「general」の検索結果

Synchronize existing READMEs with local Git code changes and every language edition. This skill should be used for update readme, sync readme, 更新 README, 更新项目文档, 同步多语言 README, README を更新して, README 업데이트해 줘, обнови README, or /readme-update. Ask for an exact project version or explicit unchanged choice before editing; inspect committed, staged, unstaged and untracked changes, weave each change into its natural position (never just the beginning or end), keep the flowchart current, and keep all language editions identical apart from the language.

Guide creation of focused single-purpose agents following the One Agent One Prompt One Purpose principle. Use when designing new agents, refactoring general agents into specialists, or optimizing agent context for a single task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-provider deliberation panel for COMPLEX, multi-view questions — architecture, strategy, market research, and codebase sweeps. Runs a 4-stage deliberation across the provider fleet (diverge → contrarian red-team → adversarial verify → cited synthesis), the same multi-perspective rigour the plan-gate already applies to plan reviews, generalised to arbitrary questions. Use when one model's answer isn't enough and you want convergence THROUGH disagreement + verification, not a single opinion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever the user wants to find, shortlist, vet, enrich, or research US professional-services firms — law, marketing, consulting, accounting, IT services, architecture, engineering, HR, PR, design, and similar B2B service providers. Triggers on requests like "find me a PPC agency in California", "shortlist three boutique IP law firms", "build a longlist of 50 mid-size IT consultancies", or "here are 12 agency domains — pull contact info and confirm which are US-based", even when the need is described indirectly without naming a category. Drives the ServiceGraph API (api.servicegraph.co) — a 100k+ US firm catalog with filters for industry, services, location, size, ratings, and third-party listings. Skip when the user is asking for personal/consumer services for themselves (an individual's own legal, tax, or medical needs), non-US firms, individual freelancers, retail/ecommerce/SaaS-product companies, recruiting-an-employee tasks, or general web research that doesn't need a structured firm directory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever the user wants to find, rank, or shortlist directories and listing sites where they can submit an AI product — an AI tool, AI app, AI agent, or agent skill / plugin — to get backlinks, referral traffic, and discovery. Triggers on "where can I list my AI tool", "directories to submit my AI agent", "agent-skills directories", "best AI tool directories for backlinks", "where do I get my GPT/Claude app discovered", or "pull submission details for these AI-directory domains", even when described indirectly (we built an AI agent, where do we get it in front of people). Drives the ServiceGraph API (api.servicegraph.co) — a catalog of 1,000+ product directories enriched with Domain Rating, backlinks, and organic traffic. Defer to find-mcp-directories for MCP-server listings specifically, and to find-product-directories for general SaaS/software/app launches with no AI angle. Skip finding an AI consultancy/agency to hire (use find-ai-consultancy), comparing AI products ("ChatGPT vs Claude"), building an AI tool (do-the-work), and AI link-building *services*.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever the user wants to find, shortlist, vet, or enrich US AI/ML/data consulting firms (consultancies) — AI/ML development, MLOps, generative AI / LLM apps (RAG, chatbots, agents), computer vision, NLP, recommendation systems, data engineering, BI/analytics. Triggers on "find an AI/ML consulting firm to build our recommendation engine", "shortlist three RAG/LLM consultancies for an enterprise chatbot", "compare three AI/ML consulting firms with strong ratings", or "pull contact info for these 8 AI consultancy domains", even when described indirectly (we want to use AI for X, deploy ML to production). Drives the ServiceGraph API (api.servicegraph.co) — a 100k+ US firm catalog filterable by industry, services, location, size, ratings. Defer to find-software-developer for general app/backend work where AI is just a feature. Skip in-house ML/data hires, LLM/AI-tool comparisons (ChatGPT vs Claude), "how do I fine-tune X" DIY questions, AI courses for individuals, non-US firms, individual freelancers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintain SQLite email-confirmed registration, its public parser, optional portal confirmation hook, hashed pending credentials, recoverable account creation, and registration-to-login E2E tests. Excludes administrative approval and general identity-store account operations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guided codebase exploration for understanding a repo's architecture, patterns, and domain language before contributing. Not issue-specific. builds general understanding. Use when exploring a new repo, wanting to understand how a project works, or preparing to become a regular contributor. Not for learning a framework or language you have never used. Use oss-learn-stack for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, debugging, or giving feedback on Go code in this repo (exercises/part2, website/tools, or any *.go file) or when asked for a "code review", "review this Go", "revisa este código Go", or "crítica de código". Reviews for correctness, idiomatic Go, error handling, resource cleanup, concurrency, performance, and security, and always ends with a test-thinking pass (what a test would catch). For exercises/part2, prefer the go-exercise-reviewer skill which knows the module-mode quirk; this skill covers general Go anywhere in the repo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

What this project has already learned the hard way, and where any new such fact belongs. Two jobs. (1) Routing: this project keeps NO per-project Claude memories — read this before writing anything down, and pick a durable home from the list here. (2) An index, by area, of non-obvious facts worth knowing before you guess: debugging rigs and measurements that lie, iOS/WebKit and the tethered iPhone, the Windows app, production and deployment, and general codebase traps. Use before setting up a browser- or server-driven debugging session, when a bug reproduces only on iPhone, in Safari or in the Windows app, before changing deployment configuration or reading store/crash data, when something behaves unexpectedly and you are about to guess why, and whenever you are tempted to record a fact for later.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Kai Marketing OS router - shows all 49 marketing skills organized by workflow, business stage, and frequency. Use when "kai help", "what marketing skills are available", "how do I use the harness", "marketing help", or any general marketing question where the right skill isn't obvious.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run CIS benchmark checks against cluster nodes and control planes when an agent needs a narrow Kubernetes hardening audit, not a general platform listing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use GitHub Agentic Workflows to let an agent triage issues, inspect CI failures, or deliver scheduled repository upkeep inside GitHub Actions with explicit workflow definitions and reviewable runs. This is for bounded, repeatable repository operations, not for listing GitHub as a general coding platform.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs Ansible diagnostic playbooks using ansible-runner and the Ansible Collections ecosystem (ansible.builtin, community.general). Captures system health, service status, and log analysis across inventory hosts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use only when the user explicitly asks to fix and verify a validated or plausible security vulnerability. Do not use for ordinary bug fixes, correctness or design review findings, general validation, or full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scores and strengthens startup pitch decks (pre-seed through Series A) against 35 investor-grade criteria grounded in Sequoia, DocSend, YC, a16z, and Carta data. Use when the user has shared a pitch deck (PDF, PPTX, markdown, pasted slide text, or a link to one) and asks for a review, score, feedback, or critique. A full review takes about 15–25 minutes, 40 or more for a long investor deck, so for a general pitch question with no deck, answer briefly in chat and offer the review instead of starting it. When it runs, score with the rubric, never with deck advice from memory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

General rules pertaining to Mobile UI development. Covers UI/UX best practices, state management, and navigation patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies general coding standards and best practices for Kafka development with Scala.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build apps with the Claude API or Anthropic SDK. TRIGGER when: code imports `anthropic`/`@anthropic-ai/sdk`/`claude_agent_sdk`, or user asks to use Claude API, Anthropic SDKs, or Agent SDK. DO NOT TRIGGER when: code imports `openai`/other AI SDK, general programming, or ML/data-science tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

N-round opposing-stance debates for trade-off analysis. Assigns pro/con roles to agents, runs structured debate rounds with quality scoring, and produces a moderator synthesis with confidence-rated recommendation. Generalizable to architecture, technology, security, and design decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reflective Memory. Use when working with memory, reflection, context management, or intent tracking. Provides the reflective memory practice — how and when to use keep tools for capturing insights, tracking commitments, and maintaining awareness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reflective Memory

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Specialized software engineering prompt methodology for Claude. Use when building prompts for system design, code review, incident response, security analysis, API design, architecture decisions, RFCs, ADRs, runbooks, or technical leadership. Trigger on: "build a prompt for code review," "system design prompt," "SRE prompt," "security review prompt," "incident response prompt," "API design prompt," "architecture decision prompt," "RFC prompt," "runbook prompt." Provides 11 tested approaches across identity, reasoning, and output for engineering analysis. Do NOT use for general coding help, writing code, or debugging — this builds prompts that shape engineering analysis, not code itself. Do NOT use for evaluating existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Specialized agentic and context engineering prompt methodology for Claude. Use when designing AI agents — system prompts, tool definitions, context window architectures, failure mode planning, multi-agent coordination, agent evaluation. Trigger on: "design an agent," "build a system prompt for an agent," "architect an agent's context," "design tool definitions," "agent system prompt," "context window architecture," "tool interface design," "evaluate agent behavior," "multi-agent coordination," "context engineering for agents," "ACI design." Provides 12 tested approaches for agent architecture (designing agents, not using them). Do NOT use for evaluating or scoring individual non-agent prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available). Do NOT use for general software architecture that hosts agents (use standard technical reasoning for that).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。