8,827 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Provide graduated assistance from abstract conceptual nudge to concrete procedural step, with reflection required before each escalation. Teaches help-seeking as a skill and prevents direct-answer shortcuts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Anchor a multidisciplinary unit in a real-world phenomenon that requires multiple subject lenses to understand. Use when designing integrated or phenomenon-based units across disciplines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a spaced retrieval schedule for any topic list and timeline. Use when planning units, term sequences, or revision programmes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Classify curriculum content into Know, Understand, and Do categories to align teaching and assessment approaches. Use when planning units, writing objectives, or selecting assessment methods.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Redesign a blocked topic sequence into an interleaved plan with mixed practice across related topics. Use when planning units, homework schedules, or revision programmes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Script a multi-turn tutoring dialogue with branching responses for anticipated student difficulties. Use when designing AI tutors, chatbot interactions, or structured one-to-one support scripts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a moment of awe or wonder that hooks curiosity and deepens emotional engagement with content. Use when opening units, introducing surprising material, or reigniting student interest.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate a teacher-drafted central historical question for its capacity to drive genuine historical inquiry. Use when assessing whether a question will generate real evidence-weighing or produce shallow responses.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Map knowledge components and skill hierarchies for a cognitive tutoring system or adaptive learning platform. Use when designing intelligent tutoring software or skill-based mastery systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate a cascading hint sequence for a problem type, revealing progressively without giving answers. Use when designing tutoring dialogues or scaffolded worksheets.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[BETA] Hands-off end-to-end branch dogfood pass with browser testing, auto-fixes, regression tests, and fix commits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to plan, map, or restructure their website's page hierarchy, navigation, URL structure, or internal linking. Also use when the user mentions "sitemap," "site map," "visual sitemap," "site structure," "page hierarchy," "information architecture," "IA," "navigation design," "URL structure," "breadcrumbs," "internal linking strategy," "website planning," "what pages do I need," "how should I organize my site," or "site navigation." Use this whenever someone is planning what pages a website should have and how they connect. NOT for XML sitemaps (that's technical SEO — see seo-audit). For SEO audits, see seo-audit. For structured data, see schema.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to optimize content for AI search engines, get cited by LLMs, or appear in AI-generated answers. Also use when the user mentions 'AI SEO,' 'AEO,' 'GEO,' 'LLMO,' 'answer engine optimization,' 'generative engine optimization,' 'LLM optimization,' 'AI Overviews,' 'optimize for ChatGPT,' 'optimize for Perplexity,' 'AI citations,' 'AI visibility,' 'zero-click search,' 'how do I show up in AI answers,' 'LLM mentions,' or 'optimize for Claude/Gemini.' Use this whenever someone wants their content to be cited or surfaced by AI assistants and AI search engines. For traditional technical and on-page SEO audits, see seo-audit. For structured data implementation, see schema.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to plan a content strategy, decide what content to create, or figure out what topics to cover. Also use when the user mentions "content strategy," "what should I write about," "content ideas," "blog strategy," "topic clusters," "content planning," "editorial calendar," "content marketing," "content roadmap," "what content should I create," "blog topics," "content pillars," or "I don't know what to write." Use this whenever someone needs help deciding what content to produce, not just writing it. For writing individual pieces, see copywriting. For SEO-specific audits, see seo-audit. For social media content specifically, see social.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structures git workflow practices. Use when making any code change. Use when committing, branching, resolving conflicts, splitting uncommitted work in a messy working tree into clean atomic commits, opening or reviewing a pull request (PR), pushing to a remote, or when you need to organize work across multiple parallel streams. Use when cutting a release, choosing a semantic version bump, tagging, or writing a changelog.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs one or more installed review lenses — adversarial critique, edge cases, verification gaps, structure, prose — and reports triaged findings. Use when, and only when, the user asks you to review a diff, a pull request, or an artifact — code or documents, one or many — and actually says "review"; an explicit skill:bmad-review directive from another skill counts as that ask. A request to act on feedback from an earlier review is a change, not a review. Never invoke this uninvited, including on edits you just made.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a finished epic folder in the ticket tree against the evidence it left behind — the epic file, each ticket plan, diffs, commits — and produce a retrospective with sourced findings, action items, and an acceptance decision. Use when the user says "run a retrospective" or "lets retro the epic [epic]". Supports -H/--headless
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test a half-formed idea in a questioning conversation, with different personas probing its weak points, until the user can act on it or drop it with confidence. Optionally writes a short brief for planning skills to build on. Use when the user says 'forge an idea', 'pressure-test this idea', 'stress-test my thinking', or 'harden this idea'
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Push the LLM to reconsider, refine, and improve its recent output. Use when user asks for deeper critique or mentions a known deeper critique method, e.g. socratic, first principles, pre-mortem, red team
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI x Web3 Architect: Autonomous agents that hold wallets: smart accounts, spend limits, intents, agent payments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Work a defect back to its cause before changing anything, and close it with a regression test. Use when a claimed task's criterion names a defect in a repository with a .ank/ directory.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate several ank agents in parallel, each on its own task, worktree and branch. Use only inside a herdr pane, when asked to fan ank tasks out across agents in a repository with a .ank/ directory.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality using Mobile First strategy. Analyzes design systems from screenshots, generates Tailwind CSS + Shadcn UI configurations, and retrofits existing projects. Optimized for Claude Opus 4.5 with structured decision trees and self-verification checkpoints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Splits large markdown documents into smaller, organized files based on level 2 (default) sections. Use if the user says perform shard document
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。