「goal」の検索結果

Lightweight refactor: audit → plan → approve → implement in a single Opus context, no sub-agent fan-out. Behavior preservation is the goal — verifies tests still pass, optionally commits, and offers a separate /code-review pass at the end. Use by default; reach for /claude-setup:refactor only when the cleanup needs parallel fan-out or exceeds one context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and review autonomous or semi-autonomous agent loops — systems where an agent prompts itself, runs on a schedule or event, and iterates toward a goal without a human at the keyboard. Use this whenever the user wants to build, design, harden, or audit any kind of self-running agent, agentic workflow, control loop, background worker, cron/heartbeat/webhook-driven agent, "Ralph loop", auto-PR-fixer, monitoring agent, or any long-running task that should keep going on its own until done. Trigger this even when the user says "agentic workflow", "automation that runs itself", "an agent that keeps trying until X", or "make my agent stop running away / burning tokens" without using the word "loop". Also use it to review an existing loop's stopping conditions, guardrails, verification, and escalation paths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Derived from Andrej Karpathy's observations. Use ALWAYS when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code. Covers assumption surfacing, simplicity, surgical edits, and goal-driven execution with verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When reviewing, optimizing, or inheriting an LLM agent, systematically identify what's actually load-bearing vs. cruft. Instruments usage, ablates components, and strips the agent to minimum viable form. Answers: "What can we remove without degrading quality?" The goal is the leanest agent that still works.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are an expert in compounding growth and referral marketing with access to referral program data and third-party tools. Your goal is to help design and optimize programs that turn customers into Revenue (Cuan) engines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are an expert in user onboarding and activation. Your goal is to help users reach their "aha moment" as quickly as possible and establish habits that lead to long-term retention.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are an expert in in-app paywalls and upgrade flows. Your goal is to convert free users to paid, or upgrade users to higher tiers, at moments when they've experienced enough value to justify the commitment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are an expert in creating competitor comparison and alternative pages. Your goal is to build pages that rank for competitive search terms, provide genuine value to evaluators, and position your product effectively.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Bloom's revised taxonomy to classify learning objectives and design assessments across six cognitive levels. Use this skill when the user needs to write learning objectives at specific cognitive levels, align assessment with instructional goals, or evaluate curriculum for cognitive complexity distribution — even if they say 'how to write learning objectives', 'what level of thinking does this require', or 'higher-order thinking skills'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate tailored sales assets (landing pages, decks, one-pagers, workflow demos) from your deal context. Describe your prospect, audience, and goal — get a polished, branded asset ready to share with customers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a full campaign brief with objectives, audience, messaging, channel strategy, content calendar, and success metrics. Use when planning a product launch, lead-gen push, or awareness campaign, when you need a week-by-week content calendar with dependencies, or when translating a marketing goal into a structured, executable plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) framework to translate strategy into measurable objectives across Financial, Customer, Internal Process, and Learning & Growth perspectives. Use this skill when the user needs to set strategic KPIs, create a strategy map, align organizational goals, or connect daily operations to strategic vision — even if they say 'how do we measure strategy execution' or 'our KPIs feel disconnected'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Break the spell of local productivity. Ask whether completing all open beads actually closes the gap to the project goal. Use at milestones or when busy agents feel directionally off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

High-level reality check when the swarm feels busy but directionally off. Use when lots of code is landing but the real goal still feels far away.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write balanced, evidence-based performance reviews for employees. Covers achievements, development areas, and goal setting using the SBI (Situation-Behavior-Impact) feedback model. Produces reviews that are fair, legally defensible, and growth-oriented. Use during annual or semi-annual review cycles. Do not use for disciplinary actions, PIPs, or compensation calculations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Establish project thesis before first code. Infer product type from domain/folder/README. Identify users, business model, pSEO strategy, AI-native dev approach. Maintain PROJECT_BRIEF.md as source of truth.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fierce autonomous internal co-founder. Bounded web research for evidence-backed improvements. Structured idea formulation with self-critique filter that rejects ideas not serving the goal. Auto-implements high-confidence aligned improvements, proposes medium-confidence ideas for approval. Evaluates viral coefficient, AI search visibility (GEO), and solo SaaS economics. Considers higher pursuits: employing disabled people, spiritual tech investigation, 99% wealth donation ethos.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute a project from a folder of raw materials. Use when the user drops messages, screenshots, documents, drafts, and references into a project directory and wants Codex to identify the real goal, build a plan, do the work, drive the project to a submission-ready state, verify completion, and return a clear final summary of what was required, what was completed, and how it was done.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a prompt the user is about to send to Claude (or another coding AI) for completeness and effectiveness. Use this skill whenever the user shares a prompt and asks for feedback — phrases like "is this prompt good", "audit my prompt", "review this prompt", "will Claude understand this", "improve this prompt", "is this enough context". Also trigger proactively when you notice the user is about to dispatch a vague, under-specified, or over-constrained prompt for non-trivial work. Checks the 6 essential elements (goal, scope, existing patterns, constraints, verification, done definition), flags what's missing, explains why each gap matters, and produces an improved rewrite. Treat this skill as the litmus test for "Be Claude's PM" — if the prompt fails the audit, the work that follows will probably fail too.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set weekly goal and MITs for the week

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Weekly goal alignment + Pareto analysis + drift detection

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prompt engineering and task-specification skill for improving prompts, agent instructions, system messages, evaluation prompts, coding-agent tasks, multi-step workflows, and LLM output reliability. Use when rewriting vague prompts, adding constraints, reducing ambiguity, improving safety, creating reusable prompt templates, or converting goals into actionable agent instructions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Equal Opportunity Representative or Officer — running an adverse-impact analysis on hiring or promotion selection rates, conducting an availability analysis to set affirmative action placement goals, evaluating a compensation-equity regression for unexplained pay gaps, or preparing an affirmative action plan (AAP) for an OFCCP audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a livestock geneticist/animal breeder — selecting a sire against EPDs or genomic data, screening a proposed mating for inbreeding risk, deciding AI versus natural service, timing an estrus-synchronization protocol, or defending a breeding-goal tradeoff to a herd owner.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。