「code quality」の検索結果

Review code for quality, simplicity, and common mistakes before declaring work complete.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scout Rule — identify the top 3 highest-impact improvement opportunities in files you're already touching. Analyzes entire file content, not just changed lines. Focuses on pre-existing code quality, not PR bugs. Use when preparing a PR, during code review, or after completing a feature.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shared in-workflow quality gates for code/PR skills — the gate model, trust tiers, and the three primitives (evidence-before-done, independent judge, anti-gaming). DO NOT TRIGGER directly — referenced by consumer skills via relative path.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a design into production-quality frontend code: extract a design system with tokens and components, make layouts responsive across breakpoints, add dark mode with WCAG-compliant theming, then run a UX audit to validate everything..

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a Meta-Harness-style optimization loop NATIVELY — automatically search over the scaffolding around a FIXED base model (memory, retrieval, context construction, prompt templates, summarization, tool-selection logic) by proposing candidate variants, scoring each on a cheap deterministic eval, and keeping a Pareto frontier of quality vs cost — using native Agent / Workflow / loop tools instead of a standalone Python harness. Use this whenever the user wants to optimize, evolve, tune, distill, or search over a harness, scaffold, prompt system, memory or retrieval policy, context-assembly code, or summarizer while keeping the model fixed; whenever they mention Meta-Harness, harness optimization, scaffold evolution, automatic prompt/memory optimization, an evolutionary or Pareto search over candidate implementations, or "make the harness/agent better without retraining"; and whenever the gain must come from the code AROUND the model rather than the model weights. Reproduces the Meta-Harness paper's method natively, with no claude_wrapper.py and no metered solver API.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Independent senior-engineering quality auditor — architecture, ownership, domain integrity, abstraction, and maintainability. Use as `--gate` inside the ck:cook pipeline (blocks a phase on BLOCKER/HIGH/current-change MEDIUM findings) or call directly with `--audit`, `--diff`, `--changed` on any repository, directory, or file. Never writes tests and never edits production code — it returns structured findings only; ck:cook or ck:fix apply the fix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Independent senior-engineering quality auditor — architecture, ownership, domain integrity, abstraction, and maintainability. Use as `--gate` inside the ck:cook pipeline (blocks a phase on BLOCKER/HIGH/current-change MEDIUM findings) or call directly with `--audit`, `--diff`, `--changed` on any repository, directory, or file. Never writes tests and never edits production code — it returns structured findings only; ck:cook or ck:fix apply the fix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert code reviewer focusing on quality, maintainability, performance, and best practices

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code refactoring expert for improving code quality, reducing technical debt, and safe transformations

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review changed code for reuse, quality, and efficiency, then fix any issues found. Sizes review effort to the diff — trivial edits get a self-review, substantial edits get parallel agents. Renamed from /simplify to avoid collision with Claude Code's built-in simplify skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous iterative refactoring workflow. Scans for tactical code quality improvements (DRY, dead code, naming, complexity), implements through SMEs, verifies with QA, commits atomically, and loops until no improvements remain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Unified verification engine for Python data science projects. Covers environment checks, type checking, linting, tests, security scans, code review with DS anti-patterns, and notebook checks. Commands (/verify, /quality-gate) invoke different subsets of this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scientific research engine with adversarial review, tree search, and serendipity detection. Use when: exploring hypotheses, validating findings against literature, running computational experiments with quality gates, or hunting for unexpected discoveries. Do NOT use for simple Q&A, code editing, or non-research tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scientific research engine for hypothesis testing, literature gap analysis, experimental validation, and data-driven discovery. Enforces adversarial review (Reviewer 2), 32 quality gates, tree search over hypotheses, confounder harness for quantitative claims, and serendipity detection. TRIGGER when: user asks to analyze scientific data, test hypotheses, validate findings, search for research gaps, design experiments, or investigate results. DO NOT TRIGGER when: pure code review, documentation writing, devops tasks, general conversation, or non-scientific data transformation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatic quality control, linting, and static analysis after code modifications. Triggers on: lint, format, check, validate, types, static analysis. NOT for full build verification (see mk:verify); NOT for test coverage (see mk:testing).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses ChIP-seq quality across antibody specificity, fragmentation, enrichment, replicate concordance, and library complexity. Computes FRiP, NSC/RSC (phantompeakqualtools), library complexity (NRF/PBC1/PBC2), deepTools plotFingerprint (JS distance, AUC, synthetic JS), ChIPQC, IDR with ENCODE Nself/Nt rules, and detects hyper-ChIPable artifacts. Use when validating an antibody, diagnosing failed peak calls, deciding whether to proceed with downstream analysis, grading against ENCODE thresholds, or auditing replicate concordance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's mental model shares with the reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check whether changed source files have corresponding test files. Use for code quality review before merging a PR, or when asked whether new code has tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shared in-workflow quality gates for code/PR skills — the gate model, trust tiers, and the three primitives (evidence-before-done, independent judge, anti-gaming). DO NOT TRIGGER directly — referenced by consumer skills via relative path.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quality gate for agent-flow. Runs the repo's test, typecheck and lint commands in the issue worktree, re-runs failures once, reports raw output as JSON. Never modifies code. Use when launched with AGENT_FLOW_ROLE=qa after a review is approved.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Opinionated constraints for building better web interfaces with coding agents. Use this skill whenever the user asks you to build, review, or fix a UI — landing pages, dashboards, components, or any frontend code — and whenever you write Tailwind CSS, motion/react animations, accessible component primitives (Base UI, React Aria, Radix), or review agent-generated interface code for quality, accessibility, and performance. Also trigger for "make the UI better", "review my interface", "clean up this component", or any frontend work in React, Next.js, or plain HTML/CSS.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing PRs/diffs/branches/documents for .NET quality, correctness, performance, security, data access, messaging, and observability. Includes adversarial critical-thinking mode for skeptical/cynical review requests. Keywords: code review, review PR, review diff, critical review, cynical review, adversarial review, production readiness, low GC, AOT, security review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when PHPStan, Rector, or ECS output appears — "phpstan says mixed", type errors, "fix code style", "run rector" — even when Eloquent/Laravel/model code is also mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user says "review this", "check my code", or wants feedback on changes. Reviews for correctness, quality, security, and coding standards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。