「find」の検索結果

Flag desktop<->den contract drift introduced by this diff. High findings gate Warden clearance; medium findings are advisory only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find high-priority open NemoClaw security PRs to review, including competing or superseded candidates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review Apache ShardingSphere or user-authorized downstream pull requests and PR discussions from public or authorized repository evidence. Use for code-correctness or mergeability decisions, CI-focused review, root-cause and regression analysis, complete consolidated findings, copy-ready committer feedback, challenged findings, multi-round review, and formal review of local implementation candidates in the repository completion loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code review focused exclusively on over-engineering. Finds what to delete: reinvented standard library, unneeded dependencies, speculative abstractions, dead flexibility. One line per finding: location, what to cut, what replaces it. Use when the user says "review for over-engineering", "what can we delete", "is this over-engineered", "simplify review", or invokes /ponytail-review. Complements correctness-focused review, this one only hunts complexity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep research agent skill. Use when the user needs thorough, scientific, truth-seeking research on any topic -- investigating claims, finding primary sources, synthesizing evidence, producing cited reports. Triggers on: 'research this', 'investigate', 'deep dive', 'find sources', 'what does the evidence say', 'literature review', 'fact check', 'analyze the research on', any request requiring multi-source investigation with citations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find and read information on the open web — fan-out web/news/finance search plus full-page fetching and source extraction. Use to answer current questions, gather and cite sources, verify a claim, or pull text from specific URLs. Triggers: 'search the web', 'look this up', 'find sources on', 'what's the latest on', 'fetch this page', 'is it true that…', 'compare X vs Y'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hardens LifeOS tests via property/mutation testing. USE WHEN harden, hardening, property test, property based testing, PBT, fast-check, mutation test, mutation testing, Stryker, CRAP score, CRAP analysis, DRY scan, jscpd, acceptance test mutation, strengthen tests, sharpen ISCs, find bugs example tests miss, universal quantified claim, shrink counterexample, what bugs am I missing, test the tests, test of the test. NOT FOR writing new feature tests (use bun test directly), grading agent output quality (use Evals), UI verification with real Chrome (use Interceptor), finding security vulnerabilities, or building new functionality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Curated aphorism collection with CRUD — content-based matching, themed search, thinker research, DB maintenance. Quotes organized by author/theme/context/usage to prevent repetition. Four workflows: FindAphorism, AddAphorism, ResearchThinker, SearchAphorisms. Themes: Stoicism, Wisdom, Truth-seeking, Excellence, Resilience, Curiosity. USE WHEN aphorism, quote, find a quote, research thinker, add aphorism, quote for newsletter, what did X say about, quote bank. NOT FOR creative writing or social posts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FLOW framework integration: evidence-led SEO using the Find → Leverage → Optimize → Win loop. Surfaces stage-specific AI prompts from the FLOW knowledge base (41 prompts, CC BY 4.0). Use when user says "FLOW", "FLOW framework", "seo flow", "evidence-led SEO", "find leverage optimize win", or wants stage-specific SEO prompts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search and analyze research papers, find related work, summarize key ideas. Use when user says "find papers", "related work", "literature review", "what does this paper say", or needs to understand academic papers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search published venue papers (IEEE, ACM, Springer, etc.) via Semantic Scholar API. Complements /arxiv (preprints) with citation counts, venue metadata, and TLDR. Use when user says "search semantic scholar", "find IEEE papers", "find journal papers", "venue papers", "citation search", or wants published literature beyond arXiv preprints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automate Affinda tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find what the workspace already says before you answer or write — search Notion, tell the canonical page from the stale copy, and cite what you used. Use when the user asks what's in Notion, refers to a doc, spec, or meeting note, or asks a question the workspace probably already answers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answer "what's breaking" questions from Sentry — find the right org and project, search issues and events with the vocabulary Sentry uses, and report what is actually firing rather than the first hit. Use when the user asks what errors are happening, whether something is stable, what changed since a release, or for any health summary of a service.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find and read mail in Superhuman — the thread where something was said, sent, or promised — by filtering on who, when, and which split before searching by words, reading the thread before answering, and linking the thread behind every claim. Use when the user asks what someone emailed, whether a reply or an invoice ever arrived, what the latest is on a thread, or what is on their calendar.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find a time and put a meeting on the calendar through Superhuman — read what is already booked, check the participants' availability, propose slots, and create the event only once the user picks one. Use when the user asks what is on their calendar, when they are free, to find a time with someone, or to schedule, move, or set up a call.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Finds undocumented and rotting documentation in a CARLA checkout — unreleased features, Python bindings missing from the API reference, documented API that no longer exists, sensors and catalogue actors missing from their reference pages, broken links, and pages unreachable from the nav. Static only, no build or server. Use when the user asks to "audit the docs", "find undocumented features", "what needs documenting", or is preparing a release or a new default branch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Queries the live CARLA world and resolves an entity description into a concrete actor id — find actors by type, role, or colour, or the single one nearest a point/actor; read the world snapshot; get static level bounding boxes by label; cast rays for semantic points; project a point to the ground; or (ros-topics) list the native ROS 2 topics each actor should be publishing and why any is silent. Identifies by stable attributes, not by any rank/order. Use when the user asks "what actors are here", "find the red prius", "the vehicle nearest the ego", "list the pedestrians", or needs a specific actor id for another skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Track validated Codex Security findings in Linear, Jira, GitHub issues, or draft GitHub security advisories. Supports issue batches, duplicate checks, and reviewed writes. Do not use for scans or fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use only when the user explicitly asks to fix and verify a validated or plausible security vulnerability. Do not use for ordinary bug fixes, correctness or design review findings, general validation, or full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shallow (quick) ensemble bug-finding review using 6 specialist agents in parallel. Each specialist reviews the same patch through a different lens: Logic & Types, Boundaries & I/O, Concurrency & State, Resources & Serialization, Absence Analysis, and API Completeness. Findings are merged and deduplicated. Best for: quick first-pass review of patches, triage of diffs, broad surface-level bug scan. For deeper file-focused review with full pattern catalogs and codebase investigation, use the deep-review skill instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, run, and verify TLA+ and PlusCal formal specifications. Use for modeling distributed systems, protocols, concurrent algorithms, state machines. Can compose specs from code, find divergences between spec and implementation, spot concurrency bugs and invariant violations. Use when asked to "write a TLA+ spec", "model check", "verify protocol", "find race conditions", or "formal verification".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Keep the privacy policy current with practice. Two modes: weekly sweep of saved PIAs, DPA reviews, and triage results to find policy drift; or direct query for a proposed new practice. Use when the user asks "does our policy cover this", "we want to start doing X — does the policy need updating", "run the policy monitor", "policy sweep", or wants to find where the privacy policy no longer matches what the team actually does.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Aggregate diligence findings into a deal team briefing at the right altitude for the audience — exec summary for leadership, working summary for the team. Use when user says "brief the deal team", "what's the state of diligence", "summarize findings for [audience]", "deal update", or on the briefing cadence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。