1,286 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Orchestrates implementation of a plan file by delegating work to subagents in parallel. Verifies git branch state, tracks progress, and ensures high-quality implementation. Invoke with a plan file path and optional model override: /implement plans/my-plan.md [--model sonnet]
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide a feature implementation through a structured seven-phase workflow with deep codebase understanding, clarifying questions, parallel architecture design, and quality review. Use this skill when the user asks to build a new feature, add functionality, or wants a methodical approach to implementation rather than diving straight to code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive code review workflow - parallel specialized reviews → synthesis
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reverse-engineer and clone a website in one shot — extracts assets, CSS, and content section-by-section and proactively dispatches parallel builder agents in worktrees as it goes. Use this whenever the user wants to clone, replicate, rebuild, reverse-engineer, or copy any website. Also triggers on phrases like "make a copy of this site", "rebuild this page", "pixel-perfect clone". Provide the target URL as an argument.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Constructs secure, efficient CI/CD pipelines with supply chain security (SLSA), monorepo optimization, caching strategies, and parallelization patterns for GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, and Argo Workflows. Use when setting up automated testing, building, or deployment workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Professional deep research report generation — multi-agent collaboration with parallel chapter writing, automatic latest-data targeting, multilingual output, and built-in quality checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze an MSBuild solution, solution filter, or Build.proj that schedules multiple project files. USE FOR: measured idle worker nodes, `-m` that does not scale, a serial ProjectReference critical path, graph builds, or an MSBuild task that builds a Projects list. Requires at least two distinct project files whose scheduling or throughput must be analyzed. DO NOT USE for non-MSBuild build systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Establish MSBuild/.NET build performance baselines before optimizing. USE FOR: a .NET build or solution that is slow or has build-performance concerns; cold, warm, incremental, or no-op measurements; before/after comparisons; CI build output caching; static graph build decisions; artifacts output; and dependency graph trimming. Start here before build-perf-diagnostics, incremental-build, or build-parallelism. DO NOT USE for webpack, npm, JavaScript bundlers, or other non-MSBuild build systems. For detailed target/task/analyzer bottleneck analysis after baselining, use build-perf-diagnostics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write, run, or repair .NET tests that use TUnit. Use when a repo uses `TUnit`, `TUnit.Playwright`, `[Test]`, `[Arguments]`, `ClassDataSource`, `SharedType.PerTestSession`, or Microsoft.Testing.Platform-based execution. Preserve TUnit's parallel-by-default model and constrain only destructive shared-state collisions. DO NOT USE FOR: xUnit projects; MSTest projects.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
MUST USE for C#/.NET deterministic tests that require the smallest production seam for DateTime/Task.Delay/File/Environment/Guid/Random, static API preservation, nested/parallel overrides, or no real I/O. USE ONLY when the target workspace contains C# source plus a .csproj or .sln. DO NOT USE for audits, bulk migration, code that already has an injectable seam, or an explicit migration to a user-named existing abstraction (migrate-static-to-wrapper). Use instead of general test generation when the requested test is impossible without a production edit and seam selection is still open.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ALWAYS USE when asked to fix, rewrite, update, improve, modernize, show corrected code for, or explain existing MSTest tests or MSTest-specific configuration. Use for "review" when corrected code or edits are wanted, even for one pasted assertion or passing tests with bad failure output. Covers expected/actual labels; generic Boolean, collection, string, numeric, null, identity, exception, hard-cast, and object[] checks; TestContext/lifecycle; timeout/cancellation; OS/CI conditions, retry, cleanup, parallelization, MSTest.Sdk project setup, and MSTESTxxxx. Honor the installed MSTest version. DO NOT USE to design new test cases (code-testing), perform report-only audits, create project files rather than explain MSTest setup, run tests, migrate frameworks, or handle non-MSTest/non-.NET code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Convert .NET tests from NUnit 3/4 to MSTest v4 while preserving VSTest or MTP. Use for replacing NUnit/NUnit3TestAdapter packages, Test/TestCase/ TestCaseSource/Values attributes, constraint assertions, SetUp/TearDown, OneTimeSetUp, SetUpFixture, FixtureLifeCycle, TestContext, categories, retries, timeouts, and NUnit parallelization. Also use when a "convert NUnit to MSTest" request may already be migrated: inspect and report the no-op. Do not use for NUnit version upgrades, xUnit/TUnit conversion, MSTest upgrades, or runner-only VSTest-to-MTP migration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Convert .NET tests from xUnit.net v2/v3 to MSTest v4 while preserving VSTest or MTP. Use for replacing xunit packages, Fact/Theory/InlineData/MemberData, assertions, IClassFixture/ICollectionFixture, ITestOutputHelper, TestContext cancellation, traits/Owner, skips, timeouts, and xUnit parallelization. Also use when a "convert xUnit to MSTest" request may already be migrated: inspect and report the no-op. Do not use for xUnit v2-to-v3, MSTest upgrades, NUnit/TUnit conversion, or runner-only VSTest-to-MTP migration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Invoke when the user asks to review, check, audit, or look over Qt6 QML code -- or suggest before committing. Runs deterministic linting (47+ rules) then six parallel deep- analysis agents covering bindings, layout, loaders, delegates, states, and performance. Optionally invokes system qmllint for type-level checks. Reports only high-confidence issues (>80/100) with structured mitigations. Read-only -- never modifies code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Invoke when the user asks to review, check, audit, or look over Qt6 C++ code — or suggest before committing. Runs deterministic linting (60+ rules) then six parallel deep- analysis agents covering model contracts, ownership, threading, API correctness, error handling, and performance. Reports only high-confidence issues (>80/100) with structured mitigations. Read-only — never modifies code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce a high-confidence, CONCISE implementation / architecture / strategy PLAN that follows the OMC plan system end to end. It first runs OMC's real requirements interview (auto-chains the `omc-plan` skill: one question at a time, explore-first, Analyst consult) to produce an initial plan in `.omc/plans/`, then DEEPENS that plan with a 3-round ITERATIVE fusion loop — each round an Opus 4.8 panelist (Agent subagent) and a GPT-5.5 panelist (via codex) critique/improve it IN PARALLEL and BLIND, then Opus 4.8 (the orchestrator) judges and synthesizes one tighter plan that seeds the next round, stopping early on convergence. Writes the final dense plan back to the same `.omc/plans/<slug>.md`, then offers the OMC handoff (`/omc-plan --review` → `/team` or `/ralph`). Use for high-stakes planning, architecture decisions, strategy calls, and hard debugging — especially when the user runs /plan or asks how to approach a non-trivial build. Reuses the `fusion` skill's run_codex.sh + judge rubric. NOT for trivial tasks (single pass is enough).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Answer a hard question by fanning it out to a PANEL of models running in parallel — each answering independently with web search and bash, none seeing the others' work — then having Opus 4.8 judge every response into a structured analysis (consensus, contradictions, partial coverage, unique insights, blind spots) and write a final answer grounded in it. The panel is two independent Opus 4.8 runs (slug opus4.8-4.8), Opus 4.8 + GPT-5.5 via codex (opus4.8-gpt5.5), Opus 4.8 + Gemini 3.1 Pro via agy (opus4.8-gemini3.1pro), or all three (opus4.8-gpt5.5-gemini3.1pro). Opus always judges and writes the final answer — the pipeline can't be reversed. Runs on local CLI subscriptions (no metered API), and saves a timestamped provenance .md per run. Use this whenever the user asks to "run it through Fusion", says /fusion, wants a multi-model / panel / ensemble answer, wants a question cross-checked across models, or wants a higher-confidence answer with consensus and blind spots surfaced — even if they don't say "fusion". General-purpose: any topic (research, law, strategy, technical, personal). Best for high-stakes research, design calls, and debugging where being confidently wrong is expensive.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when user explicitly asks for an adversarial / multi-round dialectic between masters — 祖师辩论, 各执一词, 谁更对, debate, 应成 vs 顿悟, 顿渐之争. Differs from /compare-masters (parallel single-round) by being adversarial multi-round via fresh-subagent orchestration. Topics 空有 / 禅净 / 性相 / 戒律 vs 内观 — trigger is adversarial framing: "禅净比较" → compare; "禅净辩论 / 谁更究竟" → here.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when user asks for a sequenced learning path within a Buddhist tradition — 学修次第, 先学什么, 从哪入门, 下一步读什么, curriculum, 学习计划, 路径推荐. Differs from /compare-masters (parallel opinion) and /master-debate (adversarial dialectic) by being 纵向 / 时序: stage-by-stage plan keyed on tradition × level (L0-L3) → foundation → intermediate → advanced + blind spots. Trigger is planning intent — "禅宗对比" goes to /compare-masters; "禅宗从哪开始学" goes here.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decision SOP for serving LLMs with vLLM. Covers PagedAttention mental model, quantization/parallelism/batching tradeoffs, OOM triage, and when NOT to use vLLM. Activates when a coder-agent is choosing or tuning an inference engine, debugging vLLM throughput/latency/OOM, or comparing vLLM against TGI/SGLang/TensorRT-LLM/llama.cpp.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Mandatory rules for agents in git worktree isolation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Code review: systematic single-file, parallel multi-reviewer, full-repo audit, PR diff review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Measure process costs and fork budgets when changing startup, per-file, per-test, parallel workers, reporting, or coverage paths; use for fork census and performance comparisons.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Delegate complex, long-running tasks to Manus AI agent for autonomous execution. Use when user says 'use manus', 'delegate to manus', 'send to manus', 'have manus do', 'ask manus', 'check manus sessions', or when tasks require deep web research, market analysis, product comparisons, stock analysis, competitive research, document generation, data analysis, or multi-step workflows that benefit from autonomous agent execution with parallel processing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。