「fixes」の検索結果

Maintain a changelog following Keep a Changelog format. Covers entry categorization (Added, Changed, Deprecated, Removed, Fixed, Security), version section management, and unreleased tracking. Use when starting a new project that needs a changelog, adding entries after completing features or fixes, preparing a release by promoting Unreleased entries to a versioned section, or converting a free-form changelog to Keep a Changelog format.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Four-stage alchemical code transmutation — nigredo (decomposition), albedo (purification), citrinitas (illumination), rubedo (synthesis) — with meditate and heal checkpoints between stages. Transforms tangled or legacy code into optimized, well-structured output through systematic material analysis. Use when transforming legacy code into modern equivalents, refactoring deeply tangled modules where incremental fixes keep failing, converting a codebase between paradigms, or when simpler refactoring approaches have stalled and a full-cycle transformation is needed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a verified non-trivial fix lands or existing solution docs need refresh. Not for unverified fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to fix P0s, address critical issues, or work on priorities from the weekly product briefing. Don't use for non-P0 issues or local bug fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to audit typography across a codebase. Produces a file:line report with concrete fixes ordered by impact and flags unverifiable rules. Not for building a type system or token scale.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a human explicitly asks for a full repository agent-compatibility pass returning a scored report with prioritized fixes. Not for tasks that require source or remote-system changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repair one independently verified Proto UI maintenance finding when governing authority or an explicit product decision fixes the expected result. Use for the bounded remediation and its evidence packet before independent review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reproduce and repair a bounded Proto UI regression whose expected behavior and owning layer are already governed. Use this before domain implementation skills whenever work starts from a reproducible failure, including bug fixes, drift repairs, broken exports, Runtime failures, Adapter parity defects, Prototype defects, or public-projection regressions. Do not use when expected semantics or ownership is unresolved.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designer's eye plan review — interactive, like CEO and Eng review. Rates each design dimension 0-10, explains what would make it a 10, then fixes the plan to get there. Works in plan mode. For live site visual audits, use /design-review. Use when asked to "review the design plan" or "design critique".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic debugging with root cause investigation. Four phases: investigate, analyze, hypothesize, implement. Iron Law: no fixes without root cause.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Report-only QA testing. Systematically tests a web application and produces a structured report with health score, screenshots, and repro steps — but never fixes anything. Use when asked to "just report bugs", "qa report only", or "test but don't fix". For the full test-fix-verify loop, use /qa instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically QA test a web application and fix bugs found. Runs QA testing, then iteratively fixes bugs in source code, committing each fix atomically and re-verifying. Use when asked to "qa", "QA", "test this site", "find bugs", "test and fix", or "fix what's broken". Three tiers: Quick (critical/high only), Standard (+ medium), Exhaustive (+ cosmetic). Produces before/after health scores, fix evidence, and a ship-readiness summary. For report-only mode, use /qa-only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or redesign product UI in an existing codebase, including a wireframe, substantive visual variations, and an interactive prototype. Use for requests about UI layout, visual direction, screens, flows, components, a landing page, dashboard, or making an interface feel polished. Do not use for backend work, system architecture, decks, or logic-only UI fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clean up a diff for reuse, simplicity and efficiency, then apply the fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

60-Second Restaurant Snapshot — quick assessment without subagents with grade, top 3 fixes, and CTA to full audit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect and fix AI-generated writing patterns (slop). Comprehensive detection with 50+ patterns across 3 severity tiers, structure weighted above lexical tells, scoring system, and editor mode that directly fixes problems. Use when scanning any content for AI tells, auditing drafts before publishing, checking if writing "sounds like AI", humanizing AI-generated text, or verifying content authenticity. Trigger on "check for slop", "does this sound like AI", "humanize this", "AI audit", "slop check", "clean up AI writing", or any request to detect/remove artificial-sounding patterns. Also use proactively before publishing any AI-assisted content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

60-Second Role Snapshot — quick assessment without subagents with grade, top 3 fixes, and CTA to full analysis

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

RED-GREEN-MUTATE-KILL MUTANTS-REFACTOR workflow for writing production code. Use before ANY production code change - new features, bug fixes, or behavior changes. Triggers on starting implementation work of any kind. Covers the cycle itself - failing test first, minimum code to pass, mutation verification, refactor assessment. For how to write good tests, see testing. For the refactoring step in detail, see refactoring. TDD is non-negotiable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Measures the work in a code repo as deeds (caps, fixes and tends) by running the bundled `deeds` CLI over the commit history, for this repo or any GitHub repo, over any time window. Reports totals, a week-by-week trend, a per-author breakdown and the named caps, and explains what the numbers mean.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rate limiting for serverless and edge apps with the @upstash/ratelimit TypeScript/JavaScript SDK backed by Upstash Redis. Use when adding a rate limiter or throttling to an API route, Next.js middleware, Vercel Edge, Cloudflare Workers, or any HTTP endpoint; returning 429 Too Many Requests; choosing between fixed window, sliding window, and token bucket algorithms; limiting per user, IP, API key, or tenant with prefixes and custom keys; protecting login, signup, form, or AI endpoints from abuse, bots, and brute force; using deny lists, ephemeral caching, analytics, timeouts, and multi-region rate limits; or estimating the Redis command cost of rate limiting. Also use when the user says rate limit, rate-limiting, throttle, quota, request limits, or traffic protection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the free first-party `dotnet format` CLI for .NET formatting and analyzer fixes. Use when a .NET repo needs formatting commands, `--verify-no-changes` CI checks, or `.editorconfig`-driven code style enforcement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for code generation, feature work, bug fixes, refactoring, and code review when a change creates or reshapes a multi-step flow, state lifecycle, side-effect or decision ownership, cross-unit composition, or boundary contract. Also use it when an existing structural problem makes those elements hard to trace or verify. Structural change is optional. Mechanical edits, throwaway experiments, and coherent local changes stay with their current owner and focused verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a dogfooding session for hyalo — build from source, exercise the CLI against real knowledgebases (own KB, MDN, GitHub Docs, VS Code docs), find bugs, verify recent fixes, assess UX, measure performance, and write a structured report. Use this skill whenever the user says /dogfood, "dogfood", "run a dogfood session", "test hyalo against real data", or wants to exercise hyalo on real knowledgebases to find issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

REQUIRED skill for any security-related request. Use this skill whenever the user wants to find anything dangerous, sensitive, or risky in their code, files, or repository. This includes but is not limited to: scanning for secrets/keys/tokens/credentials, checking dependencies for vulnerabilities, auditing destructive commands for missing safeguards, reviewing files for PII or internal data before open-sourcing, checking .env files or git history for leaked credentials, or any request where the concern is "is this safe/secure/exposed?" This skill provides a structured audit methodology and checklist you MUST follow — do not attempt security reviews without it. Skip this skill ONLY for pure feature work, refactoring, bug fixes, or non-security code review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。