957 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Discover and run configured quality gates for requested or changed work, preserve diagnostics as evidence, route failures to the appropriate causal/domain capability, and verify corrections. Use for linting, formatting, type-checking, configured hook checks, or pre-completion quality verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review changed user-interface or CLI presentation behavior for accessibility failures. Use for an independent accessibility perspective on a defined change set.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write and evaluate effective Python tests using pytest. Use when writing tests, reviewing test code, debugging test failures, or improving test coverage. Covers test design, fixtures, parameterization, mocking, and async testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Handle failures and errors during workflow. Use when build breaks, tests fail unexpectedly, or agent gets stuck. Semi-automatic recovery with user confirmation for destructive actions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Self-improvement loop for multi-agent workflows. Diagnose failures, improve tool descriptions, and learn from success/failure patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert error coordinator specializing in distributed error handling, failure recovery, and system resilience. Masters error correlation, cascade prevention, and automated recovery strategies across multi-agent systems with focus on minimizing impact and learning from failures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit AuthCrunch security boundaries, triage vulnerability reports and scanner findings, reproduce authentication or authorization failures, and prepare evidence-backed remediation. Covers trust, credentials, redirects, concurrency, diagnostic logging, and dependency exposure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Core agent-browser usage guide. Read this before running any agent-browser commands. Covers the snapshot-and-ref workflow, navigating pages, interacting with elements (click, fill, type, select), extracting text and data, taking screenshots, managing tabs, handling forms and auth, waiting for content, running multiple browser sessions in parallel, and troubleshooting common failures. Use when the user asks to interact with a website, fill a form, click something, extract data, take a screenshot, log into a site, test a web app, or automate any browser task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Debug CI failures in unfamiliar repo pipelines. Reads CI configs, fetches failure logs, classifies the failure type, and guides the user through diagnosing and fixing the issue. Use when CI fails on your PR in an OSS repo, when you don't understand a CI error, or when debugging GitHub Actions/CircleCI/other CI systems. Not for setting up CI from scratch — this is for debugging existing pipelines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Portable Codebase Argus agent playbook for evidence-first multi-agent review of GitHub pull requests, CI failures, GitHub Actions logs, GitHub App webhook review, /argus PR comment commands, autofix branch planning, OpenAI/Claude/Gemini/Codex provider tribunals, downstream merge/rebase work, and long-lived fork sync against an upstream repository.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Testing patterns for PHPUnit tests. Use when writing tests, debugging test failures, setting up test coverage, or implementing test patterns for ATmosphere features.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for race windows, ordering bugs, idempotency failures, lock gaps, concurrent worker drift, and state inconsistencies that produce decisive effects. Use when the user asks to reproduce timing-sensitive bugs, concurrent state corruption, duplicate actions, stale reads, or privilege or balance drift caused by request ordering. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when starting a session and suspecting configuration issues, after hook failures, MCP connection errors, or degraded vault performance. Also useful as a periodic health audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Index local coding-agent sessions into a searchable SQLite-backed view so you can inspect usage, compare failures, and recover prior context quickly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use GitHub Agentic Workflows to let an agent triage issues, inspect CI failures, or deliver scheduled repository upkeep inside GitHub Actions with explicit workflow definitions and reviewable runs. This is for bounded, repeatable repository operations, not for listing GitHub as a general coding platform.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnoses failed AWS CloudFormation stack operations using the AWS CLI (aws cloudformation describe-stack-events) and cfn-lint validator. Traces resource creation failures, rollback causes, and nested stack dependency chains.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnoses ArgoCD application sync failures and degraded states using the ArgoCD REST API and argocd CLI. Queries /api/v1/applications/{name} for sync status, resource health, and operation state. Provides automated remediation steps for OutOfSync, Degraded, and Missing resource conditions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnoses Ansible playbook failures using ansible-playbook --check --diff mode, ansible-lint, and the Ansible callback plugin API. Parses task execution results and suggests fixes for common module errors in ansible.builtin and community collections.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run or maintain the full tdmcp repo quality-audit team: command sweeps, all package/Makefile/CI gates, security review, usability/flow review, refactor/test-gap analysis, coverage hardening, QA, and follow-up fix waves. Use whenever the user asks for a complete audit, improve repo/code quality, test all commands, find security/usability failures, refactor debt, add missing tests, re-run the audit, continue a previous quality wave, or verify the repo is ready.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when starting a new project. Genesis finds real production failures from similar GitHub repos, then builds a working MVP immediately - not just documents. Two modes: fast-mvp (5 min research cap, builds right after) and deep-research (full analysis). Success = user can run the project. Triggers on: "genesis init [vision]", "I want to build X", "scaffold", "new project", "set up project", "start building", "create a tool", "make a CLI", "bootstrap", "בנה פרויקט", "צור פרויקט", "התחל פרויקט".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when writing Playwright tests, fixing flaky tests, debugging failures, implementing Page Object Model, configuring CI/CD, optimizing performance, mocking APIs, handling authentication or OAuth, testing accessibility (axe-core), file uploads/downloads, date/time mocking, WebSockets, geolocation, permissions, multi-tab/popup flows, mobile/responsive layouts, touch gestures, GraphQL, error handling, offline mode, multi-user collaboration, third-party services (payments, email verification), console error monitoring, global setup/teardown, test annotations (skip, fixme, slow), test tags (@smoke, @fast, @critical, filtering with --grep), project dependencies, security testing (XSS, CSRF, auth), performance budgets (Web Vitals, Lighthouse), iframes, component testing, canvas/WebGL, service workers/PWA, test coverage, i18n/localization, Electron apps, or browser extension testing. Covers E2E, component, API, visual, accessibility, security, Electron, and extension testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interactive code simulation engine that spawns ghost personas to review your code before it ships. Each ghost walks through your code line-by-line from a different failure perspective: The Adversary (race conditions, double-submit, idempotency), The Enterprise Edge (business logic gaps, multi-currency, B2B tax exemptions, locale), Chaos Monkey (timeouts, partial failures, network partitions, OOM). Produces a chaos timeline, structured bug report with severity ratings, and three resolution tiers (quick fix, robust architecture, generated test suite). Use this skill whenever the user mentions code review, PR review, "find bugs", "what could go wrong", "will this break", "is this safe", "stress test", "edge cases", design review, pre-merge check, dry run, chaos test, or wants a second opinion on any code — even if they don't explicitly ask for "ghost personas" or "simulation". Also trigger when someone pastes a code snippet with any question about its correctness or safety.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read GitHub Actions CI for the current branch or open PR, triage failing checks, reproduce locally, and fix scoped issues until green. Use whenever the user mentions CI failures, red checks, failed pipeline, GitHub Actions, merge blocked, fix the build, babysit CI, gh run failed, ruff/ty errors, failing pytest, example run failed, or asks to check CI on this branch — even if they only paste a log snippet. Also use after implementing a feature when tests, lint, or typecheck might have broken.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user says 'set up respira', 'respira not connecting', 'check my respira connection', or 'fix respira'. Walks through first-time setup and diagnoses connection failures: timeouts, 401s, 403s, and plugin or server version mismatches.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。