「drafts」の検索結果

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or plan in character as a Chief Business Officer archetype, covering commercial model, partnerships, deal structure, market positioning, strategic fit and opportunity cost, and returns a DRAFT review with a verdict, findings that cite the exact passage, commercial risks and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks to "run a CBO review", "pressure-test this partnership", "check the deal structure" or "what would a commercial executive say about this". Do not use for pipeline, quota, sales-motion or forecast reviews, use cro-reviewer instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reads an accounts payable exception list (mismatches, possible duplicates, missing or exhausted purchase orders, missing receipts, vendor or bank detail differences) with any invoice, purchase order and receipt data supplied, and returns a DRAFT action sheet: per line, the exception as stated, the facts as read, the difference where both sides exist, one proposed next action for the accounts payable clerk to perform, who or what it needs, and a draft query, with UNKNOWN wherever the data is silent. Use when the user asks to "review these invoice exceptions", "work through the AP exception queue", "what should I do with these blocked invoices", "propose next steps for the three-way match failures" or "sort out the duplicate and missing PO invoices". Do not use for a purchase order log screened for anomalies, use purchase-order-anomaly-review instead; for an expense claim against policy, use expense-policy-precheck. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-checks one expense claim or travel plan, line by line, against the expense or travel policy the user supplies, and returns a DRAFT precheck sheet: the policy clause matched to each line, the limit quoted as the policy states it, whether the amount sits within, at or outside that limit, missing receipts, pre-approvals or justifications, and neutral questions for the approver and the claimant, with UNKNOWN wherever the policy or the claim is silent. Use when the user asks to "check this expense claim against policy", "pre-check my travel request", "is this claim within policy", "review these expenses before I submit them", "what receipts or approvals are missing" or "prepare the approver's questions for this claim". Do not use for a purchase order log or spend extract, use purchase-order-anomaly-review instead; do not use to compare a policy against a standard or regulation, use policy-gap-review instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs twice in a PFD to P&ID job. Part 1, before gate G3, validates the discipline proposals for provenance, UNKNOWN handling, conflicts, prohibited content and cross-section consistency and returns results and blocking items. Part 2, before gate G5, assembles the review package, with job header, gate record, every register and proposal, consolidated UNKNOWN list, feedback log and closing statement. Use when the user asks to "validate the enrichment", "run validation before G3", "assemble the review package" or "build the G5 package". Do not use for the readiness map, use pid-tool-readiness-mapping instead; do not use to produce a missing discipline section, use the discipline skill that owns it. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reads a cash forecast (spreadsheet, model export, pasted table or the narrative that accompanies it) and returns a DRAFT assumptions sheet: every assumption the forecast rests on, stated or implied by the figures, with its value as read, its location in the model, the cash lines it drives, its stated source or "not stated", the evidence that would test it, an owner, and one neutral challenge question, so a reviewer can work through the assumptions one by one. Use when the user asks to "list the assumptions behind this cash forecast", "what is this cash flow forecast assuming", "prepare the challenge questions for the treasury review", "pull out the drivers of the 13-week cash forecast" or "build an assumptions register for the liquidity plan". Do not use for actuals against budget by line, use budget-variance-explainer instead; do not use for the case behind a capital request, use capex-request-pack instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Proposes redactions of personal identifiers in pasted text or an attached document (names, contact details, identification and account numbers, dates that identify, quasi-identifiers) and returns a DRAFT redacted copy with consistent placeholder tokens plus a redaction table stating what was replaced, where and why, with a confidence level and a blank reviewer decision per row. Use when the user asks to "redact the names in this document", "de-identify this transcript before we share it", "strip personal data from these notes", "anonymise this report for publication" or "what would need redacting here". Do not use for assessing a planned processing activity, use dpia-draft-pack instead; do not use for working out what data an incident exposed, use data-incident-impact-brief instead. Never declares a document anonymised, safe to release or compliant. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Proposes the instrumentation and control content a P&ID adds to an accepted PFD process model: instruments drawn carried over as facts, measurement points and control loops the control philosophy requires, tag structure per the project instrument numbering procedure, system interfaces, and alarms, interlocks, trips and fail actions as quoted. Never assigns safety functions, ranges or setpoints. Use when the user asks to "run the instrumentation and control enrichment", "add the instrument section to the P&ID draft", "list the control loops the philosophy requires" or "carry the PFD instruments into the P&ID" after the piping section. Do not use for safety flags, SIL or trip classification, use process-safety-flags instead; do not use to assign tag numbers, use tagging-and-numbering. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck, pricing plan, go-to-market plan or forecast in character as a Chief Revenue Officer archetype and returns a DRAFT review in the chat with a verdict, findings cited to exact passages, revenue risks, what would change the verdict and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks to "run a CRO review", "pressure-test the revenue plan", "what would sales leadership say about this" or "challenge this forecast". Do not use for partnership, deal-structure or market-positioning reviews, use cbo-reviewer instead; for the finance seat use cfo-reviewer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or plan in character as a Customer Advocate archetype, the seat for paying customers not in the room, and returns a DRAFT review in the chat with a verdict, findings that cite the exact passage, customer-side risks, what would change the verdict and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks to "run a customer advocate review", "do a voice-of-the-customer pressure-test", "what would our customers say about this" or "what does this plan really ask of paying customers". Do not use for the product evidence or roadmap case, use cpo-reviewer instead; for revenue or pricing strategy, use cro-reviewer; for the staff who operate the change, use frontline-skeptic-reviewer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triages a batch of customer support tickets (helpdesk export, shared mailbox, chat transcripts, web forms) into one row per ticket with category, urgency graded on the evidence in the ticket, suggested next action and owner, plus a DRAFT customer reply for every ticket that needs one, returned as one Markdown pack. Use when the user asks to "triage these tickets", "sort the support queue", "what needs an answer first", "categorise this backlog", "draft replies for these tickets" or "build today's queue review". Do not use for internal requests from colleagues, use request-intake-triage instead; for one long thread that needs handing over, use escalation-summary; for a personal mailbox, use inbox-triage. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Proposes tag and number structures for the new lines and instruments in a P&ID draft according to the project's numbering procedures, checks every tag extracted from the PFD against the quoted procedure format, and lists cross-section identifier mismatches and the registry checks a human must run. Never invents a numbering convention, never alters a PFD tag and never assigns a sequence number the procedure reserves for the registry. Use when the user asks to "run the tagging and numbering section", "check the tags against the numbering procedure", "propose the tag structure for the new lines and instruments" or "list the registry checks before validation" after the process safety flags. Do not use for validating the four sections, use validation-and-review-package instead; do not use for instrument content, use instrumentation-and-control-enrichment. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a role-tuned morning brief as a dated Markdown document covering emails that need replies, today's calendar with conflicts flagged, chat mentions and upcoming deadlines, in the section order set by a preset (project manager, executive assistant, IT admin, sales or custom) read from an editable config. Use when the user asks to "run my brief", "give me my morning brief", "start-of-day summary", "switch my brief to the sales preset" or "change what my brief covers". Do not use for tracking promises made or owed across days, use commitment-catcher instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes changes since last release and drafts them directly into the project's CHANGELOG.md. Use when users requests 'update the changelog' or 'prepare changelog release notes'

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review content quality before anything is shown or sent (vault notes, outgoing drafts, dedup merges, service files) and return an explicit pass, fail or manual-review verdict. The counterpart of a post-build test gate: that one asks whether the build works, this one whether the writing is fit to show. Triggers: "/taste-check <path|text>", "/taste", "check this note".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mine the day's sessions for the owner's intentions, cluster them into distinct ones, store them, and write two or three detailed posts with an explicit ask per channel, plus a loop tracking who answered. Drafts only. Triggers: "/intention", "mine today's intentions", "intention posts".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Split one source post into tier-sized drafts (teaser, main social post, longread, technical dev-log) with cross-links downward and a canonical link back to the repository. Draft-first: publishes nothing itself. Triggers: "/episode", "/adapt", "adapt this post", "make an episode".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scan recent agent sessions for content-worthy moments and capture them as drafts in a publishing funnel, publishing nothing. Zero-token detector, then a taste judge, then capture. Triggers: "/content-mine", "mine sessions for content", "what in our sessions deserves a post".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Work the comments under published posts in one pass: list unanswered ones, reply only where a reply is genuinely expected (at most three per pass), name top commenters as warm-DM candidates, and prepare reply drafts on approval. Triggers: "/comments", "unanswered comments", "who is commenting".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agentic design-to-build pipeline that turns a Figma design into a built WordPress site using the Figma MCP server (read side) and the Elementor MCP server (write side) attached as MCP Apps on an NV oOS assistant. Covers the 7-stage pipeline (Scope → Read → Plan → Tokenize → Build → Verify → Handoff), the normative stage rules (get_design_context first, tokenize before build, drafts only, never publish, Figma read-only), the build-manifest contract (schema + example in reference/build-manifest.md), the design-file contract (frame/section/variable naming in reference/design-file-contract.md), assistant wiring (figma + elementor MCP Apps, OAuth + application passwords, host allowlist), safety rules, and troubleshooting. Use when asked to build or create a site, page, or landing page from a Figma design, to wire Figma MCP or Elementor MCP for design-to-build work, to approve or produce a build manifest, or to debug a failed design-to-build run.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gmail skill for sending, reading, searching, labelling, and managing email via the gws CLI. Covers messages, threads, labels, drafts, filters, and inbox management.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "package the launch assets", "build a press kit", or "prep the store listing and go-live checklist"; produces a tier-scoped launch asset manifest with production status — a press kit spec (factsheet, description, history, features, videos, images, logo and icon, awards, contact), demo script and screenshot specs, a launch FAQ, dual-store listing metadata drafts against the official character budgets (per App Store Connect / Play Console documentation), and a technical go-live checklist manifest (robots flip, sitemap, OG tags, analytics verification — execution stays with technical-seo-checker and serp-markup-builder). Not for the message copy itself — use message-house-builder or content-writer; not for landing page UX — use landing-optimizer; not for keyword research beyond the store surfaces — use keyword-research. 发布资产打包/press kit/商店listing规格/上线检查清单

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "write SEO content", "draft a blog post / landing page", "update outdated content", or "fix traffic/ranking decay"; two modes — new drafts pages with keywords, headers, snippets, and evidence boundaries; refresh scores decay, prioritizes update work, and produces a republish plan with GEO guidance. Not for AI-citation/GEO readiness scoring — use geo-content-optimizer; not for publish-gate scoring — use content-quality-auditor. SEO文章写作/内容更新/排名恢复

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create authorized presenter, avatar, and UGC-style video drafts with explicit voice, likeness, consent, and synthetic-media handling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn brand context and a social brief into platform-aware copy, storyboard, reference frames, and video drafts without publishing them.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。