Red team engagement planning is the foundational phase that defines scope, objectives, rules of engagement (ROE), threat model selection, and operational timelines before any offensive testing begins.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
8,322 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Red team engagement planning is the foundational phase that defines scope, objectives, rules of engagement (ROE), threat model selection, and operational timelines before any offensive testing begins.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs financial ratio analysis, DCF valuation, budget variance analysis, and rolling forecast construction for strategic decision-making. Use when analyzing financial statements, building valuation models, assessing budget variances, or constructing financial projections and forecasts. Also applicable when users mention financial modeling, cash flow analysis, company valuation, financial projections, or spreadsheet analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extract clean markdown content from web pages using Defuddle CLI, removing clutter and navigation to save tokens. Use instead of WebFetch when the user provides a URL to read or analyze, for online documentation, articles, blog posts, or any standard web page. Do NOT use for URLs ending in .md those are already markdown, use WebFetch directly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a PlayCanvas app has too many draw calls or is CPU-bound, before hand-merging meshes or writing custom renderers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
X/Twitter public sentiment research. Searches X for real-time perspectives, market sentiment, expert opinions, breaking news, and community discourse. Use when: user asks "what are people saying about", "X/Twitter sentiment", "check X for", "search twitter for", "what's CT saying about", or wants public opinion on a stock, sector, company, or market event.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Sets up safe working habits and a change log so you always know what Cowork has done to your files — and can undo anything. Use when setting up file protection guardrails, for establishing safe automation habits, during initial access configuration, when granting file permissions for the first time, or when the user says "is cowork safe", "file safety", "what if it deletes my files", "audit trail", "safety setup", "I'm nervous about file access", "how do I trust cowork with my files", "can cowork mess up my computer", "I heard someone lost files", or "how do I stay in control".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Walks you through pairing your phone with Cowork and sending your first remote task — so you can control your desktop from anywhere. For deploying tasks while commuting or in meetings, when setting up mobile-to-desktop control for the first time, or during a Cowork Max feature exploration session. Use when the user says "dispatch", "control cowork from phone", "remote task", "phone to desktop", "try dispatch", "can I use cowork from my phone", or "send cowork a task while I am away".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Initialize a VCSDD feature pipeline. Creates the .vcsdd/features/<name>/ directory tree, sets mode (strict|lean), and activates the feature. Must be run before any other VCSDD command.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform critical Rust code reviews covering correctness, edition 2024 compliance, error handling, API design, async pitfalls, and dependency hygiene. ALWAYS use this skill when the user wants to review, audit, or critically evaluate Rust code — whether that's a PR diff, a specific crate or module, a cross-cutting concern like error handling, or the whole codebase. This includes requests to "review my changes", "check this code", "audit for best practices", "look for issues", "what's wrong with this", or "flag anything that could bite us". Use it even when the user doesn't say "review" explicitly but is asking you to find problems, inconsistencies, or anti-patterns in existing Rust code. Do NOT use for requests to write, fix, refactor, test, explain, or implement code — only for evaluating existing code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to know where a piece of reporting actually came from — the user gives an article URL and asks "where does this come from?", "who is the original source?", "is this just a rewrite?", or another skill needs the provenance chain before grading or citing a report. Follows an article's links and named attributions back to the originating vendor, government, victim or actor document and returns the chain, the primary's stated access and confidence language, publication dates, and every hop it could not resolve. Deterministic — a script or the Liberty91 platform resolves the chain; the model does not reconstruct it from memory. Invoked by /quality-of-information-check, /threat-actor-profiling, /campaign-tracking and /intelligence-writing. Works on any URL with no API key.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks "which SAT should I use for X?", wants the index of Structured Analytic Techniques, or is choosing between quality-of-information-check, ACH, key-assumptions-check, devils-advocacy, indicators of change, etc. Quality of Information Check is the default first step of any diagnostic run.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use as the default entry point for any CTI request that doesn't name a specific skill. Activates when a user asks to investigate an indicator, profile a threat actor, write an assessment, enrich IOCs, or build detection rules, and when a user asks where a report or article comes from, how reliable it is, to grade a source, check a report, or split a report into claims, or pastes a bare article URL. Routes to the right investigation, provenance, grading or analysis skill, then auto-applies rigor skills (source rating, TLP, confidence, likelihood) on the output.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to answer "which attacker techniques do our controls actually stop, and how well?", "what controls should I have for this threat?", or "what telemetry should I collect to detect it?" — joining a customer's or your own security control baseline to ATT&CK techniques using a public, versioned evidence base of 9,545 control-to-technique mappings from six sources. Produces four ranked lists (addressed strongly, addressed weakly, real gaps, and techniques no control anywhere addresses). Use for control gap analysis, security programme prioritisation, board reporting on coverage, or the Resistance Strength side of a FAIR risk assessment. Invoke after /threat-actor-profiling or /lookup-liberty91 has produced a technique list.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Visual context analyzer for AI agents. Provides screenshots, accessibility scans, DOM snapshots, and element descriptions for web pages. Use when you need to see what a web page looks like, analyze accessibility issues, inspect DOM structure, or get detailed element information. Triggers on requests like "take a screenshot", "check accessibility", "what does this page look like", "analyze the UI", "inspect this element", or any visual/UI analysis task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Complete operational workflow for implementer agents (Codex, Gemini, etc.) making code changes and writing tests. Defines the Code Change Loop, Test Writing Loop, and Issue Filing process with circuit breakers, severity levels, and escalation rules. Includes bundled scripts for specialist-review (code review) and test-review-request (test audit) that delegate to Claude CLI. Use this skill when starting any implementation task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Initialize or migrate to nested CLAUDE.md structure for progressive disclosure. Claude auto-loads CLAUDE.md from any directory it enters, so nested files get discovered automatically. Use when setting up a new project's agent config, refactoring a bloated CLAUDE.md, or adding progressive disclosure to an existing repo. Triggers on: '/agent-init-deep', 'setup progressive disclosure', 'refactor claude.md', 'split claude.md', 'claude.md is too big'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Complete operational workflow for implementer agents (Codex, Gemini, etc.) making code changes and writing tests. Drives all work through atomic commits — each loop operates on the smallest complete, reviewable change. Defines the Code Change Loop, Test Writing Loop, Lint Gate, and Issue Filing process with circuit breakers, severity levels, and escalation rules. Requires `committer` for all commits. Includes bundled provider-aware review scripts that keep same-model shell-outs as the last resort, plus a fresh-context Codex fallback for code review and test audit. Use this skill when starting any implementation task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and build AI agents for any domain. Use when users: (1) ask to "create an agent", "build an assistant", or "design an AI system" (2) want to understand agent architecture, agentic patterns, or autonomous AI (3) need help with capabilities, subagents, planning, or skill mechanisms (4) ask about Claude Code, Cursor, or similar agent internals (5) want to build agents for business, research, creative, or operational tasks Keywords: agent, assistant, autonomous, workflow, tool use, multi-step, orchestration
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interactive element picker for web pages. Opens a browser with click-to-select UI overlay. Use when you need to let users visually select DOM elements, identify element selectors, or get detailed element information interactively. Triggers on "select an element", "pick element", "let me choose", "which element", or any interactive element selection task. Integrates with agent-eyes for visual context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Browse the web for any task — research topics, read articles, interact with web apps, fill forms, take screenshots, extract data, and test web pages. Use whenever a browser would be useful, not just when the user explicitly asks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build custom AI agents in Claude Code from a user's problem statement. This skill analyzes the user's use case, asks smart clarifying questions, researches the internet for similar agents (GitHub repos, blogs, Claude Code community patterns), and then architects and builds production-ready Claude Code agents — including subagents, skills, hooks, slash commands, MCP integrations, and CLAUDE.md configuration. Use this skill whenever the user wants to create an agent, build an automation workflow, set up a Claude Code subagent, design a multi-agent system, or says things like 'build me an agent for...', 'automate this with Claude Code', 'I want a subagent that...', 'help me create a workflow', 'set up an agent pipeline', or any variation of wanting Claude Code to do something specialized. Also trigger when the user mentions agent architecture, agent SDK, agentic workflows, or task delegation in Claude Code — even if they don't use the word 'agent' explicitly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provides guidance for automatically evolving and optimizing AI agents across any domain using LLM-driven evolution algorithms. Use when building self-improving agents, optimizing agent prompts and skills against benchmarks, or implementing automated agent evaluation loops.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run Forge's canonical verification chain (format:check + lint + typecheck + build + test). Use before claiming any task complete or opening a PR.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。