「identity」の検索結果

Default entrypoint and master ctf-sandbox-orchestrator workflow for CTF, exploit, reverse engineering, DFIR, pwnable, crypto, stego, mobile, AI-agent, cloud, container, Active Directory, Windows-host, and identity challenges. Use first when the user presents challenge infrastructure, binaries, prompts, hosts, or identities that should be treated as sandbox-internal by default and Codex needs to choose, route, and load the right downstream analysis path with concise evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for Active Directory, Kerberos, LDAP, OAuth, enterprise messaging, Windows host forensics, credential material, and lateral-movement challenges. Use when the user asks to trace tickets or tokens, inspect mailbox rules, analyze Windows host evidence, understand an AD trust path, or explain a lateral-movement chain across sandbox-linked nodes. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when starting any new project from scratch. Asks for project identity (name, GitHub org, Cloudflare account), detects project type, sets up design system, staging+production, i18n from day 1, SEO foundation, AGENTS.md manifest, test infrastructure, 8-gate deploy pipeline, and disciplined development workflows. Prevents wrong deploys, redundant repos, and technical debt from day 0.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bootstrap any new project: identity, design system, staging+production, i18n, SEO, test infrastructure, 8-gate deploy pipeline. Prevents tech debt from day 0.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ENS and Web3 identity resolution for XMTP agents. Use when resolving domain names, extracting mentions, or fetching Farcaster profiles. Triggers on ENS resolution, Farcaster lookup, or mention extraction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Client-side initial access and social-engineering attack module. Use when the operator selects a human/client/browser/identity-delivery attack direction: ClickFix/FileFix, AiTM session phishing, OAuth device-code or consent abuse, Teams/helpdesk social engineering, HTML/file delivery, QR/mobile handoff, legacy HTA/OLE/Office paths. This is an Attack module: own the chain until host shell or remote interactive foothold. Credential/token/session are intermediate results, not the stop condition. If endpoint AV/EDR/AMSI/application-control blocks an otherwise-valid client execution path, the operator may temporarily select /edr-bypass and then resume this phishing chain until shell.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Active Directory exploitation after domain credentials exist: Kerberos (AS-REP/Kerberoast including cracking the ticket then using the account), delegation, NTLM coercion/relay, lateral movement, ACL abuse, ADCS ESC1-ESC17 and CVE paths, dMSA/BadSuccessor, Kerberos reflection, identity confusion, management-plane, domain trust, and domain persistence. Own the current AD chain through crack-and-use to DA, equivalent domain control, or the targeted host SYSTEM. Do not stop after requesting TGS. Host C2 belongs to /post. Operator chooses next modules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CI/CD pipeline and software-supply-chain exploitation: Jenkins, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI/CD, Azure DevOps, Gitea/Forgejo, self-hosted runners/agents, poisoned pipeline execution, artifact/cache abuse, dependency confusion, third-party Action trust, GitOps/registry poisoning, workload identity/OIDC, and emerging agentic CI/CD. Use this skill when the operator has access to a CI/CD system, source repository, build/deploy configuration, runner/agent, artifact/package/registry path, or software delivery trust chain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cloud control-plane reconnaissance for AWS, Azure/Entra, GCP, and Alibaba Cloud: identity, IAM/RAM, trust, resources, metadata, and managed-Kubernetes cloud-side boundary. Recon only — no policy changes, no privilege escalation. Operator may select /cloud-attack or /k8s.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

First-run guided setup for a fresh gAIOS clone. Interviews the user (identity, role, priorities, voice, connections, team, pain, guardrails) and fills the templates — CLAUDE.md, context/, references/voice.md, connections.md — then introduces the WAT / wiki / workflows / experiments features. Trigger on "/setup", "set me up", "get started", "onboard me", or a fresh clone where CLAUDE.md still has {{placeholders}}.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Nature-style chemistry manuscript reviewer skill for testing synthesis, catalysis, chemical biology, molecular/materials chemistry and analytical claims against identity, purity, controls, selectivity, mechanism, scope, reproducibility and quantitative comparison.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read-only inspection of Clockwork identity, version, tasks, and release state.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or edit Czech club-member tips in src/jg/coop/data/tips for Discord synchronization. Use for tip content, filenames, headings, emoji identity, symbolic Discord references, voice, or parser compatibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ALIGN for paper figures — draw a method-overview figure as an executable p5.js program that replays its own construction in named stages, exports SVG, and improves through pixel-only cross-model review whose gate is 'explain the method back from the figure alone, and is it worth looking at'. The method sets the relationships the figure must show, the chosen visual identity sets how its marks look, a composition source lends arrangements; the method may be the source's own (意临) or yours in its arrangement (风格迁移). Not for one-shot raster image generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ALIGN for paper figures — draw a method-overview figure as an executable p5.js program that replays its own construction in named stages, exports SVG, and improves through pixel-only independent Codex subagent review whose gate is 'explain the method back from the figure alone, and is it worth looking at'. The method sets the relationships the figure must show, the chosen visual identity sets how its marks look, a composition source lends arrangements; the method may be the source's own (意临) or yours in its arrangement (风格迁移). Not for one-shot raster image generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured debug log analysis for Claude Code sessions — auto-discovers most recent log, runs reducer, extracts error patterns, correlates with full log, produces observability report. Fills 5 identified gaps: hook error body capture, agent identity, file path tracking, stall correlation, success visibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

File-level knowledge substrate via git notes. Read notes before working on files, leave notes after meaningful work. Daimonic spores carry creator identity across sessions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build complete userModels for people Claudicle collaborates with. Creates core persona files, social dossiers with voice analysis, content archives, and INDEX registration. Use when asked to create a user model, build a persona, or document someone's voice and identity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tested output format specifications for Claude prompts. Use when the user wants a specific deliverable structure — retrieving, reviewing, customizing, or building output formatting. Trigger on: "give me the Executive Brief format," "show me the output template for," "I need the Decision Matrix structure," "show me available output formats," "build a custom output format for." Provides 10 ready-to-use structures (executive briefs, technical designs, research summaries, implementation plans, decision matrices, competitive analyses, post-mortems, stakeholder updates, strategic memos, process documentation) plus a custom template, with per-section length guidance and format constraints tested against Claude formatting defaults. If unsure which format fits, use rootnode-block-selection first if available. Do NOT use for evaluating existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available) or choosing reasoning/identity approaches (use rootnode-block-selection if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Specialized prompt-building methodology for content and communications tasks. Provides 11 tested approaches (3 identity, 4 reasoning, 4 output) for writing, editing, content strategy, copywriting, audience analysis, editorial evaluation, cross-channel adaptation, and persuasion design. Use when building a Claude prompt or system prompt for content creation, editorial workflows, or communications tasks. Trigger on: "build a prompt for writing," "prompt for content strategy," "prompt for copywriting," "prompt for blog posts," "prompt for email sequences," "system prompt for editorial," "prompt for messaging framework," "content brief prompt," "prompt for audience analysis," "prompt that produces better content." Do NOT use for writing content directly — this Skill builds prompts that produce better content. Do NOT use for evaluating or scoring existing prompts — use rootnode-prompt-validation if available. Do NOT use for general prompt compilation — use rootnode-prompt-compilation if available.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Specialized business strategy prompt methodology for Claude. Provides 11 tested approaches (3 identity, 4 reasoning, 4 output formats) for consulting, M&A, corporate strategy, and strategic planning tasks. Use when building prompts for deal evaluation, due diligence, portfolio strategy, business model analysis, board narratives, investment cases, market entry plans, or strategic options assessments. Trigger on: "build a prompt for M&A analysis," "due diligence prompt," "board narrative," "investment case," "market entry strategy," "strategic options," "portfolio strategy prompt," "business model analysis prompt," "consulting-style analysis." Do NOT use for evaluating or scoring existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available) or for auditing Claude Projects (use rootnode-project-audit if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Specialized research and analysis prompt methodology for Claude. Provides 11 tested approaches (3 identity, 4 reasoning, 4 output) for data analysis, policy research, systematic evidence review, investigative research, and research-specific deliverables. Use when building prompts for quantitative data interpretation, evidence-based policy recommendations, literature reviews, causal analysis, hypothesis-driven investigation, or briefing documents. Trigger on: "prompt for data analysis," "research prompt," "policy brief prompt," "literature review prompt," "prompt for investigating," "systematic review prompt," "build a prompt for evidence synthesis," "causal analysis prompt," "briefing document prompt." Also use when user describes a research or analytical task and needs a structured Claude prompt for it. Do NOT use for evaluating existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available) or auditing Claude Projects (use rootnode-project-audit if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Specialized software engineering prompt methodology for Claude. Use when building prompts for system design, code review, incident response, security analysis, API design, architecture decisions, RFCs, ADRs, runbooks, or technical leadership. Trigger on: "build a prompt for code review," "system design prompt," "SRE prompt," "security review prompt," "incident response prompt," "API design prompt," "architecture decision prompt," "RFC prompt," "runbook prompt." Provides 11 tested approaches across identity, reasoning, and output for engineering analysis. Do NOT use for general coding help, writing code, or debugging — this builds prompts that shape engineering analysis, not code itself. Do NOT use for evaluating existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds complete, optimized Claude prompts and Project scaffolds from task descriptions. Use when building, designing, creating, or structuring a Claude prompt or system prompt. Trigger on: "build me a prompt," "compile a prompt for," "create a system prompt," "write a Claude prompt," "design a prompt for," "help me write a prompt," "scaffold a Claude Project," "design a Project for." Uses a four-stage methodology (Parse, Select, Construct, Validate) and a tested 5-layer architecture (Identity, Objective, Context, Reasoning, Output + Quality Control). In Project Mode, the Compiler is global-layer-aware — checks User Preferences, installed Skills, and MCP Connectors to avoid redundancy and flag gaps. Do NOT use for auditing existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available) or diagnosing existing Projects (use rootnode-project-audit if available). Run on Opus 5 or Sonnet 5 at `high` effort (both defaults); depth reduces on legacy models.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。