Detect, respond to, and prevent software supply chain attacks on package registries, container images, and CI/CD pipelines with lockfile auditing, provenance verification, and emergency response playbooks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
1,230 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Detect, respond to, and prevent software supply chain attacks on package registries, container images, and CI/CD pipelines with lockfile auditing, provenance verification, and emergency response playbooks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when contributing to Tel-Agent - picking an issue to work on, setting up the repository for the first time, starting or finishing a task, opening a pull request, or asking "what can I work on" / "how do I start" / "is my change ready to submit". Covers the full path from a fresh clone to a merged pull request.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepare a Neva GitHub release draft from merged PRs, previous release style, and local multi-platform artifacts. Use this for monthly release preparation in nevalang/neva.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run release-readiness checks for this repository. Use when validating docs, scripts, verification coverage, and operational safety before merge or release.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Choose and apply the correct semantic version bump for this repository. Use for every user-visible release, before merge when a change set should ship as patch, minor, or major, and whenever package/plugin/desktop version metadata must stay synchronized.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and enforce the core/client boundary in multi-client projects. Detects where shared platform code is tangled with client-specific code, finds hardcoded client checks, config files that replace instead of merge, scattered client code, migration conflicts, and missing extension points. Produces a boundary map, violation report, and refactoring plan. Optionally generates FORK.md documentation and restructuring scripts. Triggers: 'fork discipline', 'check the boundary', 'is this core or client', 'platform audit', 'client separation', 'fork test', 'refactor for multi-client', 'clean up the fork'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Iterate on a PR until actionable CI passes and high/medium review feedback is addressed. Use for PR CI failures, review feedback, or green-check loops; do not wait for human approval, draft status, or merge gates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to create SEO pages at scale using templates and data—including AI-assisted, grounded copy for per-URL differentiation (vs rigid mail-merge templates). Also use when the user mentions "programmatic SEO," "programmatic SEO pages," "template pages," "scale content," "location pages," "city pages," "comparison pages at scale," "X vs Y pages," "integration pages," "pages from data," "automated landing pages," or "programmatic landing pages." Uses a playbook matrix aligned to skills under skills/pages. For user-facing template galleries or marketplaces (browse → use), use template-page-generator.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate a configurable, multi-member CLI planning council (Codex, Claude Code, Gemini, OpenCode, or custom) to produce independent implementation plans, anonymize and randomize them, then judge and merge into one final plan. Use when you need a robust, bias-resistant planning workflow, structured JSON outputs, retries, and failure handling across multiple CLI agents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform a structured maintainer-style PR review for the mariadb-operator repository. Gathers PR context, triages the change, and evaluates correctness, safety, pitfalls, backwards compatibility and code quality against the project conventions documented in AGENTS.md. Use whenever the user mentions a mariadb-operator PR number or URL and wants any kind of judgment on it — "review this PR", "what do you think of #1234", "is this safe to merge", "assess this diff", "take a look at this change" — even if they don't literally say "review".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Respond to Kubernetes incidents with runbooks and diagnostics. Use for outages, pod failures, node issues, network problems, and emergency response.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Move content between platforms, domains, or URL structures while preserving SEO equity, user bookmarks, and integrations. Use this skill when planning a CMS migration, replatforming, consolidating sites, changing URL structures, or merging content from multiple sources. Triggers on content migration, replatform, CMS migration, domain migration, URL restructure, redirect map, site merge, content consolidation, migration plan, post-migration drop. Also triggers when planning a launch that involves moving existing content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic content refresh discipline. Quarterly audits, refresh prioritization (which pieces, when, how deep), refresh-vs-merge-vs-delete decisions, the lifecycle that distinguishes intentional refresh from set-and-forget decay. Builds on the refresh sections of pillar-content-architecture and editorial-qa with a program-level discipline. Triggers on content refresh, content decay, content audit, refresh prioritization, content lifecycle, refresh strategy, traffic decay, ranking drop, content freshness, evergreen content, content maintenance. Also triggers when traffic is eroding silently across an aging content library, when teams cannot decide which pieces to refresh, or when refresh work is happening but the impact is unclear.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validation-first design for Cavekit — every kit requirement must be automatically verifiable. Six-gate validation pipeline, phase gates, merge protocol, completion signals, acceptance criteria patterns. Use when designing acceptance criteria, wiring CI gates, or debugging why an agent is producing output that nobody can verify.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fully automated ship workflow: pre-flight, merge base, run tests, coverage audit, pre-landing review, design review, adversarial review, version bump, CHANGELOG generation, TODOS.md update, bisectable commits, push and PR creation, auto-sync docs via document-release.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Emergency production fix workflow
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate changelogs from recent commits and merged PRs
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user has a judge/grader and human-labeled data, and wants to measure how well the judge agrees with humans, detect systematic biases, determine whether automatic evaluation can replace human review, or build a human-reduction roadmap. Also use when the user mentions calibration, TPR/TNR, judge validation, inter-rater agreement, Cohen's kappa, bias detection, or "is my automatic evaluation trustworthy." Merges the calibrate and align functions into one skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A pill slides under the active nav item with a springy merge — a smooth segmented control. One per view. Under prefers-reduced-motion the pill jumps without easing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ship a Drizzle schema change end to end — generate the migration, merge, hand Matt the migrate command, redeploy apps/remote, confirm it is green. Use whenever a change adds or edits a file under packages/core/db/migrations/ or changes packages/core/db/schema.ts, or when an apps/remote deploy failed with "production has not applied".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/PRD asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
EXPERIMENTAL — mutation testing with muter to measure whether tests actually assert anything: mutants that survive reveal assertion-free coverage. Advisory report only, never a merge gate. Use on engine/logic targets when coverage numbers look good but bugs still slip through.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Current version only works in 'merge' mode: A single table of gene summarizations is generated with one column for each sample file.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review open PRs two ways - default is a per-PR deep review with severity-tagged findings, inline comments, and a verdict; --survey runs a risk-tiered triage digest of what's safe to merge first
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。