Creates optimized meta titles, descriptions, and URL suggestions based on character limits and best practices. Generates compelling, keyword-rich metadata. Use PROACTIVELY for new content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
6,195 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Creates optimized meta titles, descriptions, and URL suggestions based on character limits and best practices. Generates compelling, keyword-rich metadata. Use PROACTIVELY for new content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build and deploy the same feature consistently across web, mobile, and desktop platforms using API-first architecture and parallel implementation strategies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
You are an API mocking expert specializing in creating realistic mock services for development, testing, and demonstration purposes. Design comprehensive mocking solutions that simulate real API behavior, enable parallel development, and facilitate thorough testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Authors xUnit v3 tests -- Facts, Theories, fixtures, parallelism, IAsyncLifetime.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds event-driven systems. Pub/sub, competing consumers, DLQ, sagas, delivery guarantees.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Tests Blazor components. bUnit rendering, events, cascading params, JS interop mocking.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnoses slow builds and incremental failures. Binary logs, parallel builds, restore.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs public .NET APIs. Naming, parameter ordering, return types, error patterns, extensions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structures CLI app layers. Command/handler/service separation, clig.dev principles, exit codes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Execute a quick task with GSD guarantees (atomic commits, state tracking) but skip optional agents
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manage parallel workstreams — list, create, switch, status, progress, complete, and resume
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Execute all plans in a phase with wave-based parallelization
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze codebase with parallel mapper agents to produce .planning/codebase/ documents
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Tests APIs for injection vulnerabilities including SQL injection, NoSQL injection, OS command injection, LDAP injection, and Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) through API parameters, headers, and request bodies. The tester crafts malicious payloads targeting different backend technologies and injection contexts to extract data, execute commands, or access internal services. Maps to OWASP API8:2023 Security Misconfiguration and API7:2023 SSRF. Activates for requests involving API injection testing, SQLi in APIs, NoSQL injection, SSRF testing, or API input validation assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Tests APIs for Broken Function Level Authorization (BFLA) vulnerabilities where regular users can invoke administrative functions or access privileged API endpoints by directly calling them. The tester identifies admin and privileged endpoints, then attempts to access them with regular user credentials by manipulating HTTP methods, URL paths, and request parameters. Maps to OWASP API5:2023 Broken Function Level Authorization. Activates for requests involving BFLA testing, admin endpoint bypass, function-level access control testing, or API privilege escalation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects ransomware encryption activity in real time using entropy analysis, file system I/O monitoring, and behavioral heuristics. Identifies mass file modification patterns, abnormal entropy spikes in written data, and suspicious process behavior characteristic of ransomware encryption routines. Activates for requests involving ransomware behavioral detection, entropy-based file monitoring, I/O anomaly detection, or real-time encryption activity alerting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automate AWS GuardDuty threat detection findings processing using EventBridge and Lambda to enable real-time incident response, automatic quarantine of compromised resources, and security notification workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Correlates disparate security incidents, IOCs, and adversary behaviors across time and organizations to identify unified threat campaigns, attribute them to common threat actors, and extract shared indicators for improved detection. Use when multiple incidents exhibit overlapping indicators, when sector-wide attack campaigns require cross-organizational analysis, or when building campaign-level intelligence products. Activates for requests involving campaign analysis, incident clustering, cross-organizational IOC correlation, or MISP correlation engine.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Responds to phishing incidents by analyzing reported emails, extracting indicators, assessing credential compromise, quarantining malicious messages across the organization, and remediating affected accounts. Covers email header analysis, URL/attachment sandboxing, and mailbox-wide purge operations. Activates for requests involving phishing response, email incident, credential phishing, spear phishing investigation, or phishing remediation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds a structured ransomware incident response playbook aligned with the CISA StopRansomware Guide and NIST Cybersecurity Framework. Covers preparation, detection, containment, eradication, recovery, and post-incident phases with actionable checklists. Activates for requests involving ransomware response planning, CISA compliance, incident response playbook creation, or ransomware preparedness assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement Microsoft's Enhanced Security Admin Environment (ESAE) tiered administration model for Active Directory. Covers Tier 0/1/2 separation, privileged access workstations (PAWs), administrative f
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate JSON-LD structured data for AEM Edge Delivery Services pages. Analyzes page content and metadata to determine the appropriate schema.org types, extracts relevant properties, and produces validated JSON-LD snippets ready for implementation in head.html or scripts.js. Use when adding rich results support, improving search appearance, or auditing existing structured data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compares the performance of two or more audience segments across key metrics side by side. Use this skill when someone wants to compare audiences or visitor groups — for example, "how do mobile visitors compare to desktop on conversion," "compare new vs. returning visitors," "show me the difference between these two segments," "compare these audiences on our KPIs," or "which segment performs better." Also trigger for "segment comparison" or "audience comparison."
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compares the performance of two or more audience segments across key metrics side by side. Use this skill when someone wants to compare audiences, cohorts, or groups — for example, "how do mobile users compare to desktop users on conversion," "compare new vs. returning visitors," "show me the difference between these two segments," "compare these audiences on our KPIs," or "which segment performs better." Also trigger for "segment comparison," "audience comparison," or "cohort comparison."
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。