「detection」の検索結果

Analyze indexed codebases via graph database (neug) and vector index (zvec). Covers call graphs, dependencies, dead code, hotspots, module coupling, architecture reports, semantic search, impact analysis, bug root cause from GitHub issues, class diagrams (UML), and PR review (risk scoring, conflict detection, auto-merge candidates, labeling). Also covers creating, inspecting, and repairing a CodeScope index. Use for: code structure, who calls what, why something changed, similar functions, module boundaries, bug tracing, class relationships, PR risk/conflicts, or any question benefiting from a code knowledge graph. Applies when a `.codegraph` index exists in the workspace, or when the user wants to create one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive incident response framework from detection through resolution and post-incident review. Battle-tested SRE/DevOps practices: severity classification, timeline reconstruction, structured post-incident analysis. Use when declaring an incident, coordinating multi-team response during an outage, leading a post-mortem, or setting up on-call practices for a new service.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive REST API design review with automated linting, breaking-change detection, and design scorecards. Catches inconsistent conventions, missing versioning, and design smells before APIs ship. Use when reviewing a PR that adds or changes API endpoints, auditing an existing API for v2 migration, or establishing API standards for a team.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to perform security audits, penetration testing, vulnerability scanning, OWASP Top 10 checks, or offensive security assessments. Covers static analysis, dependency scanning, secret detection, API security testing, and pen test report generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cascades strategy from boardroom to individual contributor. Detects and fixes misalignment between company goals and team execution. Covers strategy articulation, cascade mapping, orphan goal detection, silo identification, communication gap analysis, and realignment protocols. Use when teams are pulling in different directions, OKRs don't connect, departments optimize locally at company expense, or when user mentions alignment, strategy cascade, silo, conflicting OKRs, or strategy communication.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing a specific inbound deal before close — when sales has asked for a discount that exceeds AE authority, when the customer has redlined the MSA, when per-deal economics (margin after discount, multi-year payment shape, indemnity exposure) need to be quantified, or when discount approval needs to be routed to a named human approver (Sales Director, VP Sales, CFO, CRO, General Counsel). Covers deal review, discount approval routing, per-deal margin scoring, deal exception handling, MSA redline triage, contract landmine detection (uncapped indemnity, MFN, perpetual license-back, missing DPA), and named-approver chain assembly. NEVER auto-approves — every output is a numeric scorecard plus a routing recommendation to a named human.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when assessing AI/ML systems for prompt injection, jailbreak vulnerabilities, model inversion risk, data poisoning exposure, or agent tool abuse. Covers MITRE ATLAS technique mapping, injection signature detection, and adversarial robustness scoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remediates Google Cloud Security Command Center findings, including IAM permission fixes, cloud resource misconfigurations, vulnerabilities, and Toxic Combinations. Use when asked to fix, remediate, or mitigate a Security Command Center finding or address attack paths. Don't use for general IAM policy querying without a Security Command Center finding. For runtime threat detections, this skill provides containment and investigation guidance rather than automated configuration fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage Google Security Operations (SecOps) SOAR cases throughout their lifecycle. Use when listing, creating, inspecting, updating, or closing SOAR cases; adding investigative comments and notes; updating case priority or description; or linking and grouping security alerts within cases. Supports both remote Google SecOps MCP tools and local fallback tools. Don't use for SIEM UDM searches or detection rule authoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Daily runbook for tracking new customer accounts against onboarding milestones in Postgres and HubSpot for {{projectName}}. Covers the milestone framework, stall and overdue detection, nudge drafting, the owning-CSM alert, and the human approval gate before anything sends or changes account state.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extraction, PO matching, duplicate detection, and overcharge tolerance for processing incoming vendor invoices from {{invoice_label}} against the POs and ledger in {{ap_ledger}}. Load this before extracting a single invoice so every one is checked to the same standard and only genuine exceptions reach a human, with no invoice ever scheduled for payment by the agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scoring rules for daily churn-risk detection — usage decline, support friction, billing/payment risk, and renewal proximity — plus how to combine them into a ranked at-risk list with a reason and a suggested next step per account.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Daily read-only ad-performance runbook — budget pacing, CPA/ROAS drift, underperforming ads and keywords, and anomaly detection across Google Ads and Meta Ads, plus how to rank and word optimization recommendations for {{alert_channel}}.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Real Chrome/Brave + macOS Computer Use from inside the browser — zero CDP fingerprint, real sessions; mandatory for visual deploy verification. Drive clickwork yourself. USE WHEN verify deploy, confirm UI, screenshot verification, computer use, macos automation, debug web, troubleshoot, visual check, motion/animation bug, jank, transition stutter, scrub a flow, console logs/errors, runtime/JS/react errors, mismatch warning, network traffic/log, HAR/pcapng export, hydration/blank-page debug, flash then blank/page broken, why is this not working/what's happening on the page, authenticated page, bot detection bypass, reproduce bug, drive native app, about to ask the operator to click/navigate/fill a form/log in/approve OAuth, OAuth consent flow, complete a web login, do this in your browser. NOT FOR residential-proxy crawling (BrightData) or social actor scraping (Apify).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive SEO analysis for any website or business type. Full site audits, single-page analysis, technical SEO (crawlability, indexability, Core Web Vitals with INP), schema markup, content quality (E-E-A-T), image optimization, sitemap analysis, and GEO for AI Overviews/ChatGPT/Perplexity. Industry detection for SaaS, e-commerce, local, publishers, agencies. Triggers on: SEO, audit, schema, Core Web Vitals, sitemap, E-E-A-T, AI Overviews, GEO, technical SEO, content quality, page speed. Use this hub only when the SEO domain is clear and the requested workflow is not; otherwise use the exact retained leaf or command.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert knowledge for AI intelligence collection — OSINT methodology, entity extraction, knowledge graphs, change detection, and sentiment analysis

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect and use the official Obsidian command-line interface for read-only vault access; use for wiki-cli, Obsidian CLI, Obsidian read, Obsidian search, vault transport, which transport, transport detection, backlinks, tags, or Obsidian command line. Mutations always go through the claude-obsidian transaction core.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gets actor and level 3D bounding boxes and projects them into a camera image as 2D boxes — the dataset-annotation workflow. Lists box geometry, draws 3D boxes in the world via debug, or captures one camera frame and writes an annotated PNG plus a JSON of 2D boxes for matching actors. Use when the user asks to "get bounding boxes", "draw boxes around the cars", "project boxes onto the camera", or "generate a detection dataset / annotations".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GPU-accelerated data curation for LLM training. Supports text/image/video/audio. Features fuzzy deduplication (16× faster), quality filtering (30+ heuristics), semantic deduplication, PII redaction, NSFW detection. Scales across GPUs with RAPIDS. Use for preparing high-quality training datasets, cleaning web data, or deduplicating large corpora.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Meta's 86M prompt injection and jailbreak detector. Filters malicious prompts and third-party data for LLM apps. 99%+ TPR, <1% FPR. Fast (<2ms GPU). Multilingual (8 languages). Deploy with HuggingFace or batch processing for RAG security.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use Transformers.js to run state-of-the-art machine learning models directly in JavaScript/TypeScript. Supports NLP (text classification, translation, summarization), computer vision (image classification, object detection), audio (speech recognition, audio classification), and multimodal tasks. Works in browsers and server-side runtimes (Node.js, Bun, Deno) with WebGPU/WASM using pre-trained models from Hugging Face Hub.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ingest external plans with conflict detection against project decisions before writing anything.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-pass deep code review for large patches (1000+ LOC) that maximizes real bug detection. Orchestrates targeted-review, shallow-review, and deep-review in parallel across all HIGH and MEDIUM risk files and commits: understands the feature holistically, splits by file and commit, runs deep review on every HIGH/MEDIUM file, targeted review across the same scope, and per-commit shallow review, followed by cross-cut consistency checks. Use when: reviewing a large patch (feature branch, multi-commit, or single large diff, 1000+ LOC), doing a thorough pre-merge review, or when shallower reviews miss bugs due to patch size. Triggers on: "review this branch", "review these commits", "review this feature", "mega review", "thorough review", "full review of X commits", or when the user specifies a commit range or feature for review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build or review an element chart — a patent claim chart (infringement, invalidity, or review) or a civil element chart for any cause of action or defense — with every cell pin-cited and gap detection as the priority output. Use when the user asks for a claim chart, element chart, proof chart, infringement or invalidity contention, element-by-element mapping, or asks "what are we missing to prove [claim]".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。