「review」の検索結果

Produces canonical review actions from fetched review state and renders action markdown. Use when the user wants only triage/action-planning for the review-framework workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review AAS stack manifests, preview plans and selection evidence in Workbench without applying changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive code review with security, performance, and quality analysis. Use when users ask to review code, analyze code quality, evaluate pull requests, or mention code review, security analysis, or performance optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code toàn diện với phân tích bảo mật, hiệu suất, và chất lượng. Sử dụng khi người dùng yêu cầu review code, phân tích chất lượng code, đánh giá pull requests, hoặc đề cập đến review code, phân tích bảo mật, hoặc tối ưu hóa hiệu suất.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master effective code review practices to provide constructive feedback, catch bugs early, and foster knowledge sharing while maintaining team morale. Use when reviewing pull requests, establishing review standards, or mentoring developers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Copilot left 14 review comments on your PR — half are nits. Hours of fix → reply → resolve → re-request, and each round lands MORE comments. This skill runs loop engineering: auto-triggers Copilot Code Review via GraphQL (no @copilot mention), triages every open thread (Copilot, humans, advanced-security) with a fix / decline / escalate rubric, dispatches parallel fix sub-agents that obey the repo build/test/lint conventions, commits per iteration, replies+resolves citing the pushed SHA, then re-triggers until HEAD is reviewed with zero threads awaiting the agent's reply (remaining open threads are explicit hand-offs to the human — escalated declines, design tradeoffs). You merge a clean PR; the bot runs it. Trigger phrases: "address copilot comments", "run a copilot review loop", "fix this PR", "iterate on copilot feedback". Repo-agnostic, gh CLI + PowerShell. Full autopilot needs repo Triage/Write; external PR authors get single-iteration mode plus manual re-trigger (UI 🔄 or substantive-commit push).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use before opening a PR, or whenever asked to self-review a diffusers contribution. Applies the same rubric as the `@claude` CI (checks the diff against references/review-rules.md, traces call paths for dead code). Reports findings grouped by severity, flagging what to fix before submitting (blocking issues + dead code) vs what to leave for the actual review. Report-only — does not edit files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a PR or branch diff using the knowledge graph for full structural context. Outputs a structured review with blast-radius analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review only changes since last commit using impact analysis. Token-efficient delta review with automatic blast-radius detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structure a performance review with self-assessment, manager template, and calibration prep. Use when review season kicks off and you need a self-assessment template, writing a manager review for a direct report, prepping rating distributions and promotion cases for calibration, or turning vague feedback into specific behavioral examples.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a PR the way a seasoned maintainer would — build an independent model before seeing the diff, investigate the implementation and history, verify material claims, and return a concise briefing. Use for any PR review, self-review, or re-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when creating an approachable, self-contained HTML review aid for a pull request; explaining what changed, why it matters, how it works, and how it fits into the broader system; turning PR diffs, commits, tests, and architecture context into a local `.pr-review/` HTML page for reviewers; or helping reviewers understand complex code changes without dumping the full diff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft and post direct, unhedged GitHub PR reviews and issue comments — every item is a required change with a pointer and reason, PR reviews land as "request changes" or "approve" (never a bare comment), and nothing is marked optional or deferred to a follow-up. Use whenever understand-pr or understand-issue (or any review) is about to draft or post to GitHub.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review Playwright tests for quality. Use when user says "review tests", "check test quality", "audit tests", "improve tests", "test code review", or "playwright best practices check".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code review through the lens of real engineers' documented philosophies (Torvalds, Thompson, Carmack, Kent Beck, Jobs, Cagan). Complements abstract-role adversarial review with named, sourced perspectives. Use when automated review findings feel generic, when a PR has architectural or UX impact, or when the author wants pre-submit hardening beyond standard checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, scoring, or auditing third-party SaaS / vendor relationships — running a vendor scorecard with industry tuning, tracking SLA compliance with credit-claim flags, classifying third-party risk across 4 risk vectors, preparing a tier-1 vendor review, or auditing the SaaS portfolio. Forks context so large vendor catalogs (50-500 line items) and SLA logs don't pollute the parent thread. Triggers on "vendor SLA", "vendor scorecard", "third-party risk", "TPRM", "vendor review", "supplier performance", "vendor health check", "renewal review".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review agent-written changes before merge, after substantial edits, or when re-reviewing a repair. Use the adversarial protocol for high-risk changes or an explicitly requested deep review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query the pre-built code-review-graph knowledge graph (Tree-sitter, whole monorepo) instead of walking call chains with Grep+Read – 2-6x cheaper, and it catches dynamic dispatch that grep misses. Use for ANY task that spans multiple files, even when the user never mentions a graph or asks for it - fixing or tracing a bug ("fix this bug", "why does X happen", "trace this"), exploring unfamiliar code ("how does X work", "who calls X", "what imports Y", "where is X used or handled"), planning or doing a refactor ("rename X", "is it safe to change or remove X", "what would break", "blast radius", "find dead code"), or reviewing changes ("review this PR", "review this branch or diff"). When you are about to Grep for a symbol's callers, callees, or importers, use this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route code, repository, and data/SQL work to isolated Kortix sessions instead of burning your main context on it. Use when asked to implement a feature, fix a bug, make failing tests pass, work a ticket/issue, refactor, navigate or change a codebase, ship a PR, review a pull request, or run SQL/warehouse analysis against a dataset — and when the user wants two agents or parallel reviewers/investigators on the same work. Covers the explore-vs-session routing call, deciding where the code lives (this project's repo vs cloning an external GitHub repo) or where the data lives, finding the repo with gh, spawning sessions in parallel, dual PR reviews, and reporting results back. Triggers: 'implement', 'fix the bug', 'make the tests pass', 'work this ticket', 'refactor this', 'open a PR', 'review this PR', 'run two agents on it', 'query the warehouse', 'analyze this dataset'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Workflow 4: Submission rebuttal pipeline. Parses external reviews, enforces coverage and grounding, drafts a safe text-only rebuttal under venue limits, and manages follow-up rounds. Use when user says "rebuttal", "reply to reviewers", "ICML rebuttal", "OpenReview response", or wants to answer external reviews safely.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Get an external patent examiner review of a patent application. Use when user says "专利审查", "patent review", "审查意见", "examiner review", or wants critical feedback on patent claims and specification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous multi-round research review loop. In Copilot CLI it defaults to the native complementary rubber-duck subagent with host-event model evidence; elsewhere it uses Codex, while explicit external reviewer overrides remain available. Implements fixes and re-reviews until a policy-approved positive assessment or max rounds is reached.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous research review loop using any OpenAI-compatible LLM API. Configure via llm-chat MCP server or environment variables. Trigger with "auto review loop llm" or "llm review".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform a read-only, defect-first review of a specified code change and return every actionable finding. Use when another agent delegates review of uncommitted changes, a base-branch diff, a commit, or custom review instructions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。