「missing」の検索結果

Grounded in first principles, rigorously examine and refine a user's plan, task, decision, goal, strategy, proposal, or idea through structured, progressively deeper questioning, in order to bridge the gap between the User and the Agent. Use when the user explicitly requests grilling, challenge, pressure-testing, cross-examination, red-team review, pre-mortem analysis, or a decision audit. The goal is to uncover unclear objectives, hidden assumptions, contradictions, weak evidence, missing information, overlooked constraints, dependencies, risks, trade-offs, failure modes, and misalignment between intended outcomes and likely real-world results. Begin by establishing a shared understanding of the user's actual intent, goals, constraints, and success criteria. Ask focused, high-leverage questions rather than broad or repetitive ones. Adapt each question based on previous answers, probing deeper where uncertainty, unsupported assumptions, or strategic weaknesses remain. Regularly summarize the current understanding of the user's intent and position to confirm alignment, expose misunderstandings, and refine the problem or goal definition. Distinguish facts, assumptions, hypotheses, and unknowns. Challenge reasoning rigorously while remaining constructive, respectful, and solution-oriented. Continue until the reasoning is internally coherent, evidence-aware, constraint-conscious, risk-assessed, and translated into a clearer, more actionable goal, decision, or plan. Ultimately, achieving the super-alignment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Load and parse mass spectrometry data formats including mzML, mzXML, and quantification tool outputs like MaxQuant proteinGroups.txt. Use when starting a proteomics analysis with raw or processed MS data. Handles contaminant filtering and missing value assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Preprocessing and harmonization of multi-omics data before integration. Covers normalization, batch correction, feature alignment, and missing value handling across data types. Use when preparing multi-omics datasets for integration analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end clinical trial analysis workflow from CDISC SDTM/ADaM loading through ICH E9(R1) estimand-driven primary analysis to CONSORT 2025 regulatory-compliant reporting. Covers data preparation, FDA 2023 marginal vs conditional logistic regression, categorical tests with Boschloo, modern HTE/subgroup methods, missing-data sensitivity (MMRM, reference-based MI, Permutt tipping point), graphical multiplicity (Bretz-Maurer), survival analysis (Cox/RMST/competing risks) when applicable, and Table 1. Use when performing a complete analysis of clinical trial data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

First-time setup for protein design tools. Use this skill when: (1) User is new and hasn't run any tools yet, (2) Commands fail with "file not found" or "modal: command not found", (3) Modal authentication errors occur, (4) User asks how to get started or set up the environment, (5) biomodals directory is missing or tools aren't working.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Competitive intelligence and market positioning analysis. Researches competitors, compares features, pricing, and tech stacks, then produces a prioritized gap analysis with actionable roadmap. Trigger on: competitors, competitive analysis, gap analysis, feature comparison, market research, what are we missing, who are our competitors, pricing comparison, market positioning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal speech module for /codeck. Reads deck content, asks about style and duration only when missing, generates a verbatim speech transcript with stage directions. Outputs $DECK_DIR/speech.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured persuasion for tech leads, PMs, and founders—not activity logs. Five scenarios (kickoff, status update, wrap-up, investor pitch, solution selling) on one 5-part framework (Hook→Context→Proposal→Evidence→Ask). AI prompts for missing materials and audience context; pre-submit checklist. Claude Code plugin; Cursor, Codex, and chat via prompts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Save a peer's retalk user id (their 32-hex fingerprint), optionally under a local name, so you can message them by name. Use when you have a peer's fingerprint to record. Add --verify to fetch and pin their keys now. If the fingerprint is missing, ask with AskUserQuestion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Safe refactoring workflow using trace-mcp — assess risk, find candidates, check impact, and rename symbols across all files without missing import sites or cross-file references.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review Java code for bugs, duplicate code, correctness risks, maintainability improvements, and missing tests. By default review files modified in git; when the user explicitly names files, classes, packages, or a diff, review that scope instead. Generate a detailed review.md report with actionable comments and fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to create/generate/scaffold a new Spring Boot project (Maven or Gradle, REST API / Web App / Spring Boot + Angular full stack). Derives progen CLI inputs from the user's plain-English project description, asks for any missing mandatory info, ensures the progen binary is available, and runs it to generate the project. If the user asks for features progen doesn't support natively, generate the base project first, then add those features on top of the generated code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants WorkBuddy or another agent to remember an account's positioning, voice, boundaries, data, trust assets, personal IP story, and content rules across sessions. Trigger phrases: "账号档案", "记住我的账号", "写入记忆", "人设垂直", "信任名片", "brand profile", "account memory", "style guide". Do not use for one-off post drafting unless profile data is missing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants WorkBuddy or another agent to remember an account's positioning, voice, boundaries, data, trust assets, personal IP story, and content rules across sessions. Trigger phrases: "账号档案", "记住我的账号", "写入记忆", "人设垂直", "信任名片", "brand profile", "account memory", "style guide". Do not use for one-off post drafting unless profile data is missing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnoses email deliverability problems for transactional and marketing emails. Checks SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment, sending IP reputation, email content spam triggers, and bounce patterns. Use when emails land in spam, go missing, or bounce unexpectedly. Trigger words: email spam, deliverability, emails not arriving, bounce rate, spam folder, email reputation, SPF fail, DKIM fail, DMARC, transactional email, SendGrid, Postmark, SES.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate data quality in CSV, JSON, and database exports by checking for missing values, type mismatches, duplicates, outliers, and schema violations. Use when building ETL pipelines, auditing data imports, checking data freshness, or ensuring data contracts between teams. Trigger words: data quality, validation, null values, duplicates, schema check, data contract, ETL, pipeline, data drift.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs and implements website analytics tracking with Google Analytics 4 and Google Tag Manager: a written tracking plan, event and parameter names that pass GA4's rules, gtag.js or data-layer code, key events, consent mode, UTM conventions, and a verification pass. Use when someone says "set up GA4", "add conversion tracking", "track this form or button", "write a tracking plan", "GTM data layer", "UTM parameters", "why are my events missing or counted twice", or "audit our analytics setup".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Most startup ideas are bad. Not because founders lack creativity, but because they're solving invented problems instead of lived ones. Paul Graham's essays reveal a pattern: the best ideas come from living in the future and noticing what's missing. Schlep blindness hides gold. Organic ideas beat brainstormed ones. Frighteningly ambitious ideas are often easier. This skill synthesizes PG's idea-finding wisdom into actionable guidance. Use when "keywords, contexts, " mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify meeting notes are fully processed. Args: <path>, [dates], all, pending [dates] [--step=X]. Shows which wrap steps are complete or missing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Content topical authority and gap analysis powered by the DataForSEO Labs API. Clusters a domain's ranked keywords into topics, identifies strong vs weak vs missing topic clusters versus competitors, and returns a Content Score (0-100) plus the highest-leverage content opportunities to write next.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Technical SEO site audit via the DataForSEO On-Page API. Crawls the site (up to 100 pages by default), surfaces critical errors (broken links, redirect chains, missing meta, slow pages, schema gaps, indexability issues), and returns a Technical Score (0-100) with prioritized fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

One-command GitHub repository health audit. Checks for missing standard files, GitHub configuration, branch protection, documentation quality, and code hygiene. Produces a scored health report with prioritized fix recommendations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit experiment integrity against the evidence ledger. At L2 (repo + result files present) a fresh cross-model reviewer reads the eval code line-by-line for fake/derived ground truth, score self-normalization, phantom results (a paper number with no backing file/key), dead/uncalled metric code, verified-scope inflation, method-described ≠ method-evaluated drift, synthesized-looking results, placeholder/fake data still wired into a released result, code-output ≠ reported-number mismatch, and missing reproducibility artifacts (an empirical/agent/LLM paper shipping neither code nor the prompts/configs its results need) — every finding span-anchored to a ledger claim_id. At L0/L1 (PDF / source only) the same patterns are surfaced as info-level 'could-not-verify' signals where the ledger gives an anchor (observability_level_required:2) — NEVER a fraud verdict from a PDF. The reviewer PROPOSES findings; tools/adjudicate_findings.py computes the verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "experiment forensics", "audit the results", "check the eval code", "实验诚实度".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a pull request for correctness, regressions, and missing tests. Use when a mid-level developer needs structured review guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。