「research」の検索結果

Manages the research/ knowledge base of verified tool and library research entries via knowledge-explorer.py. Commands — list (browse by category or SDLC layer), fetch-github (draft entry from GitHub repo), add (validate and route to category dir), update-append (append dated revision), generate-descriptions (repair missing or low-quality descriptions), migrate (convert inline-header entries to frontmatter). Use when browsing KB topics, adding or updating research entries, fetching GitHub repo metadata, generating descriptions in parallel via Haiku subagents, or migrating old-format entries to skill-spec frontmatter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds comprehensive Claude Code skills using parallel research agents — categorization, parallel documentation gathering, anti-hallucination checkpoints, and final validation. Use when building a skill from official docs, when "research for skill" or "create comprehensive skill" is requested, or when extensive multi-source documentation gathering is needed before skill creation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans a research project as a decision map that persists across sessions, resolving one ticket per session until the design is defensible and pre-registerable. The map lives as Markdown in the repository, literature sweeps run as parallel research tickets, and the resolved map compiles into a pre-analysis plan. Use at project start, when a design has more open decisions than one conversation can hold, or when planning restarts each session. Not for executing analyses or writing the paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scaffolds or audits a research-project repository organized around its source library (original PDFs, tracked Markdown conversions, drop zone, bibliography, intake pipeline) plus the analysis, manuscript, and review folders the project type needs. Use when starting, structuring, or auditing a research repo or its sources folder. Single-PDF intake goes to process-source, replication packages to replication-package.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interviews a researcher in rounds (idea, design, or defend stage) until no decision in a research idea, design, or draft is left assumed, recommending an answer to each question and writing settled decisions to a file. Use for 'grill me', stress-testing a design, or an idea not yet a design; --plan for software or process plans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scaffold or audit a research-project repository organized around its source library (PDFs, Markdown conversions, bibliography, intake pipeline) plus the analysis, manuscript, and review folders it needs. Use when starting or auditing a research repo. Not for one-PDF intake or publication replication packages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-source deep research using firecrawl and exa MCPs. Searches the web, synthesizes findings, and delivers cited reports with source attribution. Use when the user wants thorough research on any topic with evidence and citations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds an ideal customer profile from evidence: case studies, testimonials, customer logos, solutions pages, reviews and any sales notes you have. Produces market sizing layers, firmographic segments, a champion and an economic buyer persona, a negative ICP, intent signals, customer proof points and a voice-of-customer section in the buyers' own words, every claim sourced. Triggers: "ICP research", "ideal customer profile", "who are our customers", "customer segments", "buyer personas", "who should we target". Run after /company-context. Not for competitor analysis (use /competitor-research) or call transcript patterns (use /win-loss).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build structured ICP documentation by scraping case studies, testimonials, and solutions pages from your website. Produces firmographics, champion + economic buyer personas, pain points, decision criteria, anti-ICP, customer proof points, and voice-of-customer synthesis. Writes to marketing/icp/ICP.md as the canonical ICP every downstream skill reads. Triggers - "icp research", "ideal customer profile", "persona research", "customer segments", "who are our customers", "build ICP"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert research analyst specializing in comprehensive information gathering, synthesis, and insight generation. Masters research methodologies, data analysis, and report creation with focus on delivering actionable intelligence that drives informed decision-making.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert product discovery guidance for user research and problem validation. Use when conducting user interviews, validating problems, applying jobs-to-be-done framework, sizing opportunities, customer segmentation, competitive analysis, prototype testing, usability testing, designing surveys, or synthesizing research insights. Covers discovery sprints, continuous discovery, and research operations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research best practices and synthesize into design decisions for artifact creation. Invoke BEFORE any creator skill to ensure research-backed decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive scientific research toolkit with 139 specialized skills for biology, chemistry, medicine, data science, and computational research. Transforms Claude into an AI research assistant with access to scientific databases, analysis tools, and domain-specific workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive 7-phase SEO optimization workflow covering technical SEO auditing, keyword research strategy, on-page optimization, content SEO and E-E-A-T, structured data implementation, link building, and AI search optimization. Use when auditing search engine visibility, diagnosing ranking issues, implementing schema markup, conducting keyword research, optimizing content for E-E-A-T signals, or adapting for AI-driven search (AI Overviews, SGE).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scope-specific code gap analysis — extracts referenced codes from project docs, researches what should apply, surfaces the delta. Triggers: 'code research', 'what codes apply', 'code check', 'ADA requirements', 'egress'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep research with cross-verification and source tiering. Use when investigating technologies, comparing tools, fact-checking claims, evaluating architectures, or any task requiring verified information. Triggers on "조사해줘", "리서치", "research", "investigate", "fact-check", "비교 분석", "검증해줘".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research UI component patterns across the component.gallery corpus — 60 canonical component types, ~95 production design systems, 2,600+ examples — plus an AI-era overlay (prompt inputs, tool-call cards, streaming status, citations) and composite patterns (command palette, app shell, agent console). Compare implementations, find alternative component names, ground frontend decisions in real-world precedent. Pairs with minoan-frontend-design for research-then-build workflows. Triggers on component patterns, how do others implement X, design system research, component comparison, AI chat components, agent UI patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement and execute approved research Experiment, Tuning, or Design Cards with reproducible logs, metrics, environment, and artifacts. Use for bounded coding, debugging, and runs; not for changing claims, priorities, budgets, or the Research Spine.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

8つの専門エージェント（市場規模分析・トレンド調査・競合インテリジェンス・投資シグナル・日本市場・ユーザー需要分析・規制調査・データ検証）が ディスカッション型でアプリ/デジタルプロダクトの市場調査を実施するスキル。 エージェント同士が対話・批判し合い、data-critic がライブモデレーターとして矛盾を検出・収束を判定する。 トライアンギュレーション（データ・方法論・調査者・理論の4種類）をディスカッションに組み込み、 確証バイアスを排除した信頼度付きレポートを出力する。 Gate 1（全員参加の合意形成）→ Gate 2（最終検証 + Devil's Advocate）の2段階ゲートで品質を担保。 コンテキストファイルで過去のセッションを引き継げる。 Use when: 市場調査をしたい、TAM/SAM/SOMを算出したい、市場の成長性を調べたい、 参入タイミングを判断したい、競合市場を分析したい、規制リスクを調べたい。 Triggers: "市場調査", "market research", "TAM", "SAM", "SOM", "市場規模", "市場分析", "market analysis", "参入", "market entry", "市場性", "market viability", "市場トレンド", "market trend"

Choose, configure, launch, and collect bounded subagents for research and engineering decisions. Root agents and delegation-capable subagents should read this before delegating: every task requires an explicit model tier, and high-leverage work such as research ideation, round planning, plateau pivots, large research reviews, hard optimization, disputed evidence, and expensive experiment portfolios requires frontier judgment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

**雨哥（雨哥聊海外销售）出品**的海外销售公司背调与市场调研助手 —— 雨哥海外销售方法论金字塔「第 5 层 · 市场经营」的 AI Skill 化产物。基于「五看六定」经典市场分析框架（华为原版 + 雨哥改造版），输出标准化的市场调研报告，适用于客户拜访前调研、代理商签约前尽调、竞品季度跟踪、新市场进入决策、年度战略规划、面试求职准备等多种海外销售工作场景。 作者：雨哥 · 13 年海外销售实战 · 曾任普渡机器人亚太区负责人（年营收破亿 · 团队 5→50 人）· 海外销售培训头部 IP（累计付费客户 130+）。 触发方式：当用户说"帮我调研 XX 公司""做一下 XX 公司的背调""XX 公司的市场调研""调研 XX 在欧洲/北美/东南亚的市场""XX 公司客户拜访准备""XX 代理商尽调"时使用。 也在用户提到公司名 + 关键词（"调研""背调""尽调""市场分析""客户拜访""代理商谈判""竞品分析""go-to-market""GTM""面试""五看六定"）时主动触发。 This skill should be used proactively when a company research request is detected.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Strategic keyword research powered by web search and brand context. Use this skill whenever the user mentions keywords, keyword research, SEO topics, content topics, 'what should I write about', content strategy, blog ideas, search traffic, or content planning. Also trigger when the user wants to plan what content to create, when existing content isn't attracting search traffic, when any skill needs keyword-plan.md but it doesn't exist, or when the user asks about SEO in the context of content creation. Even casual mentions like 'I need blog post ideas' or 'what topics should I cover' warrant this skill. 8-phase process from seed to content brief.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

根據使用者的文章或論文草稿，自動用 Semantic Scholar、Crossref、arXiv API 搜尋相關文獻，並查核既有引用(文獻是否真實存在、書目欄位是否正確、內容是否支持文中論點)，也能從主題出發寫出「每個宣稱都有真實文獻支撐」的帶引用文章；另含研究生工具組：文獻矩陣、領域地圖、research gap 偵測、閱讀筆記卡、引用完整性檢查、中英術語一致性、口試/審稿預演、新文獻追蹤、引用需求標記(annotate)、反面證據搜尋(counter)、證據強度評級(strength)、claim-evidence 總表(claims)、撤稿查詢(retract)。凡是使用者提到找文獻、找 paper、補參考文獻、查核引用、檢查 citation、驗證參考文獻、related work、literature review，貼文章要求配文獻、問「這段話有沒有文獻支持」、要求「寫一篇帶參考文獻的文章」、要整理文獻比較表、問已指名兩概念的交集有沒有人做過、要準備口試文獻答辯時，都要使用本 skill。本 skill 的 gap 指令只查證使用者已指名的 X 與 Y 交集；若使用者連題目都還沒有、需要生成並逐一淘汰候選方向，那是題目生成，不在本 skill 範圍(環境裝有 research-gap-hunter 時交給它，沒有就如實說明本 skill 只能查證已指名的交集)。本 skill 的 map 指令盤的是**文獻**——奠基文獻是哪幾篇、關鍵作者是誰、近三年往哪走；若使用者要的是「這個領域現在有哪些**做法**、每一種買到什麼付出什麼、哪些已經飽和」，那是技術盤點不是文獻盤點，交給 research-gap-hunter 的 landscape，沒有那個 skill 就如實說明本 skill 的 map 只回答文獻層的問題。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

리서치 에이전트. RFP 분석 결과를 기반으로 시장 환경, 경쟁/벤치마킹, 타겟 인사이트, Best Practice, KPI 벤치마크 5대 영역을 웹 리서치하여 research_brief.md를 생성합니다. Planner가 Evidence에 실제 데이터를 사용할 수 있도록 지원합니다. 트리거: 리서치, 시장조사, 트렌드, 벤치마킹, research, 시장 분석, 경쟁 분석

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。