Generate JSON-LD structured data for AEM Edge Delivery Services pages. Analyzes page content and metadata to determine the appropriate schema.org types, extracts relevant properties, and produces validated JSON-LD snippets ready for implementation in head.html or scripts.js. Use when adding rich results support, improving search appearance, or auditing existing structured data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
aemgdc/aemdev☆ 22026年10月19日 更新
Compare two versions of an AEM Edge Delivery Services page to identify what changed. Fetches preview vs live, or two different URLs, and produces a detailed content diff showing added, removed, and modified content, metadata, and blocks. Use when reviewing changes before publishing, auditing content modifications, or tracking content evolution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
aemgdc/aemdev☆ 22026年10月19日 更新
Audit and update metadata across multiple AEM Edge Delivery Services pages. Scans pages via the query index, identifies missing or inconsistent metadata (titles, descriptions, og tags, robots), and generates a corrected bulk metadata spreadsheet. Use when standardizing metadata across a site, preparing for launch, or fixing SEO issues at scale.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
aemgdc/aemdev☆ 22026年10月19日 更新
Scan an AEM Edge Delivery Services page for WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility violations and generate specific fixes. Identifies missing alt text, heading hierarchy issues, link text problems, color contrast concerns, and EDS-specific accessibility patterns. Use when fixing accessibility issues, preparing for compliance audits, or remediating WCAG violations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
aemgdc/aemdev☆ 22026年10月19日 更新
[BETA] Detect, review, and fix code-quality and correctness issues in an AEM as a Cloud Service project — locally, with no external services or network calls. Use whenever a user wants to check, review, assess, audit, scan, modernize, upgrade, or fix AEM Java, Sling Models, OSGi, or Maven code — for example: "check my Sling Models are implemented correctly", "review my @Inject usage", "are my Maven dependencies up to date", "scan this AEM project for issues", "modernize my Sling Models", or "fix code-quality problems". Name the files to assess, or ask it to scan the repo; it detects issues, plans, and — only when you ask — applies surgical edits on a branch or in place, then verifies with mvn compile. It recognises the intent and handles each issue type itself, reporting anything it cannot yet fix. This skill is in beta. Verify all outputs before applying them to production projects.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
aemgdc/aemdev☆ 22026年10月19日 更新
Design, critique, or specify honest charts and data visualizations from known data and audience needs. Use for chart selection, misleading-chart audits, accessibility, dashboard visuals, or "make this data easier to understand"; do not use for raw data analysis, PPT deck generation, spreadsheet surgery, or fabricated chart data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rosetears520/aili-workflows☆ 22026年9月27日 更新
Audits database schemas for naming conventions, type consistency, nullability patterns, and missing constraints. Provides violations report with recommended fixes. Use for "schema validation", "database linting", "schema standards", or "consistency checks".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
sathishssj3/Stereix-Engine☆ 22026年10月4日 更新
Ensures tenant isolation at query and policy level using Row Level Security, automated testing, and security audits. Prevents data leakage between tenants. Use for "multi-tenancy", "tenant isolation", "RLS", or "data security".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
sathishssj3/Stereix-Engine☆ 22026年10月4日 更新
Upgrades existing websites and apps to premium quality. Audits current design, identifies generic AI patterns, and applies high-end design standards without breaking functionality. Works with any CSS framework or vanilla CSS.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
sathishssj3/Stereix-Engine☆ 22026年10月4日 更新
Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states. Handles UX review, visual hierarchy, information architecture, cognitive load, accessibility, performance, responsive behavior, theming, anti-patterns, typography, fonts, spacing, layout, alignment, color, motion, micro-interactions, UX copy, error states, edge cases, i18n, and reusable design systems or tokens. Also use for bland designs that need to become bolder or more delightful, loud designs that should become quieter, live browser iteration on UI elements, or ambitious visual effects that should feel technically extraordinary. Not for backend-only or non-UI tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
sathishssj3/Stereix-Engine☆ 22026年10月4日 更新
Anti-slop frontend skill for landing pages, portfolios, and redesigns. The agent reads the brief, infers the right design direction, and ships interfaces that do not look templated. Real design systems when applicable, audit-first on redesigns, strict pre-flight check.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
sathishssj3/Stereix-Engine☆ 22026年10月4日 更新
Identifies and fixes XSS, SQL injection, and command injection vulnerabilities with validation schemas, sanitization libraries, and safe coding patterns. Use for "input validation", "XSS prevention", "SQL injection", or "sanitization".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
sathishssj3/Stereix-Engine☆ 22026年10月4日 更新
Reviews authentication and authorization implementation for session management, CSRF, cookie security, and auth flow vulnerabilities with findings, severity assessment, and fix recommendations. Use for "auth review", "session security", "CSRF protection", or "authentication audit".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
sathishssj3/Stereix-Engine☆ 22026年10月4日 更新
Detects data integrity issues including orphaned records, broken foreign key relationships, constraint violations, and provides automated fix migrations. Use for "data integrity", "orphaned records", "broken relationships", or "data quality".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
sathishssj3/Stereix-Engine☆ 22026年10月4日 更新
Build an animation from scratch, making the decisions in the order that determines whether it feels right — should it animate at all, what purpose, which tool, which properties, which curve and duration, how it interrupts, how it exits. Writes the implementation. Use when asked to animate something, add motion, make a component feel alive, or build a transition. For critiquing existing motion use review-animations; for auditing a whole codebase use improve-animations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
sathishssj3/Stereix-Engine☆ 22026年10月4日 更新
Use when paired tr.md and en.md files need a parity verdict, when titles, frontmatter, headings, or DOI sets may have drifted between languages, or when a bilingual document is approaching release and its translation coverage needs an audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OnourImpram/claude-code-for-social-scientists☆ 22026年9月6日 更新
Use when choosing or configuring MCP servers for research work, when a literature, reference manager, or scholarly search server needs a trust check before installation, or when an existing research tool stack needs a data flow and permission audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OnourImpram/claude-code-for-social-scientists☆ 22026年9月6日 更新
Use when authoring a new manuscript, thesis chapter, or abstract from scratch in Turkish and English in parallel — building the claim skeleton first, then drafting Turkish and re-authoring English — not for auditing parity between existing versions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OnourImpram/claude-code-for-social-scientists☆ 22026年9月6日 更新
Use when coding interviews, focus groups, or open-ended responses with AI assistance, when a codebook needs building or auditing, when intercoder reliability must be computed, or when qualitative quotes need integrity checks before publication.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OnourImpram/claude-code-for-social-scientists☆ 22026年9月6日 更新
Local-tooling companion to the bug-bounty orchestrator — carries the SAME complete bug-bounty workflow, but reach for THIS variant when you also need to resolve where tools, wordlists, and clones are installed on the local machine (jhaddix, SecLists, trufflehog, ffuf, dalfox, ghauri); for pure orchestration/routing use the bug-bounty skill. Workflow it covers — recon (subdomain enumeration, asset discovery, fingerprinting, HackerOne scope, source code audit), pre-hunt learning (disclosed reports, tech stack research, mind maps, threat modeling), vulnerability hunting (IDOR, SSRF, XSS, auth bypass, CSRF, race conditions, SQLi, XXE, file upload, business logic, GraphQL, HTTP smuggling, cache poisoning, OAuth, timing side-channels, OIDC, SSTI, subdomain takeover, cloud misconfig, ATO chains, agentic AI), LLM/AI security testing (chatbot IDOR, prompt injection, indirect injection, ASCII smuggling, exfil channels, RCE via code tools, system prompt extraction, ASI01-ASI10), A-to-B bug chaining (IDOR→auth bypass...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ajtazer/heckit☆ 22026年10月7日 更新
Comprehensive methodology for auditing and exploiting TLS/SSL implementations and misconfigurations across network services and mobile applications. Covers protocol downgrade attacks including POODLE (CVE-2014-3566) against SSLv3 CBC padding, DROWN (CVE-2016-0800) cross-protocol attack leveraging SSLv2 export ciphers to decrypt TLS sessions, and FREAK (CVE-2015-0204) forcing RSA export-grade key exchange. Addresses BEAST (CVE-2011-3389) exploiting CBC IV predictability in TLS 1.0, CRIME (CVE-2012-4929) and BREACH targeting TLS-level and HTTP-level compression oracles respectively, and Heartbleed (CVE-2014-0160) for OpenSSL memory disclosure. Covers certificate validation bypass techniques for applications with improper hostname verification or chain validation, certificate pinning bypass using Frida and Objection for mobile application interception, HSTS bypass via NTP manipulation and subdomain exploitation, TLS 1.3 0-RTT replay attacks against non-idempotent endpoints, mutual TLS (mTLS) authentication a...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ajtazer/heckit☆ 22026年10月7日 更新
Systematic bug identification methodology: source code review patterns, black-box testing strategies, taint analysis, dangerous function hunting, data flow tracing, and automated scanning setup. Use for code audits, bug bounty triage, or building vulnerability identification pipelines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ajtazer/heckit☆ 22026年10月7日 更新
Target discovery methodology for finding high-quality npm/PyPI/GitHub packages to audit for vulnerabilities, with evaluation criteria and search strategies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ajtazer/heckit☆ 22026年10月7日 更新
Complete bug bounty workflow — recon (subdomain enumeration, asset discovery, fingerprinting, HackerOne scope, source code audit), pre-hunt learning (disclosed reports, tech stack research, mind maps, threat modeling), vulnerability hunting (IDOR, SSRF, XSS, auth bypass, CSRF, race conditions, SQLi, XXE, file upload, business logic, GraphQL, HTTP smuggling, cache poisoning, OAuth, timing side-channels, OIDC, SSTI, subdomain takeover, cloud misconfig, ATO chains, agentic AI), LLM/AI security testing (chatbot IDOR, prompt injection, indirect injection, ASCII smuggling, exfil channels, RCE via code tools, system prompt extraction, ASI01-ASI10), A-to-B bug chaining (IDOR→auth bypass, SSRF→cloud metadata, XSS→ATO, open redirect→OAuth theft, S3→bundle→secret→OAuth), bypass tables (SSRF IP bypass, open redirect bypass, file upload bypass), language-specific grep (JS prototype pollution, Python pickle, PHP type juggling, Go template.HTML, Ruby YAML.load, Rust unwrap), and reporting (7-Question Gate, 4 validation ...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ajtazer/heckit☆ 22026年10月7日 更新