7,471 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Creates structured multi-file implementation plans before build. Scope-aware: trivial tasks exit early, simple tasks get fast plans, complex tasks get full research + phase files + validation. Enforces Gate 1. Activated by /mk:plan or /mk:cook. NOT for ticket complexity analysis against an existing codebase (see mk:planning-engine); NOT for CEO-level scope review of existing plans (see mk:plan-ceo-review).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when answering factual or explanatory questions about the current project — codebase, architecture, conventions, workflows, constraints — with minimal cited evidence. Triggers on "how does X work here", "what does X mean", "why is X structured this way", "is this claim true in the repo", "explain X with sources". NOT for brainstorming or comparing approaches (mk:brainstorming), trade-off decisions (mk:party), debugging/root cause (mk:investigate), code review (mk:review), plans (mk:plan-creator), security audits (mk:cso), visual explanations/diagrams (mk:preview --explain), test-coverage gaps (mk:nyquist), library docs (mk:docs-finder), or workflow navigation (mk:help).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when creating a new project from scratch — orchestrates the full journey from idea to running code. Research → design → plan → scaffold → implement → docs. Explicit invocation only — never auto-activates. CLI = project infrastructure (.claude/), bootstrap = application code + full pipeline. NOT for autonomous multi-hour builds of specified products (see mk:autobuild); NOT for single-task feature work on existing projects (see mk:cook).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Chief Security Officer mode. Infrastructure-first security audit: secrets archaeology, dependency supply chain, CI/CD pipeline security, LLM/AI security, skill supply chain scanning, plus OWASP Top 10, STRIDE threat modeling, and active verification. Two modes: daily (zero-noise, 8/10 confidence gate) and comprehensive (monthly deep scan, 2/10 bar). Trend tracking across audit runs. Use when: "security audit", "threat model", "pentest review", "OWASP", "CSO review".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Retrieve up-to-date library, framework, and project documentation using scripts + MCP tools (Context7, Context Hub) with intelligent fallback. Use this skill whenever the user or agent needs documentation for any library, framework, API, SDK, or internal project spec. Triggers on "docs for [X]", "how does [library] work", "find documentation", "API reference for", "look up [feature] in [library]", "latest docs", "what's the API for", "find our [internal spec]", or any request that requires current, accurate documentation rather than relying on training data. Always prefer this skill over raw WebSearch for documentation retrieval — it returns structured, context-efficient results.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured second-pass reasoning after code review or plan evaluation. Offers named reasoning methods (pre-mortem, inversion, red team, Socratic, etc.) to re-examine findings through a specific lens. Use after /mk:review verdict or any time deeper analysis is needed on an existing output. NOT for initial review (see mk:review); NOT for creating implementation plans (see mk:plan-creator).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep spec analysis on a Confluence page. Reads page (+ children) via the confluence-as wrapper, produces a structured Spec Research Report with requirements, acceptance criteria, gaps, ambiguities, and suggested user stories for human review. Read-only — does NOT create Jira tickets. Triggers: 'analyze spec for PAGE-ID', 'extract requirements from confluence page', 'spec research on URL'. NOT for raw page CRUD (mk:confluence-page); NOT for ticket complexity scoring (mk:planning-engine).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when surfacing architectural friction and proposing deepening refactors (shallow modules → deep modules) for testability and AI-navigability. Triggers on "improve architecture", "find deepening opportunities", "where is this codebase shallow", "architecture review". Emits structured candidates + precise patches; delegates ALL rendering to mk:preview. NOT for diagram/HTML rendering (see mk:preview); NOT for trade-off deliberation (see mk:party); NOT for plan critique (see mk:plan-ceo-review).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Full Jira ticket context analysis via the jira-analyst agent — including media (attached images / PDFs / screenshots) and linked issues. Produces structured findings suitable for posting back as a Jira comment. Read-only. Triggers: 'analyze KEY', 'rca for KEY', 'describe KEY with media'. NOT for complexity scoring (mk:jira-evaluator); NOT for story-point estimation (mk:jira-estimator).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fetch daily arXiv announcements (cs.RO), filter by research relevance, generate a structured markdown digest, and sync matched papers to a Zotero collection with arXiv PDFs attached.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured logging conventions for DraftForge backend (Django/Celery/Daphne) and frontend (React). This skill should be used when adding log statements, creating new modules, debugging with logs, or reviewing logging patterns. Covers structlog usage, system/subsystem taxonomy, required fields, log levels, and Grafana query patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
DraftForge test infrastructure for writing backend unit tests, Playwright E2E tests, and managing test data population. This skill should be used when writing new tests, adding test fixtures, creating populate functions for new features, adding Playwright E2E specs, using login/auth fixtures, creating test users/orgs/leagues/tournaments, or understanding the test data architecture. Covers backend Django tests via Docker, Playwright config (projects, workers, sharding), test auth endpoints that expose backend login to frontend, and feature-isolated test data patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Sync documentation with project structure
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Redis best practices for caching, data structures, and in-memory data architecture
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-agent structured debate with anti-groupthink mechanisms — Devil's Advocate, minority opinion protection, 2-round hard cap. Use when divergent perspectives matter more than consensus (architecture decisions, design tradeoffs, contested specifications).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate structured release notes from git history and closed issues within Claude Code session
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create a new agent with complete structure
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured SE task evaluation using 15 benchmark definitions from claude-code-harness research
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refactor code for better structure and patterns
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze a natural language idea against the project codebase and return structured issue specs
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide setup for and verify a reviewed, read-only Grafana Observability profile and its activated capability packs. Use when a user asks to set up Grafana access, verify profile readiness, discover available infrastructure, APM, log, IoT or business KPI packs, or troubleshoot why a Grafana pack cannot run.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Establish, author, restructure, or audit human-first processor Architecture, Design, Research, Review, and Verification documentation. Use for progressive documentation scaffolding, authority maps, reading paths, document-type content contracts, length-budgeted splitting, or maintainability reviews. Do not use as a substitute for cycle-accurate microarchitecture analysis or RTL implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn a live website into a working local frontend you can edit. Fetches the page, extracts its design system and structure, and rebuilds it locally in your stack, then screenshot-compares to the original. Use when the user says "url to code", "clone this site locally", "make it look like linear.app", "rebuild this page", or provides a live URL to recreate. Part of the Product Design set. Uses web-fetch + browser automation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when splitting a domain Skill into Phase-Aware File Structure (SKILL.md / design.md / constraints.md). Defines the splitting criteria, procedures, sync procedures, and validation rules. Invoked by /skill-format command or manually when restructuring domain Skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。