「egress」の検索結果

Write focused tdmcp tests for one assigned coverage gap. Use for Vitest/msw unit tests, integration tests, bridge tests, CLI/config/resource tests, and regression tests that should raise coverage without weakening behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate any tdmcp test-coverage work: run the coverage harness, inspect coverage gaps, plan focused Vitest/msw or bridge tests, delegate coverage writers, verify coverage deltas, and re-run gates. Use whenever the user asks to raise coverage, add broad regression coverage, create a test harness, improve tests, re-run a coverage wave, or fix a coverage gate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix a GitHub issue end to end -- read it, reproduce, patch, add a regression test, verify, and open a PR. Use when given an issue number or URL in this repo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Aggregate feedback signals across all active loops. Reports health, trajectory, overdue checks, regression warnings, and Goodhart's Law violations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate Mycelium's own process effectiveness. Measures cycle velocity, discard trends, confidence calibration, gate effectiveness, regression rate. Run quarterly or every 20 cycles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for tests and release verification. Triggers: regression test, Playwright, E2E, contract test, coverage, CI flake, TDD, 테스트, 회귀 테스트, 품질 게이트.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when benchmarking, profiling, or A/B-testing CUDA kernels or end-to-end perf in the imp inference engine on RTX 5090 (sm_120), including refreshing tests/perf_baseline.json or publishing numbers to docs/BENCHMARKS.md and the README. Triggers on "benchmark kernel", "profile cuda", "ncu", "nsys", "kernel timing", "kernel sum", "occupancy", "bandwidth bound", "compute bound", "roofline", "perf baseline", "is this regression real", "decode dropped", "aggregate throughput", "two-image A/B", "prefill kernel A/B". Do NOT use for writing/optimizing kernel code (sm120-cuda-expert) or output-quality checks (check-degeneration).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when verifying that a model in the imp inference engine produces coherent output without repetition loops, token-stuck states, or state corruption across turns or streams. Triggers on "degenerates", "check degeneration", "repetition loop", "own own own", "stuck token", "empty content", "multi-turn regression", "does it still work", "NIAH", and after enabling CUDA graphs / changing forward pass / MoE routing / KV cache or KV dtype / GDN state or scan / sparse attention / PDL / speculation (MTP, n-gram) / ragged prefill / batched-decode kernels (smallm, producer quantize) / FA2 softmax.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add or update automated tests for a change using the repository’s verification rules in `AGENTS.md`. Use when implementing a feature, bugfix, refactor, or regression test; prefer stable integration/API/UI coverage and pull deeper test strategy from the bundled references.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refresh evaluation harnesses with live/fallback parser reliability, SLO gates, and regression checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform security-focused review of code diffs and pull requests, identifying newly introduced vulnerabilities, security regressions, and unsafe patterns in changed code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end testing with Playwright - browser automation, visual regression, test data management.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scope-specific code gap analysis — extracts referenced codes from project docs, researches what should apply, surfaces the delta. Triggers: 'code research', 'what codes apply', 'code check', 'ADA requirements', 'egress'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build or improve a UI testing strategy covering visual regression, interaction testing, and accessibility assertions. Use when the user asks to add tests, set up testing, fix flaky tests, improve test coverage, validate UI behavior, catch visual bugs, or establish confidence in shipping frontend changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate SEO and LLM-readability claims against live HTML, local fixtures, and generated artifacts. Use this skill when the user asks to prove whether title, meta description, canonical, hreflang, JSON-LD, NewsArticle.image, OpenGraph, Twitter cards, RSS autodiscovery, robots.txt, llms.txt, sitemap, news-sitemap, crawler access, or performance evidence is actually present, and when subjective audits must become timestamped pass/fail reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run an independent read-only Kimi review over the current working tree or a branch diff. Use when the user wants a second reviewer for defects, regressions, or implementation risks, not edits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Independent re-derivation gate for proposed changes during autonomous execution. Evaluates a change (code diff, config edit, engine evolution, schema change) against the work's authority matrix and a 4-check protocol: invariant compliance, scope authorization, detection narrowness, and regression risk. Returns structured JSON with pass/fail per check, an overall verdict (APPROVE / REQUEST_CHANGES / REJECT), and blockers. Profile-driven thresholds (strict for unattended runs, lenient for desk supervision). Use when an autonomous agent proposes an engine change, when reviewing a Claude Code-authored modification before merge, or when an unattended profile requires independent re-derivation. Trigger on: "review/approve this proposed change," "critic-gate this," "is this change safe," "is this safe to merge," "should I let this land," "run the critic." Do NOT use for handoff-readiness checks (use rootnode-handoff-trigger-check), general code review, or design-time correctness. Authority matrix required.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit RuField tests, trust boundaries, privacy projections, and evidence promotion. Use for conformance review, security regression review, release validation, or checking whether field accuracy claims have support.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate RuField CSI or ultrasonic recording replay and its fusion boundary. Use for captured CSI JSONL, BatVu ultrasonic replay, replay adapter integration, or replay regression diagnosis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Restore legibility to an auto-generated graph diagram that has outgrown its canvas - rendering at single-digit percent scale with sub-pixel labels. Covers the levers that measurably reduce layout units (source-level label wrapping, invisible chain links so unconnected nodes stop spreading into one row, per-cluster splitting, layout direction picked by rendering both and measuring) and the rejected ones (raising the render font is a no-op because layout engines measure in text units; a topology heuristic for direction regressed 13 of 38 diagrams). Use when a generated Mermaid/Graphviz/DOT diagram is too small to read; not for hand-authoring a small diagram.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a bug, failure, flake, regression, review finding, or ticket needs the core fixed so it cannot recur. Not for greenfield features: use tdd. Not for style-only review or typo-class one-liners.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to optimize code, make a path faster, make this as fast as possible, reduce allocations, repair a regression, profile a target, grill every inefficiency, or run a subsystem or repo-wide performance campaign against a measured floor; when a performance requirement, slowness report, Core Web Vitals miss, or profiling evidence identifies a bottleneck; or for an "extremely optimize" performance campaign, optimizing suspected hot paths without waiting for benchmarks, or estimating hot and complexity-neutral cold paths while refusing complexity theater. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design or implement the smallest complete executable evidence for a governed Proto UI behavior. Use for conformance cases, regression tests, cross-layer verification, test-entity mappings, failure-path coverage, or validation-plan design. Do not use tests to decide unsettled semantics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement one governed Proto UI Adapter-profile realization slice. Use when target and runtime range, supported or omitted Module role, Host Capability fidelity, lifecycle translation, failure behavior, compatibility boundary, and evidence scope are fixed by current authority. Use pui-adapter-assess for research or readiness assessment and pui-regression first for a governed failing behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。