering pack", "put the delay in plain language for the sponsor" or "what decisions do these slips need". Do not use for the weekly status report, use project-status-tracker instead; for cost variances, use budget-variance-explainer; for one sprint's carry-over, use sprint-review-summary. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Summarises one sprint from the board export, sprint report and review or stand-up notes the user provides into a one-page DRAFT sprint review summary: the sprint goal as written, items delivered, items not delivered with the reasons the sources state, carry-over, impediments, metrics exactly as given, and numbered questions for the retrospective, every row referenced to a work item or note fragment and every missing fact marked UNKNOWN. Use when the user asks to "summarise the sprint", "write the sprint review", "what did we deliver this sprint", "list the carry-over and blockers" or "draft the sprint recap". Do not use for the retrospective write-up or themed lessons across several sprints, use lessons-learned-synthesis instead; for a weekly project status report, use project-status-tracker. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reads a cash forecast (spreadsheet, model export, pasted table or the narrative that accompanies it) and returns a DRAFT assumptions sheet: every assumption the forecast rests on, stated or implied by the figures, with its value as read, its location in the model, the cash lines it drives, its stated source or "not stated", the evidence that would test it, an owner, and one neutral challenge question, so a reviewer can work through the assumptions one by one. Use when the user asks to "list the assumptions behind this cash forecast", "what is this cash flow forecast assuming", "prepare the challenge questions for the treasury review", "pull out the drivers of the 13-week cash forecast" or "build an assumptions register for the liquidity plan". Do not use for actuals against budget by line, use budget-variance-explainer instead; do not use for the case behind a capital request, use capex-request-pack instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns one long support ticket thread (helpdesk history, email chain, chat transcript, call notes) into a one-page DRAFT escalation summary: the customer's ask in their own words, account context as stated, a dated history, what was tried and the stated result of each attempt, the current state, and what is needed from whom by when, every line referenced to a message and every missing fact marked UNKNOWN. Use when the user asks to "escalate this ticket", "summarise this thread for tier two", "write the hand-over for this case", "what has been tried so far", "brief engineering on this customer issue" or "prepare the escalation note". Do not use for a batch of tickets, use ticket-triage-pack instead; for the review after an outage, use incident-postmortem-drafter. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Report this machine's file-synchronization state with the whole fleet: peers connected, per-share state and files still needed, folder errors, and how many sync-conflict files piled up, which is the silent sign two machines are fighting over a file. Read-only and zero tokens. Triggers: "/sync-check", "is sync alive", "sync status".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ensure designs define data flow, state ownership, consistency boundaries, and cross-boundary writes to prevent drift and incidents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create an Estuary derivation for stateless filtering, field selection, and per-document field transformation. Use for WHERE clauses, projecting fields, computing new fields from existing ones, or data cleansing. Derivations add complexity and cost — confirm the user wants a derivation before reaching for this (renaming alone is usually a projection, not a derivation). Use when user says "filter-transform derivation", "derivation to filter by status", "transformation with WHERE clause", "derive computed fields", "cleanse data with a derivation", or "stateless derivation".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check task processing statistics to see how much data and how many docs are moving. Use when checking throughput, diagnosing a stalled task, verifying data movement, or reporting on task activity. Use when user says "is data flowing", "how much data", "check throughput", "how many documents", "task not processing", "data not arriving", "stats", "bytes processed", "stalled capture", "no data in destination", "data volume", "task report", "usage report", or "how much data did we process".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements BLoC (v9.x) event-driven state management for Flutter with unidirectional data flow using the flutter_bloc package. Use when implementing Bloc/Cubit classes, mapping Events to States, consuming state with BlocBuilder/BlocListener/BlocConsumer, applying event transformers (restartable/droppable/sequential) for concurrency control, setting up BlocProvider/MultiBlocProvider DI, integrating Freezed for sealed union types and exhaustive pattern matching, or testing with blocTest. Ideal for enterprise apps requiring business logic separation, precise concurrency control (search debouncing, form deduplication), or event replay debugging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements Riverpod (v3.3.x) compile-safe state management for Flutter apps. Use when implementing @riverpod code generation providers, handling AsyncValue loading/error/data states, using ref.watch/ref.read/ref.listen, setting up ProviderScope, writing Notifier/AsyncNotifier classes, using FutureProvider/StreamProvider, applying autoDispose and family modifiers, combining providers, testing providers in isolation, scoping rebuilds with Consumer instead of ConsumerWidget, using ref.watch with select() for field-level precision, migrating from StateNotifierProvider or Riverpod 2.x patterns, handling Notifier resource lifecycle with ref.onDispose, or using experimental Mutation and offline persistence APIs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Central status dashboard for the PA agent. Use when: owner asks 'what's the status', 'what are you working on', 'what's happening', or any status/overview question. Aggregates active tasks, open issues, monitored groups, pending follow-ups, and system health into one structured report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Proactive self-monitoring of infrastructure, services, and health. Tracks disk/memory/load, service health, cron job status, recent errors. Auto-fixes safe issues. Triggers on: health check, heartbeat, monitor status, service status, infrastructure check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cache dynamic and static responses on Netlify's CDN from Functions, Edge Functions, and proxies. Use when you add caching or cache-control headers to a function response, tune cache TTL or stale-while-revalidate, set up the durable cache, vary a cache key by query/header/cookie/country/language, purge or invalidate the cache by site or cache tag, use the programmatic Cache API (caches.open/match/put) or @netlify/cache helpers (fetchWithCache/cacheHeaders/getCacheStatus), speed up an expensive API call, add ISR or on-demand revalidation, or debug why a response is or isn't cached via the Cache-Status header.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create polished, validated architecture, workflow, sequence, data-flow, and lifecycle/state diagrams as explorable standalone HTML with inline SVG, dark/light themes, optional trace motion, and PNG/JPEG/WebP/SVG/WebM export. Accept plain-language requirements or pasted Mermaid flowchart, sequenceDiagram, and stateDiagram input; inspect repository evidence when the diagram must reflect real code. Use when the user asks to visualize system architecture, infrastructure, cloud/security/network topology, technical workflows, API call sequences, request lifecycles, data pipelines, ETL/ELT, data lineage, state machines, or to convert/beautify Mermaid.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose App Store submission blockers and operate review health with asc, including readiness validation, repair routing, status monitoring, cancellation, and retry decisions. Use when validation fails, a version is not in a valid state, review status is unclear or stuck, or a failed submission must be repaired and retried. For staging, upload, publication, and submission execution, use asc-release-flow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build SwiftUI views with modern MV architecture, state management, and view composition patterns. Covers @Observable ownership rules, @State/@Bindable/@Environment wiring, view decomposition, custom ViewModifiers, environment values, async data loading with .task, iOS 26+ APIs, Writing Tools, and performance guidelines. Use when structuring a SwiftUI app, managing state with @Observable, composing view hierarchies, or applying SwiftUI best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Activate for any ticket that changes React components, user-facing flows, or UI state. Ensures all five observable UI states are verified before state:ready-for-qa.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master orchestrator for the 5-step productivity loop. Runs audit, architect, analyst, refinery, and compounder in sequence or individually. Use when you want to run the full loop, start the system, check system status, resume from where you left off, or run a specific step. Manages state, sequencing, and skill chaining. Supports full loop, single step, resume, and status-only modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in LangGraph - the production-grade framework for building stateful, multi-actor AI applications. Covers graph construction, state management, cycles and branches, persistence with checkpointers, human-in-the-loop patterns, and the ReAct agent pattern. Used in production at LinkedIn, Uber, and 400+ companies. This is LangChain's recommended approach for building agents. Use when: langgraph, langchain agent, stateful agent, agent graph, react agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "model agent mental states", "implement BDI architecture", "create belief-desire-intention models", "transform RDF to beliefs", "build cognitive agent", or mentions BDI ontology, mental state modeling, rational agency, or neuro-symbolic AI integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。