「som」の検索結果

Distinguishing aims, objectives, hypotheses, and milestones — the hierarchy that keeps proposals logically tight.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master 1Password: vaults, Watchtower, passkeys, SSH agent, CLI, and family/team administration. Use when getting full value from 1Password personally or administering it for others.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate agents at runtime — task routing, scheduling, parallel execution, result aggregation, and supervision dashboards. Use when running agents as a managed fleet rather than one-off calls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designing alert rules that fire when it matters — thresholds, burn rates, and routing — for any monitoring stack.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use announcement banners effectively — in-app and site banners for launches, alerts, and critical messages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Application performance monitoring — transactions, profiling, and finding slow code — works with any APM platform.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive social media operations for B2B SaaS brand building and engagement. Use this skill to develop LinkedIn strategy, decide whether to run a LinkedIn newsletter and how to scope it, capture consented registrations from LinkedIn Events, check LinkedIn Live eligibility, manage Twitter/X presence, create YouTube content, engage on Reddit communities, decide whether and how to answer on Quora, build community, develop influencer and creator partnerships, vet a creator before paying them, start or fix a B2B podcast, book podcast guests and guest appearances, judge whether a podcast is worth appearing on when you cannot audit its numbers, write show notes and transcripts, run social listening (what are people saying about us, share of voice, brand monitoring, validated sentiment, alert thresholds, routing signals to the right owner), and execute organic social campaigns. Also triggers on: LinkedIn, LinkedIn newsletter, LinkedIn Events, LinkedIn Live, event registration form, subscribe to our newsletter on LinkedIn, marketing consent checkbox, Notify Employees, Twitter/X, YouTube, Reddit, community, influencer, creator partnerships, influencer vetting, engagement rate, fake followers, engagement pods, FTC disclosure, sponsored post disclosure, media kit, social media strategy, organic social, employee advocacy, podcast, podcast strategy, podcast guesting, how do I know if this podcast has real listeners, the host says they get 50k downloads, is this podcast worth going on, podcast RSS feed research, IAB podcast measurement certification, Listen Score, Apple Podcasts reviews, show notes, audiogram, episode transcript, social media account access, who has admin on our LinkedIn page, the person who ran our social accounts left, locked out of our company account, social media offboarding, YouTube channel owner, Slack primary owner, social account MFA, social media approval workflow, pause all scheduled posts, social listening, what are people saying about us, brand monitoring, brand mentions, share of voice, social share of voice vs competitors, sentiment analysis, is our sentiment dashboard accurate, listening query, boolean query, mention alerts, spike alert, CrowdTangle replacement, Reddit API access, which platforms can our listening tool see, someone on Reddit asked for a tool like ours, comment mining, voice of customer from social.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Lays a music bed under a finished video — the music is trimmed and faded to the video's exact length and ducks beneath the voice, while the video stream is copied untouched. Use when the user asks to add music, add a background track, add a music bed or soundtrack, or asks for something like "make a lofi mix of this": "put music under this ad", "add a background track", "give me a couple of music versions". Entered from a finished cut — captions already burned is the preferred input, not a problem. It never edits the picture and never changes the video's length.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze a reference video and reverse-engineer its style into a reusable Seedance 2.0 prompting template for the Novoads API. The output is a new formula file — like seedance-2-ugc.md — that captures the video's structure, pacing, camera work, edit style and tone so it can be recreated with any product, any person, in any setting. Use this whenever someone provides a video they want to use as a style reference, says "I want to make videos like this", "deconstruct this video", "turn this into a template", "analyze this style", or drops a video file and wants to recreate that format repeatedly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check whether the work is actually finished rather than finished-looking — what was promised versus what really runs. Several models compare the task against the code, and every completion claim has to survive a command that was actually executed. Use before calling something done, before a PR, at the end of a session, or on "is this done", "did I finish", "check if done", "what did we skip".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Launch some action before create push in git

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Launch some action to push the code in git

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Give your AI agents something more useful than a prompt. Velocity through clarity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintainer side of an outside contribution — find what has arrived (fork PR, issue, or patches sent out-of-band), adopt it into an in-repo branch with authorship intact, review it against the repo's bar, and ship it through the normal merge path. Use when landing work from someone without write access or without the CI fleet.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Coordinate a cross-session or cross-machine handoff — snapshot the open work, write a status doc to the pulp-planning repo on main, and emit a ready-to-paste goal prompt that links it, so a fresh session (often on another machine) can pick up and finish. Use when the user says "coordinate a handoff", "hand this off", "move this work to a new machine", "we're retiring this session", or asks for a status doc plus a goal for someone else to continue.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a moment of friction — a conflicting PR, a wedged runner, a mysterious red check, a repeated manual chore — into a durable, actionable report. Sizes up the scenario, captures the evidence, separates one-off from SYSTEMIC, proposes a fix, and routes it (fix now, or hand off). Reports are LIVING documents that the fixing agent updates with the outcome. Invoke whenever something feels like it shouldn't have been this hard, or when the same annoyance shows up twice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The acceptance bar for anything Pulp can install (a `pulp tool` registry entry, `pulp add` package, or any downloadable). Validate the FULL lifecycle — install AND uninstall, from OUTSIDE a Pulp checkout, with the installed-user's binary — before its README or docs ship. TRIGGER when adding/editing tools/packages/tool-registry.json, a new binary_download/python_pip/npm_package tool, a `pulp add` importer, or writing docs that tell users to install something.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The measurement surface for ALL Pulp DSP and audio-pipeline work — read it BEFORE writing or gating DSP, not only when something already sounds wrong. Covers the C++ harness (signal generators, metrics, assertions, RenderScenario, contracts), the offline Audio Doctor (magnitude/frequency response, THD/THD+N, phase/group delay), and their Python sibling the Audio Quality Lab (tools/audio/quality-lab — null residual + alignment, LTAS log-spectral distance, spectral flux/centroid, HNR, Theil-Sen drift slope, Kaiser-sinc resampling, license-guarded corpus, regression-net ratchet). TRIGGER on AUTHORING work — "build/design an oscillator/filter/synth/effect", "add a DSP module", "what should the acceptance gate be", "how do I measure aliasing / anti-aliasing / alias floor", "null against a reference", "is this DSP correct", "choose a tolerance", "golden/regression corpus for audio", "measure drift or jitter", "A/B two renders" — AND on DEBUGGING work — "is there sound / no audio / I hear nothing", "does this filter/compressor/synth/delay produce the right signal", "prove the DSP / prove the contract", "measure the frequency response", "what's the THD / is it distorting", "what's the group delay / phase response / measured latency", "magnitude response curve", "render a test tone and assert", "audio regression", "64-frame works but 128 is silent", "sample-rate change pitch-shifted it", "describe what's in this buffer", "audio doctor", "compare before/after a DSP refactor". Reach for this BEFORE hand-rolling any FFT, null test, alias measurement, pitch tracker, or golden-render script — most of it already exists in one of the two lanes. Test/tool layer over HeadlessHost — deterministic, no audio device, no speakers. Off the realtime thread entirely.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Building and shipping a Forge app (Modular, Instrument, MIDI, FX, and the sequencer work to come) as a signed installer somebody else can actually use. Covers the seam between the Forge and Pulp repos, what a green signal does and does not prove, shipping the runtime rather than only the binary, and the wiring gaps that make a finished feature behave like a missing one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic 4-phase debugging framework for Unity projects with GameDebug wrapper generation. Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes. Triggers on requests like "this doesn't work", "there's a bug", "it crashes when", "fix this error", "why is this happening", "null reference exception", "test is failing", "unexpected behavior", "something broke", or any debugging task. Four-phase framework (gather evidence, isolate, hypothesize, fix) that ensures understanding before attempting solutions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit whether all score-deciding logic in sgl-eval is vendored from NeMo-Skills, or whether some has crept into SE code. Use when the user asks "are we vendoring enough", "review vendor coverage", "audit vendoring", "is our vendoring complete", or before a release.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Cytogenetic Technologist — choosing a culture/harvest protocol and band resolution for a specimen, applying ISCN clonality criteria to a metaphase count, deciding between karyotype, FISH, and chromosomal microarray for a clinical question, or writing and QCing an ISCN-formatted cytogenetics report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Compensation, Benefits, and Job Analysis Specialist — market-pricing a job against salary survey data, scoring a job through a point-factor or IPE job evaluation, running a pay-equity regression or cohort analysis, building or refreshing a salary structure and compa-ratio bands, classifying a job family's FLSA exemption status through the duties test, or modeling benefits plan cost (loss ratio, PEPM, self-funded vs. fully insured). Distinct from hr-people-manager (owns the comp/leveling judgment calls — whether to approve an exception, promote someone into a level), hr-specialist (owns individual-case leave/I-9/ADA/FLSA reclassification for one employee's drifted duties), and compensation-benefits-manager (owns pay philosophy, negotiation-range policy, and the department that runs this work). This role owns the mechanics: the survey match, the point score, the regression, the band math — the analysis those upstream policy and downstream judgment calls are made against.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Bioinformatics Scientist — designing a differential-expression or GWAS analysis with correct multiple-testing correction, calling and triaging variants from NGS data using genotype-likelihood confidence rather than raw allele counts, interpreting a BLAST/DIAMOND homology search, choosing or building a genomics pipeline (aligner, caller, normalization method) for a specific data-generating process, or judging whether a computational-biology analysis's statistical design actually supports the biological claim being made. Distinct from a bioinformatics-technician (executes and QC-gates an established pipeline someone else designed) and a data-scientist (general product/experimentation judgment, not genomics-specific statistics) — this role owns which method and statistical model a genomics question requires, and why.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。