「summary」の検索結果

Conduct an adaptive interactive interview on any topic and produce a structured markdown report, summary, or implementation plan. Use when the user says "interview me", "interview me about", "run an interview on", "help me think through", or wants guided discovery on any subject. Also triggers on "talk me through", "explore X with me", "help me plan Y", or "walk me through my thinking on Z" when the user wants a guided conversation rather than a direct answer. Applies broadly — career decisions, project ideas, product direction, personal goals, research questions, team problems — not just technical topics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to auto-log all tool interactions into a self-organizing vector DB with instant recall. Intercepts interactions, extracts key information, generates embeddings, stores in LanceDB, auto-categorizes, and builds a retrieval index. Inspired by OpenClaw SQLite LCM + summary DAG pattern.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check a papercut reel's stills against the style DNA and the storyboard. Renders contact sheets at a few timestamps, runs the full checklist, then writes the delivery summary. Use for "QA the reel", "check my scenes look like paper", "is this ready to post".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user needs a standup-ready summary of recent project activity from local evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial, security-first review of a pull request from an EXTERNAL or untrusted contributor — a fork PR, a first-time or unknown author, anyone without write access — before a maintainer merges it. Use this whenever you're reviewing, triaging, or deciding whether to merge a PR opened against tbh-meter by someone outside the maintainer team: 'review PR #123', 'someone opened a PR — is it safe to merge?', 'check this contributor's changes', 'can we take this fork PR?', 'is this contribution legit?'. This is supply-chain DEFENSE, not ordinary code review: every merged PR auto-updates onto every user's machine and ships a memory-reading .exe plus an unsandboxed Electron app, so the author and the PR description are UNTRUSTED and the diff is the only evidence. It posts its verdict as a real GitHub review — an inline comment pinned to each problematic line (via the pulls/reviews API), not just one summary comment. NOT for your own or a fellow maintainer's branch (use self-review for that), and prefer this over the generic review flow for anything coming from outside the team.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform a Computer Systems Validation (CSV) assessment following GAMP 5 methodology. Covers user requirements, risk assessment, IQ/OQ/PQ planning, traceability matrix creation, and validation summary reporting. Use when a new computerized system is being introduced in a GxP environment, when an existing validated system is undergoing significant change, when periodic revalidation is required, or when a regulatory inspection demands a validation gap analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct structured insect behavior observations using sampling protocols, ethogram categories, event recording, interaction logging, environmental context, and summary analysis. Covers focal animal sampling, scan sampling, all-occurrences sampling, and instantaneous sampling methods. Defines a standard insect ethogram with locomotion, feeding, grooming, mating, defense, communication, and rest categories. Includes timestamped event recording, intraspecific and interspecific interaction logging, environmental covariate documentation, and time budget analysis. Use when studying insect behavior for ecological research, documenting behavioral repertoires for a species, observing pollinator activity or predator-prey dynamics, or supporting conservation assessments with behavioral data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Log a bias-log / vipassana observation to the memex store the moment a reasoning pattern surfaces, mid-session or at close. Use when you catch a bias in your own reasoning (anchoring, confirmation, trust-the-summary), when a pace tell or verification gap appears, or when meditate/observe produces a reflection worth persisting across sessions. Primary path pipes the body to `memex add` over stdin (`--title` required) then runs the `meditate-vipassana` extractor to make it queryable; secondary path appends a numbered bullet to `docs/OBSERVATIONS.md`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured GitHub issue creation from review findings or task breakdowns. Groups related findings into logical issues, applies labels, and produces issues with standard templates including summary, findings, and acceptance criteria. Designed to consume output from review-codebase or similar review skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Parallel SDLC batch runner. Analyzes a list of independent task descriptions, groups them by heuristic file-conflict prediction, dispatches one worktree-isolated background agent per task (each running the full pipeline-orchestrator: BA → Dev → QA → Sec → Docs), and aggregates results into a single batch summary. Use when: - `/sdlc:batch` invokes this skill after parsing its arguments (Step 2 of commands/batch.md) - You have 2+ independent feature/fix descriptions to run through the SDLC pipeline in parallel Do NOT use for: - A single task (use pipeline-orchestrator directly via /sdlc:start) - Tasks that must share a single working tree (this skill isolates each task in its own git worktree)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shared conventions for every SDLC development-phase architect agent: hard rules, code quality bar, workflow steps (superpowers invocation, spec reading, codebase exploration, verification), and the report/compact-summary contract. Architects load this skill first, then apply their stack-specific instructions on top.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to discover, group, and summarize work records across multiple systems for a given period or project. Not for organizing projects into child documents or local-only summaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks about recent engineering work, what the team is working on, planning or roadmap material, or an explicitly requested Slack summary. Not for remote or irreversible changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when addressing review feedback in analyze or reception mode, or handling GitHub PR feedback in autonomous, interactive, or summary mode for a named PR target. Classifies, applies, replies, or summarizes comments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates a single project slide or one-page visual summary for a repo. Use when generating a project intro image or promotional slide.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically QA test a web application and fix bugs found. Runs QA testing, then iteratively fixes bugs in source code, committing each fix atomically and re-verifying. Use when asked to "qa", "QA", "test this site", "find bugs", "test and fix", or "fix what's broken". Three tiers: Quick (critical/high only), Standard (+ medium), Exhaustive (+ cosmetic). Produces before/after health scores, fix evidence, and a ship-readiness summary. For report-only mode, use /qa-only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reads, searches and counts Claude Code session transcripts (the .jsonl files under ~/.claude/projects, subagents too) with the csift command-line tool, and ships hooks that re-inject compacted turns or record pending questions. Use when asked what a past or running session said, did, edited, spent or is doing now; when about to grep, jq or script over a transcript jsonl (a type=="user" filter overcounts the person's messages), count how many messages the person typed, tool calls or tokens, or claim something was never done or decided; to rebuild a lost file or plan from what a session wrote, extract pasted images, restore turns a compaction summary lost, find a subagent's own id when CLAUDE_CODE_SESSION_ID names the parent, wait on or message another session or subagent; or when csift prints "unknown label selector", "show needs an address", "looks like a session/agent id, not a project path" or "0 matches — a DEFINITIVE absence". Not for semantic or embedding search: csift matches regular expressions only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Summarize any block of text using the `summarize` CLI (chained-in from steipete/summarize — npm package `@steipete/summarize`). Use whenever the user pastes a long piece of content and asks for a TL;DR, a summary, a digest, a gist, a condensed version, or key points — even if they don't explicitly say "use summarize". Also chains into `mktg-transcribe --summarize` for audio/video TL;DRs and source-digestion workflows to condense long articles. Requires the `summarize` CLI to be installed (`mktg doctor` will tell you if it's missing). Do NOT trigger for structured data (JSON/CSV/code), for text already shorter than ~500 words, or when the user wants the full content preserved.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

将群聊记录转化为规避微信折叠、无列表符号、Emoji 标题的精简中文总结。当用户已导出群聊记录（见 wechat skill）并想生成可直接发回微信群的摘要时使用。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Show recent Claude Code sessions across all projects, so the user can re-enter work after a reboot or context switch. Lists per session the absolute project path, a short summary, where the session stopped, last activity, turn count, git branch, model, and a ready-to-paste resume command; can search sessions by what was said in them, flag projects with uncommitted or unpushed work, and re-open every session at once in new terminal tabs. Use when the user asks "what was I working on", "which projects did I touch recently", "where did I leave off", "list my recent sessions", "how do I get back into that session", "open all my sessions again", "which session did I fix X in", "where do I still have uncommitted work", or invokes /recap. Reads only local files; the default run is instant and offline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill any time a .pptx file is involved in any way — as input, output, or both. This includes: creating slide decks, pitch decks, or presentations; reading, parsing, or extracting text from any .pptx file (even if the extracted content will be used elsewhere, like in an email or summary); editing, modifying, or updating existing presentations; combining or splitting slide files; working with templates, layouts, speaker notes, or comments. Trigger whenever the user mentions "deck," "slides," "presentation," or references a .pptx filename, regardless of what they plan to do with the content afterward. If a .pptx file needs to be opened, created, or touched, use this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run cross-experiment competition strategy synthesis. Invokes the competition-strategist agent which loads daily_reports/* + all SESSION_NOTES.md / claudeSummary.md / submit/SUBMISSIONS.md / KAGGLE_DIRECTION.md in parallel and proposes next moves. Use weekly or at inflection points.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing a pull request in this repository — check the description against the PR template section by section, then run a separate regression and user-impact pass that produces impact levels and a review summary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill any time a .pptx or .potx file is involved in any way — as input, output, or both. This includes: creating slide decks, pitch decks, or presentations as PowerPoint (.pptx) files; reading, parsing, or extracting text from any .pptx or .potx file (even if the extracted content will be used elsewhere, like in an email, summary, or creating a different type of slide deck); editing, modifying, or updating existing presentations; combining or splitting slide files; working with templates (.potx), layouts, speaker notes, or comments. Trigger whenever the user asks for a PowerPoint, a deck, slides or a presentation, or references a .pptx or .potx filename, regardless of what they plan to do with the content afterward.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。