「the」の検索結果

Orchestrate the remote rules registry — the shared registry (often connected as a local folder or git repo) that the project's rules are published to and pulled from. Three modes, picked from the user's wording: create scaffolds a new local rules registry ("create a local rules registry", "init a rules registry"); update migrates/promotes local knowledge-base rules from .unikit/memory/ into the remote registry with automatic semver bumps ("migrate local rules to the remote registry", "promote my rules to the registry", "push local rules", "publish local rules", "update the rules registry"); sync pulls registry updates back into memory ("sync the rules registry", "pull registry updates"). Pass "--module <id>" to scope to one knowledge-base module. This skill ONLY orchestrates the CLI (`unikit-ai rules *`) — it never edits .unikit.json or .unikit/memory/ sources directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Firmware development for the Beetle — the CJMCU / DFRobot "Mini Arduino Leonardo" USB board (ATmega32U4 @ 16 MHz, 5 V, 21×28 mm, castellated pads) — its native USB (CDC serial + HID keyboard/mouse/joystick), Caterina bootloader and 1200 bps touch upload, ten exposed I/O pads, four PWM pins across Timer0/Timer1, five ADC channels, I2C on D2/D3, SPI on the back-side ICSP pads, 28 KB usable flash and 2.5 KB SRAM, and the PlatformIO + Arduino AVR core (`board = leonardo`) setup around them. Use when working on this board or any ATmega32U4 Leonardo/Micro/Pro-Micro-class clone: project setup, platformio.ini, why the board shows up as two different serial ports, uploads that fail or hang, recovering a bricked or HID-spamming board by shorting the ICSP reset pads, pin mapping and which pads are missing, PWM/timer conflicts, Servo and tone, USB HID keyboard projects, the SRAM budget, powering from the + pad, or debugging why something on the board does not work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Firmware development for the 40-pin ESP32-S3-WROOM-1 camera board — the Freenove ESP32-S3-WROOM (FNK0085) and the AliExpress "ESP32-S3 CAM" / "ESP32-S3-WROOM N16R8 CAM" clones that copy its header: 20 pins a side, a 24-pin DVP camera FPC connector for an OV2640/OV3660, an on-board microSD slot on the SDMMC bus, a WS2812, two USB-C sockets (CH343 bridge and native USB), ESP32-S3-WROOM-1-N8R8 or N16R8 with 8 MB octal PSRAM. Use when working on this board or any ESP32-S3 DVP camera board: project setup, platformio.ini, the qio_opi PSRAM memory type, camera and SD_MMC pin maps, esp_camera_init failures, PSRAM not found, frame buffer allocation, SD card mount failures, which GPIOs are left once the camera is wired, strapping pins, ADC1/ADC2, flashing over the two USB ports, BOOT/RESET recovery, brownouts, or debugging why the camera, the card or the board does not work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Firmware development for the WeAct Studio "Black Pill" (STM32F411CEU6) and its clones such as the DFRobot DFR0864 — the 25 MHz HSE and 32.768 kHz LSE crystals, PC13 LED, K1 button, USB-C wired straight to USB_OTG_FS, ROM DFU flashing, the SPI-flash footprint, and the STM32Cube HAL + PlatformIO setup around them. Use when working on this board or any STM32F411CE/F401CC Black Pill: project setup, platformio.ini, clock and PLL configuration for 96 MHz plus 48 MHz USB, pin mapping on the 48-pin package, USB CDC console, RTC on the LSE crystal, the internal temperature sensor, ADC accuracy, DFU flashing and recovery, or debugging why something on the board does not work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check that the scheduled data work behind the reports actually ran and produced something sensible: the daily reshaping scripts, the API pulls, the tables the reports read from. Use each morning before anyone opens a report, when a report looks wrong and nobody knows whether it is the data or the query, after a schema or API change, when a new audience or source is added to the pipeline, or when a scheduled job failed or finished suspiciously fast.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate implementation to Codex, grok, or cursor-agent, then review the diff, send it back to iterate, gate on the full test suite, and ship it as a PR. Use this whenever the user wants Codex, the grok 后端, or cursor-agent to write code, mentions handing off / delegating implementation to one of those backends, asks to work through a plan or spec unit-by-unit with an implementation backend doing the coding, or wants a review-and-merge loop wrapped around delegated output — and also when resuming such a loop ("keep going", "next unit", "继续下一个"). It encodes constraints that are expensive to rediscover: the implementer runs in the real environment behind backend-specific git and publication boundaries, must not be pointed at a full test suite by default, and its self-report is a claim rather than evidence. This loop expects an approved plan or an equivalently precise spec; settle an unsolved high-level goal into a plan first, using the engineering-mode skill when it is installed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Launch Marcus multi-agent experiments with independent Claude agents in tmux panes. Use when the user says "build X with Marcus", "run a Marcus experiment", "spawn N agents with Marcus", "/marcus", or references the Marcus multi-agent framework. This skill handles experiment setup, config generation, and spawning independent Claude CLI agents that coordinate via the Marcus MCP server. Each agent runs in its own tmux pane with full autonomy. NOT for ClawTeam — this is specifically for the Marcus MCP-based multi-agent system. NOTE: "Marcus" is also the name of the MCP server that agents use for coordination. The /marcus skill launches experiments that USE the Marcus MCP server — they are complementary, not competing. The MCP server must be running before invoking this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Observe the user's screen via screenpipe, detect repeated research workflows, match them against existing scientific-agent-skills, and draft new skills (or composition recipes that chain existing ones) for the patterns not yet covered. Use when the user asks to analyze their recent work and propose skills based on what they actually do. Requires the screenpipe daemon (https://github.com/screenpipe/screenpipe) running locally on port 3030 — the skill has no other data source and will refuse to run if screenpipe is unreachable. All detection runs locally; only redacted cluster summaries reach the LLM.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase 10.6 — sync the project's execution roadmap (project.json → roadmap.path, default docs/roadmap-execution-plan.md) to the just-landed work. Flips the tasks named in workflow.json → roadmap_tasks[] from ⬜ to ✅ and promotes their epic headings ⬜→🟡→✅, preserving the standup parser format contract. On the epic track it appends instead — the epic's heading plus one row per slice — and stamps roadmap_epic back into the epic state. Also hosts the ad-hoc backfill that puts every epic already on disk onto the roadmap. Fail-open: never throws, no-ops when roadmap.path is unset/absent or no task matches, and never blocks a commit. Runs after /archive and before /memory-sync on every committing track.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The primary tool for code-navigation questions in ANY language (frontend or backend) — walk the structural graph from an entry point (page, route, handler, command, `main`) down through imports to the IO boundary (network call, query, file read). Use this skill, in preference to the Explore agent or global grep, whenever the user asks "where does X come from?", "what API/data populates Y?", "what renders or wraps the Z panel?", "which file for feature F?", "how is this wired up?", or any code-navigation question mapping a UI element, route, or feature concept to source files. Also reverse queries ("what uses /api/foo?", "who consumes this service?"). Keyword search routinely picks up unrelated flows sharing a domain word and produces wrong answers; the walk follows the actual graph. The JS/TS `walk.mjs`/`discover.mjs` are an optional accelerator, not required — the walk is language-agnostic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search and preview Irasutoya illustrations with the installed `irasutoya` command-line tool. Use this skill whenever the user wants to find, recommend, preview, randomly pull up, or get the page/image URL of an Irasutoya (いらすとや) image — from a topic, scene, Korean/Japanese/English phrase, visual description, emotion, character, object, or action — even if they don't say "Irasutoya" by name but clearly want a free, cute illustration for a slide, 발표자료, blog, doc, or chat. Also use it to optimize vague requests into fast Japanese keyword candidates and to return page/image URLs. Do NOT use it to generate brand-new AI art (e.g. DALL·E, Midjourney), draw charts or diagrams, design logos or icons, cut out/edit existing images, or recommend other stock-image sites — it only searches Irasutoya's existing catalog.

Read the project's knowledge record before answering from memory or from the files. Use before answering about the project's state, a number, a date, a decision, a source, a deadline or what was agreed - even a casual 'what's the situation with X' or 'is that quote still current'; before changing a recorded value; and whenever the opener or a grounding line names entries. After finding relevant IDs, prefer kpop context to read them with their declared dependencies and checks. Uses pull for concise readings or when the checked reader is unavailable, affects for changed inputs, and search when no ID is known. A missing id is not absence. Not for showing the record's page (the hub skill). Requests come in any language.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

At the end of a long working session, produce a counterfactual trace note — a backward walk through the session that identifies the small number of load-bearing moments (observations, failures, accidents, decisions) without which the final outcome would not exist. Use this whenever the user asks to "close the session", "run the butterfly", "trace back", "what actually mattered here", asks for a session retrospective, or asks how the session arrived at its result. Also use it when a session ends with a significant outcome (a fix, a design decision, a shipped artifact) and the user wants a note capturing why it happened, not just what happened. Do NOT use for simple summaries of short sessions — this skill is for causal tracing, and it only earns its cost when the session was long enough to contain real forks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The crouton mental model for someone who has never seen this repo — what "layer" means (two different things), the two-halves rule, the three app.config registries, team-scoped multi-tenancy, manifest-driven field types, the numbered invariants with the incidents behind them, and the known-weak points. Use when orienting in this codebase for the first time, when a question is shaped like "how does crouton work / why is it built this way / where does X live", when deciding whether a change belongs in a package or a generated layer, when confused by an extends chain or by croutonApps/croutonCollections/croutonLayoutBlocks, or before proposing any structural change. Trigger phrases: "what is a crouton layer", "package vs generated layer", "how does multi-tenancy work here", "why is there a stub component", "where do field types come from", "what invariants must hold".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The crouton-conformance gate — the SECOND acceptance axis of graduation (the first is the experience side-by-side, /graduate stage C1). Checks a graduated app is a REAL crouton app — CLI-scaffolded, real collections, consumes the correct packages without reinventing them — by composing the existing probes (frontend-review, a11y, e2e-smoke, typecheck) plus crouton-structural checks, then renders a required, signed-off checklist on the graduation PR. Use at /graduate stage C2, or when asked "is this app crouton-native", "run the conformance gate", "check graduation conformance".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Relentless one-question-at-a-time interview (tappable options with a recommended answer) that sharpens a requirement, business plan, project plan, proposal, or raw idea through conversation, then writes it up as a brief with a glossary and decision log. Use whenever the user wants their thinking stress-tested or pinned down before acting — trigger phrases include "grill me", "grill this", "詰めて", "詰めたい", "壁打ち", "要件を固めたい", "企画を練りたい", "計画を整理したい", "アイデアをぶつけたい", "突っ込んで", "clarify", "質問して", "何が決まってないか教えて", or when the user describes a plan/idea vaguely and asks what to do next. Do NOT use for reviewing a finished document (use a document-review skill) or when the user just wants an answer, not questions.

Write the document of a research run — plan the question and the outline with rs_plan, write prose and declare its claims together with rs_write, choose the claim strength the evidence actually holds, follow the section structure the run's kind maps to, read the draft back, and build a watermarked draft before the gated clean build. Use when a run's document has to be written, a section drafted, a claim bound to a source, or a build attempted.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the NASA Systems Modeling Handbook for Systems Engineering (NASA-HDBK-1009A Rev A, 2025). Use for model-based systems engineering (MBSE) wired into NASA's NPR 7123.1 SE processes: the three aspects of MBSE (language / methodology / framework), the NASA SE Engine and its two OOSEM-derived steps (Model Planning, Setting Up the Model), the Modeling Plan as a SEMP subset, the tool-agnostic NASA SE metamodel of elements and relationships across the four SysML pillars (structure / behavior / requirements / parametrics), worked SysML diagrams and tables for stakeholders, requirements, structure and V&V, generating SE work products (ConOps, MOE, MOP, TPM, V&V), the MBSE Grid framework, alternative modeling approaches (PBR, Scenario, System Specification, Verification), and the ConOps model-content template. Scope is bounded to four common technical processes (Stakeholder Expectation Definition, Technical Requirements Definition, Product Verification, Product Validation). Does NOT teach SysML itself, mandate a tool, define NPR 7123.1 processes, cover technical-management processes 10-17, or reproduce the OMG SysML specification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the NASA Digital Engineering Acquisition Framework Handbook (NASA-HDBK-1004). Use for acquiring digital/model-based data under contract: the Data Requirements Description (DRD) instrument and the Appendix A DRD suite (TDP, MBx, CDMP, CSA, CR, FCA/PCA, SDT, EMDAL, REF, MRI); the Data Type 1-5 control scale; SOW/RFP/Cost-Volume contract language and data rights (FAR/DFARS, Table 3 license categories); the Requirements Exchange Format (REF/ReqIF, UUID schema) and Master Records Index; model-based data definition (MBSE, CAD/PMI, M&S credibility, BOM, release-state mapping, PLM); digital data collaboration, the four owned architectures, and interoperability standards (MIL-STD-31000, STEP/ISO 10303, ASME Y14); the four MBE interoperability use cases; and MBE Plan development. Scope is the acquisition and contracting side of digital engineering. Does not reproduce ISO/STEP/ASME/MIL-STD/SAE standard text, and the companion NASA-HDBK-1009A carries the deeper digital-engineering practitioner detail this handbook defers to.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the FAA AMS Lifecycle V&V Guidelines (verification and validation), Version 3.0, dated April 2017. Use for applying verification and validation across the FAA Acquisition Management System (AMS) lifecycle: the verify-vs-validate distinction (built right vs. right thing), the work-product/component/product tiers, the nine V&V planning elements, the four method catalogs (Appendix C), decision-point-gated V&V (SASP, CRD, Investment Analysis, Solution Implementation, In-Service Management), the Appendix B document checklists (PRD/APB/ISPD/PMP), and the DT/OT/IOA test triad. Scope limits: this is an FAA acquisition-V&V doctrine, NOT a general SE process model, requirements-engineering manual, or test-design textbook. It borrows its core V&V definitions from CMMI v1.2 (SEI, paraphrased) and presumes the surrounding AMS lifecycle (see the FAA SEM pack); its phase tables are policy snapshots as of April 2017 and it is thin on detailed test methods, tool specifics, and anything outside FAA acquisition governance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the FAA Requirements Engineering Management Handbook (DOT/FAA/AR-08/32). Use for writing requirements for real-time, embedded control systems — the avionics/medical slant — via the Handbook's eleven recommended practices: system overview and boundary (monitored/controlled variables), operational concepts (use cases), environmental assumptions, change-tolerant functional architecture (dependency diagrams), safety-driven architecture revision (FHA/PSSA/fault tree), system modes, detailed behavior and performance requirements (ideal value + tolerance + latency), the four-variable model bridge to software requirements (MON/CON/NAT/REQ, IN'/REQ'/OUT', DO-178B mapping), subsystem allocation, and rationale. Carries the Isolette Thermostat and Flight Control System worked examples. Slanted toward control systems with sensors and actuators; thin on information-system / enterprise / agile requirements, on requirements-management tooling, and on the formal-methods internals of SCR/RSML/SpecTRM (it names them, does not re-teach them). Does not reproduce the IEEE/DO-178B/ARP standards it cites.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintains four living project files (overview and progress log, decision log, RAID log, links) from the mail, channel posts, documents and meeting notes the user attaches or the agent can reach, returns each touched file complete in the chat for the user to save, and builds a weekly DRAFT status report from those files. Use when the user asks to "set up tracking for project X", "catch the project files up", "log this decision against the project", "add this risk to the RAID log", "save this link to the project" or "write this week's status report". Do not use for reviewing an existing RAID log for stale or ownerless entries, use raid-log-review instead; for an HTML status page, use project-dashboard-builder; for minutes of one meeting, use meeting-minutes-writer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces a DRAFT product requirements document from the discovery notes, interview summaries, support themes, analytics notes and stakeholder messages the user provides: problem statement, target users, goals with measures as stated, numbered requirements each with a testable acceptance criterion, non-goals, constraints, dependencies and open questions, with every statement tagged evidenced, assumed or UNKNOWN so each assumption is visible for the product owner to confirm. Use when the user asks to "write a PRD", "draft the product requirements", "turn these discovery notes into requirements", "document what this feature needs to do" or "build the requirements doc for this epic". Do not use for supplier-facing requirements in a tender, use rfp-requirements-pack instead; for a technical design decision, use architecture-decision-record; for the change ticket that ships the work, use change-request-pack. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scores inbound leads against the qualification rubric the user supplies (criteria, scale, weights, thresholds and disqualifiers as given): one DRAFT scorecard per lead with the evidence quoted per criterion, UNKNOWN wherever the lead's information is missing, totals shown with and without the UNKNOWN criteria, a ranked list and a suggested next step such as a qualification call, a request for missing details, nurture or a courteous decline. Use when the user asks to "score these inbound leads", "qualify this lead against our rubric", "run the web form submissions through our lead criteria", "which of these leads should sales call first" or "build a lead scorecard". Do not use for preparing the first call with a lead, use discovery-call-prep instead; for an existing account's growth plan use account-plan-builder. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。