「before」の検索結果

Requires OFOX_API_KEY — create one at https://app.ofox.ai, plus two images you already have, a start frame and an end frame. Animates the motion between them as one video — both frames go into a single Ofox video job, the clip opens on A, closes on B, and the model fills the middle. Use when a user has two stills and wants the in-between animated, e.g. "here is the before and the after, animate the transition", "make a video that starts on this image and ends on that one", "tween these two frames", or "move the object from where it sits in the first picture to where it sits in the second". Do not use when only one image exists (animating a single frame is seedance-ad-creative or seedance-product-video), or when the pair is two states of a user interface (see product-demo).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Requires OFOX_API_KEY — create one at https://app.ofox.ai. Turn a novel/script excerpt into an anime-style storyboard shot using the Ofox image and video APIs. Runs a short creative brief first (how many shots, the aspect ratio before any image exists, which animation look; "Let the AI decide" is offered on the taste questions, never on a must-ask one, and never as the default), generates the character with ofox-image-core — one opening frame for a single shot, a design sheet to confirm plus one opening frame per shot for a sequence — then feeds each frame to ofox-video-core as `--frame-first-image`, so every shot starts on an image of that character rather than on a text description alone. Use when a user asks to turn a story excerpt into an anime video, e.g. "turn this novel excerpt into an anime video", "make an anime-style storyboard clip of this scene", "generate a manga-drama shot with this character", or "turn this chapter into an anime short with the same character in every shot". Do not use for realistic-human dialogue scenes with no anime styling (see seedance-short-drama), silent product/brand shots (see seedance-ad-creative), or plain catalog footage (see seedance-product-video).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns client wins into structured case studies in multiple formats. Gathers before/after metrics, structures as Problem-Solution-Results, and outputs landing page copy, one-pager, social snippets, and email insert.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate full prospect audit as a sales tool before demos. Combines company research, CRO audit, and person intel into a presentable document with talking points and opportunity sizing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

On-page SEO optimization for existing content with before/after scoring

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for sensemaking, frame revision, anomaly handling, questioning strategy, and ambiguity diagnosis with the Data/Frame model before action is chosen. NOT for deterministic classification, settled execution planning, or situations where the frame is already stable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan database migrations before executing them: risk assessment, dependency mapping, multi-service sequencing, rollback budgets, and stakeholder communication plans. Use when deciding HOW to migrate, not when writing the actual DDL. NOT for: writing migration SQL (use database-migration-manager), data ETL pipelines (use data-migration-specialist), query optimization, or ORM configuration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Classify every destructive/gated action an agent body can attempt (git, filesystem, network, shell, github) into block/approve/allow tiers, and audit whether the pre-tool and post-tool governance backing that classification is real: blocked actions proven zero-side-effect by a negative fixture, every denial backed by a receipt and a transcript event, every block-tier denial paired with a safe alternative, and no unmanaged or same-UID body ever marked "contained." Use when building or reviewing Agent Harbor's C5 governance gate (destructive git blocker, approval request/result, denial receipts), gating a new tool surface before it can run destructive commands, or auditing whether an existing "destructive-action blocked" claim actually has evidence behind it. NOT for proving an existing sandbox boundary actually contains an adversary once an action is isolated (use sandboxed-adversarial-test-harness), deciding where in a DAG to place a human review node or designing the approval UX itself (use human-gate-designer), or designing the general work-receipt schema across an entire agent task (use agent-work-receipt-designer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Treat tokens as a coding swarm's cost-of-goods-sold and legibility engine while accounting for finite subscription allowance when per-call price is unknown. Covers provider windows, remaining-usage evidence, burn forecasts, preemptive checkpoint/model switching, per-agent budgets, compaction, shared digests, context degradation, and spend metering. Activate on: "token budget", "context budget", "compaction strategy", "briefing as compression", "context rot", "summarization collapse", "COGS for agents", "subscription usage remaining", "five-hour or weekly limit", "burn forecast", "model switch before limit", or "/context-economics-for-agent-swarms". NOT for: memory architecture (use always-on-agent-architecture), single-prompt wording (use prompt-engineer), mechanism-design proofs (use nisan-et-al-2007-algorithmic-game-theory), physical containment (use sandboxed-adversarial-test-harness), or production rebodiment and fencing (use agent-resurrection-and-body-continuity).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct Critical Decision Method (CDM) interviews to elicit expert reasoning strategies (L3 knowledge) from practitioners about specific challenging past incidents. Use when capturing expertise for skill development, preserving knowledge before practitioner departure, building post-incident learning artifacts, or investigating decisions in complex sociotechnical systems. Outputs structured incident reconstructions with cues, decisions, alternatives considered, and counterfactual analysis suitable for distillation into skills or training material.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refactor apps so backend owns runtime truth and UI only projects snapshots. Use when tools have split authority. NOT for cosmetic UI work or new features before drift is removed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verifies build output integrity after code changes. Runs builds, validates artifact structure, checks for regressions in bundle size, asset references, and static export completeness. The last line of defense before a bad deploy ships.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Own whether a multi-document product-architecture binder is internally consistent, complete against its stated customer/contingency/architecture coverage, and honest about which older product ambitions it has absorbed, superseded, deferred, contradicted, orphaned, or rejected. Use when running a binder Architect of Record pass, before an implementation chain cites a binder chapter as ready, when a proof-gate owner is missing, or when reconciling the binder against the older ambition corpus (website, plans, examples, ADRs). NOT for auditing a single Claude Skill bundle's structure or frontmatter (use skill-hygiene), rendering a single-PM accept/reject verdict on one finished deliverable (use port-daddy-user-surrogate-pm-review), or sequencing/stewarding a roadmap's sidequests once a gap or operator decision has been surfaced (use legible-roadmap-with-sidequests).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discipline an AI agent needs to work an issue/task tracker (Jira, Linear, GitHub Issues) as the shared source of truth: pull the right next item instead of inventing work, search before creating to avoid duplicates, write actionable items with checkable acceptance criteria, keep status transitions honest, and link work to items via branches/PRs/commits so progress is legible. Use when an agent picks up tracker work, files a new issue, updates status, or closes an item. NOT for authoring the PR itself (use agent-pr-authoring), roadmap-level planning and prioritization (use legible-roadmap-with-sidequests), or the mechanics of multiple agents coordinating on the same codebase (use multi-agent-coordination).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Declare an agentic application's interaction disclosure, state, context, capabilities, and effect-control boundaries. Use for a reviewable design specification and static consistency audit before implementation. NOT for proving that controls are deployed or enforced, exposing private chain-of-thought, selecting a model/router, or designing a multi-agent protocol.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify every visual-evidence artifact (screenshot/GIF/recording) attached to a PR carries a provenance manifest binding it to real daemon-backed truth — daemon port, run id, transcript head hash, agent node id, commit, and an honest real/fixture/mock source label — and that operator-control-panel PRs cover the required set of proof states. Use when gating a PR's proof artifacts before merge, auditing whether a "LIVE" visual claim is backed by a real daemon run versus a reused or fixture-backed mock, or defining the required state-coverage set for a control-panel change. NOT for the capture technique itself — headless Playwright, `screencapture -x -l`, non-interruptive capture (use port-daddy-agent-skill's visual-evidence doctrine), designing the receipt body schema an artifact attaches to (use agent-work-receipt-designer), or the broader dogfood/Potemkin product-quality bar (use multi-agent-authoring-product-bar).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert Claude's Markdown output to each channel's native text syntax before delivery. Adds zero-dependency formatting for WhatsApp, Telegram, and Slack (marker substitution). Also ships a Signal rich-text helper (parseSignalStyles) used by the Signal skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

在用户已经完成一次 implementation 工作后，把项目里的 implementation plan + git diff/log 渲染成一份单文件 HTML 实施报告。报告包含 TL;DR、风险概览、架构图（mermaid）、Before/After 数据流、决策记录卡片、风险清单。用于开会前快速对齐团队、向 reviewer 解释设计决策、归档实施叙事。当用户说"生成实施报告"、"impl-explain"、"explain implementation"、"展示这次实施方案"、"做一份 HTML 实施总结"时调用本 skill。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use before declaring any coding task complete, done, or finished.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use at the start of every session and before completing any coding task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use before starting any coding task when Superpowers is not present.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。