「scan」の検索結果

Review a pull request, commit, branch diff, or working-tree patch for security vulnerabilities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage supplied or imported security findings against a repository using its security policy and static code evidence. Accepts scanner reports, advisories, GitHub findings, and Jira or Linear tickets. Do not use for discovery, duplicate triage, runtime validation, or fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn vulnerability notes, disclosure reports, PoCs, source code, or Codex Security findings into self-contained, sceptically validated, natural-sounding vulnerability reports. Use for one vulnerability or a disclosure campaign; a Codex Security scan is optional.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use only when the user explicitly asks to fix and verify a validated or plausible security vulnerability. Do not use for ordinary bug fixes, correctness or design review findings, general validation, or full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Brand mention and authority scanner for AI visibility. Analyzes brand presence across platforms that AI models rely on for entity recognition and citation decisions. Produces a Brand Authority Score (0-100) with platform-specific recommendations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GEO-first SEO analysis tool. Optimizes websites for AI-powered search engines (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overviews) while maintaining traditional SEO foundations. Performs full GEO audits, citability scoring, AI crawler analysis, llms.txt generation, brand mention scanning, platform-specific optimization, schema markup, technical SEO, content quality (E-E-A-T), and client-ready GEO report generation. Use when user says "geo", "seo", "audit", "AI search", "AI visibility", "optimize", "citability", "llms.txt", "schema", "brand mentions", "GEO report", or any URL for analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shallow (quick) ensemble bug-finding review using 6 specialist agents in parallel. Each specialist reviews the same patch through a different lens: Logic & Types, Boundaries & I/O, Concurrency & State, Resources & Serialization, Absence Analysis, and API Completeness. Findings are merged and deduplicated. Best for: quick first-pass review of patches, triage of diffs, broad surface-level bug scan. For deeper file-focused review with full pattern catalogs and codebase investigation, use the deep-review skill instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and harden a Convex app's authorization: identity-from-arg impersonation, missing per-document ownership checks, public queries leaking data by a client-supplied id, and writes into a parent/container the caller doesn't own. Scans for the 4 shapes, applies requireIdentity/requireOwner, verifies with tsc. TRIGGER on 'secure my app', 'audit auth/authz', 'who can access this data'. SKIP when there is no convex/ directory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-release safety audit for the Bifrost repo. Scans database migrations changed in a release for high-scale deadlock / lock-contention risks and for work that blocks application boot time, then produces a pass/warn/fail report with a concrete remediation plan. Invoked with /release-checklist [git-ref-range]. Built to grow - new checks are appended to the Checks Registry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scan Bifrost HTTP controllers/handlers/integrations and validate OpenAPI API coverage, route methods/paths, parameters, request/response docs, and auth/security information. Use when asked to audit missing or incorrect APIs, compare controllers against docs/openapi, validate auth information, or fix API documentation drift. Invoked with /api-validator [scope] [--fix].

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

对进入系统的文件或 URL 执行安全与合规扫描，输出 pass/reject 判定与扫描报告，作为所有文档处理的强制前置关卡。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

信息安全分析师与软件开发工程师在搭建文档处理流水线时，当需要拦截违规文件或外部URL，请挂载此技能作为强制前置安检，自动输出 pass/reject 判定与详细合规扫描报告，一键守住零信任安全底线。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-method PDF extraction with sequential fallback and OCR for scanned documents

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides through Trail of Bits' 5-step secure development workflow. Runs Slither scans, checks special features (upgradeability/ERC conformance/token integration), generates visual security diagrams, helps document security properties for fuzzing/verification, and reviews manual security areas. Use when securing a smart contract end to end rather than hunting one bug, checking a project on every check-in or before deployment, triaging a Slither report, or asking where to start on smart contract security.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Advanced API exploitation methodology focused on business logic abuse and sophisticated attack patterns that bypass traditional security controls. Covers business logic bypass through API call chaining and workflow manipulation. Addresses GraphQL-specific attacks including batching for credential brute-force, query depth exploitation, and introspection abuse. Includes pagination exploitation for data exfiltration, webhook hijacking for SSRF and data interception, and resource exhaustion through algorithmic complexity attacks. Covers race conditions in API transactions using parallel request techniques. Provides comprehensive JWT manipulation including algorithm confusion, kid injection, jku/x5u abuse, and claim tampering. Details API key leakage detection across source repositories, client-side code, and error messages. Covers undocumented endpoint discovery through predictable naming, debug routes, and source map analysis. Tooling includes Arjun, ParamSpider, jwt_tool, and GraphQL Voyager. Designed for authorized penetration testers targeting business logic layers that automated scanners miss.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive offensive methodology for software supply chain attacks covering the full kill chain from reconnaissance through exploitation. Addresses dependency confusion across npm, PyPI, and NuGet ecosystems where internal registry override allows an attacker to inject malicious packages that shadow private dependencies. Covers typosquatting techniques for popular packages, compromised package injection via maintainer account takeover or social engineering, and build system attacks through Makefile injection, setup.py install hooks, and npm postinstall scripts. Extends into CI/CD artifact tampering where build outputs are replaced or modified in transit, code signing abuse through stolen or self-signed certificates, upstream repository compromise via commit injection or force-push to trusted repos, and container image supply chain attacks including base image trojaning and registry confusion. Maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1195.001 (Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Dependencies and Development Tools) and T1195.002 (Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain). Integrates tooling such as confused for dependency confusion scanning and dependency-check for known vulnerable component detection. Each technique section provides reproducible proof-of-concept patterns, detection guidance for defenders, and engagement-safe execution notes for authorized red team operations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for NVIDIA-related requests where an NVIDIA skill might help, even if the user did not ask for a skill. Trigger on NVIDIA products, hardware, software, SDKs, GPUs, Jetson/JetPack/L4T/BSP/SDK Manager/driver/flashing/setup, CUDA, NIM, NeMo, Omniverse/OpenUSD/SimReady, RAPIDS/cuDF, cuPyNumeric, cuOpt, Dynamo, Holoscan, TensorRT, DeepStream, VSS, TAO, NGC/NVCF. Do not use for generic non-NVIDIA route, optimize, deploy, AI, video, data, or infrastructure tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage supplied or imported security findings against a repository using its security policy and static code evidence. Accepts scanner reports, advisories, GitHub findings, and Jira or Linear tickets. Do not use for discovery, duplicate triage, runtime validation, or fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn vulnerability notes, disclosure reports, PoCs, source code, or Codex Security findings into self-contained, sceptically validated, natural-sounding vulnerability reports. Use for one vulnerability or a disclosure campaign; a Codex Security scan is optional.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a pull request, commit, branch diff, or working-tree patch for security vulnerabilities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Track validated Codex Security findings in Linear, Jira, GitHub issues, or draft GitHub security advisories. Supports issue batches, duplicate checks, and reviewed writes. Do not use for scans or fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use only when the user explicitly asks to fix and verify a validated or plausible security vulnerability. Do not use for ordinary bug fixes, correctness or design review findings, general validation, or full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use only when the user explicitly requests verification that a security fix remediates a reported vulnerability. Do not invoke automatically while implementing fixes, reviewing ordinary code changes, or running tests. Do not use for non-security fixes, candidate finding validation, or full repository scans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate a complete competitive analysis across six steps, from landscape to strategic direction. Use when you need the full picture, not a single scan or card.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。