「evidence」の検索結果

Evidence-driven tracing lane that orchestrates competing tracer hypotheses in Claude built-in team mode

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft a PR body from OMC's paper trail — the smallest visual that proves the change, evidence consumed from the verify protocol (never re-collected), reversibility from the ADR test on the diff, glossary language throughout.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Harbor intake for external work — the captain only handles unresolved decisions. Sweeps incoming issues and PRs, verifies every claim before disposition, reuses every decision already made, and hands the maintainer a docket whose pending items each carry one question with options, recommendation, impact and evidence. Agent-autonomous for facts and for actions covered by standing authorization; signed for every new judgment. Never merges.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shipyard's governed delivery pipeline — converge the mission, synthesize a durable spec, decompose vertical-slice tickets with blocking edges, run the frontier in parallel via team, close with verification, and report with a full decision log. Two entry gates — the yard gate (drydock audit) and the fog gate (an effort whose destination is unclear is routed to /ask-navigator before this pipeline starts). Humans own the checkpoints where there is no unique answer or the error cost is severe; agents continuously run everything repeatable and acceptable-by-evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compile heterogeneous knowledge sources—including documents, notes, web content, transcripts, research materials, and code repositories—into a Karpathy-style, evidence-grounded LLM Wiki with a maintained index; default entity and concept pages; and selective method, comparison, analysis, or instruction-requested summary pages. Use with ov compile to create or incrementally refresh knowledge that is easy for people and agents to retrieve, navigate, and reuse.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compile timestamped conversation logs, agent sessions, IM messages, collaborative documents, meeting notes, task records, and similar OpenViking materials into concise, evidence-grounded daily reports. Use with ov compile when the user asks for a daily work report, end-of-day digest, 日报, or reports for one or more dates, especially when activities must be reconstructed across heterogeneous sources without treating plans or agent suggestions as completed work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compile documents, notes, web content, transcripts, research materials, or code repositories into an evidence-grounded, visualization-ready knowledge graph with semantically typed entity nodes, statement-level provenance, and typed relationship edges. Use with ov compile to create or incrementally refresh `entities/*.md` node artifacts and a root `relations.jsonl` edge file for people, organizations, groups, animals, places, products, projects, systems, services, modules, datasets, standards, documents, events, and other identifiable things.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compile one or more OpenViking knowledge bases or document collections into topic-organized, evidence-grounded high-level knowledge, including cross-source findings, trends, changes, drivers, comparisons, implications, and uncertainties. Use with ov compile when the user asks to distill or synthesize a knowledge base, compare multiple collections, or derive higher-order insights such as changes across financial reports; do not use for document-by-document summaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Load when the user asks to add, import, compile, or ingest a research paper/PDF into OpenViking, especially when they mention ov-add-paper, ARA, claims, evidence, figures, tables, or paper-to-OV knowledge resources.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit SGLang startup logs, save evidence, and propose cleanup for user review. With no arguments, run Qwen3-8B at TP1 and TP2 plus gpt-oss-20b at TP1.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Workflow for upgrading/integrating cache-dit in SGLang diffusion (multimodal_gen): DBCache, DMD calibrator, TaylorSeer, SVDQuant DQ; porting upstream PRs and resolving conflicts against the per-request knob system; adding new cache knobs; building the sglang generate CLI test matrix; precision validation (PSNR / log evidence); troubleshooting environment issues (wheel ABI, svdq extension, flashinfer conflicts). Use when upgrading or integrating cache-dit in sglang diffusion, porting cache-dit PRs with conflicts, adding cache knobs, running the sglang generate CLI test matrix, or validating precision (PSNR) for DBCache/DMD/SVDQuant(DQ) paths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Goal-driven finance research workflow: attach a research-only objective, track criteria, and add evidence while avoiding live trading execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A short self-bias checklist to run at the START of any investment research task (stock screen / sector study / company deep-dive). Four biases that systematically warp AI research — leader-bias (only big caps), English-bias (miss JP/KR/TW players), narrative-bias (chase concept labels), confirmation-bias (only bullish evidence) — plus recency-bias. Load this first, then research with the corrections in mind. Not a workflow, just a 60-second attitude reset that materially improves coverage and honesty.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Named investor reasoning frameworks packaged as reusable analytical lenses — 12 lenses (deep value, quality franchise, inversion, scuttlebutt growth, GARP, cycle positioning, debt cycle, forensic short, cost drag, right-business, weak-system contrarian, three questions) that stack on top of evidence already gathered, each with ordered priority signals, hard disqualifiers, and documented failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize the description prompts an AI agent reads to learn its built-in tools (the `.md` files under prompts/tools/). Two halves: (1) measure how much of a prompt is already inferable from the tool's JSON parameter schema + name, to prune redundancy with evidence; (2) house authoring rules for what belongs in a tool prompt vs what stays in code. Use when auditing, trimming, writing, or reviewing tool prompts, deciding what schema field descriptions already cover, or testing schema-vs-prompt overlap before deleting prompt lines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify focused, evidence-backed skills CLI bug fixes worth quuu's attention.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Respond to security incidents in AWS, Azure, and GCP via identity-based containment, cloud-native log analysis (CloudTrail, Azure Activity Logs, GCP Audit Logs), resource isolation, and forensic evidence acquisition adapted for ephemeral cloud infrastructure. Use when CSPM alerts or audit logs show compromised cloud credentials, unauthorized IAM changes, or a breach spanning cloud services.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Parse Windows LNK shortcut files to extract target paths, MAC timestamps, volume serial numbers, and machine identifiers for forensic timeline reconstruction. Use when investigating recently-accessed files, tracking removable media or network paths referenced by shortcuts, or building a DFIR timeline from LNK artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Examine Linux system artifacts (auth logs, cron/systemd persistence, shell history, SSH keys, and system configuration) to uncover evidence of compromise, detect rootkits or backdoors, and reconstruct user/attacker activity. Use when investigating a compromised Linux server or workstation, hunting for persistence mechanisms, or scoping a Linux-based breach during incident response.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze the NTFS Master File Table ($MFT) with MFTECmd, analyzeMFT, and X-Ways Forensics to recover metadata and content of deleted files by examining MFT record entries, $LogFile, $UsnJrnl, and MFT slack space. Use when recovering evidence of deleted files, reconstructing NTFS file-system timelines, or detecting anti-forensic timestomping during a Windows forensic examination.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform comprehensive forensic analysis of raw (dd), E01, or AFF disk images with Autopsy and The Sleuth Kit, recovering deleted files, examining metadata and embedded artifacts, keyword searching, and building investigation timelines with visual reports. Use for structured analysis of a forensic disk image or when stakeholders need visual reports from evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate compromised Docker containers by analyzing images, layers, volumes, logs, and runtime artifacts to identify malicious activity and evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[OMX] Bounded best-practice research wrapper using official/upstream evidence first

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run read-only deep repository analysis and return a ranked synthesis with explicit confidence, concrete file references, and clear evidence-vs-inference boundaries. Use when a user says 'analyze', 'investigate', 'why does', 'what's causing', or needs grounded cross-file explanation before any changes are proposed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。